Monday, November 6, 2017

Brazile’s revelations stir confusion, anger among Democrats

   
Brazile’s revelations stir confusion, anger among Democrats
© Getty Images
Former Democratic National Committee (DNC) interim chairwoman Donna Brazile on Sunday further stirred the pot among Democrats, who are already reeling from her revelations about the DNC during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Democrats are confronting the implications from excerpts of Brazile's forthcoming book, “Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House,” including the possibility that the 2016 primary was rigged in favor of Hillary Clinton at the expense of her opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Some Democrats are calling for party reform, while others are downplaying Brazile's account. 
The former chairwoman appeared to backtrack during a Sunday show interview over the implication that the primary was rigged, but much of the damage has already been done. 
“I found no evidence, none, whatsoever,” Brazile told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on “This Week" when asked about charges of rigging.
“The only thing I found, which I said, I found the cancer, but I’m not killing the patient, was this memorandum that prevented the DNC from running its own operation," she said.
The explosive suggestion was first described in an excerpt of Brazile's book published Thursday in Politico, in which she described a fundraising arrangement between the Clinton campaign, the DNC and Clinton’s joint fundraising committee that said the campaign would “control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised.”
“The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical,” Brazile wrote of the agreement.
“If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity," she continued.
The Hill has reached out to Brazile for clarification on the apparent discrepancy between the excerpt and her comments Sunday morning. She declined to comment for this story, but previously told The New York Times that a non-disclosure agreement reached with her book publisher prevents her from speaking about its full contents.
Her disclosure re-opened a party rift that Democrats had sought to move on from after a contentious primary. Brazile defended her right to speak out, which some in her party criticized, especially during the lead-up to important state elections in Virginia and New Jersey.
“George, for those who are telling me to shut up, they told Hillary that a couple months ago. You know what I tell them? Go to hell. I’m going to tell my story,” Brazile said on ABC.
Tom Perez, the DNC’s current chairman, on Sunday dismissed a claim in the book about Clinton’s health that was first reported by The Washington Post. He suggested that what he characterized as an inaccurate claim could cause others to question the book’s credibility.
“Hillary Clinton was anything but incapacitated. She was tireless. She was a workhorse and frankly what saddens me about this as much as anything is I think people who read that charge, which is just without merit, are going to perhaps start wondering about other claims in the book,” Perez said.
Former Clinton staffers have also pushed back on Brazile’s claim, writing in an open letter that they “do not recognize the campaign she portrays in the book."
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in her own Sunday show interview emphasized that the Democratic Party must move forward, but also slammed the party’s use of super delegates, or officials who are not bound to a specific candidate and can choose the candidate they vote for at the nominating convention.
“Not knowing the facts of what it is, I would hope that there's another side to the story,” Pelosi told CNN’s “State of the Union” about Brazile’s disclosures. “But that — again, that's neither here nor there. It's almost a waste of time, except for people to put their view of it on the record.”
The fiery Politico excerpt even caused Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to say on television last week that she believes the Democrats’ nominating process was rigged.
The old rift between Clinton's camp and Sanders backers pits the establishment wing of the party, which largely backed Clinton during the primary, against the more progressive wing of the party that supported Sanders’ insurgent campaign.
DNC deputy chairman Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), who received Sanders’ support in his bid for the DNC chairman position, called for transparency in the wake of the disclosure and vowed to work toward changes to prevent such a fundraising arrangement from taking hold in the future.
“We must heed the call for our party to enact real reforms that ensure a fair, open and impartial nominating process in elections to come,” said Ellison in a statement reported by The Washington Post.
“I’m committed to working with Chairman Perez to make the DNC more transparent and accountable to the American people, whether that’s by ensuring that debates are scheduled far ahead of time or by guaranteeing that the terms of joint fundraising agreements give no candidate undue control or influence over the party," he said.
And while Brazile’s disclosure seems to mainly impact the Democratic party, an interparty conflict could be a boon to the GOP. President Trump helped fan the flames of the controversy last week.
“The real story on Collusion is in Donna B's new book. Crooked Hillary bought the DNC & then stole the Democratic Primary from Crazy Bernie!” Trump wrote on Twitter.
Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) also weighed in Sunday on the news from Brazile, saying he doesn’t blame Democrats who are troubled by her description of the campaign’s relationship with the DNC.
“I’ve never seen anything like that. I mean, we all said that the Clintons thought they lived above the rules, but this takes the cake. I mean this is pretty amazing. For them to basically be running the DNC in a primary,” Ryan told “Fox News Sunday.”
"To see such a deck stacked is really pretty jaw-dropping to me. No wonder the Democrats are ticked off," he continued. "I would be, too.”
— Updated 4:35 p.m.
   
LOAD COMMENTS (1,023)
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/04/emp-threat-600.jpg
emp-threat-600
WASHINGTON – There’s no question that the United States is vulnerable to an electromagnetic pulse attack that could result in mass starvation and the death of about 90 percent of the American population, a nuclear strategist warns.
But the deep state – those entrenched bureaucrats whose loyalties likely lay with a previous administration, under which they got their jobs – is indifferent.
Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, a nuclear strategist formerly with the CIA who served as chief of staff of the Congressional EMP Commission until it was terminated in September (the same month North Korea tested a hydrogen bomb, which it described as capable of a super powerful EMP attack), said liberal Democrats still are running a lot of Washington even after President Trump’s election.
“The people who sabotaged the EMP Commission, Obama holdovers, are still at the Department of Defense. They have not been replaced by the Trump administration. This is happening not just with the vitally important EMP Commission,” he said. “Our society, the Trump administration and the people who voted for Trump are paying for the failure of Congress to support Trump appointees quickly.
“At the same time during the Obama administration, he had twice as many appointees appointed to positions in government than Trump has. It’s not President Trump’s fault – these people are undermining and opposing the policies that President Trump has enacted, including the case of the EMP Commission.”
Obama administration bureaucrats, who believed Hillary Clinton would win the 2016 presidential election, did everything they could to sabotage and undermine the commission, Pry said.
“They held back money for a whole year. They held back security clearances. They tried to stop the commission’s staff from working, arguing that ‘you need a contract in order to work for the EMP Commission.’ They wouldn’t even let me work, or other staff, pro-bono. We did anyway.
“Had Hillary won, we would never have received any of our funding or security clearances. It was all after she clearly lost and Congress intervened that they relented at the last minute. A commission that was supposed to have been able to work 18 months at EMP ended up with resources and support from the Department of Defense that enabled us to put in six months of work. That’s no way to provide for the national security of the country against an existential threat like EMP.”
The threat of a North Korean nuclear attack on the U.S. is almost unimaginably worse than turning a city like Chicago or Denver into ashes, they testified. If just one of the nuclear weapons North Korea is now known to possess could be directed toward the heartland of the U.S. and detonated in the upper atmosphere, it could fry the electrical grid with an electromagnetic pulse, paralyze communications and transportation nationwide, instantly plunge the country back into a 19th century-style existence and cause 90 percent of Americans to starve to death in one year.
Nukes at altitude
An EMP attack likely would come from the explosion of a nuclear bomb at altitude over the United States. It’s shockwaves would disrupt all electronics in line of sight, including systems that deliver food, fuel, energy and communications to Americans.
The result would be a run on food currently in stores, and starvation when those supplies failed, as replacements would be impossible without those delivery systems.
White House Chief of Staff John Kelly assured on Fox News Tuesday night that Trump appointees will be confirmed, eventually, over Democratic opposition.
“The names have been put forward in most cases,” Kelly told Fox News host Laura Ingraham. “The president was making this case last week when he had lunch with the Republican caucus on the Senate side. If you compare where this administration is, relative to the Obama administration, we are way, way behind, maybe half the number of those confirmed. And even under the last Bush administration – we are way behind. The Senate Democratic leadership has been very, very effective in slowing things down to a snail’s pace.”
Kelly also addressed the possibility of North Korea using a bomb to explode an EMP over the mainland of the United States.
“The great hope we all have and they are already doing this, is that the Chinese [will] exert their pressure –[North Korea] is already observing the sanctions,” he said “We all hope, and the president hopes, that the leadership as it is in North Korea will come to their senses. With the help of countries like China, decide to denuclearize, give up their atomic weapons.
“They already have the capability to at least reach with missiles the great American citizens that live in Guam.”
 
Even Defense Secretary Jim Mattis refused to meet with the EMP Commission, Pry explained.
“We couldn’t get Secretary Mattis. Our chairman wrote to Secretary Mattis and told him what was going on. We didn’t even get a reply from him,” he said. “One can argue that the secretary of defense is busy with other things – he’s the secretary, ultimately the buck stops with him as secretary of defense and everything that happens with DOD. I cannot comprehend that not only did he not save the EMP Commission, we offered to brief Mattis and we never even heard from him.
“We would have told Mattis, we think North Korea has intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) that can reach the United States. We think they probably have mastered the miniaturization problems and can fit a warhead on those ICBMs.
“They might even be postured to do an EMP attack right now as we speak,” he continued. “Several times a day, North Korean satellites pass over the United States, on a trajectory evad[ing] U.S. national missile defenses, at an altitude that would put in the EMP field. It’s an intolerable threat.”
The possibility of an EMP catastrophe makes it so that the enemies of the U.S. – North Korea, Russia and Iran – no longer need sophisticated nuclear weapons.
New plan: Combined Armed Cyber Warfare
They have a new plan.
“It’s centered around EMP, but it’s not just EMP. We call it Combined Armed Cyber Warfare. It uses a combination of cyber-attacks, physical sabotage, non-nuclear EMP weapons and, ultimately, the most powerful cyber-weapon doctrine is an EMP attack,” he said. “All of these, in combination to attack not just our military but maybe our electric grid so that everything gets blacked out, would enable a failed state like North Korea or Iran for the first time in history to defeat the most advanced civilization on Earth.”
He explained: “This is like before World War II. Einstein figured out from physics experiments that were being conducted in Nazi Germany that the Nazis were working on the atomic bomb. The Western democracies weren’t even aware of the possibility of this technology. They were completely blind to it. Einstein wrote a letter to Franklin Roosevelt, warning him about it, asking for a meeting. It was from that we got the Manhattan Project and the race for the bomb between Germany and the United States, which fortunately we won.
“EMP is a decisive weapon in our information, electronic age – even more decisive than the atomic bomb was in its time. The Albert Einstein of EMP, Dr. William Graham, who was present during the discovery of the EMP phenomenon 1962, recently tried to get the secretary of defense to not only save the EMP Commission, but to hear him out on the threat from EMP and couldn’t get a meeting. This would be the equivalent of Franklin Roosevelt not taking the meeting, or reading the letter, from Albert Einstein, or just trash-canning the letter and not thinking about it. That’s how potentially disastrous this bomb is.”
Liberal Democrats don’t want to gear up for a fight over EMP because it conflicts with their worldview that the American military should be weakened, Pry said.
“Their solution is a world without nuclear weapons – that everyone should be giving up nuclear weapons, not just North Korea – the U.S. should lead by example and give up our nuclear weapons. That was a major Obama administration point of view – it’s the ideological objective of the American left and the Democratic Party. They believe nuclear weapons don’t really have a military utility. But EMP doesn’t fit into that picture,” he said. “If all you can do is blow up a city, blow up a base, it’s not so urgent to have a good verification regime to find out for a fact that Iran doesn’t have the bomb. The United States has hundreds of nuclear weapons, and we could turn Iran into a plate of glass.”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/09/emp-heritage1.jpg
emp-heritage
Establishment Republicans, who “are in bed with the electric power industry,” are also responsible for the termination of the EMP Commission and obscuring the threat of EMP, Pry argued.
Democrats ‘not the only guilty ones’
“Liberal Democrats are not the only guilty ones. The North America Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) is supposed to be concerned with security and partner with the U.S. Federal Regulatory Commission to provide security for the electric grid. But the reality is that it’s a big lobby and a very well-financed lobby. They own half of K street. They have whole electric grid institutes – so-called think tanks. They have the veneer of scientific and technical expertise, but what they’re really about is lobbying so that Congress doesn’t force them to spend money on anything, so that Congress doesn’t give to federal department and agencies regulatory authority over the electric power industry,” he said.
“The 3,000 electric utilities in this country are the last critical infrastructure that regulates themselves. They still exist in the 19th-century regulatory environment, and they are very happy with that. Measures to prevent EMP threatens all of that – it would require that someone who knows about EMP, the DOD or Department of Homeland Security, to say: ‘You have to admit you need to be hardened. You don’t know how to do it, so we are going to help you, maybe we’ll even help you pay for it, but we need to expect and make sure it’s done and we are going to make sure it’s done right.’ They don’t want that,” he said. “So, you’ve got very well-funded people on the right who are against the EMP commission – I think of them as the establishment, the chamber of commerce Republicans.”
American leftists are erroneously underestimating the ability of rogue regimes like North Korea and Iran to wipe out American civilization, Pry said.
“Their point of view is valid as long as you don’t know about EMP. You enter EMP into the equation, now you can successfully end a civilization with one bomb and it doesn’t have to be an advanced or sophisticated one – you could use a meteorological balloon and launch it off a freighter at sea.”
Pry detailed how an EMP attack would be more devastating than an asteroid hitting.
“We have a population of 320 million Americans today – we are only able to sustain that population because of our technology. Our modern technological economy and all of our critical infrastructure that support that economy is keeping 320 million Americans alive,” he explained. “Communication, transportation, business and finance, our industrial capability, even food and water depend on electricity. When you subtract electricity, when you cause a nationwide blackout, blackout the electric grid and all the life-sustaining critical infrastructures, how can you now support 320 million people? How many people can you support?”
Pry said many downplay the threat of an EMP attack by claiming the conditions resulting from the attack would be similar to “time traveling” to a time when people were less dependent on electricity. But in reality, he warned, the “aftermath of an EMP would be an unprecedented environmental catastrophe.”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/04/emp11.jpg
emp11
Time traveling
“When people talk about the consequences of an EMP, people sometimes describe it as putting Americans into a time machine and delivering them back to the 19th century,” he said. “It’s not true, it’s even worse. The plants and facilities for purifying water would back up during a blackout. Rivers and lakes become polluted – they are already polluted. In the 19th century, most people had bacteria in their gut so that they could drink safely from streams and rivers. There were streams and rivers that were not so polluted. Today, you take your life in your hands if you have to go drink out of a river or a lake. When water purification plants get blacked out, human wastes and industrial waste back-flow and bodies of waters become even more polluted.
“We don’t have the 19th-century critical infrastructures to fall back on,” he continued. “We don’t have thousands of coal-fired locomotives. Seventy five percent of our population today does not work on farms or even know anything about farming, less than two percent of our population feeds the other 98 percent. You don’t have well water. Almost every house had well water in the 19th century. We don’t have that complex localized economy.”
A burnout of electronics across the nation also would have other effects.
“Gasline pipes are going to blow up – you’ll have firestorms in cities from exploding gas pipelines. Chemical spills, toxic clouds industrial accidents, where fires break out because of the failure of safety patrol systems,” he said. “This huge chemistry set that is our society isn’t just going to sit there and black out; in many cases, it’s going to detonate and basically turn into bombs. In seven days, the nuclear reactors will go Fukushima and spread radio-activity everywhere.”
The government’s rebuild plan also is inadequate.
“[The EMP Commission] tried to come up with ways on how we would sustain the population. Bottom line – we couldn’t come up with any way to keep 320 million Americans alive with no food and water for a year. We are experiencing this in Puerto Rico right now; their electrical grid is out,” he said. “FEMA, the DOD and Homeland Security – all of our collective power is focused on Puerto Rico. We are going to save them from starvation. Hopefully no pandemic will break out, so there won’t be any disease.”
But he said that’s just a small island.
Pryer worked 10 years for the CIA as the senior expert on nuclear strategy and weapons, including EMP, and as an EMP expert for the House Armed Services Committee. He helped establish the EMP Commission in 2000 and served as the chief of staff for the commission for 17 years until it was terminated, during which time he had access to classified and unclassified doctrine and to military documents.



Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/11/obama-holdovers-exposing-u-s-to-possible-emp-attack/#M5jTpPiBzZqmaov8.99

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *