Thursday, February 10, 2022

February 10, 2022 Our Authoritarian Moment By Jeffrey Folks...In The Authoritarian Moment, Ben Shapiro warns of the rise of censorship, voter fraud, fake news, and other leftist tactics for seizing control.

 


American Thinker

Our Authoritarian Moment


In The Authoritarian Moment, Ben Shapiro warns of the rise of censorship, voter fraud, fake news, and other leftist tactics for seizing control.  According to Shapiro, these authoritarian abuses have been especially prevalent since the start of Obama's second term, because it was in his second presidential campaign that Obama made the fateful decision to radicalize the Democrat party and tie its future to a coalition of so-called marginalized or minority groups.

Shapiro prefers the term "authoritarian," but he might just as well have used totalitarian, dictatorial, fascist, Stalinist, or any number of other terms.  It is clear that something very disturbing is afoot in America that we have not seen in the past, and that the progressive left, intent on exercising and holding on to power, is behind it.

It is also clear from Shapiro's analysis that progressives are the enemies of ordinary Americans and that progressive values are opposed in every way to the thinking of decent, hardworking Americans who love family, country, and God.  These decent citizens are hated by the left simply because they are decent and refuse to participate in the anti-capitalist, anti-democratic, and anti-white woke culture.

Unfortunately, progressives have had the advantage.  They are fervent, almost religious (or pseudo-religious) in their commitment to change.  They comprise a small, cohesive group similar to the Bolsheviks in revolutionary Russia, and, like those revolutionaries, they believe that the righteousness of their cause justifies any sort of behavior ("by any means necessary," as they say).  And, because they despise Middle America and its citizenry, they are motivated by the strongest of emotions: hate.

Nothing like this can be said of ordinary Americans, who still believe in fair play and following the law, and that is why so many key institutions have fallen into the hands of progressives, including government, corporations, education, the federal bureaucracy (including elements within the FBI and IRS), entertainment and sports, and even the church.  As Shapiro has it, ordinary Americans are not focused on the culture war to begin with, and when they are, they are too polite to object. They lack the fanaticism and ruthlessness of the left, and so the left has been winning.

Top ArticlesWhat's the Deal With Mike Pence?The Biden family is a criminal enterprise as defined in the RICO ActStacey Abrams and Voter SuppressionBlack History and the DemocratsAnd the Band Played OnREAD MOREWill the Churches Follow Mark Zuckerberg into the Metaverse?And the BandPlayed On
And the Band Played On

Unfortunately, a lot of well-meaning conservatives fall into this "too polite" category.  A lot of us have believed for too long that totalitarianism could never happen in America.  We believed that our constitutional guarantees and system of checks and balances would keep us safe.  We like to think Antifa and Black Lives Matter are simply fringe groups that will have their day and disappear, and that the left's takeover of government is temporary and that the midterm elections will restore constitutional government.  The problem is that, after eight years of Obama and a year of Biden, authoritarianism has become deeply rooted.

Now we are threatened with attempts by the left to seize permanent power through federal control of voting, executive orders, and a massive expansion of federal spending.  Senators Manchin and Sinema may have blocked Build Back Better for the time being, but, even with the likelihood of a GOP victory in the fall, Democrats have another nine months and a lame-duck Congress in which to have their way.  And we're stuck for another three years with a leftist president whose grasp of reality is questionable but who seems to be in the hands of radical handlers.

What the left has in mind is chilling, for it would transform America into an authoritarian nation similar to communist China, theocratic Iran, and oligarchic Russia.  Like these dictatorships, America would then be governed by a permanent ruling class with no regard for our Constitution or our traditions of liberty and democracy.  We would live under the tyranny of one-party rule, bureaucratic abuses, ideological censorship, fraudulent elections, show trials, and political prosecutions, aspects of the totalitarian state that are already too familiar.

Ben Shapiro, in his books and popular podcasts, is doing a service by exposing the breadth of these abuses and the dangers that lie ahead.  It's clear that he loves America and is dedicated to trying to save it.  But the forces of authoritarianism are powerful, well funded, and influential, and it's far from certain that conservatives will prevail.

The November elections will be a good start, but even with Republicans in control of Congress, that leaves Biden in the White House for another two years, and it leaves an anonymous bureaucracy, most of it left-leaning, in control of nearly all of our government agencies and departments.  And it leaves radicals in charge of our schools and colleges, and cowardly CEOs too frightened to oppose the extortion of radical leaders, and even scientists too afraid to speak out on matters like climate change and biological sex differences.  It leaves us with a mainstream media establishment still in the hands of mindless leftists spewing the party line on everything from national defense to abortion to so-called gay rights.  It leaves mayors, judges, state legislatures, governors, and bureaucracies at the state and local levels still in the hands of the left.  And all of this progressive leviathan is intent on transforming America into what amounts to a fascist state.


Just to have a chance, we must constantly oppose authoritarianism through legal and peaceful means, through voting and political organization, and through writing and speaking out, and we must be a little less polite in our resistance.  If we fail, this really will be "the authoritarian moment" — or, more to the point, the establishment of a totalitarian communist state in America.

 Jeffrey Folks is the author of many books and articles on American culture including Heartland of the Imagination (2011).

Image via Picryl.

February 10, 2022 Letter from Facebook Jail By John F. Di Leo I’m writing from jail… but that’s okay. I’ve been in jail before.

 

American Thinker

Letter from Facebook Jail


I’m writing from jail… but that’s okay.  I’ve been in jail before.

In 2021, I served two stints in Facebook’s Cell Block H, once for posting about the likely origin of Covid-19 in Wuhan and the fact that masks and lockdowns did far more damage than help… and once for sharing a meme complimentary of Kyle Rittenhouse’s volunteer work in scrubbing graffiti off walls in Kenosha. Thirty days each.

But my current stint came as a surprise to me.

On Sunday, I posted a humorous one-stanza poem by Hilaire Belloc, the great English author and member of Parliament. The title is “Epitaph on the Politician Himself,” and it describes how sad the author is at seeing a corrupt politician die of natural causes, when he clearly should have been hanged after conviction for corruption.

A friend asked for clarification on its meaning – not unusual with poetry – and I answered the question. Within seconds my account was restricted, and I received the all-too-familiar notice of a 30-day suspension from the megalomaniacs of Menlo Park.

There wasn’t time for someone to report it, or for a human being to review it.  This was an act of Facebook’s famous Artificial Intelligence, known to its users as the Algorithm, or the Bot, or Blinky’s Minions.

The system registered a reference to hanging and shut down the user who posted it. Immediately.

There was no recognition that this was a literary discussion, analyzing a century-old poem by an English parliamentarian.  The system has no way of distinguishing between a call for suicide or lynching, and a call for legitimate capital punishment following a conviction.  The system has no way of telling whether I was calling for it, or someone else was calling for it, or even, as in this case, two modern poetry fans were discussing a poem about fictional characters from a century ago.

Even if Mr. Belloc had had someone in mind when he wrote the poem – I have no idea – that person is unnamed, and long dead.  Belloc’s service in Parliament was over 110 years ago.

But the system cannot tell the difference, and is not interested in doing so, because Facebook – the company, and its human enforcers – decided to implement a single standard upon the world, regardless of language, culture, or context.

Facebook cannot distinguish between fiction and nonfiction, between reality and fantasy, between serious statements, sarcasm, and jokes.  

Post at your peril.

Reflecting upon my perceived crime and sentencing, I cannot help but draw certain parallels to other situations.

If a public school or coffee shop is a gun-free zone, then anything that looks like a gun is banned; police may be unwelcome unless they leave their sidearms in the car, and students can be suspended or expelled if they nibble a Pop-Tart into the shape of a handgun.

If a school has a no-smoking policy, then children can get disciplined for having candy cigarettes, just because they look like cigarettes.

If a surgical team in an operating room, cutting into a sick human being, wears masks in hope of protecting against infection, then surely mandating such masks for people walking in parks, driving alone in cars, and sitting in offices is just as sensible.

If a welfare plan – such as free housing, food, and medical care – makes sense for the aged and poor, then surely it makes just as much sense to offer such a welfare plan to everyone, regardless of age and condition, even regardless of citizenship.  What’s good for 90-year-old WWII veterans who lived their lives in Chicago should also be provided to a caravan of Venezuelans who hiked through seven other countries to get here.  Why not?

The people of Arizona and California have frequent water shortages.  But if you buy a shower head or toilet in Michigan, in the very heart of the Great Lakes, that product must be designed with a water governor to limit your usage too. It’s federal law, applied nationwide, no matter whether you live in constant drought or you reside in a flood plain.

Wind and sunlight are free; to use windmills and solar panels to power a farmhouse in a sunny, windy area might be cost-efficient and sensible… but the federal government is now staffed with legions who worship the sun and wind as cure-alls and seek to impose dependence upon these sources on areas that lack both consistent wind and sun.

Each of these issues seems completely different from the others.  Some are the choices of unions and associations, others the decree of school boards.  Some are the unconstitutional whim of mayors and governors, some are the regulatory overreach of federal bureaucracies.

But what they have in common is a lack of judgment, a lack of understanding that circumstances differ, so situations require localized or personal discrimination.

That’s a trigger word, nowadays, isn’t it?  Discrimination.  At least two generations have been raised to believe that discrimination is pure evil.  And certainly, some kinds (such as anti-Semitism or blind racial bigotry) can be.

But the term itself simply means the act of distinguishing between different cases, and judging each accordingly.  Discrimination – sensible, thoughtful judgment, based on the facts – is critical in our personal lives, and is more important than ever in the political arena.

The contest in America and the West -- for at least the past two centuries -- has been a contest between free markets and central planning.  The advocates of the latter – the practitioners of over-regulation at every level – are responsible for the ongoing degradation of the greatest economic and social system in human history.

There are times when wearing a mask makes sense, and times when it doesn’t. There are times when water governors make sense, and times when they’re silly.  Times when welfare is generous and honorable, and times when welfare bankrupts society and destroys the standard of living of entire nations.

The individual can and should make most of these decisions, at the most local level. A company makes decisions for its own management and its own products. A hospital makes decisions for its own operating rooms.  An individual makes decisions for his own life.

When central planning makes bad decisions, its advocates tell us that these mistakes are the exception.  The unspoken message is that “socialism just wasn’t done right, all those other times.”

But they are not the exception.  Central planning makes mistakes because, the larger the scale, the more differences there are - the more idiosyncrasies, the more data points there are. The bigger the organization, the more impossible it becomes for anyone, or for any policy, to take everything into account and make the right decisions.

We are all much safer if we follow the Founding Fathers’ advice and leave decisions up to the people.  The sovereign individual citizens.

Central planning doesn’t work in government; remember the USSR. Central planning doesn’t work in appliances; just remember your low-flush toilet.  And central planning doesn’t work in social media; just remember the last time Mark Zuckerberg put you in jail for using sarcasm.

John F. Di Leo is a Chicagoland-based international transportation professional.  A onetime Milwaukee County Republican Party Chairman, he has been writing a regular column in Illinois Review since 2009.  His book on vote fraud (The Tales of Little Pavel) and his brand new political satires on the current administration (Evening Soup with Basement Joe, Volumes I and II) are available on Amazon.

 

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *