Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Why I Am an Atheist and Against Euthanasia

Why I Am an Atheist and Against Euthanasia

 OPINION   KEVIN YUILL   AUG 1, 2017   |   10:47AM    SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
Some prominent Australians who favour a change in the law on assisted dying seem so anxious to implement it that they deliberately ignore arguments against it.
Jeremy Irvine spent two years making a documentary entitled Fade to Black, which follows terminally ill Peter Short’s final months as he transforms from businessman into a right-to-die activistIrvine, who claims the film canvasses the ‘full spectrum’ of views about whether Australia should allow assisted dying, came up with this bizarre claim: ‘Without exception those who opposed assisted dying laws did so because of their religious beliefs — even those who offered other reasons for their views.’
‘I spent probably 12 months searching and I found it really tough to find people who opposed assisted dying laws who weren’t looking at [sic] from a religious view.’ ‘Even people who would not talk about their religion, if you dug a little deeper, it would always come to that: “Oh, I’m a Catholic”. I didn’t find anybody.’
I feel like the kid at the front of the class with his hand up as the teacher scans everywhere else in the room for a hand. Me! Over here, Mr Irvine! In 2013, I published a book entitled Assisted Suicide: The Liberal, Humanist Case Against Legalisation. I have been writing about this subject for more than 20 years. OK, the book has sold modestly, shall we say, down under. But it is there if you look for it. And, I really am an atheist.
Irvine might have asked his fellow supporter of assisted dying, Andrew Denton. Mr Denton knows my ideas, if not me. He has berated me on some of his podcasts (he added eerie music to selected parts of a speech I did in Adelaide in 2015, which he recorded with my permission, like a morbid DJ). I wrote to him in a friendly and respectable manner more than once to point out some inaccuracies and, more importantly, to open up a dialogue.
He never replied. He’d had the chance to speak to me before. He sat through my conference speech in Adelaide, where I was billed as an atheist. Did he attempt to interview me (though he interviewed many of the others at the conference) or even introduce himself? No.
I’m not the only atheist in the “No” camp. Prominent British actress and comedienne Liz Carr has recently returned from your fair country and, lo, she, too, is an atheist. So was the late great Stella Young. We exist!
The reason we have been ignored is that it is much easier to write off opinion as religious than confront it. Then you avoid the difficult questions like, if assisted dying is deemed medical treatment, how can it be denied to anyone who suffers? (My homeland, Canada, which legalised it last year because of a 2012 case about a terminally ill woman, has recently granted it this year to a 77-year old woman because she had osteoarthritis).
Or, what will sanctioning suicide for some do to efforts to combat suicide generally? Or, won’t defining dignity as the ability to go to the toilet unaided demean and devalue the existence of many disabled people who lead enjoyable, fulfilled lives, thank you very much, despite not having that ability?
That’s just for starters. I could go on (and do, at length, in my book). But I doubt Denton will read it or anything else that gets in the way of his righteous indignation. Some campaigners are simply offended that anyone would have the gall to disagree with them. We await the documentary but it is difficult to believe, given Irvine’s pronouncements, that Fade to Black will have any shades of grey. Christians today are no match for this crusade that substitutes emotive examples for reason.
The activists for assisted suicide like to see themselves as rational and realistic, dealing with terrible situations in a compassionate and sober manner. Of course, I suspect that most of them are compassionate and well meaning. But so are those of us on the other side of the question. No one that I know who opposes assisted suicide – religious or not – would oppose doctors taking occasional acts of kindness in the last hours, days, or weeks of a life of a dying person. Our objections are to a change in the law. At least take us and our arguments seriously. In my experience, Christians can sometimes say worthwhile things.
I live in hope. I would be delighted to have a debate with anyone on this subject and honestly hope that there can be rational and reasoned discussion about such a radical proposal. But perhaps that is what some are frightened of. Parliament in the UK had one of its longest, most passionate and most considered discussions in 2015 and, in its wisdom, overwhelmingly rejected assisted dying.


Irish Health Minister Pushes Legalizing Abortion Even Before Citizens Vote on Referendum

Irish Health Minister Pushes Legalizing Abortion Even Before Citizens Vote on Referendum

 INTERNATIONAL   SPUC   JUL 31, 2017   |   5:29PM    DUBLIN, IRELAND
Irish health minister Simon Harris has defended his decision to start drafting legislation that could legalise abortion, before the committee set up to examine the issue has reported.
A special Oireachtas committee has been set up to consider under what conditions, if any, abortion should be permitted if the Eighth Amendment, which protects the equal right to life of mother and child, was repealed.
However, health officials are already drafting laws, including a way to legislate for potential lawful abortions for rape victims without a conviction, to be ready for a referendum in summer 2018, the timescale indicated by taoiseach Leo Varadkar. The committee is planning to start taking evidence in September.

Accelerating preparations

Mr Harris said he had “great regard” for the committee, which is following the work of the citizens’ assembly. “My department, in conjunction with the office of the attorney-general, is seeking to explore and research the issue so that, in so far as is feasible, as much preparation as possible can be drawn upon once the special joint committee finalises its recommendations,” he said. “I am concerned that we are prepared in the event that a decision is made by the Oireachtas to hold a referendum. This will be important if we are to complete the process in line with the timetable set out by the taoiseach.”
However, Mattie McGrath, an independent TD and one of only two of the 21 on the committee in favour of keeping the amendment, asked Mr Harris if he was trying to accelerate preparations for a vote while it was carrying out its work.
Pro-choice activists have also been agitating for an early referendum, claiming that holding it in June or July, when many students are abroad on holiday, “would effectively mean disenfranchising thousands of young people”.

A crucial decision

The significance of a referendum was highlighted on Saturday, when Mr Varadkardismissed UN criticism of Ireland’s abortion laws. The UN committee against torture told the Irish government that it had a responsibility to explain to the public that if the state kept its constitutional ban on abortion, it would continue to breach the human rights of women. Mr Varadkar responded saying: “One thing I would be very firm about is that whatever laws we have in Ireland, those laws should be determined by either the Irish people through a referendum or through the Oireachtas voting democratically.”

Fair debate?

The news comes after Irish pro-life organisation Youth Defence had some of their information boards seized by gardai (police) in Kilkenny, during their annual roadshow. Spokeswoman Rebecca Roughneen told the Irish Independent that the event has left Irish pro-lifers concerned that they won’t get a fair debate during the referendum. “It was a very peaceful street event which was attracting a lot of support since the referendum is in the news so much these days, and everyone is very concerned in regard to what happened,” she said. “This has very serious implications for a free and fair debate ahead of the referendum on abortion expected in spring.”


Mother Survives Open Heart Surgery While Giving Birth at the Same Time

Mother Survives Open Heart Surgery While Giving Birth at the Same Time

 STATE   MICAIAH BILGER   AUG 1, 2017   |   3:47PM    CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
North Carolina mom Danielle Gaither believes she and her baby boy are still alive for a reason.
In February, Gaither almost died while pregnant with her son, Fox 46 WJZY reports. But the mother and son are still alive today after quick-thinking doctors performed open heart surgery and a cesarean section simultaneously to save their lives.
This week, the mother finally was well enough to go home to her family in Monroe, North Carolina.
Gaither suffers from Marfan syndrome, a chronic condition that affects the heart, eyes, bones and blood vessels, and she began experiencing life-threatening complications in February.
“My chest was hurting; my stomach was hurting. The ambulance had to come and pick me up off the floor,” she told the local news.
Pregnant, Gaither was flown to the Carolinas Medical Center where doctors immediately decided to try a risky dual operation – open heart surgery and a C-section. Gaither was given just a 1-percent chance of survival, according to the report.
Her baby boy K.V.’s condition was better. He was able to go home from the hospital much sooner than his mother. Gaither spent several months in the hospital recovering from her surgery and finally went home on Monday, the report states.
“It was hard for me to learn how to walk,” Gaither said. “The first day I came I probably walked five steps. Now I’m walking 250 steps.”
Gaither said she is so thankful for her mother who has been helping her and her family since February.
Now home with her four children, Gaither said she wants to share her miraculous story with her church and community.
“My life is special and I need to be here for my kids,” she said. “I’m going to share my story and go to my church and share my testimony. Life is great. Life is good. Don’t take your life for granted.”


Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *