Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Ethiopia: Muslims attack Christian with machetes for proselytizing ( Can this Happen in America? )

JIHAD WATCH
Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Ethiopia: Muslims attack Christian with machetes for proselytizing

  BY 24 COMMENTS
“The man – who, for security reasons, cannot be named – was attacked in Hirna…”
He cannot be named because if Muslims find out who he is, some will try to kill him again. Islamic law forbids non-Muslims to proselytize among Muslims on pain of death.
“Ethiopian Christian attacked with machetes for evangelising,” World Watch Monitor, July 31, 2017:
An Ethiopian Christian suffered deep wounds to the back of his head when he was attacked while alone in his home by a group of local Muslims with machetes[.]
The attack on 16 July left the 27-year-old man needing life-saving surgery.
The man – who, for security reasons, cannot be named – was attacked in Hirna, a rural town 400 KM east of the capital, Addis Ababa. His local clinic referred him to the hospital in nearby Asebeteferi who in turn sent him to Adama, where a doctor, believing he would die en route to a bigger hospital, operated on his wounds. Although he is still unwell, the surgery stabilised him enough to be taken elsewhere for more specialised treatment.
A source told World Watch Monitor that the gang of Muslims who attacked the man were angry because he was evangelising. The gang had first attacked the local Full Gospel Church and partly damaged its roof and a wall before going to the man’s house….
UK: Muslim from pro-Sharia, pro-caliphate group gives keynote speech at Universities UK HQ
New Jersey: Court forbids residents to mention "Islam" or "Muslim" at public hearing on mosque construction
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousStumbleUponDiasporaEmailPrint
at

New Jersey: Court forbids residents to mention “Islam” or “Muslim” at public hearing on mosque construction ( This Still is America, Is It Not? )

JIHAD WATCH
Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

New Jersey: Court forbids residents to mention “Islam” or “Muslim” at public hearing on mosque construction

  BY 83 COMMENTS
Most Americans have no idea how severely imperiled the freedom of speech really is. I discuss in detail in my new book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Free Speech (and Its Enemies). But as this fundamental freedom slips away, most people don’t even care. Look: Kardashians!
“Court: Residents Can’t Mention ‘Islam’ or ‘Muslim’ At Public Hearing on Mosque Construction; Thomas More Law Center Files Federal Lawsuit,” Thomas More Law Center, August 1, 2017:
ANN ARBOR, MI – In a settlement agreement, which reads more like an instrument of surrender, Bernards Township (“Township”), New Jersey officials agreed that, in addition to a $3.5 million payment to Islamic Society of Basking Ridge (“ISBR”), residents and citizens of the Township are prohibited from commenting on “Islam” or “Muslims.” at the upcoming public hearing to approve the settlement. Astonishingly, a federal judge approved the prohibition as a fully enforceable Order of the Court.
As a result of this suppression of speech, the Thomas More Law Center (“TMLC”), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, yesterday, filed a lawsuit in the New Jersey Federal District Court on behalf of Christopher and Loretta Quick. The lawsuit was filed by TMLC affiliated New Jersey attorney, Michael Hrycak. Mr. Hrycak was assisted by TMLC staff attorney, Tyler Brooks. The TMLC is representing the Quicks without charge.
TMLC’s lawsuit alleges that Bernards Township’s settlement agreement constitutes a prior restraint on speech based on content, as well as, a violation of the Establishment Clause because it prefers Islam over other religions. The lawsuit asks the court to: declare that the settlement agreement is unconstitutional; and to enter a preliminary and permanent injunction against its enforcement….
The Quicks reside within 200 feet of the proposed mosque construction in a zoned residential area. Yet, the settlement agreement prohibits them from describing the many unique features of Islamic worship which will impact design of the building, traffic density, water and sewage, traffic control problems, road construction, and parking arrangements. According to the settlement agreement, ISBR is permitted to make statements concerning Christians and Jews and their places of worship, but in contrast, the Agreement prohibits commentary relating to Islam or Muslims. In fact, ISBR has previously discussed the Christian and Jewish religions and their places of worship.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented: “As we have previously documented, ISBR has taken the extraordinary step of concealing significant links on their website to a radical group named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in America history, the Islamic Society of North America (“ISNA”). ISNA is claimed by the Muslim Brotherhood as one of “our organizations.” According to internal documents seized by the FBI, the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy is to engage in a “grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within . . .”
Thompson continued, “While claiming that the Township had a religious animus against Muslims, ISBR hid from the public view its animus toward Christians and Jews, by not only hiding anti-Christian and anti-Semitic verses published on its website, but also hiding its significant ties to ISNA. Instead of standing up to defend its citizens against ISBR’s hate-filled anti-Semitic and anti-Christian bias, the Township colluded with ISBR’s “Civilization Jihad” by capitulating to payment of millions of dollars to ISBR, allowing the construction of the new mosque and Islamic center in violation of zoning codes, and now even suppressing speech concerning Islam or Muslims at a public meeting.”
In March 2016, ISBR filed a lawsuit in the New Jersey Federal District Court alleging that Bernards Township had discriminated against the Islamic Society when it declined to approve the construction of a large mosque on a lot that was far too small to handle the contemplated structure. And in November 2016, the United States represented by the U. S. Justice Department filed a second lawsuit against the Township on similar grounds. The settlement agreement covers both lawsuits….
Ethiopia: Muslims attack Christian with machetes for proselytizing
UK Muslim who tried to smuggle bomb onto flight was let go: cops didn’t realize it was a working explosive
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousStumbleUponDiasporaEmailPrint
at

UK Muslim who tried to smuggle bomb onto flight was let go: cops didn’t realize it was a working explosive

JIHAD WATCH
Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK Muslim who tried to smuggle bomb onto flight was let go: cops didn’t realize it was a working explosive

  BY 58 COMMENTS
Of course. To have suspected that it was a working bomb would have been “Islamophobic.”
Meanwhile, “Mr Sandiford said the prosecution could not be sure if terrorism was the motive.”
Of course. How could a Muslim carrying a live bomb onto an airliner possibly have anything to do with terrorism? Only a greasy Islamophobe could possibly have such suspicions.
“Air passenger ‘attempted to smuggle working pipe bomb onto Ryanair flight from Manchester to Bergamo but was let go because police didn’t realise it was a working explosive,'” by Samantha Mordi, Mailonline, July 31, 2017 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):
A man who attempted to smuggle a pipe bomb onto a plane was allowed to fly again days later because police did not realise the device was viable, a court has heard.
Nadeem Muhammad, 43, was attempting to board a flight to Bergamo, Italy, on January 30 when security officers at Manchester Airport found the device, made from batteries, tape, a marker pen and pins.
Jonathan Sandiford, prosecuting, told the trial at Manchester Crown Court Muhammad had intended to detonate the device once on board the Ryanair flight.
But the court heard when airport security swabbed the bomb there was no trace of explosive on the outside and officers did not believe it was a viable device.
Muhammad, who was born in Pakistan but had an Italian passport, was questioned by police but not arrested and on February 5 boarded another flight to Italy.
Mr Sandiford said: ‘At that stage nobody had realised this was a real device and the defendant was allowed to go on his way.’
He said it was only on February 8 when the device was examined again that suspicions were raised and the bomb squad was called.
The explosive was then sent for examination by expert Lorna Philp, who found it was a ‘crude but potentially viable improvised explosive device’.
Muhammad was arrested when he returned to the UK on February 12.
Mr Sandiford said the explosive, which experts said would have been ‘unreliable’ and ‘unpredictable’, was made up of batteries, the barrel of a marker pen, pins, and double base smokeless propellant normally found in firearms ammunition.
If wires, protruding from either end of the tube, had been connected to each other the device would have detonated….
Mr Sandiford said the prosecution could not be sure if terrorism was the motive.
He said: ‘That may be the most likely motive but equally it could be a desire to commit suicide or another purpose altogether.’…
New Jersey: Court forbids residents to mention "Islam" or "Muslim" at public hearing on mosque construction
Canada: Muslim convicted of jihad mass murder plot claims mental illness, plans appeal
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousStumbleUponDiasporaEmailPrint
at

Canada: Muslim convicted of jihad mass murder plot claims mental illness, plans appeal

JIHAD WATCH
Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Canada: Muslim convicted of jihad mass murder plot claims mental illness, plans appeal

  BY 36 COMMENTS
On September 23, 2015, Jaser and Esseghaier were sentenced to life imprisonment for their roles in a jihad terror plot to derail a passenger train that travels between New York City and Ontario. Throughout the trial proceedings, Esseghaier remained defiant, insisting that only the Qur’an, not a Canadian court, could judge him and shouting Qur’an verses at the jury. He wrote a statement to the jury explaining, “I required the Holy Qur’an as unique reference of my trial and the judgement of all matter of people’s life.” He exhorted jury members to exonerate him and convert to Islam: “I encourage you to retreat from the charge that has been affected to you as a first step of your sincere repentance to God.”
This jihad plot was a long time in preparation. According to Canadian officials, this bloodthirsty and unrepentant fanatic had gone to Iran within two years of beginning to plan the jihad plot, to which his trip was related. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Assistant Commissioner James Malizia saidthat Esseghaier and Jaser had been given “support from al Qaeda elements located in Iran.” These elements, he said, also gave them “direction and guidance.” According to American officialsinvolved with the case, al-Qaeda operated out of the Iranian town of Zahedan, near the Iranian borders with Afghanistan and Pakistan, passing men and money through Iran.
But now Esseghaier says he is crazy and should therefore be let off. Given that so many instances of jihad terrorism are ascribed to mental illness today, and that Esseghaier lives in Canada, where the government is so very solicitous of Muslims, he will probably be swiftly released and maybe even given a few million dollars in compensation, a la Omar Khadr.
“‘Delusional’ Via Rail plotter now on anti-psychotics, plans appeal,” by Richard Warnica, National Post, July 26, 2017 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):
A Tunisian man convicted in a botched Canadian terror plot is being treated in prison with anti-psychotic drugs and now plans to appeal both his conviction and his sentence, a lawyer appointed on his behalf said Wednesday.
Chiheb Esseghaier was convicted in 2015 of planning a series of never-executed terror attacks. An undercover FBI agent recorded him discussing plans to cut a hole in a Toronto-area railway bridge—possibly with a laser—poison the food on a military base, and trigger the eruption of a long-dormant volcano.
Esseghaier represented himself at trial and often acted erratically, by turns spitting, ranting and falling asleep in court. Two separate psychiatrists testified during his sentencing that he was actively delusional and likely schizophrenic. He appeared to believe that, like Jesus, he would literally be taken into heaven when he was 33. He believed prison guards were conspiring to keep the actual date from him. He mounted no real defence and refused to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the court.
(He demanded, throughout the trial, to be judged by the Koran, not Canadian law.)
On Wednesday, more than two years after his conviction, a court-appointed lawyer revealed that Esseghaier is now being treated for his mental illness in a B.C. prison. He “now understands the severity” of his life sentence, said Toronto lawyer Erin Dann and intends to widen his appeal.
Esseghaier was convicted of conspiring to commit murder for the benefit of or in association with a terrorist group, among other charges. He was sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole until at least 2023….
UK Muslim who tried to smuggle bomb onto flight was let go: cops didn’t realize it was a working explosive
Germany: Muslim biker gang patrolling against "Islamophobia"
FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInDiggBlogger PostDeliciousStumbleUponDiasporaEmailPrint
at
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *