Sunday, January 3, 2021

January 3, 2021 What Arlington National Cemetery can teach our cowardly elected officials By William M. Gardner

 

American Thinker

What Arlington National Cemetery can teach our cowardly elected officials

In my lifetime, I have been to Washington, D.C. three times.  Whenever I am there, I make a point of visiting the memorials to our fallen men and women.  My dad fought in WWII and Korea, so those particular monuments are especially poignant for me.  Having lived during the Vietnam era, I find the Vietnam Wall to be crushing and spirit-lifting all within the same visit.

I myself am a Vietnam War–era veteran, but I did not serve in the Vietnam War.  There is a real distinction here.  I served in the Navy during the closing days of the Vietnam War. 

Each time in D.C., I always carve out a slice of time to visit Arlington National Cemetery.  As I walk those hallowed grounds, I find myself overwhelmed by the selfless sacrifice.  It is always serene there.  People walk slowly, quietly, and they speak in hushed tones to show their reverence.  That is why I go there: to show my respect to the men and women of our armed forces.  I know they can't hear or see me any longer, but I feel real comfort and a true sense of patriotism when I walk among the thousands of neatly aligned white markers.  Could you name me someone who is not stirred to the soul while watching the changing of the guard at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier?  If you can find an American without a feeling or sense of pride during this event, then I will just go ahead and say it: he is not a patriot.

When trying to take in the full entirety of Arlington, for me, the cost in human sacrifice is staggering and has always been beyond my ability to fully comprehend.  I always, without exception, find myself humbled and grateful after each visit.


When in Arlington, so I do not find myself wandering with no purpose or sense of direction, I usually set out to find someone's individual marker.  One time, it was Audie Murphy, the most decorated combat soldier of WWII.  I knew that John Basilone was buried at Arlington, but I got directionally confused and was unable to find his marker (next visit for sure).

Once while visiting, the Arlington app was down, so there was no way to find anything.  So I visited the Information Center and asked a young man behind the counter if he could point me in the right direction for finding General Jimmy Doolittle's final resting place.  The young man was probably in his mid-twenties.  I remember his mentioning that Doolittle was an unusual name, and then he asked if Jimmy Doolittle was a relation of mine.  He was polite and respectful, so I answered him in kind.  I remarked that we were not related but that General Doolittle was a personal hero of mine.  I politely suggested that the young man read two books: Target Tokyo by James M. Scott and The Doolittle Raid by Carroll V. Glines.  I guaranteed that he would be mesmerized by the bravery of General Doolittle and the numerous bomber crews that flew with him. 

I want to make sure I don't minimize anyone laid to rest in the consecrated ground of Arlington; it is just that I don't personally know anyone buried there.  My father is buried at the National Cemetery in Bushnell, Florida.  So, when at Arlington, I seek out those who were household names when I was a boy.  All buried there are bigger than life to me.  It is nice that when I visit Arlington, I have names to associate with the magnitude of the place.         

Why all of this?  Because the men and women of Arlington, and all those represented by the other national cemeteries around the United States of America, stood for all of us when it really counted.  January 6 really counts, and I want our elected officials to stand for us.  It is really important; I want them to stand for America.  Since they are already in Washington, D.C., if they have never done so, I want them to visit Arlington National Cemetery before January 6.  I want them to try to comprehend and imagine the enormousness of the sacrifice; I want them to feel what I feel as an American when I walk among the fallen.

I really could give a damn about Republican or Democrat; both have proved themselves wanting of character.  What do I want?  I want all of our elected leaders to be really honest, and if they see election fraud, I want them to stand and do the right thing for all Americans.  I see it so easily.  Why can't they?

Image: cgcolman via PixabayPixabay License.




January 3, 2021 Mitt Romney's Trump-hatred is starting to look demonic By Earick Ward

 

American Thinker

Mitt Romney's Trump-hatred is starting to look demonic



Mitt Romney's singular focus in opposing President Donald Trump is eerie.  

Is it revenge, as President Trump passed on him for secretary of state, or do we see his fight as more sinister still?

Yesterday, Mitt Romney blasted Josh Hawley, who has stated that he will challenge the electors sent to Congress on January sixth.  Josh Hawley and countless other congressmen and senators are concerned with myriad reports, signed affidavits, video evidence, data dumps, statistic improbabilities, and hacked Dominion tabulating machines strongly suggesting that massive fraud occurred in the 2020 presidential election.

If one has watched any of the televised testimony or read any reports, it is evident that a possibility exists that mass fraud occurred.  To date, none of this evidence has been given the scrutiny necessary to confirm affirmatively and transparently that Joe Biden legitimately beat Donald Trump.  Democrats are doing everything in their power to suppress this scrutiny.  Sadly, many Republicans, led by Mitt Romney, have worked tirelessly to hide evidence under a basket.


In September, Mitt Romney blasted GOP senator Ron Johnson and Senate Republicans for their "illegitimate" investigation into Hunter Biden and his ties to China and Ukraine.  Today, after the election, Democrats and their sycophantic media and Big Tech have affirmed the legitimacy of this investigation.  Has Mitt apologized to Mr. Johnson or the American people?

Does Mitt believe himself a god?

Mitt Romney's actions come off as holier than thou.  Does Mitt believe in his own self-righteousness?  Has he attained (in his mind) godlike qualities here on Earth?  Or is he, like the rest of the swamp (and Judas), just working to conceal his own sins?

Jesus proclaimed: "No one, when he has lit a lamp, puts it in a cellar or under a basket, but on a stand, that those who come in may see the light."

What is Mitt Romney working so hard to conceal?  Is it personal, or is he working on behalf of one yet to come?

Image: Gage Skidmore via FlickrCC BY-SA 2.0.




January 3, 2021 What comes next in these 'interesting times'? By Ted Noel "May you live in interesting times." —Ancient Chinese Curse

 

American Thinker

What comes next in these 'interesting times'?

"May you live in interesting times." —Ancient Chinese Curse

There has been considerable discussion since Trump attorney Jenna Ellis tweeted out my proposal for Pence to do his constitutional duty and refuse to accept any electoral votes from contested states.  My argument was based on subversion of election law, not fraud, but recent data on fraud (e.g., this), demonstrate further how election law was simply disregarded.

A friend wrote:

Let us say the vice president did as you suggest and declared [that] ... Mr. Trump wins with the required "majority of votes cast (recognized) in the Electoral College."


Of course there would be the riots in the streets. There already are. ...

The problem is the media would immediately scream for the president and vice president's heads, and a significant number of wishy-washy elected Republicans would go along with them. ... 

In the Senate, it might not be that difficult for the Democrats to find 20 +/- Republican senators [willing to declare "abuse of power"] to join the Democrats in providing the two thirds majority in order to impeach [convict] Trump and Pence.  The list of traitors would start with Romney. ...

The power of the Senate to remove is constitutional, undisputed, and not subject to judicial review.

If the president and vice president were both removed ... Ms. Pelosi would immediately become president.

Welcome to war games.  What would actually happen?  Before I go farther, please note that I attempt to avoid predictions.  They tend to bite you in anatomically unpleasant places.  One prediction is almost certainly correct: in the short run, there will be riots, almost exclusively in Democrat-run cities.  Dems will reap what they sowed.  President Trump will allow them to continue for a short period and then invoke the Insurrection Act to establish a semblance of peace.  After that...

Suppose Trump and Pence are impeached, convicted, and removed from office.  It's far from clear that Nancy Pelosi would succeed to the presidency.  The Presidential Succession Act, passed under the authority of Article II, paragraph 7 of the U.S. Constitution, states that the speaker of the House is next in line.  But it's far from clear that the act is constitutional.  The issue here is that Article II allows Congress to determine which "officers" would stand in which position in the line to fill the presidency.  There are powerful legal voices saying an elected official (such as the speaker of the House) is not an "officer" and similarly respectable voices that say she is.  Welcome to the Supreme Court.  And until SCOTUS rules, we might not have a chief executive.  And then it could be either Nancy Pelosi or Mike Pompeo.  Tea leaves, anyone?  A real constitutional crisis could be in the offing.

Suppose only Pence is impeached and convicted, but Ossoff and Warnock win in Georgia.  That leaves the Senate to confirm a replacement for the V.P.  Would Pierre Delecto Romney vote with the Democrats to confirm a Democrat, meaning the Dems have a majority in the Senate, blocking any further Trump judicial picks?  Would Joe Manchin vote with Republicans, allowing the Trump revolution to continue?  It's like the ketchup bottle.  Anticipation!  When will we have an answer?

Let's throw in another twist.  As soon as Pence counts the votes and declares Trump the winner, Dems will be on the steps of the Supreme Court with a lawsuit.  Doubtless, it's getting its finishing touches as I write.  Dems leave nothing to chance in their headlong rush for power.

But what will the SCOTUS justices do?  Will they dance and dodge to try to prevent weighing in?  After all, they have proven themselves very political in their attempts to appear non-political.  Or will they try to see which side their bread is buttered on and vote to elect the candidate of that side?  Do they want great taste or less filling?

If Pence disallows E.C. votes from the disputed states, Democrats and their media allies will scream that he has bought into "discredited" claims of fraud.  Republicans will properly point out that while state legislatures have held multiple hearings with evidence of rampant fraud, the lamestream media haven't reported on it.  They will also note that no court has held an evidentiary hearing on fraud.

What will happen?  Your guess is as good as mine.  None of us would have predicted what has happened already.  All I can suggest is that you get another tub of popcorn.  This movie isn't over.

Ted Noel, M.D. posts as DoctorTed and @vidzette on multiple social media platforms.

Image: Michael Vadon via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.




January 3, 2021 The timing is perfect to decentralize DC By Carlisle Johnson

 

American Thinker

The timing is perfect to decentralize DC

Much has been written about the pandemic-driven favorable aspects, promise, and implications of virtual working compared to traditional in-person interfaces.  We are all woke to the now known to be unnecessary complications, inconveniences and costs of physical offices, urban crime, commuting, and virus-transmitting.

Much less has been written about virtual management's implications for decentralizing the federal government and putting the decision-makers physically among the decision-affected — real instead of virtual reality.
 How about considering the following departmental tectonic shifts: Interior to Wyoming, Utah, or Colorado; Agriculture to Iowa, Nebraska, or South Dakota; and Commerce to Florida or Louisiana?

Regulators of the environment could literally step out their back doors and visit a forest, see a farm, soybean, cornfield, or cow; or visit a vibrant multicultural economy on the hemisphere's doorsteps.

Relocating individuals could cash in on D.C.'s inflated housing prices and boost their quality of life with bigger homes and maybe even a back 40, or at least a backyard.  Fourth of July parades in clean, healthy open air and Eagle Scouting could be reborn.


Sub-Cabinet-level relocation possibilities are equally endless: Fisheries to New England, FDA to the university-rich Research Triangle in North Carolina, and the FAA to an actual hub such as Nashville, St. Louis, or even Chicago.

The movement even lends itself to a catchy slogan, "Decentralize D.C.," which fits nicely on a bumper sticker.

Author's credits: Emisoras Unidas (ABC Radio affiliate), Canal Antigua TV, VOA (radio and TV), American Thinker,  BBC4, El Periodico, Cincinnati Enquirer, Guatemala Post, Atlantic, Washington Times, Mexico News Daily, St. Petersburg Times (comments).  MarriottGolden Circle award and numerous local recognitions.

Image via Pxhere.




Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *