Saturday, October 3, 2020

Trudeau govt resurrects bill criminalizing help for unwanted LGBT inclinations The government appears to be downplaying the scope and breadth of the legislation, but pro-family experts in Canada are sounding alarm bells.

 


Trudeau govt resurrects bill criminalizing help for unwanted LGBT inclinations

The government appears to be downplaying the scope and breadth of the legislation, but pro-family experts in Canada are sounding alarm bells.
Fri Oct 2, 2020 - 11:23 am EST
Featured Image
JEFF VINNICK / GETTY IMAGES

DROP Disney+: New teen film 'Out' features openly homosexual main character! Sign the petition here.

OTTAWA, Ontario, October 2, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government reintroduced a bill Thursday making it a crime punishable by five years in jail to help minors overcome same-sex attraction or gender confusion, or to remove them from Canada to seek such help.

Justice minister David Lametti tabled Bill C-6, “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy),” on October 1.

It’s identical to the controversial C-8, which died when Trudeau prorogued Parliament in August in the wake of the WE Charity funding scandal.

Bill C-6 adds five offenses to the Criminal Code: causing a minor — defined as under age 18 — to undergo conversion therapy; removing a minor from Canada to undergo conversion therapy abroad; causing a person to undergo conversion therapy against his will; profiting from providing conversion therapy; and advertising an offer to provide conversion therapy.

The first three offenses are punishable by up to five years in prison, the last two by up to two years in prison.

The bill defines “conversion therapy” as any “practice, treatment or service designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual or gender identity to cisgender, or to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour.”

“Cisgender” is a term LGBT activists use to describe people who acknowledge and accept their biological sex. It’s opposite — for people who deny their sex and insist on a different one — is “transgender.”

It adds: “For greater certainty, this definition does not include a practice, treatment or service that relates to a person’s gender transition; or to a person’s exploration of their identity or to its development.”

“These amendments are the same as those proposed by Bill C-8 in the previous parliamentary session,” according to a Liberal press statement.

“If passed, this bill will make Canada’s laws on conversion therapy the most progressive and comprehensive in the world.”

The government appears to be downplaying the scope and breadth of the legislation.

The Liberals haven’t made it a crime for Canadians to express their views on homosexuality or transgenderism, Lametti told reporters, as reported by CTV News.

“The bill does not put an end to conversations youth and individuals may have with supportive adults and professionals in their lives in assisting them in exploring their identity. These discussions are often critical to personal development,” he added.

“Nor would the proposed offences criminalize conversations where personal points of view on sexual orientation or gender identity are expressed.”

The Liberal press release likewise asserted the “new offences would not apply to those who provide support to persons questioning their sexual orientation, sexual feelings or gender identity (such as teachers, school counsellors, pastoral counsellors, faith leaders, doctors, mental health professionals, friends or family members).”

But Jack Fonseca, director of political operations for Campaign Life Coalition, warned concerned Canadians to pay no heed to these words. Rather, they should look at the text of the bill itself.

The Liberals’ assurance that the bill won’t apply to teachers, counselors, faith leaders, doctors, mental health professionals, friends, or family members who “provide support to persons questioning their sexual orientation, sexual feelings or gender identity” is misleading to the point of mendacity, he said.

“This is an exercise in smoke and mirrors to pre-empt a massive uprising by parents and spiritual leaders across the country,” Fonseca told LifeSiteNews.

“There are no protections whatsoever in Bill C-6 for parents or pastors who, for example, discourage a gender-confused child from identifying as transgender and try to help them be at peace with the body in which they were born,” he said.

If C-6 is passed, “loving moms and dads will end up in prison,” and it will be “illegal for the Church to carry out its sacred mission of evangelizing sinners and calling them to conversion in Christ,” he warned.

Gwen Landolt of REAL Women slammed Bill C-6 as “disgraceful” and agreed that it provides no protection to parents, pastors, or counselors who during a discussion oppose a gender “transition” or will to affirm their homosexuality.

“The whole thing is truly a wicked piece of legislation based only on ideology and the Liberals trying to promote themselves with the LGBTQ community,” she told LifeSiteNews.

“It’s fundamentally an attack on the integrity of the human being,” added Landolt.

“Someone who is 16, 15, 14, they need to be helped, not channelled” into accepting homosexuality or transgenderism.

Moreover, the Liberals are “trying to make conversion therapy a terrible, disgusting thing, but it’s not what they’re pretending,” she said. 

That was echoed by Fonseca, who noted that “what’s disingenuously being labelled as ‘conversion therapy’” is “really just pastoral counselling or traditional psychotherapy.”

Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole said he supports a ban on conversion therapy but fears that Bill C-6 will criminalize discussions around same-sex inclinations or gender confusion between minors and their parents, pastors, counselors, and teachers.

The Conservatives will be discussing possible amendments to the bill at an upcoming caucus meeting, reported the Toronto Star.

Both REAL Women and Campaign Life emphasize that the bill is irredeemable and must be scrapped. Fonseca urged pro-family Canadians to mobilize to defeat the bill.

“I say to every parent, priest, pastor and conscientious therapist across this country: you need to rise up now, en masse, while you still can, and flood your Member of Parliament’s office with opposition to Bill C-6, by phone, email, twitter, mail and in-person.”

For M.P. contact information, check Campaign Life’s website here, or use Campaign Life’s Action Alert Email campaign to send your M.P. a message.


  Conversion TherapyFreedom Of AssociationFreedom Of SpeechHomosexualityJustin Trudeau

Keep this news available to you and millions more

Your gift will spread truth, defeat lies, and save lives


Share this article

Trump-supporters’ garage firebombed, defaced with ‘Biden 2020’ graffiti 'They saw that we have a jungle gym and toys in the backyard.' Fri Oct 2, 2020 - 6:00 am EST

 


Trump-supporters’ garage firebombed, defaced with ‘Biden 2020’ graffiti

'They saw that we have a jungle gym and toys in the backyard.'
Fri Oct 2, 2020 - 6:00 am EST
Featured Image
CHRISTIAN.DK / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

BROOKLYN CENTER, Minnesota, October 2, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) ― A family’s garage may have been firebombed because they are Trump-supporters.

Dennis and Deana Molla of Brooklyn Center, Minn. were woken by an explosion at 3 A.M. on September 23. They told the media they saw three people running away as their garage, a campervan, and two of their trucks were consumed by flames. The arsonists left a calling card on the garage door: graffiti reading “Biden 2020,” “BLM,” and an anarchy sign.

The couple managed to get their two children to safety, and police and firefighters stated that they rescued three dogs in kennels and four puppies from the garage. Work tools and equipment worth thousands of dollars were destroyed. The house sustained minor damage.

The Brooklyn Center police department stated that “this fire is considered suspicious and our investigation remains extremely active. The home occupants had a fairly large ‘Trump 2020’ sign that was destroyed, and our officers observed what appeared to be fresh spray paint on the garage before it burned down. The spray paint included ‘Biden 2020,’ ‘BLM,’ and capital letter ‘A’ with a circle around it.”

Dennis and Deana had not made a secret of their own political beliefs. After Dennis,a contractor, had an argument on a worksite about his support for President Trump, the couple bought two 3’ X 5’ Trump flags, which they draped over the campervan and one of their trucks.

Dennis Molla was born in Ukraine and came to the USA as a child. He told Minneapolis’s StarTribune that he felt sorry that his immigrant parents had to see this happen.

“I think things have gotten way out of control,” he said.

“I’m not one of those confrontational people. ... I just feel very sorry for my parents, just because they wanted to leave the USSR for us to have a better future and life in America,” he continued.

“For them to see me express my beliefs as a Republican, it’s crazy to think it came to this.”

Deana Molla expressed disbelief that people would put their children in danger.

“They saw that we have a jungle gym and toys in the backyard,” she told the StarTribune.

“To put our babies in harm’s way because you don’t agree with our politics ... Just don’t put our kids in danger.

An online fundraiser for the family has raised over $16,600. The couple thanked supporters, who include Democrats as well Republicans, on Saturday, saying their kindness had “drowned out” spiteful comments about them.

“It has been overwhelming seeing people from both sides of the political spectrum giving and sharing kind words,” they wrote.

“It's been so hard reading some of the things people have been saying about us and our situation, but you have stepped up and drowned out their voices. Thank you so much.”

They stated that they will put the money toward whatever their insurance doesn't cover, and if there is any left, they will put it into an account for their children.


  2020 ElectionArsonDonald TrumpJoe BidenMinnesotaTerrorism

Keep this news available to you and millions more

Your gift will spread truth, defeat lies, and save lives


Share this article

Canadian judge rules 2 doctors can have patient euthanized even if many docs disagree

 


Canadian judge rules 2 doctors can have patient euthanized even if many docs disagree

If two doctors or nurse practitioners approve a death by lethal injection, it doesn't matter that other doctors' or nurse practitioners' assessments disagree that the person qualifies to be killed under the law.
Fri Oct 2, 2020 - 8:43 pm EST
Featured Image
FUNNYANGEL / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

October 2, 2020 (Euthanasia Prevention Coalition) — When Canada's parliament passed Bill C-14 legalizing euthanasia (MAiD) the legislation required two doctors or nurse practitioners to agree that a person qualified for death by lethal injection. As long as two euthanasia assessments approve death, it doesn't matter if several euthanasia assessments determine that a person doesn't qualify under the law.

Katherine Sorenson believes that husband of 48 years, who was approved for (MAiD) euthanasia even though he received conflicting assessments, is not dying, has questionable capacity and is delusional about his medical condition.

Katherine's lawyer, Hugh Scher, sought an injunction to prevent the euthanasia death based on an assessment by a physician, an affidavit from a physician who has known her husband for years, and Katherine's affidavit. These affidavits state that her husband is not terminally ill, that he has questionable capacity to decide and he has "delusional" beliefs concerning his medical condition.

Today, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decided that:

there is no role for courts in the review of MAiD eligibility assessments. ... Parliament considered, and rejected a role for judges in the pre-approval or review of MAiD eligibility assessments. Parliament made clear that the role rests with approved healthcare assessors.

In other words, if two doctors or nurse practitioners approve a death by lethal injection, it doesn't matter that other doctors' or nurse practitioners' assessments disagree that the person qualifies to be killed under the law.

Further to that, if a euthanasia assessment is false, such as, if a MAiD assessor accepting a person's delusional beliefs about their medical condition, that there is no legal way to challenge the assessment, even if the challenger has been married to that person for 48 years.

Katherine stated:

I am committed to seeing this matter through for the benefit and protection of my husband of 48 years and for the benefit of others across Canada in the public interest, who may lack capacity and who otherwise will remain unprotected by a MAID law that clearly lacks adequate safeguards to protect those who are vulnerable.

Katherine's lawyer Hugh Scher noted that; 

Doctor shopping is a serious concern that must be addressed. Court or tribunal oversight are essential in those rare cases where there are multiple conflicting medical reports over the core issue of capacity which is an essential condition of eligibility for MAID.

Hugh Scher also noted that: 

The federal MAID law requires application in accord with provincial laws including those regarding consent and capacity.  Where capacity is at issue provincial consent and capacity laws across Canada call on courts or tribunals to resolve conflicts and disputes over capacity. 

It would be criminal to subject terminal treatment decisions under MAID to less protection than any other treatment decision. 

Toronto lawyer John Campion stated that: 

A more nuanced test for injunctions should be developed for end of life cases as the present tests of serious issue to be tried, irreparable harm and balance of convenience are inadequate and/or obviously determined in favour of the applicant (wife in this case) when the result is so final — death. The process should identify the single issue- in this case capacity — and design a process that brings the central concern into timely focus with evidence and argument as part of the balance of convenience... 

Lawyer Kate Naugler noted that: 

The dignity and autonomy of all Canadians is threatened where a person who lacks capacity is permitted to access MAID.

Katherine Sorenson and her legal team have not yet decided their next course of action.

Published with permission from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.


  Assisted SuicideCourtsEuthanasiaEuthanasia Prevention CoalitionModern Medicine

Keep this news available to you and millions more

Your gift will spread truth, defeat lies, and save lives


Share this article

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *