|
| ||||||||||||||
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, dozens of churches and pro-life pregnancy centers were firebombed by radical pro-abortion terrorists nationwide.
Nearly a year later it seemed as though no one would ever be held accountable.
But the way this radical pro-abortionist who firebombed a pro-life center was caught will put a smile on your face.There is no doubt the FBI has been slow walking, or even no walking, the investigations into the violent attacks on churches and pro-life centers.
Last year, on Mother’s Day, Wisconsin Family Action – a pro-life 501(c)(4) non-profit organization headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin – was viciously attacked by pro-abortion terrorists.
This attack was part of a nationwide reign of terror from pro-abortionists and their radical socialist allies that began roughly one week after the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was illegally leaked to Politico.
Left-wing radicals firebombed the organization’s headquarters with a Molotov cocktail, and spray painted the message, “If abortions aren’t safe then you aren’t either,” on the side of the building.According to reports, upon entering the building, law enforcement investigating the attack discovered multiple broken Mason jars, including one with a singed cloth still tucked into it, as well as a purple disposable lighter nearby.
But most importantly, police were also able to recover DNA from the scene.
Nearly 10 months after the attack, law enforcement identified Hridindu Sankar Roychowdhury, a 29-year-old former University of Wisconsin-Madison doctoral student, as a suspect.
And in what had to be the easiest police work of all-time, they tracked the left-wing radical down to a protest at the Wisconsin State Capitol over the construction of an Atlanta, Georgia police training facility last month.Investigators proceeded to conduct surveillance of the protest, and observed Roychowdhury toss a half-eaten burrito into a public trash can, allowing them to retrieve the burrito and other contents the suspect threw away.
Using the “quarter portion of a partially eaten burrito wrapped in waxed paper, a soiled napkin, a crumpled napkin, a stack of napkins, the wrapper of the burrito, a crumpled food wrapper, [and] four unopened hot sauce packets,” they found in the trash can, police were ultimately able to compare the DNA found at the crime scene to the DNA on Roychowdhury’s burrito.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Justice Department found that the DNA was a match.
“On March 17, 2023, law enforcement advised that a forensic biologist examined the DNA evidence recovered from the attack scene and compared it to the DNA collected from the food contents,” the Justice Department said. “The forensic biologist found the two samples matched and likely were the same individual.”
It’s about time
From there, law enforcement proceeded to track Roychowdhury from Madison to Portland, Maine – he obviously thought it was the other Portland – and then to Boston, where he purchased a one-way ticket to Guatemala City, Guatemala.
But once the suspect arrived at Boston Logan International Airport to flee the country, he was arrested and charged with one count of attempting to cause damage by means of fire or an explosive.
“According to the complaint, Mr. Roychowdhury used an incendiary device in violation of federal law in connection with his efforts to terrorize and intimidate a private organization,” Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen said in a statement. “I commend the commitment and professionalism of law enforcement personnel who worked exhaustively to ensure that justice is served.”
“Violence is never an acceptable way for anyone to express their views or their disagreement,” FBI’s Counterterrorism Division Assistant Director Robert R. Wells said. “Today’s arrest demonstrates the FBI’s commitment to vigorously pursue those responsible for this dangerous attack and others across the country, and to hold them accountable for their criminal actions.”
Of course, it did take nearly a year for this arrest to occur, and the idea that someone could firebomb a building for the express purpose of political intimidation and only be charged with one count that has nothing to do with domestic terrorism seems rather absurd.
The Family Research Council has documented more than 100 violent attacks on pro-life organizations and churches since the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe was leaked.
And for most of those more than 100 attacks, the extremist left-wing group, Jane’s Revenge, has taken responsibility.
Yet, the arrest of Roychowdhury was one of the very first arrests connected with the attacks to yield any semblance of justice for the victims.
Meanwhile, the Biden regime is targeting peaceful pro-life activists, like 47-year-old father Mark Houck and 87-year-old Holocaust survivor Eva Edl, for having the audacity to pray outside of abortion factories.
In the case of Houck, the FBI sent dozens of heavily armed stormtroopers to his home for a pre-dawn raid in which they stormed his home and drug him out in front of his wife and children.
But when it comes to a left-wing radical, like Hridindu Sankar Roychowdhury, they simply quietly pick him up in the middle of an airport without any fuss and no weapons drawn.
It’s almost like there’s a double-standard in America’s justice system that gives left-wing radicals a pass for literal domestic terrorism while pro-life Christians are treated like Al Capone for simply existing.
Informed American will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.RELATED ARTICLES
Politicians often engage in hyperbole to make their point and that is especially true on the left side of the political divide.
All too often many of the most vocal players in a debate make uninformed statements based more on emotion than reason.
That’s how Senator John Kennedy just leveled Mayorkas by asking him one simple question. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas called for a ban of “assault weapons” in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Mayorkas made his statement after a deadly school shooting by a 28 year-old transgender activist in which three students and three adults were killed at a private Christian elementary school in Nashville, Tennessee.
But when Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) asked Mayorkas his definition of a so-called “assault weapon” Mayorkas was unable to answer, instead giving a mealy-mouthed non-response answer.
Mayorkas said, “I am not an expert with respect to the definition of the assault bans. I defer to the experts, I defer to, for example, the definition of an assault weapon that was codified in the prior iteration of the legislation that was passed and that was in operation when I served as an assistant United States attorney and the United States Attorney in the Central District of California.”Kennedy asked, “So you would support the prior definition?”
Mayorkas replied, “Senator, I must defer to the experts with respect to the definition, but I will tell you for example, military style weapons are of tremendous concern, we are seeing too much devastation.”
Kennedy then dryly said, “But I mean you, you personally think that we should ban assault weapons and I know you to be an intelligent man and a thinking person. I know you’ve thought about it.”
Kennedy asked next what Mayorkas meant by “military-style weapon.”
Being led by “international counterparts”
Mayorkas said, “Senator, I really must say that you are probing a very, very important area definitionally in which I do not have the requisite expertise. I will say this, when we see, when we see the tragedy in Nashville, and it is not the first such tragedy that we see, when I engage with my international counterparts and they ask me almost invariably first what is going on with all the mass killings in the United States and why are these assault weapons disseminated so broadly, I say that we need legislation to ban them.”
Kennedy then asked, “Let me follow up on that, so you support an assault weapon ban, but you don’t have a definition, is that correct?”
Mayorkas replied, “Senator, I think that you understand where I stand.”
Kennedy, knowing he had Mayorkas cornered, said, “No, I don’t. I don’t. You made a very bold statement, very firmly saying we should ban all assault weapons and all I’m asking is what in your mind is an assault weapon. I mean you say it’s military-style, does that mean it looks like a military weapon?”
Mayorkas eventually said he would consider an AK-47 to be an assault weapon.
In the end, the exchange just shows how willing the Biden administration is to use any tragedy to further their radical political agenda, with members of the ruling government making over the top calls for quick action but with little forethought.
And that’s just a perfect example of why the 2nd amendment and all constitutional rights need to be so fiercely protected.
Informed American will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.RELATED ARTICLES