Saturday, November 4, 2017

Prince William Pushes Population Control: Too Many People on the Planet Hurts the Wildlife

 INTERNATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   NOV 3, 2017   |   5:51PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Prince William pushed a message of population control during a gala Thursday in London, England.
The Daily Mail reports the British royal family has been advocating for population control during the past decade, claiming the world will face “monumental” problems if the human population continues to grow.
The century-old claims about a depletion of resources and other dire circumstances resulting from the earth’s growing human population have not come true; but that has not stopped some of the world’s elite from continuing to push the message.
Speaking during the Tusk gala Thursday, the Duke of Cambridge said the growing human population is damaging the environment, and more must be done reverse the trend.
“In my lifetime, we have seen global wildlife populations decline by over half,” Prince William said. “We are going to have to work much harder and think much deeper, if we are to ensure that human beings and the other species of animal with which we share this planet can continue to co-exist.
“Africa’s rapidly growing human population is predicted to more than double by 2050, a staggering increase of three and a half million people per month.
“There is no question that this increase puts wildlife and habitat under enormous pressure. Urbanisation, infrastructure development, cultivation—all good things in themselves, but they will have a terrible impact unless we begin to plan and to take measures now.”
Interestingly enough, Prince William and his wife, Kate, have faced criticism from population control groups for having children. The royal couple is expecting their third child next spring.
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter. 
Christine Rousselle, a web editor with Townhall.com, wrote earlier this year:
According to data from the World Bank, the U.K. and the rest of Europe is currentlyreproducing at below replacement-level fertility, which means that there’s no chance that the continent is going to be overpopulated at any point in the near or distant future. If anything, it’d be a positive thing for Will and Kate to give birth to a station wagon full of tiny royal babies–the nation needs more people in order to stay financially solvent. (Looking at you, Japan.)
Overpopulation is a myth that largely is spread mostly by the world’s elite. They have been predicting a depletion of natural resources and destruction of the environment for more than a century, but their predictions have not come true yet. At the same time, resulting population control measures have led to horrendous abuses, including forced sterilizations and forced abortions. Some of the worst abuses come out of China, where, under its one child policy, women are forcibly sterilized and forced to abort their unborn babies through all nine months of pregnancy.

at

Planned Parenthood Asks Judge to Let It Continue Killing Babies in Dismemberment Abortions

( I am not a violent person by any means. However I would love to get planned parenthood  ( say Representative, Corporate whatever. & Punch them in the proverbial face) Then ask what the hell is wrong with you people. Are you are bloody demonic vampire? ) However as a Christian man I would not. I would have to pray so deep, so hard that it would bring me to tears. and it has. Dear God this brutality has to stop. Please God stop these people in there tracks. Make them stop. )



 STATE   MICAIAH BILGER   NOV 3, 2017   |   12:51PM    AUSTIN, TX
Pro-abortion doctors testified Thursday that dismembering nearly fully-formed unborn babies while their hearts are beating should remain legal because it is the safest and best second-trimester abortion method.
Thursday was the first day of a Texas court battle between the abortion industry and pro-life state officials.
Earlier this year, the abortion chains Whole Woman’s Health and Planned Parenthood, along with other pro-abortion groups, challenged Texas Senate Bill 8, which prohibits dismemberment abortions, a method typically used in the second trimester to kill nearly fully-formed, living unborn babies. It is a barbaric and dangerous procedure in which the unborn baby is ripped apart in the womb and pulled out in pieces while his or her heart is still beating.
In late August, U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the law until the case could go to trial. Yeakel also is presiding over the hearing this week.
The abortion industry’s case is based on the claim that the law will outlaw the most common second-trimester abortion procedure (dilation and evacuation or D&E) and put an undue burden on women’s access to abortion.
Big Country News reports three doctors testified Thursday on behalf of the abortion industry. They argued that dismembering unborn babies while their hearts are still beating is the safest abortion method in the second trimester, and banning it would place an undue burden on women’s access to abortion.
Here’s more from the report:
Dr. Bhavik Kumar, medical director at Whole Woman’s Health, told the court the state’s requirement under the law for fetal demise, or for a death of a fetus in the uterus, prior to the D&E abortion would be an added step without any benefit to the patient.
… Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton also showed up in court mid-afternoon and issued a brief statement to reporters afterwards.
“Live dismemberment is every bit as brutal, gruesome and inhumane as a partial birth abortion, something that Congress and the Supreme Court agree should be banned in this country,” Paxton said.
The attorney general said defending this law “recognizes unborn children should at least have the same rights in Texas as prisoners being executed for the most heinous crimes and animals who would never be torn alive.”
Witnesses for the abortion industry also testified that the law would force abortionists to use untested, riskier procedures that could hurt women.
… Dr. Mark Nichols said the regulation would force Texas physicians to choose from several methods of inducing “fetal demise” that carry increased risks of infection and injury for what is otherwise the safest and most common form of second-trimester abortion — dilation and evacuation, or D&E.
Two methods of injecting toxins into the fetus require special skills and equipment and are not guaranteed to work, forcing doctors to consider a second injection — adding to the health risks for women — or face prosecution for violating the law, he said.
“I would be very nervous about being able to provide this service and not violate the law,” said Nichols, who teaches at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland.
Dr. Robin Wallace, who works at a Dallas abortion facility, said another method to ensure that the unborn baby is dead before being dismembered would be to cut the umbilical cord. However, Wallace said this can be very tricky depending on where the placenta is, and there are greater risks of infection and perforations of the uterus.
The trial is expected to last five days.
Judge Lee Yeakel has a history of ruling against life-protecting legislation. However, pro-life leaders said they are not discouraged.
“We welcome the lawsuit,” Texas Right To Life’s Melissa Conway said in July. “We believe the state has a right to ban this gruesome procedure. The lawsuit just moves us one step closer to overturning Roe vs. Wade.”
The pro-life organization said if Yeakel rules against the law, the state likely will appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which considers protections for unborn life more fairly.
“Texas Right to Life supports Attorney General Ken Paxton’s efforts to defend the Dismemberment Abortion Ban in the highest court possible to honor Texas’ intent to protect innocent human Life,” the pro-life organization said in a statement.
The legislation received strong support in the Texas legislature this year, and Gov. Greg Abbott signed it into law in June.
The law made Texas the eighth state to protect developing preborn children from such a heinous act. Earlier this year, Arkansas also enacted its Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act joining Alabama, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma and West Virginia.
The dismemberment abortion ban embodies model legislation from the National Right to Life Committee that would prohibit “dismemberment abortion,” using forceps, clamps, scissors or similar instruments on a living unborn baby to remove him or her from the womb in pieces while their heart still is beating.

at

Conjoined Twins Die 24 Hours After Birth Due to Severe Respiratory Disorder

 INTERNATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   NOV 3, 2017   |   1:48PM    NEW DELHI, INDIA
Parents in Ambajogai, India were forced to say goodbye to their conjoined twins on Monday less than 24 hours after they were born.
The Free Press Journal reports the conjoined twins were born at 9:30 p.m. Sunday, Oct. 29 and died less than a day later.
Doctors at the Government Medical College of Ambajogai said it is very rare that twins with their condition are born alive. The twins were diagnosed with dicephalic parapagus, which means they had their own heads and necks but shared a torso, according to the report.
Doctors said they died of respiratory failure and internal organ complications. It is likely that they were born prematurely, but the report does not give any indication of this.
“The twins were kept on ventilators after birth because their lungs were not developed and one of the babies was diagnosed with anencephaly (life-threatening brain and skull underdevelopment),” the doctors said.
The doctors indicated that they would have recommended an abortion if they had known about the twins’ condition sooner.
According to the report:
[Dr Sudhir] Deshmukh added the family being, farm laborers did not have enough money to conduct a sonography which could have revealed the condition of the foetus in time for an abortion. “The condition of the children was diagnosed only in the seventh month of gestation. By then the woman had passed the legal age of abortion,” he added. Doctors said that in most of such cases, delay in diagnosis results in families having to go through the trouble of witnessing the death of the children.
Abortion often is recommended when an unborn baby is diagnosed with a disability. Unborn babies with Down syndrome and fatal disorders are aborted at extremely high rates, but some doctors even recommend abortion for minor, repairable conditions such as cleft lips.
In cases of fatal anomalies, an abortion does not spare the unborn child or parents from pain and death. It merely kills the child, rather than allows them to die naturally. And it often deprives parents of the chance to hold and comfort their child for the short time they have together.

at

Facebook Restores Pro-Life Group’s Advertising After Media Reports Censorship

 NATIONAL   RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN   NOV 3, 2017   |   6:11PM    LANSING, MI
We’re happy to report that Wexford/Missaukee Right to Life of Michigan is able to use advertising on Facebook again!
Yesterday reporters from Mlive and the Detroit News contacted Facebook about their unexplained ban, and Facebook reversed itself.
Mlive ran a story today on the issue.
The restoration was very similar to the ban of the Right to Life of Michigan ad account: Facebook told reporters that they contacted us about the mistake, but that never happened. While it’s positive that Wexford/Missaukee RTL had their access restored, it’s still troubling that Facebook refuses to explain how the mistake occurred, and if they took any steps to remedy the situation for future cases.
Our best guess is that a disgruntled pro-abortion Facebook user trolled a harmless advertisement of Wexford/Missaukee RTL and reported it as offensive. Facebook automatically banned the page, especially since it’s a smaller community group unlikely to have access to media/someone to take their case up to fix the problem. Facebook’s customer service responses were all automated form letters responses.
When reporters contacted Facebook, that’s the point a human being actually reviewed the ban and saw it was indefensible.
That’s our theory, anyway, in absence of some sort of human contact with a company that prides itself on “community.” Nobody should have to rely on reporters to be third-party customer service agents. Facebook needs to resolve this if they want to build “trust” with groups concerned about censorship.
Facebook somewhat menacingly told Wexford/Missaukee RTL that there was “no further action you may take” to fix the ban. Well, pardon us, but Facebook doesn’t dictate what we may or may not do, and Facebook was wrong here.

at
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *