Friday, November 3, 2017

It’s a Fact! . . . God Gave Israel to the Jews

Written by: J.R. Church

    First published in 2008 – President George W. Bush made his first “official state visit” to Israel on January 9-11, 2008, during his last year in office. For the last seven years, he stayed away, while travelling to several Arab countries. However, he finally decided to go – for the purpose of forcing Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to actively seek an agreement that will lead to a Palestinian state. His plan is to carve the borders of “Palestine” out of the heartland of Israel, with Jerusalem as its capital.
    bush-israel-poster
    On the eve of his arrival, at least six Israelis were arrested for hangingposters around the Old City. Also, Orthodox Jews prayed at the Western Wall wearing “sackcloth” in an effort to register their public protest to his visit. The Sanhedrin Court drafted a “Bush Scroll” calling him the “Chief Prince of Meshech and Tubal” and begging him not to betray Israel.
    It was on November 2, 1917, that the British government issued the Balfour Declaration promising a homeland for the Jews. Thirty years later, on November 29, 1947, the British government placed the matter of Israel’s future before the United Nations, resulting in another historic declaration – the establishment of the state of Israel.
    state-of-israel
    A few months later, on May 14, 1948, the nation was born.
    The restoration of Israel is one of the most controversial political issues of the century. Palestinians have claimed that the land is theirs, that the Jews have no right to even one square foot of it, though the area had been under the control of the Turkish government for some 400 years – not Palestinian control. Just who deserves the land? Do the Jews?  Do the Palestinians?  Do Jews have a right to control the land in the so-called “occupied West Bank” areas?
    Though the United Nations established Israel in 1948, most of the world no longer supports the concept of Jewish sovereignty. They regret ever giving them any territory in the Middle East. The controversy rages today as much as it ever did. The children of Abraham are still fighting it out! If the fate of the Israeli government were placed in the hands of any human court, the verdict would probably be disastrous. Time and time again, the United Nations has taken the side of the Arabs against Israel. While dedicated Christians around the world are in favor of Israel’s existence, their governments are not. The only political ally on the side of Israel is the United States – and many in Washington are wavering. In light of these developments, let us appeal to the court of heaven for the final verdict in the case.

    God Owns the Land

    There is one verse of Scripture, which declares the absolute ownership of, not only the Middle East, but the entire world:
    “The earth is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein” (Psalm 24:1).
    Since God created the earth, the right to ownership is His. Whether man recognizes the existence of God or not is irrelevant, for in the final analysis God will lay claim to His earth. He not only owns the world, but also everybody in it. Among the continents, however, there is one special area to which God lays a unique claim. It is the land of Israel. There are several places in the Bible where God calls the land, “My land.” For instance, in Ezekiel 38:16 God condemns the mighty Gog and Magog for the invasion of His land:
    “And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land” (Ezekiel 38:16).
    Here, God emphatically calls the land of Israel His land. That claim is repeated in Joel 3:2:
    “I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land” (Joel 3:2).
    Both of these verses pronounce a judgment upon Gentile nations for their part in denying the Jews a right to live in God’s land. Notice that God calls Israel, “My People,” and He calls their land, “My land.” When Gentile nations challenge the integrity of the land and its people, God steps forward to proclaim His judgment upon them.

    A Covenant With Abraham

    God is the absolute Owner of the land, and as such, had every right to evict the Jewish people 20 centuries ago. But He also has the right to bring them back in this generation. God is Sovereign over the land. Let us review Genesis 17 – the days of Abraham – and determine God’s sovereign disposition over HIS land.
    “And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.”
    “And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God” (Genesis 17:7-8).
    There can be no doubt that such a covenant was declared and recorded 4,000 years ago. Ah, but the Arabs also claim to be descendants of Abraham. They are children of Ishmael.
    Does not the land then also belong to them? You may recall, the Arabs are descendants of Ishmael, while the Jews are descendants of Abraham’s other son, Isaac.

    Isaac’s Inheritance

    The controversy was settled in Genesis 26:3-4. It is there that God narrows down the covenant to exclude the children of Ishmael. It was to Isaac that God said:
    “Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for unto thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath which I sware unto Abraham thy father;
    “And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed” (Genesis 26:3-4).
    God not only promised the land to Isaac, but He gave what the Scripture declares to be “all these countries.” In fact, He used the term twice in His promise to Isaac.

    Jacob’s Inheritance

    However, Isaac had two sons – Jacob and Esau – and there is a good deal of evidence that the Palestinian people who live in the land today could be descendants of Esau. Do they not also have a claim to the land? God has decided that they do not have any claim on the Promised Land. He narrowed the inheritance of the land to Jacob and his descendants:
    promised-land
    “And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy lions;
    “And the land which I gave Abraham and Isaac, to thee I will give it, and to thy seed after thee will I give the land” (Genesis 35; 11,12).
    The proclamation is clear. God has promised the land to Jacob and his descendants – namely the 12 tribes of Israel. When we consider these three covenants together, the line of descents to which the land is promised is evident. In each case, God narrowed His promise of the land – from Abraham, to Isaac, to Jacob, and then to his descendants after him.

    The Verdict

    In view of God’s covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, we must declare a verdict in favor of Jacob’s descendants. We have no choice. We stand without reservation on the side of Israel. We must conclude that the land of Israel has been given to the people of Israel – to the descendants of Jacob. However, we know that the people were evicted from their land almost 2,000 years ago. It is the prophetic Scripture to which we must look for the final disposition of the land – and the prophecies do not differ from the original covenant.

    Had It Not Been For Israel

    Humanly speaking, we owe our eternal destiny to Jacob’s descendants. If there had been no Israel, there would have been no patriarchs, no prophets, no apostles, no Bible, and no Savior.
    In John 4:22 Jesus, Himself, summed up all of this in one simple statement. He said,  “…for salvation is of the Jews.” Regardless of our nationality or background, we owe a spiritual debt to the Jewish people that can never be calculated.
    The first 11 chapters of Genesis serve as an introduction to the main theme of the Bible. They fill in the background and set the stage for all that is to follow. From that point forward, the Bible is essentially the history of Abraham and the nation that descended from him through Isaac and Jacob. The Bible is basically the story of Israel embracing both the past and future. Geographically, the Bible is set in the land of Israel, and historically, its theme is the people of Israel. It is a Jewish Bible penned by Jewish men, giving both the history and the future of the children of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
    Even the New Testament is a Jewish book. The most important Person in the New Testament, Jesus Christ, was a Jew. Furthermore, He did not lose His Jewish identity after His death and resurrection. Sixty-three years after His crucifixion, Revelation 5:5 still referred to Jesus as the “Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David.” He is still identified with the family of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He is forever a Jew.
    Furthermore, Jews penned all of the New Testament books. Contrary to the opinions of some, I am convinced that Luke was a Jew. The twelve Apostles were Jews. Paul, who became the Apostle to the Gentiles, was a Jew. Most of the co-workers of these great men were also Jews.
    The writer of Hebrews tells us that the ultimate goal of all true believers is a “city which hath foundations whose Builder and Maker is God” (Heb. 11:10). In Revelation 21, the holy city New Jerusalem, is described as having gates and foundations. On its gates are inscribed the names of the twelve tribes of Israel. On its foundations are the names of the twelve apostles of Jesus. Every name inscribed in the New Jerusalem is a Jewish name. I must say that no one with an anti-Semitic prejudice could ever feel comfortable in the New Jerusalem.
    Written by:  J.R. church/Article originally published in the February 2008 PITN magazine.
    By | October 9th, 2017|Tags: 

    About the Author: 

    J.R. ChurchJ.R. CHURCH (1938-2011)- Founder of PITN Converted at age seven, J.R. Church set out with one main goal in life – to win others to Jesus Christ. He received a B.A. degree with a major in Bible and a minor in history at Tennessee Temple University in Chattanooga, TN. In 2001, he was given an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree from Immanuel Baptist Theological Seminary in Peachtree, Georgia.  His love for history gave him insight into God’s great “Plan of the Ages” and prompted him to pursue this field of prophetic research. J.R. and Linda were married for 52 years.  They have two children and five grandchildren. After pastoring a church in Lubbock Texas for 17 years, in 1979 he moved his family to Oklahoma City and developed the PROPHECY IN THE NEWS ministry. He has traveled across America many times lecturing on eschatology – the study of prophetic subjects.  He has hosted several tours to Israel and the Middle East. J.R. has authored eight books with chapters in several other books. Prophecy in the News publishes a monthly 48-page magazine as well as a weekly syndicated television broadcast which airs on stations across the country and via satellite network to most of the United States. Before he went to be with the Lord on March 22, 2011, after a three year battle with cancer, J.R. Church was convinced that Jesus Christ would return soon. He was famous for his saying, “KEEP LOOKING UP!”

    https://prophecyinthenews.com/product-category/authors/j-r-church/

    Early American School Curriculum Used the Bible as a Primary Text

    Written by: Prophecy in the News
      As we see God and prayer being removed from our schools every day, we should be reminded that in early American schools, the curriculum was greatly influenced by the Bible’s texts and teachings.
      Frederick A. Packard, an educator, wrote, “No child should leave a daily public school in our country ignorant of the generally received principles of the Christian faith.”
      Horace Mann said, “Our system earnestly inculcates all Christian morals and welcomes the religion of the Bible.” He went on to report that the Bible was used “in almost all the schools, either as a devotional or as a reading book.”
      Before the public schools were made commonplace, children would meet in churches to get an education.  The use of the Bible as a text in the classroom was a natural progression for many teachers.
      The great desire to read the Bible was the reason many parents wanted to learn to read and it was very important to them that they teach their children to read. It also shaped the way in which reading was taught in America.
      In the 1680’s, the earliest English settlers in America used schoolbooks that they had brought from England. An early example of this was the “New England Primer.” It was successfully used as an educational textbook and throughout this primer; it referred to God with reference to stories in the Bible.
      It was continued to be used through the 1700’s as it taught the basics of a classical education as well as Christian character and Bible reading. Scholars estimate that two to three million copies of the primer were sold over the course of 150 years. Various versions of this primer also included Bible passages from the King James Version of the “Lord’s Prayer” from Matthew 6: 9-13. This “New England Primer” gives us a glimpse inside early colonial schoolhouses and shows us how deeply the Bible was embedded in American education.
      It was continued to be used through the 1700’s as it taught the basics of a classical education as well as Christian character and Bible reading. Scholars estimate that two to three million copies of the primer were sold over the course of 150 years. This “New England Primer” gives us a glimpse inside early colonial schoolhouses and shows us how deeply the Bible was embedded in American education.
      Sadly, in two landmark decisions, Engel v. Vitale on June 25, 1962, and Abington School District v. Schempp on June 17, 1963, the Supreme Court declared school-sponsored prayer and Bible readings unconstitutional. They said it violated the First Amendment because it represented establishment of religion.
      We now see the results of this decision in our society today. As Christian parents, sometimes we look at the teenagers today and ask ourselves, “What happened?”
      Just remember what the Bible says in Proverbs 22:6 (KJV)“Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”
      PITN

      About the Author: 

      The Maccabean Revolt Is the First Religious War

      Written by: Prophecy in the News
        Antiochus IV Epiphanes, ( Greek: “God Manifest”) also called Antiochus Epimanes (the Mad) (born c. 215 BC—died 164, Tabae, Iran), Seleucid king of the Hellenistic Syrian kingdom who reigned from 175 to 164 BC. As a ruler, he was best known for his encouragement of Greek culture and institutions. His attempts to suppress Judaism brought on the Wars of the Maccabees.
        Antiochus forestalled an Egyptian expedition to Palestine by invading Egypt. He defeated the Egyptians between Pelusium and Mount Kasion, conquered Pelusium, and in 169 occupied Egypt with the exception of Alexandria, the capital.
        When he became the ruler of the Seleucid Empire in 175 BC, he issued a decree that made possessing the Hebrew Bible an offense punishable by death, and he burned all the copies of the Bible that he was able to find. He also banned many Jewish practices, including circumcising males, observing the Sabbath and the feasts, and offering sacrifices. He further demanded that Jews forsake their worship of the God of Israel and instead worship foreign gods – or be put to death.
        If Antiochus’s attempt to eradicate the Hebrew Bible and religious practices had succeeded; it is possible that Judaism would have ceased to exist. And without the Bible, Christianity and Islam would not exist in the forms we know them today either.
        However, Antiochus made a costly mistake. He underestimated the Jews’ devotion to their God and his laws. Instead of submitting to the emperor’s orders to worship false gods, the Jews held firmly to the Bible’s commands to worship God alone. They took seriously the commandment in Exodus 20: 3, 5 (KJV) “Thou shalt have no other gods before me…Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God.”
        Taking these words to heart, the Jews did not waver. When Antiochus’s troops demanded that the Jews sacrifice a pig to the Greek gods, a Jewish leader named Mattathias refused. Mattathias and his family fled to the hills and assembled an army of faithful Jews, led by his son Judah, who was nicknamed Maccabee (“The Hammer”). This guerilla army, known as the Maccabees, mounted a revolt against Antiochus. Their resistance to religious persecution led many Jews to death, as they preferred to die as martyrs rather than forsake their God and transgress his laws as expressed in the Bible.
        The Maccabean Revolt set a historical precedent as the first religious war. In the ancient world, people didn’t die for their gods, only the Jews considered their God worth dying for.
        After a hard-fought victory over the Seleucids, the Maccabees entered Jerusalem in triumph and rededicated the temple. The Jewish festival of Hanukkah (meaning, “to dedicate”) celebrates this significant event.
        Resources: Encyclopedia Britannica & Museum of the Bible




        About the Author: 

        Lights Out America!

        Written by: Prophecy in the News
          For three years, Russian cyber warriors have been terrorizing Ukraine. Their ultimate goal? Learning how to terrorize the United States.
          The Clocks Read Zero When The Lights Went Out…
          It was a Saturday night last December, and Oleksii Yasinsky was sitting on the couch with his wife and teenage son in the living room of their Kiev apartment. The 40-year-old Ukrainian cyber security researcher and his family were an hour into Oliver Stone’s film “Snowden” when their building abruptly lost power.
          “The hackers don’t want us to finish the movie,” Yasinsky’s wife joked. She was referring to an event that had occurred a year earlier, a cyber attack that had cut electricity to nearly a quarter-million Ukrainians two days before Christmas in 2015. Yasinsky, a chief forensic analyst at a Kiev digital security firm, didn’t laugh. He looked over at a portable clock on his desk: The time was 00:00. Precisely midnight.
          After lighting candles, Yasinsky went to the kitchen window and looked out on a view of the city, as he’d never seen it before: The entire skyline around his apartment building was dark. Only the gray glow of distant lights reflected off the clouded sky, outlining blackened hulks of modern condos and Soviet high-rises.
          Noting the precise time and the date, almost exactly a year since the December 2015 grid attack, Yasinsky felt sure that this was no normal blackout. He thought of the cold outside – close to zero degrees Fahrenheit – the slowly sinking temperatures in thousands of homes, and the countdown until dead water pumps led to frozen pipes.
          Yasinsky was an engineer and in the past 14 months, he found himself at the center of an enveloping crisis. A growing roster of Ukrainian companies and government agencies had come to him to analyze a plague of cyber attacks that were hitting them in rapid, remorseless succession. A single group of hackers seemed to be behind all of it.
          Upon further investigating, he discovered that a piece of malware that had served as the hackers’ initial foothold: an all-purpose Trojan known as BlackEnergy. After many attacks on companies such as Ukrzaliznytsia, Ukraine’s biggest railway company, it was discovered that the hackers used BlackEnergy for access and reconnaissance, then KillDisk for destruction. He has no idea that by December 2015, BlackEnergy and KillDisk were also lodged inside the computer systems of at least three major Ukrainian power companies, lying in wait.
          The Cyber-Cassandras said this would happen. For decades, they warned that hackers would soon make the leap beyond purely digital mayhem and start to cause real, physical damage to the world.
          In Ukraine, the cyber-war scenario has come to life. Twice. On separate occasions, invisible saboteurs have turned off the electricity to hundreds of thousands of people. Each blackout lasted a matter of hours, only as long as it took for scrambling engineers to manually switch the power on again. But as proofs of concept, the attacks set a new precedent: In Russia’s shadow, the decades-old nightmare of hackers stopping the gears of modern society has become a reality.
          The blackouts weren’t just isolated attacks. They were part of a digital blitzkrieg that has pummeled Ukraine for the past three years – a sustained cyber assault unlike any the world has ever seen. A hacker army has systematically undermined practically every sector of Ukraine: media, finance, transportation, military, politics, and energy. Wave after wave of intrusions have deleted data, destroyed computers, and in some cases paralyzed organizations’ most basic functions.
          Kenneth Geers, a NATO ambassador who focuses on cyber security said, “You can’t really find a space in Ukraine where there hasn’t been an attack.”
          In a public statement in December, Ukraine’s president, Petro Poroshenko, reported that there had been 6,500 cyber attacks on 36 Ukrainian targets in just the previous two months. Ukraine’s investigations point to the “direct or indirect involvement of secret services of Russia, which have unleashed a cyberwar against our country.”
          It helps to understand Russia’s uniquely abusive relationship with its largest neighbor to the west. Moscow has long regarded Ukraine as both a rightful part of Russia’s empire and an important territorial asset – a strategic buffer between Russia and the powers of NATO, a lucrative pipeline route to Europe, and home to one of Russia’s few accessible warm-water ports. For all those reasons, Moscow has worked for generations to keep Ukraine in the position of a submissive smaller sibling.
          Over the past decade and a half, Moscow’s leash on Ukraine has frayed, as popular support in the country has pulled toward NATO and the European Union. From the beginning, one of this war’s major fronts has been digital.
          Yushchenko, who ended up serving as Ukrain’s president from 2005-2010, believes that Russia’s tactics, online and off, have one single aim: “To destabilize the situation in Ukraine, to make its government look incompetent and vulnerable. Russia will never accept Ukraine being a sovereign and independent country.”
          Many global cyber security analysts have a much larger theory about the endgame of Ukraine’s hacking epidemic: They believe Russia is using the country as a cyber war testing ground – a laboratory for perfecting new forms of global online combat. And the digital explosives that Russia has repeatedly set off in Ukraine are ones it has planted at least once before in the civil infrastructure of the United States.
          Back in the United States, a man named Robert Lee was to be married in his hometown of Cullman, Alabama. Lee had recently left a high-level job at a three- letter US intelligence agency, where he’s focused on the cyber security of critical infrastructure. Now he was settling down to launch his own security startup and marry the Dutch girlfriend he’d met while stationed abroad.
          As Lee busied himself with wedding preparations, he saw news headlines claiming that hackers had just taken down a power grid in western Ukraine. A significant swath of the country had apparently gone dark for six hours. Lee blew off the story. He had heard spurious claims of hacked grids plenty of times, but they were usually caused by a rodent or a bird. The notion that squirrels represented a greater threat to the power grid than hackers had become a running joke in the industry.
          The next day, just before the wedding, Lee got a text about the purported cyber attack from Mike Assante, a security researcher at the SANS Institute, an elite cyber security-training center. That got Lee’s attention: When it comes to digital threats to power grids, Assante is one of the most respected experts in the world. He was telling Lee that the Ukraine blackout hack looked like the real thing.
          Just after Lee had said his vows and kissed his bride, a contact in Ukraine messaged him as well: The blackout hack was real, the man said, and he needed Lee’s help. Lee immediately retreated to his mother’s desktop computer in his parents’ house nearby. He pulled up maps of Ukraine and a chart of its power grid. The three power companies’ substations that had been hit were in different regions of the country, hundreds of miles from one another and unconnected. “This was not a squirrel,” Lee concluded with a dark thrill.
          It appeared the hackers had spread through the power companies’ networks and eventually compromised a VPN the companies had used for remote access to their network – including a software that gives operators remote command over equipment like circuit breakers.
          Looking at the attackers’ methods, Lee began to form a notion of whom he was up against. He was alerted to a group known in the cyber security world known as Sandworm. In 2014, the security firm FireEye had issued warnings about a team of hackers that was planting BlackEnergy malware on targets that included Polish energy firms and Ukrainian government agencies. All signs indicated that the hackers were Russian: FireEye had traced one of Sandworm’s distinctive intrusion techniques to a presentation at a Russian hacker conference.
          Most disturbing of all for American analysts, Sandworm’s targets extended across the Atlantic. Earlier in 2014, the US government reported that hackers had planted BlackEnergy on the networks of American power and water utilities. Working from the government’s findings, FireEye had been able to pin those intrusions, too, on Sandworm.
          For Lee, the pieces came together. It looked like the same group that had just snuffed out the lights for nearly a quarter-million Ukrainians had not long ago infected the computers of American electric utilities with the very same malware.
          The Ukraine attack represented something more than a faraway foreign case study. “An adversary that had already targeted American energy utilities had crossed the line and taken down a power grid,” Lee says. “It was an imminent threat to the United States.”
          Soon after, as meeting took place at a Hyatt hotel, a block from the golden-domed Saint Sophia Cathedral. Among those in attendance was the staff from the FBI, the Department of Energy, the Department of Homeland Security, and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, the body responsible for the stability of the US grid, all part of a delegation that had been assigned to get to the bottom of the Ukrainian blackout. They met with the staff of Kyivoblenergo, the city’s regional power distribution company and one of the three victims of the power grid attacks.
          With utmost precision, the hackers had engineered a blackout within a blackout. “The message was, ‘I’m going to make you feel this everywhere.’ Boom boom boom boom boom boom boom,”Assante says, imagining the attack from the perspective of a bewildered grid operator. “These attackers must have seemed like they were gods.”
          In 2016, there was another attack to Ukraine’s grid, taking down the distribution stations that branched off into capillaries of power lines. A single Kiev transmission station carried 200 megawatts, more total electric load than all the 50-plus distribution stations knocked out in the 2015 attack combined. Luckily, the system was down for just an hour. The Ukrenergo engineers were able to manually close circuits and bring everything back online before pipes started freezing and the locals started panicking. Ukrainian security officials say they’ve linked the 2016 attack to the same hackers who hit regional power utilities in 2015. The attackers this time came a step closer to building a fully automated grid-killing weapon, capable of breaking circuits on cue.
          For the first time in history, Robert Lee pointed out that a group of hackers had shown that it was willing and able to attack critical infrastructure. They have already planted BlackEnergy malware on the US grid once before. “The people who understand the US power grid know that it can happen here,” Lee says.
          A future breach might target not a distribution or transmission station, but an actual power plant. An attack could be designed not simply to turn off equipment, but to destroy it. It is possible that someone could permanently disable power-generation equipment or the massive, difficult-to-replace transformers that serve as the backbone of our transmission system, “Washington, DC? A nation-state could take it out for two months without much issue,” Lee says.
          The American cyber security community often talks about “advanced persistent threats” – sophisticated hackers who don’t simply infiltrate a system for the sake of one attack, but stay there, silently keeping their hold on a target. In his nightmares, Lee says, American infrastructure is hacked with this kind of persistence: transportation networks, pipelines, or power grids taken down again and again by deep-rooted adversaries. “If they did that in multiple places, you could have up to a month of outages across an entire region. Tell me what doesn’t change dramatically when key cities across half of the US don’t have power for a month,”
          It is one thing to contemplate what an actor like Russia could do to the American grid; it’s another to contemplate why. A grid attack on American utilities would almost certainly result in immediate, serious retaliation by the US.
          Some cyber security analysts argue that Russia’s goal is simply to hem in America’s own cyberwar strategy: By turning the lights out in Kiev – and showing that it’s capable of penetrating the American grid – Moscow sends a message warning the US not to try a Stuxnet-style attack on Russia or its allies, like Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad. In that view, it’s all a game of deterrence.
          Lee, who was involved in war-game scenarios during his time in intelligence, believes Russia might actually strike American utilities as a retaliatory measure if it ever saw itself as backed into a corner – say, if the US threatened to interfere with Moscow’s military interest in Ukraine or Syria.
          American power companies have already learned from Ukraine’s victimization, says Marcus Sachs, chief security officer of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation. Sachs said, “It would be hard to say we’re not vulnerable. Anything connected to something else is vulnerable. To make the leap and suggest that the grid is milliseconds away from collapse is irresponsible.”
          For those who have been paying attention to Sandworm for almost three years, raising an alarm about the potential for an attack on the US grid is no longer crying wolf.
          For John Hultquist, head of the team of researchers at FireEye that first spotted and named the Sandworm group, the wolves have arrived. “We’ve seen this actor show a capability to turn out the lights and an interest in US systems,” Hiltquist says.
          Yasinsky says there is no way to know exactly how many Ukrainian institutions have been hit in the escalating campaign of cyber attacks. The attacks, Yasinsky has noticed, have settled into a seasonal cycle: During the first months of the year, the hackers lay their groundwork, silently penetrating targets and spreading their foothold. At the end of the year, they unleash their payload. Yasinsky knows by now that even as he’s analyzing last year’s power grid attack the seeds are already being sown for 2017’s December surprises. Yasinsky thinks that what Ukraine has faced for the past three years may have been just a series of practice tests. He believes the attackers’ intentions until now can be summed up in one single Russian word: polygon – A training ground. Even in the most damaging attacks, the hackers could have gone further. They could have destroyed more than just stored data, but its backups too. The American analysts like Assante and Lee noted that they could have caused more permanent , physical harm to the grid, but they believe as Yasinsky said, “They’re still playing with us.”
          Ukraine is not France or Germany. Lots of Americans can’t even fine it on a map, so it is a great place for Russian hackers to practice.
          At a meeting of diplomats in April, US secretary of state Rex Tillerson went so far as to ask, “Why should US taxpayers be interested in Ukraine?”
          In that shadow of neglect, Russia isn’t only pushing the limits of its technical abilities, it is also feeling out the edges of what the international community will tolerate. Russian hackers turned off the power in Ukraine with impunity.
          Thomas Rid, a professor in the War Studies department at King’s College London said, “They’re testing out red lines, what they can get away with. You push and see if you’re pushed back. If not, you try the next step.”
          What will the next step look like?
          Yasinsky admits he doesn’t know. He says, “It’s a medium, and that medium connects, in every direction, to the machinery of civilization itself.”

          When will they turn the lights out in America?

          That’s the million-dollar question!


          Summarized from an article written by Andy Greenberg for WIRED magazine/July 2017.

          About the Author: 

          Contact Form

          Name

          Email *

          Message *