Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Congo’s top Catholic slams state’s ‘barbarism’ after deadly protests

FILE PHOTO: Democratic Republic of Congo's President Joseph Kabila addresses the nation at Palais du Peuple in Kinshasa
FILE PHOTO: Democratic Republic of Congo’s President Joseph Kabila addresses the nation at Palais du Peuple in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo April 5, 2017. REUTERS/Kenny Katombe/File Photo
By Patient Ligodi and Amedee Mwarabu
KINSHASA (Reuters) – The head of the Roman Catholic Church in Congo on Tuesday condemned a crackdown on protests against President Joseph Kabila as “barbarism”, escalating a confrontation between the government and one of the country’s most powerful institutions.
Security forces in Democratic Republic of Congo killed at least seven people in the capital, Kinshasa, on Sunday during demonstrations that Catholic activists organized to protest Kabila’s refusal to step down from office, according to the United Nations.
Police spokesman Pierrot Mwanamputu, however, said on Tuesday that five people, including one police officer, had died in Sunday’s violence and that the police had acted justifiably in each case against militants and gangsters.
In a rare appearance before the media, Cardinal Laurent Monsengwo, wearing a red prayer cap and gold cross, accused security forces of opening fire on peaceful protesters and desecrating places of worship.
“We can only denounce, condemn and stigmatize the actions of the supposedly valiant men in uniform, which are, unfortunately, nothing more, nothing less than barbarism,” Monsengwo told reporters in the capital Kinshasa.
“How can we trust leaders incapable of protecting the population, of guaranteeing peace, justice and love of people?” he said.
The Catholic Church is one of the few institutions in Congo to enjoy broad credibility. Some 40 percent of the population identifies as Catholic and the Church has long filled voids in education, healthcare and other services left by an absent state.
Its bishops have frequently spoken out against human rights abuses by the government and alleged plans by Kabila to remove term limits that forbid him to run for re-election.
However, it reverted to a more neutral posture as Kabila’s mandate expired in December 2016 in order to broker a deal between the ruling coalition and opposition leaders.
Under the Dec. 31 agreement, Kabila was permitted to stay in office beyond the expiry of his mandate but required to step down after an election to be held in 2017.
Instead, Congo’s electoral commission said later that the election could not be organized until December 2018, reviving suspicions that Kabila intends to cling to power. Kabila denies those charges and blames the delays on a slow voter registration process.
Dozens have died in protests over Kabila’s future in the past two years and militia violence across the country has also risen, stoking fears the country will slide back into the kind of civil war that killed millions at the turn of the century.
(Writing by Aaron Ross, editing by Larry King)

Mother of Wounded Vet DESTROYS Debra Messing for Being Proud of Son’s Anthem Protest

She’s going to feel that in the morning.

     
8963
Hollywood leftist Debra Messing (Will & Grace) thought she was the proudest mom in America after her young son requested to sit through the national anthem at a recent New York Rangers game, but that’s because she has never met Lisa Smith, a “proud mother of a wounded soldier.” 
Messing captured the virtue-signaling moment of her lefty-in-the-making on Instagram and blubbered, “Who’s crying? I’m not crying. #BLM (Black Lives Matter).” Yes, disrespecting the US flag should bring a tear to one’s eyes but not for the same reason as this self-important celeb.
Cue Smith who has a real hero in the family. This “#Trumptrain #MAGA #DrainTheSwamp #AmericaFirst #Trump2020” Twitter-proficient mom wanted to let Messing know what kind of pride she carries for her son:


You can still hear the sonic boom from Messing being put in her place.
Thank you for your son’s sacrifice, Mrs. Smith. We’re honored to celebrate his commitment to an America that allows these Hollywood idiots to roam freely.


Photo by tommylane on Foter.com / CC BY-SA

Olympian: Trophies Are For Winning

"The pain of losing is what drives one to improve."

     
6
1217
Participation trophies. We know they're ridiculous, but lefties are into them, and there's data to prove it. Former Olympian and LA Galaxy soccer player Cobi Jones argues in the latest video from Prager U that, not only are they bad for kids, they're bad for parents- and all of society. Jones says that "the pain of losing is what drives one to improve," and that, without that pain, we will become complacent:
The road to victory- in sports, in business, in life, is paved with losses.
Jones talks of being cut from Olympic rosters and losing in championships before going on to success, and how those disappointments only made the victories that much sweeter. 
Sorry, lefties, but engaging in healthy competition and accepting the outcome is good for kids. Good for grownups, too (we're looking at you, Hillary Clinton).

NYT Coverage Sympathetic with Iran’s Regime, Makes Millions Hosting Tours There

Well, isn’t that interesting?

     
9
8949
In the face of mounting protests against an oppressive Iran, The New York Times has offered more sympathy to the authoritarian regime in its coverage than the Iranians crying for freedom under threat of physical harm. That could be because the Gray Lady is in the pockets of the Muslim leaders thanks to lucrative tours it hosts in the area.
One headline over the New Year’s weekend read: “Iranian authorities have clamped down on Tehran after demonstrators across the country ignored calls for calm.”
That brought much ire on Twitter, with someone responding, “‘Clamped down’ is a weird way to say opened fire.”
Former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul “rewrote” the headline for the NYT:
“Iran's brutal dictatorship yet again killed & arrested brave Iranian citizens demanding greater freedoms."
In The Washington Times, writer Larry O’Connor added his two cents:
If [the NYT lede] reads to you like a condemnation of protesters for defiantly demonstrating for basic rights and a defense of the reasonable, benevolent Iranian government you’re not alone. It’s almost as though Erdbrink is blaming the dead protesters for running in front of the peaceful warning shots fired from government troops. 
In a follow-up piece, O’Connor exposed the very inconvenient fact that The Times may be soft on Iran not simply because it’s soft on facts, but also because it makes so much money hosting private tours to the country:
Over the weekend, the New York Times took some heat for seeming to defend the authoritarian regime in Iran while it gunned down protesters in the streets of Tehran. 
More disturbing than the Times toeing the line for an authoritarian theocracy is the fact that the venerable paper of record is making bucket-loads of cash selling exclusive, high-end tours to Iran through their “Journeys” program. The Times promotes these things like they’re selling cabins on a luxury sea cruise:
"Persia. Iran. For 2,500 years, this powerful country has entranced, mystified and beguiled the world. Discover the ancient secrets and modern complexities of this influential land on a 13-day itinerary, visiting some of the world’s oldest archaeological sites and the family home of the religious leader who engineered Iran’s transition to an Islamic republic. Welcome to the once-forbidden land of Iran."
The basic package of the tour costs $8,000 and reportedly brings the NYT at least $1.5 million each year.
“In a closed society like Iran, one has to assume that the extensive tours conducted by the Times is made possible only through the benevolence of the regime in Tehran,” O’Connor writes. “If it’s true that the Times makes over a million dollars a year on their Persia trips (the number could be much higher) it clearly behooves the paper to keep good relations with their benefactors. If the Times angers the government, say goodbye to those tours.”
The connection is nothing new and has been reported on in the past, but with the latest uprisings in the country and the corresponding coverage by The Times, it sheds an even brighter light on media malpractice. As O’Connor states, this relationship “effectively turn[s] over the editorial page to a string of apologists for the Tehran regime.”
O’Connor reported that lectures are conducted on these tours of Iran. He found one that will blow your mind even more: “Muddled Media: Why does the press so often miss stories and developments that it should have seen coming?”
That isn’t made up; it’s directly from the tour website. The tone-deaf Times should look in a mirror sometime. It ain’t pretty.

LA Times: Trump is a Wimp for Not Asserting Us Internationally

What happened to the good ol' days of international tyrant George W. Bush?

     
2212
Thanks, Los Angeles Times, for your pro-American stance. 
The headline of of the Times reads "Trump claims he's boosting U.S. influence, but many foreign leaders see America in retreat."
According to the report, written by Tracy Wilkinson, Alexandra Zavis, and Shashank Bengali:
"China has now assumed the mantle of fighting climate change, a global crusade that the United States once led. Russia has taken over Syrian peace talks, also once the purview of the American administration, whose officials Moscow recently deigned to invite to negotiations only as observers... France and Germany are often now the countries that fellow members of NATO look to, after President Trump wavered on how supportive his administration would be toward the North Atlantic alliance... And in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the U.S., once the only mediator all sides would accept, has found itself isolated after Trump’s decision to declare that the U.S. recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel."
Isn't the Left the side that generally leaps to reprimand Republicans for getting involved in other countries' affairs? A la imperialism? Apparently, in Trump's case, he's making a wimp of the U.S. by not asserting ourselves in everybody's business. Where is George "Hitler" Bush when we need him?
Attempting to lend credence to their point, the Times writers assert:
"One year into his presidency, many international leaders, diplomats and foreign policy experts argue that he has reduced U.S. influence or altered it in ways that are less constructive. On a range of policy issues, Trump has taken positions that disqualified the United States from the debate or rendered it irrelevant, these critics say."
Critics = Democrats. And one of those critics is Nicholas Burns, of Harvard's Kennedy School:
"Nicholas Burns, who served as a senior American diplomat under Republican and Democratic administrations, said the administration’s strategy was riddled with contradictions that have left the U.S. ineffective.... Trump’s 'policy of the last 12 months is a radical departure from every president since WWII,' Burns said in an interview. 'Trump is weak on NATO, Russia, trade, climate, diplomacy. The U.S. is declining as a global leader.'"
Burns, for one, has a different preference than the article reveals: in 2016, he wrote a USA Today article titled "Hillary Clinton is the president we need." 
It sounds like the L.A. Times may want to find less partisan critics, and the Left may want to find more consistent criteria by which to judge a President. In the meantime, perhaps, Hillary Clinton is the president they need. Thankfully, that's a need which will never be met.
Photo by AdamAtom on Foter.com / CC BY-NC-SA

Professor Who Wishes for 'White Genocide' Gets Picked Up By NYU

"All I want for Christmas is white genocide."

     
9549
At the end of 2017, George Ciccariello-Maher stepped down from his position as politics professor at Drexel University. As for his reason, Ciccariello-Maher cited the combination of "death threats" and "nearly a year of harassment by right-wing, white supremacist media outlets and internet mobs."
The professor, apparently confounded by such castigation, couldn't fathom the response to his December 2016 tweet:
"All I want for Christmas is white genocide."
Riiight. Why would anyone have a problem with that?
Beyond the end of his employment as an anti-white, homicidal demagogue, the professor said at the time that he would continue "to support and work with [students] informally, whether in reading groups, in the streets, or both," fighting against “Right and White Supremacists” via the “establishment of the Campus Antifascist Network.”
"Staying at Drexel in the eye of this storm has become detrimental to my own writing, speaking, and organizing," he continued on Facebook.
Fortunately for Ciccariello-Maher, the university world loves a good white genocide: he's been hired as a visiting scholar by New York University's Hemispheric Institute. Accordingto the official website, the Institute is "a collaborative, multilingual, and interdisciplinary consortium of institutions, artists, scholars, and activists throughout the Americas. Working at the intersection of scholarship, artistic expression, and politics, the organization explores embodied practice—performance—as a vehicle for the creation of new meaning and the transmission of cultural values, memory, and identity."
Cultural values, such as white genocide.
As per a statement by Drexel, the school "wishes Professor Ciccariello-Maher well in his future pursuits." That seems unwise, considering his taste for racist mass extermination.
When asked by Campus Reform for further comment on his resignation from Drexel, he gave quite the scholarly response: "F**k y'all."

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *