Wednesday, August 2, 2017

NOW WESTERN MEDIA FACE WRATH OF ISLAMIC BLASPHEMY LAWS

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/04/Media.png
Media
A group of international Islamist organizations led by the Saudi-based Organization of Islamic Cooperation, or OIC, recently held a two-day conference on countering “Islamophobia” in which it recommends imposing Islamic blasphemy laws on the media worldwide.
Under Islamic law, it is considered a serious offense to criticize Allah, Muhammad or Islam. In countries like Pakistan, a Muslim can take a non-Muslim to court and claim he was “offended” by something that was said, resulting in a trial and jail time, even death, for the non-Muslim.
Christians in Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt, Sudan and other Muslim-dominated countries with significant Christian minorities have been the targets of brutal persecution, with the blasphemy laws often serving as the catalyst for their incarceration. Christians have been jailed, stoned, beheaded, and even had acid thrown in their faces for violating the blasphemy laws.
But the OIC, which consists of 57 Muslim-majority countries and boasts the largest voting bloc at the United Nations, is not satisfied with its own people living under threat of arrest for offending Islam by something that is said, written or posted on the Internet.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2017/08/20131215_oic_logo_large-e1501629710483.jpg
20131215_oic_logo_large
The July 15-16 symposium, held at London’s Central Mosque Trust and Islamic Cultural Center, was attended by lawyers, media leaders, politicians, academics from European universities and diplomats from various embassies. It was titled: “Mechanisms to challenge Islamophobia legally and through the media.”
Organizers spoke of the need for a new media strategy, citing there is usually a surge in “hate crimes” against Muslims following terrorist acts perpetrated by Muslims, such as the London Bridge attack and Manchester concert attack earlier this year.
But, as noted by the Barnabas Aid Fund, a group that advocates for persecuted Christians, the conference organizers’ reference to “Islamophobia” should not be confused with actual crimes of violence against Muslim people.
One of the three central themes of the conference was the legal status of “defamation of religion.” This is a term the OIC has previously used as part of its decade-long campaign to make criticism of Islam a criminal offense – even in Western democracies where free speech is a staunch tradition.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2017/08/20161012105449862.jpg
The OIC's headquarters in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, represents 57 Muslim-majority countries worldwide and boasts the largest voting bloc at the United Nations.
The OIC’s headquarters in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, represents 57 Muslim-majority countries worldwide and boasts the largest voting bloc at the United Nations.
In fact, the section on “Islamophobia” in the OIC’s “10-year strategic action plan” published in 2005 only uses the word in this sense and makes no reference to countering hatred of Muslims as people.
So, when the London conference organizers spoke of looking at  countering Islamophobia from a “legal perspective,” this should be taken as a serious threat. In fact, only last December the OIC met in Saudi Arabia and launched a new media strategy, part of which aimed “to tackle Islamophobic discourse in the U.S., U.K., and European media.”
“Barnabas Aid strongly condemns all forms of anti-Muslim hatred,” the Christian-aid agency said in a statement Monday. “However, we also condemn the attempt to use the suffering that has resulted from recent terrorist attacks to advocate the introduction of what is, in effect, a backdoor Islamic blasphemy law.”
Related stories:
As Barnabas Aid has previously reported, there are attempts being made by Pakistan, and 27 other governments who are OIC members, to introduce global Islamic blasphemy laws. In fact, as Barnabas Aid points out, the Palestinian Authority recently enacted just such a law.
“These actions represent a serious threat not only to Christians in the world’s 57 Muslim-majority countries, but also to Christians in the West, particularly those who have fled persecution in Islamic countries and found sanctuary in Western countries,” Barnabas Aid stated.
It is particularly disturbing that the proposals from the Pakistan government seek to criminalize social media posts critical of Islam that are uploaded in Western countries.
So, although Dr. Mahjoub Bensaid of the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization spoke at the conference of “the real and true image of Islam as a religion of peace which advocates tolerance,” what he appears to have meant is that non-Muslims should “tolerate” the introduction of an Islamic blasphemy law that prohibit any criticism of Islam by the media, and anyone who does not tolerate the blasphemy laws is labeled “Islamophobic.”
Philip Haney, co-author of the whistleblower book “See Something Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government’s Submission to Jihad,” says the OIC’s recent “recommendation” should not be viewed in a vacuum but as the latest in a series of moves by the international community aimed at criminalizing all criticism of Islam, which is being positioned as the global elites’ most favored religion. The end result will be the implementation of Islamic blasphemy laws worldwide.
Here is the timeline for the international effort to criminalize anti-Islam speech in accordance with Shariah law:
  • First came the OIC 10-year strategic plan (2005)
  • The United Nations Human Rights Council passed Resolution 16/18 (March 2011), with the help of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The resolution’s stated goal is “Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief.” It calls on all member states to consider adopting laws to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief. Other recommendations include creating government programs to promote inter-religious tolerance and dialogue, training government employees to be sensitive toward people’s religious sensitivities, which sounds reasonable were it not for the fact that Islam is by far the most sensitive of all the world’s faiths to criticism in the public square.
  • In July 2011, the OIC launched the Istanbul Process in cooperation with the U.S., led by Secretary of State Clinton to come up with a plan to help nations implement U.N. Res. 16/18 into law.
  • November 2011, under the leadership of President Obama’s chief counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan, the U.S. caves to pressure from Muslim organizations and begins to scrub all references deemed offensive to Islam from its FBI and DHS training manuals. Counter-terrorism operations would never be the same, focusing on “violent extremism” rather than Islamic-inspired terrorism as the U.S. bought the argument that, as Hillary Clinton stated, “Islam has nothing to do with terrorism.”
  • In December 2015, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, in the wake of a terrorist attack in San Bernardino in which two Muslims killed 14 Americans, threatened to arrest and prosecute any American who posted comments that “edged toward violence” against the Muslim community.
  • Governments of Germany, U.K. and Canada have all passed or tried to pass laws over the last two years criminalizing speech deemed offensive to Islam.
  • In September 2015, then Attorney General Loretta Lynch goes to the United Nations to announce the launch of the Strong Cities Network, an effort to globalize Obama’s policy of “countering violent extremism,” which detaches Islam from police counter-terrorism efforts.
  • In December 2016 the OIC issues its “Media strategy in countering Islamophobia and its implementation mechanisms” with special focus on media in the U.S., U.K. and Europe.
  • In January 2017, U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres stated at a joint news conference with the Saudi foreign minister that “Islamophobia and Islamophobic comments…in some parts of the world” are the “fuel” that ignites global Islamic terrorism.
  • In April 2017, the U.S. Senate passed Resolution 118, co-sponsored by Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., and Susan Collin, R-Maine, which critics say lays the foundation for future banning of anti- Islam commentary as “hate speech.”
  • June 2017, city of Minneapolis launches hate crimes hotline focusing on “anti-Muslim” or “Islamophobic” decisions and behaviors, joining San Fransisco, Nashville and the state of New York that have similar hotlines.
  • In July 2017 the Palestinian Authority adopts so-called Abbas Blasphemy Law. This law applies to all social media postings. Anyone “sharing” or even “liking” a Facebook post that the PA disapproves of will be arrested and jailed.
  • In July 2017 a court in New Jersey bars anyone speaking at a public hearing regarding a mosque project from mentioning “Islam” or “Muslims.”
  • July 18, 2017, the city of Boston launches anti-Islamophobia campaign.
“The OIC has put a lot of effort into criminalizing speech critical of Islam, along with solving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict,” Haney said. “Those two issues have been at the top of their agenda for the last 10 years, and I’d say they’ve made plenty of progress.”
Pamela Geller, a free-speech advocate and activist against global Shariah, said the OIC has been extremely successful in cowing Western governments to voluntarily submit to Islamic blasphemy laws, proving Islam does not need to conquer a country militarily, all it needs to do is envelop its leaders into the culture of extreme political correctness with regard to Islam.
“The West is already adopting Islamic blasphemy laws, willingly and voluntarily,” Geller said. “The stigma that is attached immediately to any critic of jihad terror, the unwillingness to stand for free speech and print the Muhammad cartoons, and the criticism I received after jihadists attacked my free speech event in Garland, Texas, in 2015, as if I was the villain for offending Islam, all testify to how much the Western elites have already internalized the Shariah prohibition on criticism of Islam.”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2017/02/m-nahrenanweya-341x515.jpg
Nahren Anweya's family fled Iraq in 1989 after being decimated by Muslim community there.
Nahren Anweya’s family fled Iraq in 1989 after being decimated by Muslim community there.
Nahren Anweya, a native of Dohuk, Iraq, who now lives in the Detroit area and works as an activist on behalf of persecuted Assyrian and Chaldean Christians, said it’s ironic that in an age of unspeakable Christian persecution around the world, much of it at the hands of Muslims, the United Nations and other international bodies are concerned about “Islamophobia.”
It’s an effort to turn the tables on Christians, she said, and make their persecutors out to be the victims.
“This type of strategy is another form of jihad by infiltrating and influencing our government,” Anweya told WND. “Christians are being persecuted and slaughtered in almost every Islamic dominated country. We don’t even have equal rights in my birth country of Iraq but yet they want to create laws to increase terrorism by removing sources which are spreading awareness? Christianity is attacked through schools, the government and even on the streets of numerous countries in the world but yet where are the laws to protect Christians from being slaughtered like cattle?”
Christianity is not welcome in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Kuwait, Abu Dhabi, Yemen, Iran, Pakistan, India and many other countries, she said.
And unlike most cases of “Islamophobia,” the Christians in these countries face actual physical violence, not merely “mean words” posted on a Facebook site.
“In many countries in the Middle East, Christians are being crucified, beheaded, raped, sold into sex slavery markets, drowned and tortured in so many other strategies,” she said. “We are decreasing by the day, we are the indigenous people in many of these countries tracing back to the cradle of civilization. In my home country of Iraq, the native Assyrians trace back almost 7,000 years but we have been drastically decrease since the rise of Islam.”
That, she said, goes beyond any “phobia.” It is genocide.
Copyright 2017 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/now-western-media-face-wrath-of-islamic-blasphemy-laws/#IDioweeRtORBCRD7.99

Sunspots Stifled, Electroquakes | S0 News Aug.2.2017

Published on Aug 2, 2017

Observing the Frontier 2018: http://www.observatoryproject.com/otf...

Wanted- Earthquake Forecasters: https://youtu.be/l1iGTd84oys
Earthquake Forecasting Contest: https://youtu.be/Fsa_4jAyQsI

They have invented laws that condemned to painful deaths without trial more than 61 million babies for the crime of being "inconvenient."



 
Patriots and Politics |  


  Dear Reader,

For 44 years, a few unelected men and women on the Supreme Court have played God with innocent human life.

They have invented laws that condemned to painful deaths without trial more than 61 million babies for the crime of being "inconvenient."

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling forced abortion-on-demand down our nation's throat.

In the past, many in the pro-life movement have felt limited to protecting a life here and there -- passing some limited law to slightly control abortion in the more outrageous cases.

But some pro-lifers always seem to tiptoe around the Supreme Court, hoping they won't be offended.

Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is over.

Working from what the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade, pro-life lawmakers can pass a Life at Conception Act and end abortion using the Constitution instead of amending it.

That is why it's so urgent you sign the petition to your Senators and Congressman that I will link to in a moment.

Thanks to the results of the last election, you and I are in a better than ever position to force an up-or-down roll call vote on the Life at Conception Act.

And your petition will help do just that.

Signing the Life at Conception Act petition will help break through the opposition clinging to abortion-on-demand and ultimately win a vote on this life-saving bill to overturn Roe v. Wade.

A Life at Conception Act declares unborn children "persons" as defined by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, entitled to legal protection.

This is the one thing the Supreme Court admitted in Roe v. Wade that would cause the case for legal abortion to "collapse."

When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined "right of privacy" which it "discovered" in so-called "emanations" of "penumbrae" of the Constitution.

Of course, as constitutional law, it was a disaster.

But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a constitutional right.

Instead, the Supreme Court said:

"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins... the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

Then the High Court made a key admission:

"If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e., "Roe" who sought an abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."

The fact is, the 14th Amendment couldn't be clearer:

"... nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law."

Furthermore, the 14th Amendment says:

"Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

That's exactly what a Life at Conception Act would do.

But this simple, logical and obviously right legislation will not become law without a fight.

And that's where your help is critical.

You see, it will be a tough fight, but I believe with your signed petition it is one we can win.

Please click here to sign your petition right away.

http://smtpl9.dmsgs.com/t/992653/46137077/12497522/1006/

By turning up the heat through a massive, national, grassroots campaign in this session of Congress, one of two things will happen.

If you and other pro-life activists pour on enough pressure, pro-lifers can force politicians from both parties who were elected on pro-life platforms to make good on their promises and ultimately win passage of this bill.

But even if a Life at Conception Act doesn't pass immediately, the public attention will send another crew of radical abortionists down to defeat in the next elections.

Either way, the unborn win... unless you do nothing.

That's why the National Pro-Life Alliance is contacting hundreds of thousands of Americans just like you to mobilize a grassroots army to pass a Life at Conception Act.

The first thing you must do is sign your petition by clicking here.

They are the key ingredient in the National Pro-Life Alliance's plan to pass a Life at Conception Act. They'll also organize:
 
... Hard-hitting TV, radio and newspaper ads to be run just before each vote, detailing the horrors of abortion and mobilizing the American people.
... Extensive personal lobbying of key members of Congress by rank-and-file National Pro-Life Alliance members and staff.
... A series of newspaper columns to be distributed free to all 1,387 daily newspapers now published in the United States.
... An extensive email, direct mail and telephone campaign to generate at least one million petitions to Congress like the one linked to in this letter.
Of course, to do all this will take a lot of money.

Just to email and mail the letters necessary to produce one million petitions will cost at least $460,000.

Newspaper, TV and radio are even more expensive.

But I'm sure you'll agree pro-lifers cannot just sit by watching the slaughter continue.

The National Pro-Life Alliance's goal is to deliver one million petitions to the House and Senate in support of a Life at Conception Act.

When the bill comes up for a vote in Congress, it is crucial to have the full weight of an informed public backing the pro-life position.

I feel confident that the folks at the National Pro-Life Alliance can gather those one million petitions.

But even though many Americans who receive this email will sign the petition, many won't be able to contribute. That's why it's vital you agree to your donation of $10, or even more if you can.

Without your help, the National Pro-Life Alliance will be unable to gather the one million petitions and mount the full-scale national campaign necessary to pass a Life at Conception Act.

A sacrificial gift of $50 or even $25 now could spare literally millions of innocent babies in years to come.  But if that's too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10.

You should also know that a National Pro-Life Alliance supporter wants to make your decision to give easier by agreeing to match your donation, no matter the size, increasing its value by 100%!

So please respond right away with your signed petition.

http://smtpl9.dmsgs.com/t/992653/46137077/12497522/1009/

And please help by agreeing to your generous contribution of $10. Some people have already given as much as $500. Others have given $100.

But no matter how much you give, whether it's chipping in with $10 or a larger contribution of $25, I guarantee your contribution is urgently needed and will be deeply appreciated.

That's why I hope and pray that you will not delay a moment to make a contribution of $10, $25, or even $50 if you can.

Your contribution to the National Pro-Life Alliance and your signed petition will be the first steps toward reversing Roe v. Wade and waking up the politicians about where our barbarous pro-abortion policy is taking us.

Sincerely,

Rand Paul,
United States Senator (R-KY)
P.S.  The Supreme Court itself admitted -- if Congress declares unborn children "persons" under the law, the constitutional case for abortion-on-demand "collapses."
That's why it's so critical to work to get a vote on the Life at Conception Act, legislation that would reverse Roe v. Wade.

Please help make that happen. Sign your petition today to the National Pro-Life Alliance to reverse Roe v. Wade.

Your petition is the critical first step in fighting to end abortion.

Along with your signed petition, please consider making a sacrificial contribution of $25 or $50.  If that's too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10.

You should also know a generous donor has agreed to match all contributions, no matter the size, increasing your gift to the National Pro-Life Alliance by 100%!
http://smtpl9.dmsgs.com/t/992653/46137077/12497522/2002/




To help NPLA grow, please consider forwarding this message to a friend.


  The National Pro-Life Alliance's address is 5211 Port Royal Road Suite 500 Springfield, VA 22151.

Not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense.

Because of NPLA's tax-exempt status under IRC Sec. 501(c)(4) and its state and federal legislative activities, contributions are not tax-deductible as charitable contributions (IRC § 170) or as business deductions (IRC § 162(e)(1)). Privacy Policy.

Revelation in the News: 'Slow Indoctrination' of the Mark of the Beast Happening Right Now


With technology as commonplace as a cellphone or a vacuum, many in cyberspace can already track users' every move. Add these technological advancements to personal implanted RFID chips, and you have what Revelation in the News calls the "slow indoctrination" of the mark of the beast.
A Wisconsin-based company is the first in the United States to offer employees the chance to implant a microchip between their thumb and forefinger to pay for snacks out of the vending machine, among other uses.
"It seems so casual," Ricky Bakker, son of famed evangelist Jim Bakker, says. "It's convenient, you know. I don't want to have to carry my wallet around or I don't want to have cash in my pocket, so I'll just take a little microchip inside my hand. I'll scan it, I'll have my lunch for the day. I'll be able to get into the building, I'll be able to clock in, clock out. But what happens when we get to the point where our credit cards, Social security numbers, every little detail about our lives is on this thing?"
Want to know more? Just watch the video.
Jessilyn Justice is the director of online news for Charisma. Born and raised in a pastor's family in Alabama, she attended Lee University and the Washington Journalism Center. She's passionate about sharing God's goodness through storytelling. Tell her what you think of this story on Twitter @jessilynjustice.
Readers are Leaders! Subscribe now and get 3 magazines for the price of 1. Get Charisma, Ministry Today and SpiritLed Woman all for $24. YES - Sign me up!
3 Reasons Why you should read Life in the Spirit. 1) Get to know the Holy Spirit. 2) Learn to enter God's presence 3) Hear God's voice clearly! Click here to draw closer to God!

U.S. TOWN BANS RESIDENTS FROM CRITICIZING MOSQUE

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/06/islam-dominate.jpg
islam-dominate
A New Jersey township that was sued by Muslims for refusing to approve a massive mosque project is returning to court because of a settlement agreement that restricts speech regarding Islam.
The settlement required the township to hold a public meeting about the mosque project, but it forbade anyone from commenting on “Islam” or “Muslims.”
A key tenet of Shariah, the Muslim law that governs both personal and political life, bans any negative comments about Islam or Muslims.
According to the Thomas More Law Center, which sued the township on behalf of two residents whose home is within 200 feet of the proposed mega-mosque, the settlement with Bernards Township “reads more like an instrument of surrender.”
The Islamic Society of Basking Ridge sued and won a decision in federal court after its mosque proposal was rejected based on traffic and other concerns.
The Township agreed on a $3.5 million payment and a “public hearing to approve the settlement.”
Residents Christopher and Loretta Quick challenged the agreement in court, arguing it restricts speech and violates the Establishment Clause by preferring Islam over other religions.
“The Quicks reside within 200 feet of the proposed mosque construction in a zoned residential area,” Thomas More explained. “Yet, the settlement agreement prohibits them from describing the many unique features of Islamic worship which will impact design of the building, traffic density, water and sewage, traffic control problems, road construction, and parking arrangements. According to the settlement agreement, ISBR is permitted to make statements concerning Christians and Jews and their places of worship, but in contrast, the agreement prohibits commentary relating to Islam or Muslims. In fact, ISBR has previously discussed the Christian and Jewish religions and their places of worship.”
Richard Thompson, chief counsel for Thomas More, said the Islamic center “has taken the extraordinary step of concealing significant links on their website to a radical group named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in America history, the Islamic Society of North America (‘ISNA’).”
Related stories:
“ISNA is claimed by the Muslim Brotherhood as one of ‘our organizations.’ According to internal documents seized by the FBI, the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy is to engage in a ‘grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,'” said Thompson.
He said that while “claiming that the township had a religious animus against Muslims, ISBR hid from the public view its animus toward Christians and Jews, by not only hiding anti-Christian and anti-Semitic verses published on its website, but also hiding its significant ties to ISNA.”
“Instead of standing up to defend its citizens against ISBR’s hate-filled anti-Semitic and anti-Christian bias, the township colluded with ISBR’s ‘Civilization Jihad’ by capitulating to payment of millions of dollars to ISBR, allowing the construction of the new mosque and Islamic center in violation of zoning codes, and now even suppressing speech concerning Islam or Muslims at a public meeting,” Thompson said.
IslamThreat.com estimates there were nearly 3,200 mosques in the United States as of 2015, with a massive surge following the 9/11 terror attack by Muslims.
The website lists 525 mosques in California, 507 in New York, 302 in Texas, 200 in Illinois and 186 in Florida.
The Islamic center sued the township when officials refused to permit a huge project on a lot critics contend is far too small. Later, U.S. Department of Justice, then under Barack Obama, also sued the township.
The new complaint argues the First Amendment provides no open door for governments to issue blanket censorship orders on speech.
“Defendants … have put in place a prior restraint on speech that bans citizens from engaging in free speech at a public hearing on political matters because of the content,” the complaint asserts.
“The settlement agreement further allows defendants to forbid speech with which they or others disagree.”
Further, the fact that the agreement doesn’t provide the same protections to Christians, Jews and others means that “defendants have shown preference for Islam and Muslims over other religions.”
The complaint seeks a declaration that the residents’ constitutional rights are being violated, preliminary and permanent injunctions against the agreement, and damages.
WND reported earlier this year citizens fought back after the personal communications of critics of the Basking Ridge project were subpoenaed in the case.
Neighborhood residents, including Lori Caratzola, were named by ISBR in its lawsuit as a fervent opponent of the mosque. Caratzola faced demands for all of her personal communications that mention Muslims, Islam, mosques, the Quran, imams, burkas, hijabs, Shariah, jihad and other features of Islam.
“ISBR is setting a dangerous unconstitutional precedent by abusing a court process to chill and trample on the First Amendment rights of private citizens whose only involvement was to speak out against the mosque at public hearings,” Thompson said at the time.
He asked for the subpoenas to be thrown out “because the U.S. Supreme Court has held that speech at a public place on a matter of public concern is entitled to special protection.”
Caratzola charged the Muslims’ intent with her was “to embarrass, strike fear, silence and cause financial harm to any citizen who dared oppose his nonconforming project.”

Copyright 2017 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/u-s-town-bans-residents-from-criticizing-mosque/#CFErGIuMf26fq78u.99

Must Watch Chris Wallace Pounce On Aged Mentally Disabled Nancy Pelosi T...

Published on Jul 30, 2017

Must Watch Chris Wallace Pounce On Aged Mentally Disabled Nancy Pelosi The Queen Fool Of The DemoRat . 7 / 30 / 2017

HILARIOUS!...Tucker Takes On Mentally Challenged CalEXIT Leader 8 / 1 ...

Published on Aug 1, 2017

HILARIOUS!...Tucker Takes On Mentally Challenged CalEXIT Leader
8 / 1 / 2017

Joyless Reid Just Told The Dems To Forget About White People... Cue Tuck...

Published on Aug 1, 2017

Joyless Reid Just Told The Dems To Forget About White People... Cue Tucker Destruction! 8 / 1 / 2017

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *