Friday, November 3, 2017

Evidence of Demons is Everywhere Christian!





Published on Nov 2, 2017
SUBSCRIBED 16K
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnDuf...

https://youtu.be/uL_mA9nZBDc

Mark 4
22 For nothing is hidden, except to be revealed; nor has anything been secret, but that it would come to light. 23 If anyone has ears to hear, let him hear.”

Angels, Fallen and Unfallen

We believe that God created an innumerable company of sinless, spiritual beings known as angels; that one, "Lucifer, son of the morning"–the highest in rank–sinned through pride, thereby becoming Satan; that a great company of the angels followed him in his moral fall, some of whom became demons and are active as his agents and associates in the prosecution of his unholy purposes, while others who fell are "reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day." (Isaiah 14:12-17; Ezekiel 28:11-19; 1 Timothy 3:6; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6.)

We believe that Satan is the originator of sin, and that under the permission of God he through subtlety led our first parents into transgression, thereby accomplishing their moral fall and subjecting them and their posterity to his own power; that he is the enemy of God and the people of God, opposing and exalting himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped and that he who in the beginning said, "I will be like the most High," in his warfare appears as an angel of light, even counterfeiting the works of God by fostering religious movements and systems of doctrine, which systems in every case are characterized by a denial of the efficacy of the blood of Christ and of salvation by grace alone. (Genesis 3:1-19; Romans 5:12-14; 2 Corinthians 4:3-4; 11:13-15; Ephesians 6:10-12; 2 Thessalonians 2:4; 1 Timothy 4:1-3.)

We believe that Satan was judged at the cross, though not then executed, and that he, a usurper, now rules as the "god of this world"; that at the second coming of Christ, Satan will be bound and cast into the abyss for a thousand years, and after the thousand years he will be loosed for a little season and then "cast into the lake of fire and brimstone," where he "shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever." (Colossians 2:15; Revelation. 20:1-3, 10.)

We believe that a great company of angels kept their holy estate and are before the throne of God, from whence they are sent forth as ministering spirits to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation. (Luke 15:10; Ephesians 1:21; Hebrews 1:14; Revelation 7:12.)

We believe that man was made lower than angels; and that in His incarnation Christ took for a little time this lower place that He might lift the believer to His own sphere above the angels. (Hebrews 2:6-10.)
SHOW LESS

Diamond and Silk defends Donald Trump





Published on Oct 29, 2017
SUBSCRIBE 1K
Diamond and Silk.

Diamond and Silk tell the raw truth about the MSM and Chuck



Published on Nov 2, 2017
SUBSCRIBED 119K
Warning: Salty language submerged with plenty of beeps. Diamond goes off on the MSM while obliterating Chuck. Silk second the motion of the brutal take down.
Like and Share, Share, Share.....

http://www.DiamondandSilkStore.com (Get Your Trump Pins Now)

Subscribe Now: www.youtube.com/c/theviewersview
Like us on Facebook
Diamond and Silk
Follow us on Twitter
@DiamondandSilk
SHOW LESS

House Votes to Repeal Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), Obamacare’s “Death Panels”

 NATIONAL   STEVEN ERTELT   NOV 2, 2017   |   6:01PM    WASHINGTON, DC
The U.S. House of Representatives voted today to repeal a portion of the Obamacare law that pro-life advocates strongly opposed because it could lead to rationing of health care for patients across the nation.
Leading pro-life groups asked members of Congress to approve legislation that would repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board, which has been derisively called “death panels” by detractors. Today, the House did just that.
Some 307 members of the U.S. House of Representatives voted for H.R. 849, the Protecting Seniors’ Access to Medicare Act of 2017, to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).
National Right to Life was one of the pro-life groups seeking the vote and it criticized the 111 House members who voted against the bill.
Carol Tobias, National Right to Life president, said “Pro-lifers have long opposed IPAB due to concerns that it could reduce access to healthcare. The time to repeal this dangerous rationing board is now.”
Tobias told LifeNews the IPAB is composed of 15 unelected bureaucrats who are answerable to no one. The Board is directed to recommend measures to limit private, nongovernmental spending on health care to a growth rate below medical inflation. Although most news reports have focused on the Board’s authority to limit government spending in Medicare, little attention has been given to this more sweeping danger of rationing healthcare paid for with nongovernmental dollars.
According to Jennifer Popik, J.D., National Right to Life director of federal legislation, “IPAB’s powers go well beyond some benign effort to control Medicare spending. IPAB would recommend drastic limits for the Department of Health and Human Services to impose even on what Americans are allowed to spend out of their own funds to save their own lives and the lives of their families.”
National Right to Life is calling on the U.S. Senate to take action to advance this legislation.
“The mission of National Right to Life is to protect and defend the most fundamental right, the right to life of every innocent human being from the beginning of life to natural death. In that defense, we strongly urge you to repeal the so-called Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB),” NRLC wrote House members in a letter before the vote.
“The IPAB is composed of 15 unelected bureaucrats who are answerable to no one. The Board is directed to recommend measures to limit private, nongovernmental spending on health care to a growth rate below medical inflation. Although most news reports have focused on the Board’s authority to limit government spending in Medicare, little attention has been given to this more sweeping danger of rationing healthcare paid for with nongovernmental dollars,” it said.
The letter continues: “IPAB’s powers go well beyond some benign effort to control Medicare spending. IPAB would recommend drastic limits for the Department of Health and Human Services to impose on what Americans are allowed to spend out of their own funds to save their own lives and the lives of their families. More can be found at: www.nrlc.org/uploads/communications/healthcarereport2014.pdf
National Right to Life “urges every Member of Congress to recognize the importance of repealing the Independent Payment Advisory Board. We urge you to support H.R. 849 to repeal this assault on our health care system and the sanctity of life and to reject the dangerous consolidation of unchecked government power which IPAB represents.”
Concerned Women for America president Penny Nance talked about the problems with the IPAB and why it needs to be repealed.
“ObamaCare was signed into law in 2010, and its ramifications are astronomical, with IPAB being one of the most contentious portions of the health care law. Although the reasoning behind IPAB was to keep Medicare spending down, the facts show that it will ignore the essential problems associated with Medicare and lower costs by rationing treatment to seniors,” she said. “As a result, unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats will decide what treatments our elderly parents receive. No longer will we be able to make decisions in conjunction with medical professionals about our parents’ needs; these decisions will be decided by reimbursement rates set by an inauspicious board. CWA views this as a small victory on the long road to stopping this egregious health care law that tramples economic freedom and religious liberties. We will continue to shed light on the wrongheaded health care law until it is fully dismantled.”
Pro-life NRLC attorney Jennifer Popik talked previously about the pro-life rationale for ending the program.
“Integral to the Obama Administration’s stated mission to drive down what Americans choose to spend for life-saving and health-preserving health care, the IPAB is charged with a key role in suppressing health care spending by limiting what treatment doctors are allowed to give their patients,” she says. “While the focus throughout this debate has been on the IPAB’s  authority to cut Medicare with very limited Congressional authority to override or alter those cuts, National Right to Life has been emphasizing a still graver concern – one at the core of rationing in ObamaCare.”
“The health care law instructs the IPAB to make recommendations to limit what all Americans are legally allowed to spend for their health care to hold it below the rate of medical inflation.  The health care law then empowers the federal Department of Health and Human Services to implement these recommendations by imposing so-called “quality” and “efficiency” measures on health care providers,” Popik continues. “What happens to doctors who violate a “quality” standard by prescribing more lifesaving medical treatment than it permits? They will be disqualified from contracting with any of the health insurance plans that individual Americans, under the Obama Health Care Law, will be mandated to purchase.  Few doctors would be able to remain in practice if subjected to that penalty.”
“This means that treatment a doctor and patient deem advisable to save that patient’s life or preserve or improve the patient’s health–but which exceeds the standard imposed by the government–will be denied even if the patient is willing and able to pay for it. Repeal of IPAB is critically important to prevent this rationing of life-saving medical treatment,” she added.

OBGYN Claims Life Doesn’t Begin at Conception: “That’s a Religious Definition Not a Scientific One”

 HOME POSTS   MICAIAH BILGER   NOV 2, 2017   |   11:32AM    WASHINGTON, DC
A widely-respected California doctor criticized the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services this week for recognizing that a unique, new human life begins at conception.
Dr. Richard Paulson, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at USC and the president of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, wrote an op-ed criticizing the new HHS language as religious, rather than scientific.
“This is a religious definition of life, not a scientific one,” he wrote. “… From a scientific perspective, life doesn’t begin at any one point, it is a continuum.”
Paulson, despite his expertise in fertility and reproductive health, made the absurd claim that life does not begin at conception – a claim refuted by dozens of textbooks, medical experts and even some abortion supporters.
He argued:
As an infertility specialist, I witness human fertilization in the laboratory every day. The human egg is a single living cell and it becomes a one-cell embryo if it successfully combines with a live sperm. No new life is formed — the egg and the sperm were already alive — and fertilization is not instantaneous. Nearly 48 hours pass from the time sperm first bind to the outside of the zona pellucida, the human eggshell, until the first cell division of the fertilized egg. The two newly formed cells then have the potential to give rise to a human being, but only if they are appropriately nurtured so that they continue to divide and then successfully implant in the uterus.
The problem with Paulson’s argument is that, while both egg and sperm are alive, neither are genetically unique living human organisms. Eggs and sperm are just parts of the man and woman until they combine.
“The embryo from fertilization is a unique entity that directs its own development from within. Left alone, a skin cell will not develop into a mature human, but that’s exactly what a zygote will do. All of the embryo’s parts work together for the good (survival and flourishing) of the whole organism.
“Once the sperm and egg unite, they cease to exist and a brand new human organism exists.”
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter. 
This is not a pro-life argument. It is information from biology and embryology textbooks and researchers. For example, Keith L. Moore wrote in his 2003 textbook “The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition”:
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”
Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D., the pioneer of in vitro fertilization, similarly said, “The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”
But Paulson made several arguments to claim life does not begin at conception. He argued this point later in his column:
As women age, the proportion of eggs with chromosomal abnormalities increases dramatically. If such eggs are fertilized, they implant rarely, or result in a miscarriage. In vitro fertilization has shown human reproduction to be a highly inefficient process. Even a chromosomally normal embryo will successfully implant and result in a live birth only about half the time. This is true whether fertilization takes place in the body or in the laboratory.
It appears that Paulson was implying that human life does not begin at fertilization because so many embryos die before implantation. But this is a value-based argument, not a scientific one. Some human beings are more likely to die than others, maybe because of their age or environment or even the point in history in which they were born. But these factors should not determine whether a human being is valuable.
Outside factors should not determine whether a human life is valuable or deserving of protection. Nor should their abilities, their race, gender, their expected lifespan or anything else about them. The only thing that makes sense is to protect every human life from beginning to end.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *