Autopen Controversy: Who Was Really in Control of the Presidency?;If Biden wasn’t mentally fit to authorize these signatures, are the resulting policies legally valid?

 

Autopen Controversy: Who Was Really in Control of the Presidency?

The Biden administration faces new scrutiny following a startling report by the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project. The report raises profound questions about who truly wielded executive authority throughout Biden’s presidency. If Biden wasn’t mentally fit to authorize these signatures, are the resulting policies legally valid?

Report Reveals Identical Biden Signatures

A bombshell investigation by the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project has uncovered evidence suggesting President Joe Biden routinely used an autopen for signing official documents throughout his presidency. The report analyzed numerous presidential signatures and found them to be suspiciously identical across multiple documents, raising serious questions about who was authorizing presidential actions.

The Oversight Project pointedly declared, “WHOEVER CONTROLLED THE AUTOPEN CONTROLLED THE PRESIDENCY,” highlighting concerns about the potential exploitation of presidential authority. This revelation comes amid ongoing debates about Biden’s cognitive abilities and whether unelected staffers might have been making policy decisions without proper presidential oversight.

Legal and Constitutional Questions Emerge

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has called for a Justice Department investigation into Biden’s cognitive state and the administration’s use of the autopen. Bailey argues that if Biden was being exploited or unaware of what he was authorizing, the executive orders and other documents signed using the autopen could be “null and void” under constitutional law.

Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson added fuel to the controversy with alarming claims about Biden’s awareness of his executive actions. In a conversation with journalist Bari Weiss, Johnson alleged that Biden “genuinely did not know what he had signed” regarding an order on Liquefied Natural Gas exports, suggesting a concerning disconnect between the president and the policies issued under his name.

Notable Exceptions and Historical Context

While most examined documents displayed identical signatures indicative of autopen use, the report identified notable exceptions. Biden’s letter announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race appeared to bear a genuine signature, as did the controversial pardon for his son Hunter Biden, which Heritage attorney Samuel Dewey described as “shaky” and likely signed in person.

The use of autopens has been a common practice among presidents for decades, with the technology allowing for the mechanical reproduction of signatures when the president is unavailable or when efficiency demands it. However, the apparent systematic use throughout Biden’s presidency raises unique ethical questions about transparency, authenticity, and whether the public was misled about the president’s level of engagement with policy decisions.

Critics argue that while automation may be necessary for government efficiency, the public deserves clarity about when a president’s signature is personally applied versus mechanically reproduced. This controversy ultimately highlights the tension between modern administrative requirements and traditional expectations of presidential authority, especially when questions about a president’s capacity have become politically contentious.

Sources:

• Documents signed by Biden were done using an autopen, report finds

• Biden’s ‘autopen signature’ appears on most official docs, raising concerns over who controlled the WH: report

The Complex Reality of Fighting Racism Recognizing the Need for Heart Transformation Beyond External Measures. March 12th, 2025 • Estimated Reading Time: 3 minutes

 

The Complex Reality of Fighting Racism

Recognizing the Need for Heart Transformation Beyond External Measures.

March 12th, 2025 • Estimated Reading Time: 3 minutes

In recent times, calls to "end racism" have become prominent across various platforms, from sports arenas to social media campaigns. While these initiatives aim to promote equality and justice, it's essential to understand that addressing racism requires more than external measures; it necessitates a profound transformation of the human heart.

The Limitations of External Efforts

Efforts such as policy reforms, diversity training, and public awareness campaigns play significant roles in combating systemic racism. However, these approaches often address behaviors without necessarily transforming the underlying prejudices that fuel discrimination. As noted in discussions on the topic, "No politician. No law. No march nor protest. No best resolves nor coercive measures. No amount of listening nor diversity training can end racism."

The Root of the Issue: The Human Heart

Racism, at its core, is a manifestation of sin a reflection of humanity's inherent brokenness and propensity to exalt oneself over others. This perspective aligns with biblical teachings that highlight the sinfulness of humanity and the need for divine intervention to effect true change.

The Necessity of Spiritual Rebirth

True and lasting change in attitudes toward race comes from a transformation that only God can provide. This transformation, often referred to as being "born again," involves receiving a new heart and spirit that align with God's love and justice. As highlighted in relevant discussions.

The Church's Role in Racial Reconciliation

The Christian community is uniquely positioned to model genuine reconciliation and unity. By embracing the transformative power of the gospel, believers can demonstrate a love that transcends racial and ethnic boundaries. This unity serves as a testament to the world of God's power to heal divisions and foster genuine brotherhood among diverse peoples.

Conclusion

While societal efforts to combat racism are vital, they are insufficient without addressing the deeper issue of the human heart. True reconciliation and the eradication of racial prejudice require a transformation that comes from spiritual rebirth. As individuals and communities experience this change, they can collectively move toward a world where love and justice prevail.

If this perspective resonates with you, consider sharing this article or subscribing to our newsletter for more insights on fostering genuine unity and understanding.