Saturday, July 1, 2017

Vatican Criticized for “Cowardly” Statement After Court Says Hospital Can Kill Charlie Gard (Please Everyone, Everywhere Please Pray This Little One Survives) Carl )

Vatican Criticized for “Cowardly” Statement After Court Says Hospital Can Kill Charlie Gard

 INTERNATIONAL   CHRISTINE ROUSSELLE   JUN 30, 2017   |   6:20PM    WASHINGTON, DC
On Friday, the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life issued a rather curious statement onthe sad case of British baby Charlie Gard. Gard has effectively been sentenced to die by a European “human rights” court, who decided that moving him to the United States for treatment (on his parents’ dime) would be inhumane and only further increase his suffering.
The Pontifical Academy for Life’s statement was, in a word, “cowardly.” The Academy inexplicably seemed to side with the court ordering Gard’s life support to be withdrawn, stating that while this was a very “complex” situation, “[…] we must also accept the limits of medicine and, as stated in paragraph 65 of the Encyclical Evangelium Vitae, avoid aggressive medical procedures that are disproportionate to any expected results or excessively burdensome to the patient or the family.”
Many people were justifiably disturbed by the Academy’s statement, including, apparently, Pope Francis himself. Several hours after the statement was issued, Pope Francis tweeted from his official account that it is a “duty of love that God entrusts to all” to defend human life. This would appear to be a “subtweet” at the Academy’s statement.
Also of note–Pope Francis only tweeted this from his English  and Italian language @Pontifex accounts, and not on the German, Spanish, French, or Italian accounts. [Editors’ note: Pope Francis did in fact tweet this from his Italian account, but not French, Spanish, or German.]
While it’s good to see the Vatican dial back that horrendous rhetoric (especially from, quite literally, the top), why was that statement even released in the first place?
LifeNews Note: Christine Rousselle is a web editor with Townhall.com.


Pro-Life Democrats Meet With Party Chair Tom Perez. He Tells Them, “Sorry, We’re Pro-Abortion ( Pro-Infant Dissection & Murder) He Means, Carl

Pro-Life Democrats Meet With Party Chair Tom Perez. He Tells Them, “Sorry, We’re Pro-Abortion

 NATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   JUN 30, 2017   |   12:15PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Democratic Party leaders met with pro-life Democrats this week to discuss how the party’s radical and out-of-touch stance on abortion is alienating voters.
Democrats for Life Executive Director Kristen Day said she and several other pro-life Democrats met with party chairman Tom Perez on Tuesday to urge the party to welcome pro-life candidates again. She said they also asked the party to back down on one of its most unpopular new platforms: support of taxpayer-funded abortions.
The Democratic Party has aligned itself closely with the abortion industry in the past few years. It once welcomed and supported pro-life candidates for office, but recently party leaders have made it clear that pro-life candidates are not welcome.
Earlier this year, amid pressure from abortion activists, Perez declared that abortion is a “fundamental value” in the Democratic Party and every Democrat should support it.
“Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health. That is not negotiable,” Perez said in a statement this spring.
Some described Perez’s statement as a “litmus test” for future Democratic candidates.
On Tuesday, Day and other pro-life Democrats urged the party to rethink its radical pro-abortion stance, the Catholic News Service reports. Day said she thought the meeting was a step in the right direction, but they have a lot of work to do.
The Democratic Party leaders issued a statement after the meeting, saying they remain committed to abortion but they do want to listen to different people’s opinions.
“Our party has always welcomed different opinions on several issues and Tom (Perez) is committed to listening to all Democrats as we work to rebuild our party,” said Xochitl Hinojosa, DNC communications director, in a statement. “Our party platform makes clear that Democrats trust women to make their own choices about their body and their health, and Tom [Perez] stands by this.”
Day told the Atlantic that they gave the DNC leaders a list of requests, including a public statement “explaining that the party does not support an abortion litmus test and pressuring people to change their position on life.” They also asked the party to reverse its new platform opposing the Hyde Amendment, which prevents taxpayer funding of abortion.
Struggling after heavy election losses in November, many in the party are debating whether to support pro-life Democratic candidates, especially in rural areas where voters tend to be more pro-life.
The debate erupted in the spring after abortion activists with NARAL criticized DNC Chair Perez, Sen. Bernie Sanders and others for supporting Heath Mello, a Nebraska Democratic mayoral candidate who has a pro-life voting record.
Here’s more from CNS:
“When a pro-life Democrat decides to run, the Democratic consultants come in and they tell you, ‘Well, you can’t run as a pro-life Democrat,’ and they urge you to change your position on life, like they did with Heath Mello,” Day said.
In early May, Mello lost the Omaha mayoral election when the DNC received criticism from NARAL Pro-Choice America for the DNC chairman’s support of pro-life Democrat Mello. This led to Mello making a statement that while he was pro-life, he would not vote as such, according to Day.
“That was such a mistake at the end of the campaign,” Day said. “To have a pro-life Democrat, and for him to go in right at the end of the campaign and say, ‘I’m pro-life, but I’m not going to vote that way. That was a huge tactical error.”
Day said Democrats for Life will continue to pursue discussions with party leaders about including pro-lifers in the party.
On Wednesday, Democrats for Life board member Charles Camosy wrote at Crux that the Democratic Party needs to stop aligning itself with radical pro-abortion ideologies if it wants to win elections again.
“[T]he Democratic Party needs to fundamentally rethink its relationship with NARAL-style abortion orthodoxy,” Camosy wrote. “It has killed the party in the past, it is killing the party today, and spells doom for the party’s future with young people as well.”
Democrats for Life estimates more than 23 million Democrats in the U.S. are pro-life.
Last year, Pew Research found that 28 percent of Democrats say abortion should be illegal in most or all cases. Marist/KofC polling also found that 23 percent of Democrats consider themselves pro-life. In opposition to most Americans’ beliefs about abortion, the Democratic Party platform supports abortion for any reason up to birth and taxpayer funding for all abortions.


Terri Schiavo’s Brother: “What Happened to My Sister Continues to Happen, and It’s Getting Worse”

Terri Schiavo’s Brother: “What Happened to My Sister Continues to Happen, and It’s Getting Worse”

 NATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   JUN 30, 2017   |   6:47PM    WASHINGTON, DC
More than 10 years after Terri Schiavo’s death, her family continues to fight for the rights of the medically vulnerable.
Schiavo’s brother, Bobby Schindler, spoke Friday at the National Right to Life Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin about Terri’s life and starvation death, and the work his family is doing to help other people like her.
“We are here today because this continues to happen to this day and it’s only getting worse,” Schindler said. There are times when it is “appropriate to stop treatment, but in cases like Terri’s, those that are not dying and can function on a feeding tube without rejecting it, those are the people we’re talking about.”
Today, he runs the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network, which has helped more than 2,000 families advocate for loved ones’ medical treatment when hospitals or other individuals try to deny them care.
“Our medical rights are eroding,” he continued. “We’re having strangers make medical decisions for us rather than our families.”
Schindler said there still is a lot of misinformation about his sister’s highly publicized death, perpetuated by the mainstream and entertainment media.
He said they still do not know the reason why Terri collapsed on Feb. 25, 1990, but she had a cardiac episode that blocked oxygen to her brain and caused brain damage.
He said Terri had serious brain injuries, but she was not dying or brain dead. He said she was not hooked up to machines on life support; the only thing she needed was a feeding tube. Schindler said Terri showed signs of improvement when she was undergoing therapy and, at one point, even began forming words; but her husband, Michael Schiavo, discontinued rehabilitation and therapy after two years.
Schindler said his sister was not bedridden, and they sometimes took her in a wheelchair to the movies and other places. The family even took a video of Terri responding to a neurologist’s voice. He said people can find it on YouTube by looking up “Terri Schiavo opens her eyes.”
Schindler and his parents went through a long court battle to keep Terri’s care in place, and even the governor, president and pope became involved. But a judge allowed her husband, Michael Schiavo, to have her feeding tube removed. In 2005, she slowly and torturously starved to death, and her parents and siblings were unable to protect her, Schindler said.
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter. 
Cases like Terri’s continue to happen today.
“It’s worse. Terri’s case … is a progression of what’s happening in our health care system today,” Schindler said, citing money as a key factor.
He said all 50 states allow people to be denied food and hydration through a feeding tube. He brought up a recent Oregon bill that would allow hospitals to deny even spoon feeding to a patient.
The classification persistent vegetative state, or PVS, a label that Terri Schiavo was given, is hugely problematic, he said. Schindler said the PVS classification is subjective, and a number of studies have found that it is misdiagnosed 40 percent of the time or even more often.
If a patient is labeled or mislabeled PVS, he said many insurance companies will stop paying for their rehabilitation. This puts many low- and moderate-income families in extremely difficult positions because they cannot afford to pay for their loved one’s rehabilitation and therapy out of pocket, Schindler said.
Overall, Schindler said many doctors and bioethicists have adopted policies that devalue human lives, especially unborn babies, the elderly and people with disabilities. He emphasized that there still are many good doctors and medical facilities, but there is a growing trend of putting costs above vulnerable patients’ lives.
“There certainly is a shift that’s occurring, and their best interest is their bottom line rather than their patients … and that’s what is governing a lot of their decisions today,” Schindler said.
He said starving is not a peaceful way to die, and it is a felony to dehydrate or starve an animal to death. Yet, society allowed his sister to die that way.
Schindler related how heart-wrenching it was to watch Terri slowly dehydrate and die over the course of two weeks. He said her lips cracked and skin became jaundiced, her breathing was rapid and uncontrollable and her face became skeletal.
“It was a nightmare,” he said.
Since then, he has heard of thousand of other cases like his sister’s. Schindler said a young man named Brenden Flynn was seriously injured in a vehicle accident several years ago, and medical professionals told his mother to just “let him die.”
Schindler said Flynn’s mother fought for her son, and, as a result, today Flynn is living a normal life. He has a wife and three children, and he now shares his inspirational story at high schools, he said.
In other cases, Schindler said his organization has been involved in cases where the hospital put a “do not resuscitate” order in a loved one’s file without the family’s knowledge or consent.
Schindler urged individuals to research and understand their rights involving medical care. He urged families to be persistent in fighting for their loved ones’ care, because many may have to in the future.
“The best way to protect ourselves is to understand our rights and be advocates for patients,” Schindler said.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *