Thursday, September 2, 2021

US left behind majority of Afghan allies who applied for visas: Report September 2, 2021 | BPR Wire

 

US left behind majority of Afghan allies who applied for visas: Report

Thomas Catenacci, DCNF

The U.S. abandoned more than half of all interpreters and Afghans who applied for special immigrant visas (SIV), a senior State Department official told The Wall Street Journal.

The official didn’t share specific information or figures, but estimated that a majority of the visa applicants were left behind in Afghanistan, the WSJ reported. The Department of State doesn’t have exact data on who was evacuated from the Middle Eastern nation after the Taliban took control of the capital city of Kabul, due to the urgent nature of the operation.

0:00 / 0:00

“I would say it’s the majority of them,” the administration official told the WSJ. “Just based on anecdotal information about the populations we were able to support.”

“Everybody who lived it is haunted by the choices we had to make and by the people we were not able to help,” the official continued.

The U.S. evacuated a total of 123,000 people from Afghanistan including an estimated 6,000 Americans during the operation, which began on Aug. 15, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said during remarks on Tuesday. Blinken didn’t mention how many of the individuals were SIV applicants.

Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby estimated that the U.S. had evacuated 7,000 Afghan SIV applicants during a press briefing on Friday.

Ads by 

“This has been a massive military, diplomatic, and humanitarian undertaking – one of the most difficult in our nation’s history – and an extraordinary feat of logistics and coordination under some of the most challenging circumstances imaginable,” Blinken said.

On Monday, the last remaining American troops who had been coordinating the massive evacuation operation departed Kabul. Blinken said Tuesday that the military mission in Afghanistan had ended, but that a diplomatic mission to transport people out of the country was beginning.

For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Powered by Topple


Thousands of pediatricians stand up against child transgender surgery mandate September 1, 2021 | Frank Webster

 

Thousands of pediatricians stand up against child transgender surgery mandate

The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds), as well as the Catholic Medical Association (CMA) and an OB-GYN with a specialty in treating adolescents, are represented by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) in the suit.

This comes on the heels of Biden’s Health and Human Services Department (HHS) decision in May that redefined “sex” as it applies to perceived discrimination in healthcare, and reverses the Trump administration’s policy that restored the biology-based, male-female definition of sexual discrimination in federal healthcare regulations.

Enable

Dr. Michelle Cretella, executive director of ACPeds, said in a statement:

To equate sex with gender identity as if children may be born in the wrong body sacrifices science and our children on the altar of political correctness. Sex is a medically significant innate and immutable binary trait that is determined by genes at fertilization. No drugs or surgeries can change a person’s sex, but so-called gender transition interventions do cause irreversible damage, especially to youth.

 

The complaint further states:

Under the government’s overreaching interpretation, doctors now face an untenable choice: either act against their medical judgment and deeply held convictions by performing controversial and often medically dangerous gender-transition interventions, or succumb to huge financial penalties, lose participation in Medicaid and other federal funding, and, as a practical matter, lose the ability to practice medicine in virtually any setting.

 

Ads by 

The ADF complaint added: “Essentially, the government is telling those in the medical profession that they need to ignore the scientific fact that there are two sexes—male and female. But the biological reality is that women’s and men’s bodies are not the same. They react differently to different medications. They are at greater risks for different types of cancer. And, of course, only women are capable of being pregnant.”

“But this doesn’t just threaten doctors,” ADF asserted. “It threatens their patients as well—children, in particular.”

Dr. Quentin L. Van Meter, president of ACPeds warns that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones combined can cause sterility at an early age as well as increasing the potential for serious chronic illnesses such as diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancers that the individual might not otherwise develop.

That is to say nothing of the reported psychological abnormalities associated with gender dysphoria, which can be the impetus for the desire to change one’s sex through surgery.

HHS Assistant Secretary Rachel Levine (born Richard Levine) said of the reinterpretation:

The mission of our Department is to enhance the health and well-being of all Americans, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation. All people need access to healthcare services to fix a broken bone, protect their heart health, and screen for cancer risk. No one should be discriminated against when seeking medical services because of who they are.

 

However, American Principles Project President Terry Schilling respondedto Levine’s statement, as apparently, Levine feels that it is no more life-altering than the resetting of a broken bone.

“Make no mistake: the policy announced by HHS today is not about ‘fix[ing] a broken bone’ or ‘screen[ing] for cancer risk.’ No American was being denied access to these treatments for identifying as ‘LGBTQ.’ Rather, this policy is really about forcing hospitals and medical professionals to adhere to leftist ideology regarding sexuality and gender—and in particular to provide sex-change procedures to all comers, including children,” said Schilling at the time.

Catholic League President Bill Donohue said the Biden administration’s mandate is an affront that essentially declares war on Catholic doctors and hospitals.

The policy “would force doctors who can perform sex transition surgery to do so, regardless of their religious objections,” he said, and “will also be contested in the federal courts.”

“Catholic hospitals do not deny routine health care to transgender persons. There is a difference between denying transgender persons treatment for COVID and forcing a Catholic doctor to make anatomical changes on the sexually confused,” Donohue added.

Although the suit could end up in the U.S. Supreme Court, the alleged “conservative” court is unreliable at best.

And when it comes to America under the Biden administration, every day is better than the next.

Powered by Topple

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *