Saturday, June 3, 2017

Abortionist: “As a Christian I Feel It’s My Job” to Kill Babies in Abortions (He has got to be demon posesd by a unclean spirit of death & evil)

Abortionist: “As a Christian I Feel It’s My Job” to Kill Babies in Abortions

 NATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   JUN 2, 2017   |   12:31PM    WASHINGTON, DC
According to abortionist Willie Parker’s version of Christianity, women should be allowed and encouraged to sacrifice their unborn babies’ lives to better their own.
Parker performs abortions in several states to help them do it. He calls it his “ministry.”
The southern abortionist has been traveling across the country during the past few months to promote his new book and claim that he is serving God by killing babies in the womb.
“Preserving access [to abortion] is my calling,” Parker writes in his new book, “A Life’s Work,” which will bring him to Seattle’s Town Hall on June 6. “As a Christian and a doctor, I am committed to protecting women’s health.”
By protecting women’s health, Parker means destroying unborn babies in abortions – and that’s all he does. Years ago, after reading a sermon by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. about the Good Samaritan, Parker said he decided to make aborting unborn babies his sole work, according to the report.
Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures.
Later, the report continues:
Parker realized that in order to be a “Christian in practice,” he had to show compassion for all women, regardless of their needs. What happens to these women if abortion is not available?
He started performing abortions exclusively, traveling from town to town — mainly in the South, where abortion providers have been chipped away by layers of laws and fund restrictions. …
“As a Christian, I feel that it’s my job to help offer a counternarrative,” Parker writes. “That God gave every woman gifts, and the agency to realize those gifts, and that nothing about choosing to terminate a pregnancy or to delay childbearing puts a woman outside of God’s love.
“… No God I believe in would judge this woman for wanting to be the best version of herself.”
Parker admitted in the interview that he does not attend a church; he is too busy promoting and performing abortions.
When the newspaper asked him if he is worried about meeting God someday, Parker replied: “I meet God every day with the people who need my help. I know God and God will know me. I don’t believe that the people who say they know God will have any say in that.”
Whether Parker actually believes what he says or he is just doing it for publicity is hard to say. Either way, he is openly defying Christian teachings about the sanctity and value of human life.
Scripture says that innocent human lives should be protected, not destroyed. God commands “Thou shalt not murder” in Exodus 20:13 and Deuteronomy 5:17. Thousands of years after the Bible was written, science has confirmed that babies in the womb are unique, living human beings from the moment of conception. Their lives, too, are valuable and deserving of protection.
Parker claims to be helping women, but true service never involves destroying one human being’s life to help another. He is not really helping women, either. Millions of women have been scarred by the deceptive claim that abortion will help them gain a better life. They realize too late that their abortion killed their unborn child, a child who they never can get back. Many women suffer from depression, anxiety, guilt and even suicidal thoughts when they realized they were deceived by abortionists like Parker.
If Parker actually listened to some of his abortion patients, maybe he would realize that he is not helping anyone by killing unborn babies. Or maybe he wouldn’t.


Harvard Law Journal Concludes Unborn Babies Have Constitutional Rights (It is about time, Thank You Harvard)

Harvard Law Journal Concludes Unborn Babies Have Constitutional Rights

 NATIONAL   CORTNEY O'BRIEN   JUN 2, 2017   |   1:19PM    WASHINGTON, DC
The Fourteenth Amendment, which was adopted in 1868, declares that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” A debate that has been raging in courtrooms for years is whether the “life” part includes unborn persons.
Harvard Law student Joshua Craddock did some constitutional soul searching to answer that question in a new report for the Harvard Law Journal, concluding that unborn babiesdo fall under the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections.
One might look to dictionaries of legal and common usage, the context of the English common law tradition, and cases that attempted to construe the meaning of the text in a manner consistent with original meaning. Using this methodology, it is reasonable to construe the Fourteenth Amendment to include prenatal life. The structure of the argument is simple: The Fourteenth Amendment’s use of the word “person” guarantees due process and equal protection to all members of the human species. The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. Therefore, the Fourteenth Amendment protects the preborn. If one concedes the minor premise (that preborn humans are members of the human species), all that must be demonstrated is that the term “person,” in its original public meaning at the time of the Fourteenth Amendment’s adoption, applied to all members of the human species.
In addition to using language to prove his point, Craddock puts his conclusions in context, noting that at the time the Fourteenth Amendment was written, several states called the unborn person a “child” in their anti-abortion laws. Moreover, The Stream notes, in 1859, the American Medical Association mandated that the government must protect the “independent and actual existence of the child before birth.”
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter. 
Using this logic, Craddock notes, the Supreme Court justices were flawed in their 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which granted the right to abortion. When he wrote the majority opinion, Justice Harry Blackmun failed to properly assess the word “person” as it was applied in 1868, Craddock argues.
Will the Supreme Court consider the Fourteenth Amendment in future cases dealing with abortion?
LifeNews Note: Cortney O’Brien is a Townhall web editor, where this was originally published.


“Comedian” Sarah Silverman Mocks Jesus and Promotes Abortion in New Netflix (how sad for Sarah)

“Comedian” Sarah Silverman Mocks Jesus and Promotes Abortion in New Netflix Show

 NATIONAL   MARK JUDGE   JUN 2, 2017   |   10:45AM    WASHINGTON, DC
Vulgar and tiresome comedian Sarah Silverman has just posted a new promo trailer for “A Speck of Dust,” her new comedy special on Netflix.
In the trailer, Silverman brings in “Republican Congressman Tom Virtue” to shoot an ad for the special. Tom Virtue is actually an actor who plays the dad on “Even Stevens.”
“Congressman Virtue” says Silverman has left behind her edgy “blue humor and politics meddling.”
“This is not the inappropriate Sarah Silverman of recent times,” he declares, “but a wholesome comedy special about family. Sarah’s days of blue humor and politics meddling are over. That ship has sailed, as she’s had a true come to Jesus moment and is writing clean material that the whole family can enjoy…We are one nation under God.”
Silverman is then shown in the edit bay, where she cuts the spot to make Virtue sound like he is promoting abortion, “s—ting,” a vulgar phonographic term, and Jesus among the topics to be discussed.
“It’s perfect,” says Silverman.
LifeNews Note: Mark Judge writes for the Media Research Center.


Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *