Thursday, January 4, 2018

Frmr Clinton Spox Wants Trump Booted Off Twitter for Nuke Taunt

Just another Dem that wants to squelch free speech.

     
31
Hillary Clinton’s former spokesman, Brian Fallon, wants President Trump kicked off Twitter for calling North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s bluff with his “nuclear button” jab.
This week, the dictator taunted the United States, saying he has a nuclear button on his desk at the ready. Trump wasted no time getting on Twitter and launching this perfectly reasonable counterstrike:


Fallon, now a CNN contributor, showed his disregard for the First Amendment and our strong president when he tweeted:


Apparently, these softies feel the president violated Twitter’s anti-violence policy. 
It has been reported that protests will commence Wednesday evening in San Francisco at Twitter headquarters as a result of Trump’s tweet. The anti-Trump group Resist SF already projected “@jack is #complicit” and “Ban @realDonaldTrump” on the building. Protesters have accused Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey of “endangering the world” by allowing Trump continued access to an account.
Twitter maintains that the president’s tweet doesn’t include a “specific threat,” and therefore doesn’t violate company rules.
But don’t worry, Twitter is plenty busy banning other conservatives for much less

Photo by Gage Skidmore on Foter.com / CC BY-SA

Actor Asner Presumes to School Conservatives on Constitution

"If right-wingers truly understood what the Constitution meant they wouldn’t use it as a crutch every time they screw over the poor and the disenfranchised.”

     
106
Whom should one consult for real expertise on the Constitution? Why, old left-wing actors, of course. That seems to be the presumption of a recent comment and book by Ed Asner, who -- perhaps not coincidentally -- is old, left-wing, and used to act.
In an interview with the Daily Beast, the Mary Tyler Moore Show alumnus is asked by interviewer Craig Modderno why Asner wrote his book The Grouchy Historian. He did it to set conservatives straight about the Constitution, apparently. Asner stated grouchily,
"If right-wingers truly understood what the Constitution meant they wouldn’t use it as a crutch every time they screw over the poor and the disenfranchised.”
It should be noted that the full title of Asner's profound lesson in history is The Grouchy Historian: An Old-Time Lefty Defends Our Constitution Against Right-Wing Hypocrites and Nutjobs.
Sounds scholarly.
In the interview, Asner takes particular aim at the NRA, saying:
“The Republican Party basically uses [the NRA] to advance their own agenda, often at the expense of their own members.”
Remember, this is the same radical who wrote an article for Salon entitled "Sorry, NRA: The U.S. Was Actually Founded on Gun Control."
Wait -- there was gun control in the United States in 1776? Who knew? We're fortunate to have a Constitutional historian like actor Asner to enlighten us about these things.
Historical anomalies aside, Asner went on to offer advice to his Democrat cohorts on targeting those greedy, rich Republicans. As told to Modderno:
“[The Democratic Party] needs to draw more attention to Republican discrepancies: what Republicans are doing to hurt anyone who isn’t rich, and emphasize how the laws they’re proposing are actually meant to destroy the middle class!”
Sure. By all means, Democratic Party, ignore the real lessons of the election of 2016 and embrace the advice, historical revisionism, and hypocrisy of socialist Ed Asner, whose net worth is $10 million.

Obama's 2017 Favorite Songs List: Filthy and Misogynistic, But Totally Okay

"I heard that p***y for the taking."

     
7
2922
Leftists claim to stand fiercely against misogyny. Unless, that is, it concerns one of their own. And the Left has never known an exception as sacred as its saviorBarack Obama. Unable to accept that he is no longer President, the mainstream media continue to lovingly cover the trivialities of his existence; therefore, surely they are all aware of his Facebook-shared 2017 Favorite Songs List.
In a year plagued by exposure of sexual misconduct against women, and featuring pussy hats, Women's Marches, and the #MeToo movement, one might assume that any prominent public figure would steer clear of endorsing songs which degrade women. However, when it comes to the media, Obama is the king of free passes. So why should he be afraid to let his freak flag fly?
Here are a few lyrical excerpts from the favored playlist of the former Commander-in-Chief.
Perhaps Obama likes to crank up "Havana," by Camila Cabella, feat. Young Thug, while remembering with pride his work toward eliminating the (non-existent) gender pay gap:
Bump on her bumper like a traffic jam
Hey, I was quick to pay that girl [the same rate as a male prostitute!] like Uncle Sam
Maybe the former community organizer nostalgically recalls his stance against rape as he dances to the take-advantage-of-the-drunk-girl anthem “Unforgettable," by Humble Montana:
I'm gonna catch the rhythm while she push up against me
Ooh, and she tipsy
….
If you loved the girl then I'm so, so sorry
I got to give it to her like we in a marriage
Oh, like we in a hurry
No, no I won't tell nobody
Or maybe Barack likes to get down to "Wild Thoughts," by DJ Khaled, while he watches the video of the rapper castigating a certain "grabby" quote of "unbelievable rhetoric coming from the top of the Republican ticket" in 2016:
Ayy, uh huh, uh huh, I heard that p***y for the taking
I heard it got these other niggas goin' crazy
Yeah I treat you like a lady, lady
F*** you 'til you're burned out, cremation
The Left loves to portray Donald Trump as the man who removed class and dignity from the presidency. But where are all their pussy hats and hashtags when it comes to Barack Obama?





Rationing Underway in UK Hospitals

"It is absolutely not what I want."

     
8
3227
Britain's National Health Service (NHS) is often held up by American leftists as the pinnacle of healthcare. While the right has warned that these healthcare systems lead to rationing, the left pretends this isn't an issue. What would they call, then, what's happening right now? There is so much need for medical care in Britain in the present "winter crisis" that NHS England is telling officials to postpone non-urgent surgeries to make room for emergency patients. This delay will be in place until at least the end of the month and, Yahoo! reports, will impact more than 50,000 patients. 
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt says "It is absolutely not what I want," while NHS England Director James Keough warns that the worst may be yet to come as there are "early signs" of flu spreading through hospitals.
Meanwhile, wait times in emergency rooms have skyrocketed to 36 hours in some hospitals. While many argue (always ignoring Medicare) that the American insurance market distinguishes between the haves and the have-nots, this is immeasurably worse in countries with a single-payer system. In the United States, most people have some form of healthcare that allows them to be seen by doctors. In the United Kingdom, everyone has healthcare which allows them to wait. The very wealthy, however, can afford to pay both the oppressive taxation that grants them this privilege and the cost of private insurance which gets them what the average American has. It is the public hospitals that are having these issues, not the private ones. The wealthy still have their healthcare in Britain, while everyone else waits. 
What do you call it when someone in charge decides who needs a limited resource and doles it out accordingly? Ah, that's right: rationing.

Insufferable Hypocrites Streep and Hanks Promote Upcoming Love Letter to the Media

"We made this movie about 1971, but it really is about 2017."

     
49
The New York Times published excerpts from an interview with Hollywood elitists Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks about their upcoming film, and the conversation predictably turned to contemporary politics -- because for some reason interviewers today feel compelled to ask self-righteous celebrities their meaningless political opinions.
The Post, directed by Steven Spielberg, is centered on Washington Post publisher Katharine Graham (Streep) and editor Ben Bradlee (Hanks) as they wrestle with the decision in 1971 to publish the Pentagon Papers, the government’s secret history of the Vietnam War.
Interviewer Cara Thomas quickly addressed the film's relevance to the current contentiousness between the news media and a president who isn't afraid to call them out for their blatant, left-leaning activism and bias.
"There are echoes of Nixon in what we’re hearing now from the White House," she said, "with the difference being that the person in the White House is saying that real reporting is 'fake news.' Was it gratifying to do a movie set when people actually believed things?"
Let's pause for a little correction: the person in the White House is calling media lies and disinformation -- not real reporting -- fake news. Cara Thomas' paper, the New York Times, doesn't do any real reporting.
Hanks went on to claim that the Trump administration, not the media, is manipulating the truth. "What’s happening now is this guerrilla war that is going on against the First Amendment."
Another correction: it's the left that is at war with the First Amendment, and if you want to talk about government corruption and lies, let's begin with Barack Obama.
Thomas then tentatively asked about the Harvey Weinstein sexual harassment scandal, and Meryl pretended ignorance: "You make movies. You think you know everything about everybody. So much gossip. You don’t know anything. People are so inscrutable on a certain level. And it’s a shock."
It's impossible to believe that Meryl Streep, a proud defender of child rapist Roman Polanski, wasn't aware of the "open secret" of Weinstein's reputation or of Hollywood's culture of sexual predation, but she claims that "in terms of Harvey, I really didn’t know."
Hanks tried to boost his feminist cred by confessing that he has "participated in crude humor worthy of a baseball locker room on a set" and that the scandal and the #MeToo movement are bringing about "a reckoning that is going to make us a better society."
Streep added that women are "the last group it’s kind of O.K. to demean, degrade." Seriously? Try being a white male Christian conservative, Meryl.
Hanks and Streep go on to pretend that they're just simple artists who reluctantly find themselves with a pulpit from which to speak out -- but on this new movie, they say, it's welcome and appropriate."[T]his movie," Hanks said, "this is what this entire film deals with. We made this movie about 1971, but it really is about 2017. There’s no reason not to get involved in what this overpowering discussion is about."
TruthRevolt's prediction: The Post will be a box office dud but will rake in the Oscars as the smug hypocrites in Hollywood pat themselves on the back for their integrity and moral superiority.

Trump Takes a Shot at NY Times' New Publisher

""Another reason that I'm going to win another four years, is because newspapers, television, all forms of media will tank if I'm not there."

     
2
Howard Kurtz writes at Fox News that the new publisher of the New York Timeshad barely managed to promise his readers that the paper would uphold the principles of independent journalism before President Donald Trump fired a shot across the Gray Lady's bow.
After taking over the newspaper from his father Arthur Sulzberger Jr., A.G. Sulzberger (pictured above) wrote in a full-page letter,
"Misinformation is rising and trust in the media is declining as technology platforms elevate clickbait, rumor and propaganda over real journalism, and politicians jockey for advantage by inflaming suspicion of the press."
No one has to "inflame suspicion" of the press -- the news media has utterly destroyed its own credibility and no longer even bothers to put up a pretense of objective journalism. As for misinformation, again the mainstream media is to blame.
In any case, President Trump tweeted in response,
"Get impartial journalists of a much higher standard, lose all of your phony and non-existent 'sources,' and treat the President of the United States FAIRLY, so that the next time I (and the people) win, you won't have to write an apology to your readers for a job poorly done!"
Trump was referring to an open letter written by Sulzberger Jr. after the 2016 election asking, "Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters?" As Kurtz notes, the letter did not include any apology.
Kurtz also pointed out that Trump told Times reporter Michael Schmidt last week that the news media is going to be the reason Trump wins again in 2020:
"Another reason that I'm going to win another four years, is because newspapers, television, all forms of media will tank if I'm not there because without me, their ratings are going down the tubes ... 
"So they basically have to let me win. And eventually, probably six months before the election, they'll be loving me because they're saying, 'Please, please, don't lose Donald Trump.' O.K."
If Trump runs again and wins, however, it won't simply be because the media obsess over him. It will be because he has made America great again. But Kurtz concedes that
there are very few media outlets that haven’t benefited from Trump’s nonstop newsmaking. Those openly opposed to Trump are marketing themselves to the resistance, those openly backing Trump appeal to his loyal supporters (who don’t trust the MSM), and those that are trying to position themselves in the middle benefit from a hyped-up atmosphere in which everyone is debating politics, from the coffee shop to Twitter and Facebook.
That’s the great irony of this new era: the media, targeted and taunted by Trump, are also riding the financial wave he’s created.
And the president, in turn, feeds off the constant media attention to drive his agenda.
"I suspect he's trolling the media," Kurtz concludes, "having a little fun at their expense. But he's also right that the constant combat has been ringing their cash registers."
And yet at the same time, Trump is exposing the mainstream media outlets for what they largely are: leftist propaganda organs.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *