Wednesday, February 9, 2022

‘Convicted’ Financier Of Terror Operations Has ‘Contributed’ To Biden And Other Democratic Campaigns & Biden, Dem lawmakers take cash from convicted terrorist financier

 


‘Convicted’ Financier Of Terror Operations Has ‘Contributed’ To Biden And Other Democratic Campaigns

Joe Biden and several other high-profile Democrat politicians have taken campaign donations from a convicted felon who finances terrorist operations. Emadeddin Muntasser, 57, has been accused of supporting “violent jihad” even after being released from prison.

The New York Post reported that Muntasser and two co-conspirators were convicted in January 2008 for entering into a conspiracy to defraud the US government, conceal evidence, and lie to FBI agents. The charges arose from the group’s operation of Care International, an Islamic charity they created that was used to finance jihad activities overseas. They also committed fraud in lying about the nature of the organization to obtain tax-exempt status.

Since 2018, Muntasser has donated to Biden and several Democrats running for federal office, including Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) and Rep Tom Malinowski (D-NJ). He has also contributed to a Democratic PAC, ActBlue.

Hank Sheinkopf is a New York Democratic strategist who told the Post that the contributions show a “lack of judgment” and show that Democrats will “do anything to get money” for political campaigns. He added that the “unbelievable” situation indicates Democrats are setting themselves up for failure.

As a result of his criminal activities using Care International, Muntasser served five months in federal prison and five months of home confinement. He also had six months of supervised release and paid a $10,000 fine.

Muntasser used Care International to transfer $120,000 to Makhtab al-Khidamat, an organization funded in part by Osama Bin Laden. He also traveled to Afghanistan in 1995 to meet with Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who US officials designated as a “global terrorist.” Care International was also a successor organization of the Boston branch of the Al-Kifah Refugee Center.

Muntasser declined to comment to the Post for its reporting, and no Democrats who received money from him have addressed the contributions. Muntasser is currently operating Quitri III, a Massachusetts real estate investment and development firm.


NEWS

Biden, Dem lawmakers take cash from convicted terrorist financier

A convicted felon accused by the US government of supporting “the cause of violent jihad” — and promoting 9/11 mastermind Osama Bin Laden — donated to Joe Biden’s presidential campaign and a host of progressive Democrats following his release from prison, records show.

Emadeddin Muntasser, 57, and two of his associates were convicted in January 2008 on counts of conspiring to defraud the United States government, lying to the FBI and engaging in a scheme to conceal evidence. The charges stemmed from their operation of an Islamic charity that acted as a front to finance Islamic jihad abroad and lying about the organization in order to obtain tax-exemption status.

“Today’s verdict is a milestone in our efforts against those who conceal their support for extremist causes behind the veil of humanitarianism. For years, these defendants used an allegedly charitable organization as a front for the collection of donations that they used to support violent jihadists,” Kenneth L. Wainstein, Assistant Attorney General for National Security said at the time.

During years-long criminal proceedings that followed the convictions were briefly tossed — only to be later reinstated in 2011. Muntasser ended up serving five months in a Rhode Island prison and another five months of home confinement, six months of supervised release and paid a $10,000 fine.

In 2018 Muntasser became a Democratic donor, cutting a $1,000 check for Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey, according to Federal Election Commission records.

Rep. Tom Malinowski is one of the Dems whose benefitted from Munstasser's donations.
Rep. Tom Malinowski is one of the Dems whose benefitted from Munstasser’s donations.
REUTERS

New Jersey Rep. Tom Malinowski — one of the most endangered members of the House heading into the midterms — has taken $2,250 from Muntasser since 2018.

Muntasser also backed progressives in primary challenges. Last April he offered a max $2,900 donation to Rana Abdelhamid, an aspiring “Squad” member who is running against longtime Upper East Side Rep. Carolyn Maloney.

Muntasser has also donated $2,900 to Muad Hrezi, a Connecticut progressive looking to oust Democratic Rep. John Larson.

Muntasser gave $250 to Biden during his presidential campaign last year.

“Democrats can’t do anything but set themselves up for failure at this point,” Hank Sheinkopf, a longtime Democratic strategist in New York City told The Post, calling the situation “unbelievable.”

“This shows a lack of judgment and what it will be portrayed as is they will do anything to get money for their campaigns. They will deal with anybody — even enemies of the nation. They lose the moral argument entirely,” he added.

Last year, Munstasser offered a significant sum to candidate Rana Abdelhamid.
Last year, Munstasser offered a significant sum to candidate Rana Abdelhamid.
Rana for Congress

A spokeswoman for Malinowski told the New Jersey Globe he would donate the money he got from Muntasser.

“We are proud that thousands of people donate to the Congressman’s campaign. It is common for elected officials to discover problematic donors,” spokeswoman Naree Ketudat, told the outlet. “In this case, we are donating this particular individual’s contributions to the United States Capitol Police Memorial Fund.”

In their sentencing memorandum, government lawyers wrote that the “primary purpose” of Muntasser’s Care International was “financial support of the mujahideen and promotion of violent jihad.”

Muntasser transferred $120,000 from Care between 1993 and 1995 to Makhtab al-Khidamat, an organization co-founded by Bin Laden. He additionally traveled to Afghanistan in 1995 and met with Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, a U.S.-designated “global terrorist,” according to the sentencing memo.

Ed Markey received $1,000 from Munstasser in 2018.
Ed Markey received $1,000 from Munstasser in 2018.
AP

The feds additionally said that “Muntasser served as director of the Boston branch of Al-Kifah Refugee Center,” in the early 1990s and that Care was a “successor” and “outgrowth” of the organization.

“In early 1993, after the first World Trade Center bombing, both Newsweek and The New York Times published articles linking the Brooklyn branch of Al-Kifah to violent Islamic groups. Within days, Muntasser dissolved the Boston branch of Al-Kifah and incorporated Care in Massachusetts,” the feds said.

Muntasser, now a self-styled “human rights and political leader,” currently runs real estate investment and development firm based in Massachusetts called Quitri III. The company received a $24,922 PPP loan from the government in 2020. He declined to comment for this story.

WH Official on Biden Flying Criminal Migrants Across USA: 'Beautiful to Watch' It seems like the Biden administration actually wants the chaos on the southern border to rage on. Read more…

 

 
 
Web version
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WH Official on Biden Flying Criminal Migrants Across USA: 'Beautiful to Watch'
 
It seems like the Biden administration actually wants the chaos on the southern border to rage on. Read more…
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Public Turns on 'Coward' GoFundMe CEO -- And Locked Twitter Account Doesn't Help
 
He might not want to hear from the public, but critics aren't keeping quiet. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GoFundMe Just Got Some Horrific News as Truckers Emerge Victorious
 
Donors have already given over $2,500,000. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Controversy Strikes After Mysterious DQs Hand China Gold Medals
 
'Very suspicious based on who has benefited from the reviews.' Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rittenhouse Judge Hands Down Brutal Decision After Receiving New Evidence
 
The Kyle Rittenhouse legal saga isn't over yet. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Community Blown Away as Respected Man Gives Dark Deathbed Confession
 
The heist and epic getaway have all the makings of a Hollywood hit. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OLYMPIC NIGHTMARE: Athletes in Tears Over Food and Living Conditions
 
Athletes are risking it all to speak out against the CCP's abhorrent Olympic accommodations. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Woman Reveals Haunting Discovery of What Was Hiding in Walls of Home
 
The house has been around for hundreds of years ... including what was found inside. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Memphis BLM Founder Sentenced to Six Years in Prison
 
Moses was previously charged with a slew of felonies, including stalking and perjury. Read more…
 
 
 




Are You Exhausted Spiritually? The everlasting God…neither faints nor is weary. ISAIAH 40:28

 

Capitol Police under investigation for spying on Congress, staff February 9, 2022 Ryan Green Latest News, Politics 0 Comments

 

Capitol Police under investigation for spying on Congress, staff

Share on

There remain many questions about the U.S. Capitol Police and how its officers acted during the riot there on Jan. 6, 2021. One officer shot and killed an unarmed protester, likely without issuing any warning, even though her most offensive offense likely was trespassing.

There also are video clips of officers opening the doors for protesters who entered and took selfies, and then were charged with crimes. Others, a relatively small group, broke windows and did other vandalism.

But now a report in the Federalist reveals that in the wake of the violence, the police department may have been “inappropriately surveilling elected members of Congress, their staff, and visitors to their offices.”

The publication explained it has learned the inspector general for the USCP has opened a formal investigation into the behavior of “the law enforcement agency tasked with security the Capitol.”

The review, the report said, follows “news reports and accusations from lawmakers that USCP has overstepped its bounds as it tries to recover from the January 6 riots that tarnished both the Capitol and the reputation of the law enforcement agency that was supposed to keep it safe.”

The department’s chief, J. Thomas Manger, confirmed the investigation in comments to members of Congress.

“While I am confident in our methods, I am asking the USCP Office of the Inspector General to review the USCP’s programs related to these security assessments to assure both this committee, the Congress as a whole, and the public that these processes are legal, necessary, and appropriate,” he said in a written response to GOP lawmakers who raised questions about the actions.

Politico had explained in a report that one Capitol Police official, Julie Farnam, had insisted that officers do “background checks” on people that were meeting with lawmakers, including donors.

“When staff were listed as attending these meetings, Capitol Police intelligence analysts also got asked to check the social media accounts of the staffers,” Politico had charged.

While Manger said the department’s actions are all just fine, there are reasons for the concern, the report explained.

“Suspicions that USCP may not be acting appropriately did not arise in a vacuum, however. In November 2021, a USCP officer entered the congressional office of Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Tex., and took a photo of a whiteboard in Nehls’ legislative office detailing various legislative plans being considered by Nehls and his staff. In a formal police report filed several days after the incident, the officer wrote that he had been conducting a routine security patrol on Saturday, November 21, and discovered that one of the doors to Nehls’ office was open.”

The officer apparently saw a whiteboard that contained mention of a federal government contractor who defrauded the government by supplying Chinese-made body armor.

The case included a guilty plea from a 32-year-old who admitted wire fraud, the report said.

But the mention on the whiteboard ended up being the focal point of a discussion in the Capitol Police agency, the report said.

Manger said officers also were concerned by an “outline of the Rayburn Building with an X marked at the C Street entrance,” which Nehls’ office spokesman said was a crude map to help an intern find an ice machine.

“If Capitol Police leadership had spent as much time preparing for January 6 as they spent investigating my white board, the January 6 riot never would have happened,” Nehls, a former law enforcement officer, said in the Federalist report. “When I was a patrol officer responding to a call, I didn’t have the time or authority to go rifling through someone’s personal papers. There are serious 4th Amendment, constitutional issues at play here.”

While Manger claimed the cops were worried the references were a “veiled threat” to the member of Congress, that essentially was debunked when Nehls confirmed they never contacted him with any warning.

The Daily Caller News Foundation noted that Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., and dozens of others wrote to Pelosi about the issue.

The letter said, “According to the [Politico] report, Capitol Police is monitoring the online activity of congressional staff and individuals who meet with members of Congress. … If true, these allegations are serious violations of Americans’ civil rights and civil liberties. Our constituents have the right to petition Congress and they should exercise this right without fear that the Capitol Police will scrutinize their property taxes, social media, or relationships.”

Nehls had noted a staff member caught police officers, in plain clothes, inside his office without the congressman’s knowledge and they were photographing “confidential legislative produces.”

The officers returned later, while Congress was in recess, to try to enter his office again, he said.

The Federalist reported a source confirmed “that rather than addressing the massive security and intelligence failures by USCP that allowed the post-election protests to spiral into riots, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi instead doubled down on failure and used the uproar as a pretext for turning the Capitol Police into her own force of political mercenaries.”

The suspicions, the report said, are that “Pelosi is using the January 6 proceedings to justify increased surveillance of her political enemies in Congress.”

Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill., pointed out there remain “too many unanswered questions. The Capitol Police have a lot of explaining to do.”

He said, “My main concern is that the entire Capitol Police board structure is dependent on political leadership to make security decisions. Security decisions are being made based on politics, not on real data.”

Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., warned that Pelosi is using the House’s January 6 committee as a political weapon.

“It’s painfully clear to all of us that the sham January 6 commission is not at all interested in making the Capitol safer or preventing something like January 6 from ever happening again,” Banks said. “It’s clear that the January 6 commission is just a witch hunt against the political enemies of Nancy Pelosi and Liz Cheney.”

It was a former House speaker, Newt Gingrich, who has pointed out that as Pelosi’s job was “to ensure that there was adequate police” on duty that day.

And if there’s weren’t enough officers, it was her job as speaker to “ensure that the National Guard was there.”

So logically, she should be testifying about those failures in any review of that day’s events, he said.

The Associated Press reported Jan. 7 that three days before the breach of the Capitol, the Pentagon asked Capitol Police, who report to Pelosi and others, if the department needed National Guard manpower. Further, amid the riot, Justice Department leaders offered FBI agents.

But police turned them down both times, according to senior defense officials and two people familiar with the matter who spoke to the AP.

In February, one-time White House chief of staff Mark Meadows said President Trump had offered ahead of the Jan. 6 joint session of Congress “as many as 10,000 National Guard troops,” which were declined.

The riot developed when a few dozens or hundreds from a crowd of thousands broke windows to enter the building, take selfies, and vandalize.

Some 700 people have been charged, mostly with crimes like trespassing.

They were protesting Congress’ schedule that day to vote to accept Joe Biden as president, following an election that two analyses have concluded was impacted by Democrat activism.

First, a study revealed that Mark Zuckerberg’s $420 million, handed over to leftists in key positions in elections offices with instructions often to recruit Democrat voters, essentially bought the election for Biden.

Further, the Media Research Center found in an analysis that enough people would have changed their vote away from Biden had legacy and social media not suppressed accurate reporting about scandals involving the Biden family that he would have lost the vote and President Donald Trump would be in office today.

Gingrinch said, “So a lot of this, I think, is a dance by the Democrats, who don’t want us to look very closely at what actually happened.

“If you’ll notice, the political committee they’ve created is, in fact, only looking at political things. They’re not looking at the various ringleaders who’ve not been arrested. They’re not looking at a lot of the details about whether or not the FBI was as involved as provocateurs.

“We know, for example, in Michigan that the FBI was deeply involved in creating an entire project to kidnap the governor, and then pretend it was being done by White nationalists, when in fact all the leading figures were FBI activists.

“So there’s reason to question everything about what happened on Jan. 6.

“Again, as a former speaker, I was deeply offended that anybody would do what they did on the Capitol grounds, but as a former speaker I was also really offended that the current speaker, Pelosi, failed so totally in her job, which was to make sure this didn’t happen.”

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *