The New Under Ground Church-THE TRUTH MUST BE TOLD

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Dearborn-area hair salon posts “No Men Please” sign while helping Muslim customer

JULY 31, 2017 11:23 AM BY ROBERT SPENCER33 COMMENTS

It’s always the same principle: in Muslim countries, you must conform your behavior to suit Muslim sensibilities. And in non-Muslim countries, you must conform your behavior to suit Muslim sensibilities.

“Salon posts sign not allowing men in while they help Muslim customer,” by Dave Herndon, News Herald, July 25, 2017 (thanks to Creeping Sharia):

A woman no longer has a job after her manager found out she temporarily asked men not to enter a Taylor hair salon while she helped a Muslim customer.

The woman, who was not identifed [sic], left her job about a week after the incident took place. The salon’s corporate office said she had already issued notice she was leaving before the incident took place.

Photos of a sign on the window at SmartStyle Family Hair Salon, 7555 Telegraph Road, asked for “no men please,” without further explanation.

SalonStyle’s corporate office issued a short statement on the situation.

“SmartStyle welcomes all guests, and we apologize to anyone who was offended by the piece of paper taped to the salon window,” they said. “The message was inappropriate and it does not reflect our standards or beliefs; our goal is to offer a quality experience to all guests. Again, our apologies to anyone who was offended.”

While the sign was posted briefly July 10, the manager didn’t find out until about a week later. On July 25, a man posted photos of the sign online, store manager Erika Van Etten, responded to the photos. She said he called July 24, claiming that it had happened that day and gave a false name and phone number for her to contact him at to talk about the situation.

She explained that store policy is not to close the salon, or restrict access to men, even when a Muslim customer is in the store.

“We are not allowed to close the salon under any circumstances for anyone,” Van Etten wrote. “If someone has a head scarf we are to let them know that we cannot close the salon and if a man comes in we cannot stop them.”…

Facebook Twitter Google+LinkedIn Digg Blogger Post Delicious StumbleUpon Diaspora Email Print

France’s only jihadi “deradicalization” center is closing — it was voluntary, and it was empty

JULY 31, 2017 9:36 AM BY ROBERT SPENCER13 COMMENTS

“The centre had capacity for up to 25 people, who were accepted on a voluntary basis and were able to undergo education and internship programmes of up to ten months. However, it had been sitting empty since February and only welcomed nine people in total – none of whom completed the full programme.”

It was voluntary, and it was empty.

Deradicalization programs, upon which the West has placed so much hope, have long been an obvious failure. Such programs are based on the premise that the true teachings of Islam are peaceful, and so all that needs to be done is show the jihadis how they’re misunderstanding the Qur’an and overlooking its teachings of peace, and all will be well. But since the Qur’an and Sunnah are full of commands to make war against and subjugate unbelievers, the idea that jihadis can be “deradicalized” by reference to them is just a myth told to Infidel authorities to lull them into complacency.

Well, let’s see. De-radicalization programs have been implemented elsewhere, notably in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. Let’s look at how they fared. From the Jihad Watch archives:

Gitmo prisoner reveals: Saudi “deradicalization program” is really a jihad training program

11 ex-Gitmo prisoners flee the Saudi “rehabilitation program” and join up with terrorist groups

Jaw-dropper: 25 former Gitmo detainees “return to militancy” despite Saudi rehab program!

Graduate from Saudi jihadi rehab program killed in Syrian jihad: “killed a large number of Christians before his acceptance by God”

Flight 253 jihadist wasn’t cured by Saudi anti-jihad art therapy

Former Guantanamo detainee now top al-Qaeda ideologue — “He was transferred to Saudi Arabia in 2006 where he was placed in a national rehabilitation project.”

Indonesian government admits that its jihadist rehab program is a failure

Nor have they worked elsewhere, as we see from this story.

“France’s only deradicalization centre is closing,” The Local, July 28, 2017:

France’s first centre for deradicalization is set to close after less than a year, the government announced on Friday.

The Pontourney centre in central France was inaugurated in September 2016 with the aim of working with young people to convince them to turn their backs on extremism. Officially labelled a centre for ‘Reintegration and Citizenship’, it was targeted at 18-30-year-olds who had been exposed to radical ideologies.

But the Interior Ministry said on Friday that “the experiment has not been conclusive” and that the centre would be permanently closed.

The centre had capacity for up to 25 people, who were accepted on a voluntary basis and were able to undergo education and internship programmes of up to ten months.

However, it had been sitting empty since February and only welcomed nine people in total – none of whom completed the full programme.

Since its inception, the centre in Beaumont-en-Véron in the Indre et Loire department had been criticized by local residents and politicians. In particular, those living nearby were unhappy about the fact those staying at the centre were able to come and go freely in the town, due to the programme’s voluntary nature.

A Senate report in July had criticized France’s deradicalization strategy and called for the centre to be closed.

In Friday’s announcement, the government stressed that the closure did not mean an abandonment of the policy entirely….

Facebook Twitter Google+LinkedIn Digg Blogger Post Delicious StumbleUpon Diaspora Email Print

The EU’s Fateful Choice: Fortress Europe or Chaos and Collapse

JULY 31, 2017 8:53 AM BY NICOLAI SENNELS24 COMMENTS

Massive Third World migration to Europe will continue so long as Islamic jihad activity and overpopulation threaten the migrants’ countries of origin. Europe has to choose between its much cherished ideals and plain survival.

Israel soldiers guarding a check point in Jerusalem, a country that had to learn from painful experience the necessity of forceful border protection.

Supported by Islamic regimes and major terrorist organisations such as the Muslim Brotherhood — both of whom aim to create a strong base for the global jihad (i.e., holy war) — Islamic jihadists are threatening millions of lives in the developing world. With too few safe zones in their own regions, lured by Europe’s promise of free transport across the Mediterranean and promise of asylum with social benefits, many individuals are ready to give up everything, place their family’s fortune in the hands of cruel human smugglers, and leave their women, children, and elderly in poverty and danger back home, in order to embark on a long and often life-threatening journey to the West.

Africa’s population will double the next 40 years. Islamic countries such as Bangladesh and Pakistan, plus many others, continue to experience soaring population growth. Fights over clean water, land for crops or pasture, and other vital resources will be endless. There is no end in sight for the conflicts that already drive these mass migrations.

A difficult choice?

European voters need to realize that — so long as we encourage this by not stopping them — millions of migrants will continue heading toward the EU. Neat signs along the road and a polite “no entry” warning will not halt the flow of desperate migrants, many of whom have valid reasons to leave their own countries — despite having no legal claim to be a “refugee” who is validly seeking political or humanitarian asylum.

Soon it will dawn upon the Europeans how misallocated compassion and lack of foresight have left them with only two choices: We can either let the continent be overrun, thereby martyring ourselves for our much cherished liberal values; or safeguard our perimeter with the necessary means. Chaos and collapse, or bloody borders. The first scenario is already unfolding in France and Sweden, two countries with a longstanding tradition of Muslim immigration and openness to Islam. For three straight years, France has been in state of emergency, and experts are openly talking about civil war in Sweden. More Western European countries will follow, as all of them believe they should allow refugees, unlimited immigration, and family reunification from the Islamic world.

Also read: Danish State Television Celebrates Midsummer by Burning TRUMP-WITCH: A “Symbol of All the Evil Men in the World”

The second option also is not pretty: endless lines of barbed wire, swarms of drones patrolling Europe’s long outer borders, and armed border control with orders to shoot to kill if necessary. If we let in just one, millions will feel encouraged to follow their example. By letting them in we can help a few million for a while, but it will destroy us forever.

Vetting migrants adequately is so difficult that it is practically impossible, especially with such massive influxes of people. Whoever promotes these policies should at least make sure that the applicant pays all expenses and posts a large performance bond (assuring long term compliance with local laws as a condition of citizenship).

Over time, the seriousness of this situation will reawaken European voters. Their slumbering survival instinct will oblige them to choose the latter. Much pain can be avoided if we act now.

The sooner we realize this, the sooner we can start looking for long term win-win solutions. Ones that help people in real need and, at the same time, protect the future of our children and our culture, which has benefited the world in so many valuable ways.

Three great win-win solutions

Cutting the…

Full story at 10News.one