The Soros empire is expanding its reach into media with latest radio acquisition Non-citizens voting? No thanks, Americans say;Peanuts’ new special features black character as atonement for past sins

 

View this email in your browser DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical! DONATE Best political cartoons: FISSION Nikki Haley vows to pardon Donald Trump if elected INSIDER: Minnesota school district to let Muslims opt-out of LGBTQ indoctrination after lawsuit threat INSIDER: WHO chief warns Disease X is coming, James Woods can tell you exactly when Peanuts’ new special features black character as atonement for past sins Migrant smuggling operation at northern border spikes, locals have Border Patrol on speed dial NYC Dems push for unlimited shelter stays for illegals, seek to overrule mayor Teacher sounds alarm on DHS-funded ‘media literacy’ program set to ‘indoctrinate children’ Trump praises ‘great patriots’ truckers boycotting NYC to protest unfair judge’s ‘obscene’ $355M penalty Cops attacked sticks, rocks and other items at African ‘cultural event’ in Charlotte White House considered firing Mayorkas, attempted to squash calling border migration surge a ‘crisis’ Ann Coulter on Bill Maher, says if Super Bowl parade shooters were white, we’d know their identity. Watch reaction. State Dept. threatens to obstruct House censorship probe ‘The whole thing was a scam’: Jim Biden used his powerful brother’s name to promote failed health company The Soros empire is expanding its reach into media with latest radio acquisition Non-citizens voting? No thanks, Americans say Is the red wave finally coming to the Senate in 2024? Biden’s latest economic talking point is missing the mark. Here’s why. ‘Parental nightmare’: Blue states are becoming magnets for runaway kids seeking trans treatments

‘Genocide, ethnic cleansing’ – PA attacks Israel at ICJ hearing February 19, 2024;Jerusalem did not send attorneys to present counter arguments to the claim, and the court’s decision is not legally binding for Israel.

 

‘Genocide, ethnic cleansing’ – PA attacks Israel at ICJ hearing

 February 19, 2024

Judges at the International Court of Justice, or World Court in The Hague, Feb. 13, 2019. (AP/Peter Dejong)

 Email  Print 7 Comments

Jerusalem did not send attorneys to present counter arguments to the claim, and the court’s decision is not legally binding for Israel.

By World Israel News Staff

Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad Al-Maliki slammed Israel during an International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing on Monday, accusing the Jewish state of “genocide” and “illegal occupation.”

Al-Maliki asked the court to “declare that the Israeli occupation is illegal” and that jurists push Israel to withdraw its control of Jerusalem and Judea and Samaria “immediately, totally and unconditionally.”

He added that Israel is guilty of “ethnic cleansing, apartheid, or genocide” against Palestinians.

Attorney Paul Reichler, representing the PA, argued that Israel’s ultimate goal is usurpation of all Palestinian territories in Judea and Samaria.

READ MOREWATCH: IDF soldiers eliminate terrorist in adramatic face-to-face encounter

“Senior Israeli officials admit their objective is sovereignty over all the territory over the Green Line,” Reichler charged.

“There is no reason not to take them at their word because their deeds are consistent with them.”

Israel “has been steadily annexing Palestinian territory and the objective is the permanent acquisition of this territory and to exercise sovereignty over it, in defiance of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,” he added.

Last year, the UN General Assembly asked the ICJ to provide an advisory opinion regarding the legality of Israel’s communities in Judea and Samaria, along with its control of eastern Jerusalem.

Israel maintains that the dispute regarding territorial divisions with the Palestinian Authority is a political matter and therefore does not recognize the ICJ’s jurisdiction in the case.

Jerusalem did not send attorneys to present counter arguments to the claim, and the court’s decision is not legally binding for Israel.

Notably, the ICJ issued a ruling in 2004 demanding that Israel take down the security barrier, which divides pre-1967 Israel from Palestinian towns and cities in Judea and Samaria.

The barrier was constructed during the Second Intifada in order to reduce terrorism.

Israel ignored that ICJ ruling, with little to no real world consequences.