Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Sessions approved by Senate committee

Sessions approved by Senate committee

   
Autoplay: On | Off
 
A Senate committee voted to confirm Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) to be attorney general on Wednesday, two days after the growing controversy surrounding President Trump’s travel ban on seven Muslim nations led to the firing of an acting attorney general for insubordination. 
 
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Sessions 11-9 along party lines. His nomination now goes to the floor, where he is widely expected to be confirmed given the GOP's 52-seat majority. 
 
The committee vote comes as Senate Democrats have sought to slow progress on other Trump nominees, including Steve Mnuchin, the pick at the Treasury Department, and Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), Trump's pick to lead the Health and Human Services Department. 
 
The Alabama senator's already difficult path to confirmation was made more contentious by Trump's firing of acting Attorney General Sally Yates, who deemed the president's order illegal and said she would not have Justice attorneys defend it. 
 
Committee Democrats on Tuesday praised Yates for her actions and accused Sessions of helping Trump draft the order, a claim Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) denied.
 
“I’m not sure if it would be a problem even if he was involved,” he said during his opening marks. “The fact of the matter is he was not involved.”
 
Democrats have fiercely criticized by Trump's order and Yates's firing, and said that any vote for Sessions is a vote to let Trump stifle dissent in his Justice Department. They used a procedural move to stall a planned vote on Sessions on Tuesday.
 
Trump quickly replaced Yates with Dana Boente, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. He rescinded the Yates order and said Justice will defend the executive order. 
 
Reports have linked Trump senior advisor Stephen Miller — a former Sessions staffer — to the order, and Democrats pointed to a Washington Post report detailing Sessions’s influence in the Trump administration. 
 
“To suggest he didn’t have an impact on these executive orders is misleading,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said. “He had indirect influence at the highest level.”
 
But Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) argued that being a close adviser to Trump doesn’t disqualify him from being attorney general.
 
“Who do you expect him to pick?” he asked, adding that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) was okay with President John Kennedy choosing his brother Robert Kennedy to be attorney general.  
 
“Who do you really expect the president to pick?”
 
A protester stood and answered Graham’s rhetorical question. 
 
“Certainly not a puppet,” she said before Capitol Police hauled out of the meeting room.
 
But Democrats questioned whether Sessions would stand up to Trump the way Yates did Monday when faced with seemingly unconstitutional orders.
 
“What is so tragically apparent here is Trump is unwilling to consider the legal reasons Sally Yates stood her ground and why that position now more than ever deserves someone who will stand for the rule of law and constitutional principle,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.).
 
The committee vote, which Democrats delayed last week, follows two days of confirmation hearings in which Sessions defended his record on civil rights addressed head-on charges that he’s made racially insensitive remarks about African Americans.
 
Civil rights groups have been pushing Democrats to reject the Alabamian who lost a confirmation fight in 1986 for a federal judgeship over those claims, and lawmakers seized the opportunity over two days of hearings to question him about his remarks as well as his record on voting rights. 
 
“I do not harbor those kinds of animosities and race-based ideas I was accused of,” Sessions said when questioned by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).
 
Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) even broke Senate tradition and became the first sitting senator to testify against another sitting senator chosen for a Cabinet post. 
 
Booker argued that Sessions has not proven he can uphold the responsibilities of an attorney general, namely ensuring equal rights for all Americans. 
 
But Sessions’ confirmation, which is now headed to the floor for a full Senate vote, is almost assured.  Sessions, who is well liked by his GOP colleagues, appears to have the 50 votes he needs to get confirmed with Republicans holding a 52-seat majority.
 
GOP members have not voiced any opposition to Sessions and he has the vote of at least one Democrat — Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

Michael Moore tells Trump and 'Pencey' they 'haven't seen anything yet'

Michael Moore tells Trump and 'Pencey' they 'haven't seen anything yet'

   
Michael Moore tells Trump and 'Pencey' they 'haven't seen anything yet'
© Getty Images
Michael Moore is warning Donald Trump and Mike Pence that they "haven't seen anything yet" after the president-elect posted a tweet calling the cast of "Hamilton" "very rude" and demanding an apology for comments aimed at the vice president-elect.
"Ha! Rude? You & Pencey haven't seen anything yet," the liberal filmmaker tweeted on Sunday.
"Millions of us are going 2 be everywhere. U will not get away w/ what you're planning 2 do."
Ha! Rude? You & Pencey haven't seen anything yet. Millions of us are going 2 be everywhere. U will not get away w/ what you're planning 2 do https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/799974635274194947 
The Indiana governor attended the Broadway hit on Friday. When he was leaving, one of the actors asked for him to stay to listen to a statement from the cast.
"Vice President-elect Pence, we welcome you and we truly thank you for joining us at 'Hamilton: An American Musical,' " actor Brandon Victor Dixon said onstage. 
 
"We are the diverse America who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us, our planet, our children, our parents, or defend us and uphold our inalienable rights, sir. We hope this show has inspired you to uphold our American values and work on behalf of all of us."
 
On Saturday, Trump called or the cast of Hamilton to apologize.
 
"The Theater must always be a safe and special place," Trump tweeted. "The cast of Hamilton was very rude last night to a very good man, Mike Pence. Apologize!"
 
The president-elect doubled down on his call for an apology on Sunday.
 
Pence on Sunday, though, said he wasn't offended by the message and reassured the American people that Trump is preparing to "be the president of all of the people."
 
Moore, who correctly predicted Trump's election win, said after his victory that he thinks the president-elect will either resign or be impeached before his term is up.
 
Moore said Trump has "no ideology except the ideology of Donald J. Trump."
 
"And when you have a narcissist like that, who’s so narcissistic where it’s all about him, he will, maybe unintentionally, break laws," Moore said. "He will break laws because he’s only thinking about what’s best for him.”

Michael Moore to Dems: Block Gorsuch or face primaries

Michael Moore to Dems: Block Gorsuch or face primaries

   
Michael Moore to Dems: Block Gorsuch or face primaries
© Getty Images
Liberal filmmaker Michael Moore on Wednesday threatened any Senate Democrats who do not block President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee with primary challenges in their next election.
Trump announced his pick of Neil Gorsuch to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia on Tuesday, setting up a fierce confirmation battle between Democrats and Republicans.
This Supreme Court pick was Obama's to make and it was stolen by Republicans. Democrats had better block this and demand a nom we approve.


Trump repeatedly vowed during his 2016 presidential run he would fill Scalia’s vacancy with a conservative similar to the late judge. Gorsuch, a judge on Colorado’s 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, seemingly fits that mold.
Gorsuch will face an uphill confirmation process, however, due to the stakes surrounding the makeup of the nation's highest court.
Senate Democrats remain bitter about GOP efforts last year halting Merrick Garland, former President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, from getting a vote or even a hearing.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) has vowed to filibuster any nominee from Trump, meaning Gorsuch would require 60 votes under current rules.

Centrist Dems won't rule out Supreme Court filibuster

Centrist Dems won't rule out Supreme Court filibuster

   
Centrist Dems won't rule out Supreme Court filibuster
© Greg Nash
Centrist Senate Democrats say they are reserving the right to filibuster President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, once they review his record.
America Rising Squared, a conservative group backing Gorsuch’s nomination, circulated an email Tuesday evening claiming six Democrats are “rejecting the liberal push for a filibuster.” 
But while several of those Democrats, including Sens. Chris Coons (Del.) and Claire McCaskill (Mo.), have called for a vote on the nominee, they have stopped short of saying they would vote to end the expected Democratic filibuster of Gorsuch. 
The distinction is key, as the cloture motion to end a filibuster would require 60 votes.
Coons told reporters Wednesday morning that he is only in favor of calling for a vote on Gorsuch in the Senate Judiciary Committee and would not commit to supporting a floor vote at this early stage.
“I think we’ll get to that,” he said, when asked whether he supports holding a vote on ending an expected Democratic filibuster. “He should get a hearing and vote [in] committee.”
Coons said it was “a misunderstanding” to characterize his position as supporting an up-or-down, simple-majority vote on the Senate floor.
He said that Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) has announced Democrats will require a 60-vote threshold for Gorsuch, something he did not disagree with. 
“It is a 60-vote threshold vote, that is what it is,” he said.
McCaskill, who is running for reelection in a state Trump won by nearly 20 points, said Tuesday that she would carefully review Gorsuch’s record before making a decision on whether to support a filibuster.
“I will treat this nominee as I have every other nominee, on the merits. Probably waiting until a confirmation hearing to get as much information as possible,” she said. 
She said Democrats should not block Gorsuch just because Senate Republicans refused to schedule a vote on Merrick Garland, whom former President Barack Obama nominated for the Supreme Court in 2016.
But that doesn’t mean giving Trump’s pick an automatic green light for a final up-or-down vote.
“Folks in my state want me to call balls and strikes based on the individual nominee and their record,” she said. 
Before Trump’s announcement, McCaskill said she anticipated the nomination “with a great deal of skepticism” because she had reviewed the list of 21 potential candidates he floated during the campaign — a list that included Gorsuch — and found them “all pretty extreme.” 
Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), a third Democrat some activists are counting as a possible vote to quash a filibuster of Gorsuch, said Tuesday — before the nominee was named — that he would support the dilatory tactic if he found the nominee to be out of the mainstream.
“I’m not filibustering for the sake of person, I won’t do that,” Manchin said.
“I will look at their past findings, their past writings, and how they’ve been involved and make my decision. If I’m against that person, I will vote against them for cloture,” he said. 
“I’m not going to be voting for cloture and then have 51 votes to get somebody in,” he said.
Activists are also citing the recent statement of Sen. Richard Blumenthal(Conn.), a more liberal Democrat who just won reelection.
He told MSNBC on Tuesday that he “will support having a hearing and a vote” because he said Trump’s nominee “deserves that consideration.”
But he told CNN on Wednesday that he supports a 60-vote threshold for the 49-year-old Gorsuch because his appointment to the Supreme Court would be for life.
Coons explained to reporters earlier in the day that requiring a 60-vote threshold for confirmation is akin to a filibuster.
“There’s been a lot of back and forth about what a filibuster means for a Supreme Court nomination. Here’s my understanding. It doesn’t mean that we go to the floor and get out the cots and stay there and talk for 26 hours. It is simply a question of whether there is or isn’t a 60-vote threshold,” he said. 
If Gorsuch were to fall short of 60 votes, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would face the decision of whether to use the “nuclear option” to change Senate rules so that Supreme Court nominees can be confirmed with 50 votes.
Trump encouraged that option Wednesday. 
“If we end up with that gridlock, I would say, if you can, Mitch, go nuclear,” Trump told reporters during a meeting with judicial advocates in the Roosevelt Room. 
"Because that would be an absolute shame if a man of this quality was put up to that neglect," he said of Gorsuch, a federal circuit court judge. "So I would say, it's up to Mitch, but I would say go for it."

BREAKING: "Gill Broussard Planet 7X Update"

Started streaming 1 hour ago

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *