Saturday, October 3, 2020

California enacts measures to reduce Covid rates in Latino, Black, Pacific Islander communities NBC News THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Oct 2nd 2020 4:59PM

 

California enacts measures to reduce Covid rates in Latino, Black, Pacific Islander communities

LOS ANGELES—California will begin to require counties to bring down coronavirus infection rates in disadvantaged communities that have been harder hit by the pandemic, a move that could slow the methodical reopening of the nation's most populous state.

The complex new rules set in place an “equity metric” that will force larger counties to control the spread of COVID-19 in areas where Black, Latino and Pacific Islander groups have suffered a disproportionate share of the cases because of a variety of socioeconomic factors.

“We can’t allow transmission rates to be so disproportionately impacting those communities without significant effort to really reduce that disparity and reduce the burden on those communities," Dr. Mark Ghaly, the state's health secretary, said Thursday.

The measure could further put the brakes on the state's conservative approach to a return to business as usual after a more rapid reopening of a larger segment of the economy in the spring, including allowing bars and indoor restaurant dining, was accompanied by surge of infections in early summer.

The latest reopening plan that took effect in August is a four-step process based on the percentage of positive tests and per capita new cases in each of the 58 counties. It allows counties to incrementally reopen businesses as they meet more rigid state standards for both numbers for two consecutive weeks. Counties can be forced to close businesses if their rates increase.

The equity measure will require that positive test rates in its most disadvantaged neighborhoods, where rates are often much higher, do not significantly lag behind the county overall.

Dr. Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola, director of the Center for Reducing Health Disparities at the University of California, Davis, said it was an innovative approach to controlling the epidemic that he hasn't been applied elsewhere in the U.S.

The outbreak is worse in Latino, Black and Pacific Islander communities because many work in higher-risk industries including agriculture, restaurants and nursing facilities and often live in crowded conditions that make it hard for people to isolate when they get sick. They often don’t have health care or resources if they can’t work.

Latinos make up about 40% of the state's population of just under 40 million, but about 60% of California's more than 800,000 COVID-19 cases and almost half the nearly 16,000 deaths.

Infections that may be isolated to disadvantaged communities can quickly spread beyond those boundaries as more businesses reopen, more people return to work and people travel from widely.

“This is kind of a Whack-a-Mole game,” Aguilar-Gaxiola said. “You have an outbreak in a specific place, and because COVID-19 doesn’t know borders they can be spread easily from one place to another.”

It was not clear how the new measure, which takes effect next week, will affect each county.

Health officials in San Diego, Orange and San Francisco counties said they already have been targeting vulnerable communities with testing for the virus, providing interpreters and taking other measures to address inequality.

AdChoices

“We’re happy that the state has recognized the need to focus in on these areas," said Orange County Executive Officer Frank Kim, who said positivity rates in predominantly Latino neighborhoods have come way down since reaching double digits. Orange County's overall rate among people tested is about 3%.

Not everyone was happy to find another hurdle on the road to recovery.

“I believe the ‘equity’ metric is a misguided bit of virtue signaling by the governor," said Orange County Supervisor Don Wagner, who has been pushing to reopen more businesses. "It will also make it harder to safely reopen, which is the one thing we should be encouraging as that will benefit the most people, and especially the young people in our disadvantaged communities who are most impacted by the digital divide, educational uncertainties, and challenges to accessing the American dream.”

But Dr. George Rutherford, an epidemiologist at University of California, San Francisco, said the rules will support efforts by health officers who have been pressured to reopen more quickly.

“It gives the county health departments a lot of welcome cover for going more slowly than perhaps others in the counties would want,” Rutherford said.

América Bracho, chief executive of Latino Health Access, welcomed the new metric after seeing infection rates two and three times higher in Orange County's two largest cities, Anaheim and Santa Ana, than in wealthier communities.

But she said the state’s metric doesn’t address some of the problems that made low-income communities so vulnerable to the pandemic in the first place, such as a lack of access to health care, distrust of government authorities and the need to work.

While many people are aware they should stay home when they’re ill, there’s tremendous pressure to keep working to receive a paycheck and hang onto jobs, she said.

“We think it needs to go beyond that because if you don’t have savings, you cannot stay home and not work. If you don’t have health insurance, you will be afraid of using the system,” she said. “It’s complex, and I think we need to address complexity if we want to reduce the risk for another outbreak.”

The California Department of Public Health said a team will work with advocacy groups to develop a list of resources focused on improving equity.

The city of San Francisco highlighted its work to offer free coronavirus testing, free isolation and quarantine accommodations and even paying workers minimum wage for up to two weeks to encourage them not to work when they are sick.

Taxin reported from Orange County. Associated Press reporter Olga R. Rodriguez contributed from San Francisco.

Here's what you need to know about 'silent' COVID-19

 

Here's what you need to know about 'silent' COVID-19

One in five people could be walking around with “silent” COVID-19, according to a study published in the journal Thorax, leading researchers to suggest these people may act as an important driver of viral spread in the community.

Lead author Sung-Han Kim, from the Department of Infectious Diseases at Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, said the findings add further support to the use of face masks by the general public.

He also said the scope of testing for COVID-19 should be expanded to include asymptomatic individuals in high-risk settings, such as nursing homes or healthcare facilities.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently U-turned on its advice around testing asymptomatic people and now stresses the need to test asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic people, including close contacts of a person with confirmed COVID-19.

WHAT EXACTLY DID THE NEW STUDY ON SILENT COVID FIND?

The new study found those with asymptomatic COVID-19 cases appear to have similar viral loads to those with symptoms, echoing the results of past studies. Viral load refers to the total amount of virus a person has inside them. In theory: the higher the viral load, the more infectious someone is likely to be.

Researchers looked at a large cluster outbreak of COVID-19 in Daegu City, South Korea, early on in the pandemic. The close contacts of the cluster were traced and more than 3,000 cases of COVID-19 were uncovered, ranging from people having no symptoms at all to severe effects.

Those with mild or no symptoms were admitted to dedicated care facilities for isolation and monitoring. The 213 participants involved in this study had been admitted to one such facility.

People were classified as symptomless if they had none of the following: fever; chills; muscle pain (myalgia); fatigue; runny nose (rhinorrhea); blocked nose; loss of taste or smell; sore throat; swallowing difficulties; cough; phlegm production; coughing up blood; headache; dizziness; loss of appetite; nausea; vomiting, abdominal pain; and diarrhea.

AdChoices

In 213 patients with the virus, 41 (19%) remained asymptomatic. Of them, 39 (95%) underwent follow-up testing after an average of 13 days, while in 172 patients with mild symptoms, 144 (84%) underwent follow-up testing.

The follow-up testing is important as it showed those with silent COVID didn’t then develop symptoms, which would’ve meant they were pre-symptomatic. 

A large proportion of mildly symptomatic patients with COVID-19 and asymptomatic individuals showed persistent positive upper respiratory RT-PCR results at follow-up. Asymptomatic individuals and symptomatic patients also had very similar viral loads.

Researchers said further studies are needed to clarify whether the persistence of viral DNA in people without any symptoms warrants precautionary quarantine measures. They added that most of the participants were in their 20s and 30s, so the findings might not apply to other age groups.

Nevertheless, they pointed out: “Considering that most asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 are likely to go unnoticed by healthcare workers and continue to reside within communities, such individuals may act as an essential driving force for the community spread of COVID-19 and the ongoing pandemic state.”

SO, WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

Until we know how long, and to what extent, asymptomatic people might be infectious, testing should be extended to certain groups as a precautionary measure, the researchers recommended.

While we don’t know exactly how many people tend to be asymptomatic, we do know that the number could range from 20-50%.

Jenna Macciochi, an immunologist and author of “Immunity: The Science of Staying Well,” previously told HuffPost UK asymptomatic carriers are “one of the biggest challenges” with easing restrictions.

A study from Italy published at the end of June found that of residents who tested positive for COVID-19 in the municipality of Vo’, a small town near Padua, 42% were asymptomatic. Another study of 9,000 people selected to take a coronavirus test in Iceland found 50% of them tested positive for COVID-19, but didn’t have any symptoms.

Most recently, a review of 94 studies concluded that the proportion of people who catch COVID-19 and remain asymptomatic throughout infection is somewhere around 20%.

The secondary attack rate – meaning the rate of infection among close contacts – was lower in contacts of people with asymptomatic infection than those with symptomatic infection.

A higher proportion of infections resulted from transmission from pre-symptomatic individuals than from asymptomatic individuals, the study found.

This story originally appeared in HuffPost UK.

Experts are still learning about COVID-19. The information in this story is what was known or available as of publication, but guidance can change as scientists discover more about the virus. Please check the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the most updated recommendations.

  • This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

How soon after COVID-19 exposure should you get tested? HuffPost US LINDSAY HOLMES Oct 2nd 2020 12:14PM

 

How soon after COVID-19 exposure should you get tested?

So you think you may have been exposed to COVID-19. How long will it take for you to know if you’re infected?

The coronavirus affects everyone differently, including the amount of time it takes to start experiencing symptoms or get confirmation that you have the virus. That said, here’s a general timeline you can expect and what else you should know:

COVID-19 CAN ENTER SOMEONE’S BODY IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXPOSURE, BUT YOU LIKELY WON’T KNOW YOU HAVE IT RIGHT AWAY.

There’s an incubation period for COVID-19. If you test too soon after exposure, it can result in a false negative. In one study on false negative rates after COVID-19 exposure, researchers found that in the four days prior to symptom onset, the probability of a false negative was extremely high on day one. The probability of a false negative on day four was around 67%.

This is why experts don’t recommend getting tested the day after being in a potential exposure situation. As MIT Medical explains on their COVID-19 page:

For example, it’s not a good idea to fly into Boston on a crowded flight, get a COVID-19 diagnostic test within a day or two of arrival, and then, based on a negative result, visit your elderly grandparents. The only thing that negative test can tell you is that, at that particular moment in time, your sample did not show viral levels high enough to be reliably measured. It does not mean you were not exposed and infected during your travels. It does not mean you were not exposed and infected after your arrival. Do you want to visit your grandparents after flying into Boston? Self quarantine for 14 days first. 

IT TAKES A FEW DAYS AFTER EXPOSURE TO PRODUCE A POSITIVE COVID-19 TEST RESULT.

There are no firm numbers on how long it takes to get an accurate positive test result. The time from exposure to the onset of symptoms is around two to 14 days, according to Harvard Health. Most people’s symptoms appear around day five, on average.

It’s recommended that you wait to get tested for at least two to three days after potential exposure. Some health experts say five days after exposure might be a good testing point, since that’s the median time when symptoms usually appear.

If you don’t have any symptoms, you still may want to get tested a few times — once about two or three days after exposure, and once again later on in the 14-day incubation period. If you are experiencing symptoms, get tested right away.

What To Do Before And After You’ve Been Tested

Isolate.

Do not continue to go out if you know you’ve been exposed to someone with COVID-19 (except to go get your test). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that you “stay home until 14 days after last exposure and maintain social distance (at least 6 feet) from others at all times.”

A person who has the virus “may be contagious 48 to 72 hours before starting to experience symptoms,” per Harvard Health. Many cases of COVID-19 are asymptomatic, but even if you don’t have any symptoms, you can still spread the illness to others. 

AdChoices

Alert friends and family you were near during that time.

If you saw loved ones after you were exposed to someone with the coronavirus, be sure to tell them that they could have potentially been exposed, too. They may want to isolate themselves and/or get tested.

Stay in touch with your doctor.

Keep your physician updated on your condition, particularly if it starts to worsen. Your doctor should know what over-the-counter medicines to suggest based on your medical history.

Monitor your symptoms.

The most common physical symptoms are a fever (typically over 100 degrees), loss of taste and smell, cough and shortness of breath. Other frequent symptoms include headaches, diarrhea, nausea and congestion or a runny nose. You don’t have to experience all of these symptoms to have COVID-19 ― some may get a few, some may get one, some may get them all.

If you notice that you’re unable to catch your breath or are having severe difficulty breathing, it may be best to seek emergency medical care.

Take care of yourself and others.

Continue to look out for your own well-being, as well as the health of others. Make sure high-touch surface areas in your home are frequently disinfected. Everyone in your household should wear a face mask to protect against any possible transmission. You should also get lots of rest, stay hydrated and practice self-care however you can.

Experts are still learning about COVID-19. The information in this story is what was known or available as of publication, but guidance can change as scientists discover more about the virus. Please check the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the most updated recommendations. 

Officials: 11 positive tests traced to debate----At least 11 positive coronavirus tests can be traced to organizers of this week's presidential debate in Cleveland, city officials said Friday.

 

Officials: 11 positive tests traced to debate

At least 11 positive coronavirus tests can be traced to organizers of this week's presidential debate in Cleveland, city officials said Friday.

The city's announcement came after President Donald Trump, who debated Democratic rival Joe Biden on Tuesday in Cleveland, revealed that he and his wife have both tested positive for Covid-19 and are in isolation. Trump was transported to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Friday.

"The City of Cleveland is aware of positive cases of Covid-19 following the Sept. 29 presidential debate," according to a City Hall statement. "We advise anyone who has come in contact with someone who has tested positive to self quarantine. If anyone who was in attendance has concerns or is symptomatic, they should contact their healthcare provider."

The city's announcement also came shortly after the Cleveland Clinic, which oversaw Covid-19 protocols at the debate, said it's confident that guests at Tuesday night's event will be safe from coronavirus.

"Based on what we know about the virus and the safety measures we had in place, we believe there is low risk of exposure to our guests," the Cleveland Clinic said in a statement.

The city specifically said that positive tests were traced to people involved in organizing the debate.

"In total, at this time, we are aware of 11 cases stemming from pre-debate planning and set-up, with the majority of cases occurring among out of state residents," the city said.

"At this time, though that could change, no City residents appear to have contracted the virus as a result of this event."

Despite reassurances from the Cleveland Clinic, a prominent Ohio lawmaker, who attended the debate, went into self-isolation on Friday after learning about Trump's positive test.

Ohio House Minority Leader Emilia Strong Sykes said she personally witnessed members of the president's entourage declining masks from healthcare providers — from the Cleveland Clinic — inside the hall at Case Western Reserve University.

"I am frustrated today as I worry now about my own health and the health of so many others who were present that evening like journalists, support staff, Cleveland Clinic professionals, and many others who could have potentially been exposed," Sykes said in a statement on Friday.

Image: FILES-US-VOTE-DEBATE (Jim Watson / AFP - Getty Images)

"This didn’t have to happen. If more would follow the guidelines, this wouldn’t continue to happen.”

Sykes' communications director Amber Epling said her boss texted senior staff that night with her concerns.

AdChoices

"She was just horrified, she was in the same room as them and they just waved off the physicians" offering masks, Epling told NBC News.

The Democrat from Akron, who holds advanced degrees in public health, said she doesn't know how long she'll be in quarantine. She wished Trump and the first lady a speedy recovery.

“Americans woke this morning to this news of which the ripple effects are yet to be seen. This is a very somber moment for our country in a year of somber moments," Sykes said.

"The president’s diagnosis poses a risk for not only our national security, our economic stability but also our upcoming election. I wish the president, first lady and his team a speedy recovery."

Image: US-VOTE-DEBATE (Jim Watson / AFP - Getty Images)

It wasn't immediately clear how many Case Western or Cleveland Clinic employees were at the site on Tuesday night, or if any of them were in close contact with Trump or White House aide Hope Hicks, who tested positive for Covid-19 on Thursday.

A spokesman for Case Western also declined comment when asked Friday if the university made any ventilation or filtration system upgrades at the Sheila and Eric Samson Pavilion ahead of Tuesday night's event.

"The university appreciates the additional efforts Cleveland Clinic is taking today for attendees who might have concerns and/or questions," Case Western said in a statement on Friday.

Some attendees, who wore masks on Tuesday night, said they were livid when mask-less spectators strolled into the hall.

Kristin Urquiza, who lost her dad to Covid-19 and was a guest of the Biden campaign on Tuesday, said she was wearing a mask — but was stunned to see no one in Trump's entourage in a facial covering.

"But when I looked over to the right-hand side, not a single person on the Trump side, including the Trump family, Melania Trump, the Trump children, were wearing a mask," Urquiza told MSNBC's "Live with Ayman Mohyeldin."

"And I remember thinking to myself, and this was just when the debate stated, 'Oh. My. Goodness. Isn't anybody going to regulate on these people wearing a mask?' And nobody did."

U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, said Trump's wife entered the hall just ahead of him but he kept a safe social distance away. But he too was amazed to see so many people without masks at the debate.

"And they walk in without masks, it was really a level of arrogance you rarely see," Ryan told MSNBC.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *