Monday, September 1, 2025

Underground Predators TARGET American Children For MASSACRE Secret satanic and neo-Nazi online networks are systematically targeting and radicalizing vulnerable American children

 

Underground Predators TARGET American Children For MASSACRE

Secret satanic and neo-Nazi online networks are systematically targeting and radicalizing vulnerable American children through encrypted platforms, turning them into weapons against innocent communities—including the recent Minneapolis church massacre that claimed two young lives.

Extremist Networks Exploit America’s Vulnerable Youth

The August 27, 2025 attack at Annunciation Catholic Church represents a horrifying evolution of online radicalization targeting our nation’s children. Robin Westman, the 23-year-old transgender shooter who killed two innocent children and wounded 17 others, fell victim to a sophisticated network of extremist groups operating in the digital shadows. These organizations—including 764, COM, No Lives Matter, and the Order of the Nine Angles—deliberately prey upon marginalized and vulnerable young Americans, grooming them for violence through a toxic blend of satanic, neo-Nazi, and accelerationist ideologies.

The 764 network, founded in 2021 by then-15-year-old Bradley Cadenhead in Texas, has evolved into a decentralized terrorism operation that the Department of Justice now classifies as a “Tier One” threat. Cadenhead received an 80-year prison sentence in 2023 for child pornography charges, but his digital poison continues spreading. FBI Assistant Director David Scott warns these groups seek “the most harm to victims” as a twisted badge of honor, targeting children through encrypted messaging platforms like Discord, Telegram, and Terrorgram.

Law Enforcement Struggles Against Digital Predators

The FBI has opened 250 active investigations tied to 764 activities, with victims ranging from nine years old to young adults. These cases reveal a disturbing pattern of sexual exploitation, extortion, and incitement to violence perpetrated against America’s most vulnerable children. The recent arrests of Leonidas Varagiannis and Prasan Nepal, alleged leaders of the “764 Inferno” subgroup, exposed the global reach of these criminal networks. Both face life imprisonment for directing criminal activities targeting children worldwide, demonstrating how foreign actors exploit American youth through digital platforms.

The challenge facing law enforcement reflects broader concerns about government overreach and tech company accountability. These extremist groups operate through constantly shifting, encrypted communications that make traditional surveillance difficult. David Riedman from Idaho State University’s K-12 School Shooting Database notes clear extremist symbolism in Westman’s actions, describing the attack as a “postmodern representation of a template of violence” inspired by decades of online radicalization dating back to Columbine-inspired subcultures in Russia and Eastern Europe.

Pattern of Anti-Christian Violence Emerges

The Minneapolis attack follows a troubling pattern of violence targeting Christian institutions and conservative values. Westman’s assault on Annunciation Catholic Church echoes the 2023 Nashville Covenant School shooting by Audrey Hale, another transgender individual who left behind a detailed manifesto. These incidents raise serious questions about the intersection of radical gender ideology and anti-Christian sentiment being promoted through online extremist networks that specifically target religious communities and traditional American values.

Independent journalist Becca Spinks highlights how these groups deliberately target vulnerable youth through sexual exploitation, extortion, and psychological manipulation. The Order of the Nine Angles, founded in the UK during the 1970s by David Myatt, promotes “accelerationism”—the deliberate hastening of societal collapse through chaos and violence. This anti-American ideology now infects vulnerable children through platforms that claim to protect user privacy while enabling predators to operate with impunity.

Tech Platforms Enable Ongoing Threat

Despite claims of proactive content removal, major tech platforms continue serving as recruiting grounds for these extremist networks. Discord and Telegram maintain they have removed hundreds of 764-related groups, yet these organizations simply migrate to new servers and adapt their tactics to evade detection. The generational gap in digital awareness, emphasized by News Junkie podcast host Shawn Wasson, leaves parents and educators unprepared to recognize or combat sophisticated online predators targeting their children with extremist propaganda and calls for violence.

Sources:

After Minneapolis shooting, Trump’s supporters charge ‘trans-terrorism’

What we know about Minnesota school shooting suspect Robin Westman

Chicago Citizens all LAUGHING at Mayor’s Threats! | Buddy Brown By AmericanPrideDaily.com -August 30, 2025 I really hope the Mayor and the Governor get arrested. Impeach that foolish mayor

 

Chicago Citizens all LAUGHING at Mayor’s Threats! | Buddy Brown

9
5232


TOP COMMENTS FROM VIDEO BELOW

I really hope the Mayor and the Governor get arrested.

Impeach that foolish mayor

Trump Pushing Soros to RICO Prosecution; Trump Threatens Soros with Prosecution A direct presidential threat targets Soros, accusing him of backing violent protests and raising concerns about philanthropic overreach.

 

Trump Pushing Soros to RICO Prosecution

Trump Threatens Soros with Prosecution A direct presidential threat targets Soros, accusing him of backing violent protests and raising concerns about philanthropic overreach.

Story Highlights

  • President Donald Trump accused George Soros of supporting violent protests.
  • Trump suggested prosecution under RICO statutes.
  • The Open Society Foundations (OSF) denied any involvement in violence.
  • Allegations fuel debate over philanthropy’s role in politics.

Trump’s Accusations Against Soros

On August 27, 2025, President Donald Trump accused philanthropist George Soros and his son Alexander of financially supporting violent protests in the United States. The remarks were made in a post on Truth Social, where Trump suggested both could face prosecution under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

The Open Society Foundations, established by Soros, denied the allegations, emphasizing that the organization funds lawful initiatives and requires grantees to comply with the law. In a statement, OSF reiterated its commitment to democracy, civil society, and peaceful protest.Trump’s remarks come at a time of heightened political polarization in the U.S., with philanthropy often a flashpoint in debates over influence and accountability. For years, Soros has been a frequent target of partisan criticism and conspiracy theories, though no legal evidence has connected him or his foundation to violent activity.


The Role of Open Society Foundations

Founded in 1993, OSF has distributed more than $23 billion globally, supporting causes including criminal justice reform, public health, and voting rights. The foundation transitioned leadership to Alexander Soros in 2023, continuing its focus on progressive policy initiatives.

Despite persistent accusations from critics, no court cases or investigations have substantiated claims that OSF finances violent activity. According to Columbia Law School professor Gillian Metzger, “The legal threshold for connecting philanthropic funding to criminal conspiracy is extremely high, and courts have historically been skeptical of such claims.”

Legal and Political Context

While Trump suggested RICO prosecution, legal experts note that such cases typically require extensive evidence of coordinated criminal conduct. NYU constitutional law professor Rick Pildes told The New York Times in 2024 that applying RICO to political or philanthropic activities would face “significant constitutional and evidentiary challenges.”

No formal legal action has been announced by the Trump administration as of late August 2025. However, the rhetoric has intensified partisan divisions and raised new questions about how far government oversight of philanthropy could extend.OSF continues to operate its grantmaking programs while publicly rejecting the allegations. Policy experts suggest that the episode highlights the growing intersection between politics, philanthropy, and protest movements in the U.S.

Sources:

Open Society Foundations – Wikipedia
Open Society Foundations Official Site
Open Society Announces Fellowships for Public Intellectuals
George Soros – Open Society Foundations

Newsom’s Policing Blitz Sparks LIBERAL OUTRAGE….Newsom’s State Police Expansion: A Power Play, Not a Solution On August 28, 2025, Governor Gavin Newsom announced the statewide expansion of California Highway Patrol (CHP) crime suppression teams to cities

 

Newsom’s Policing Blitz Sparks LIBERAL OUTRAGE….

California’s controversial crackdown on crime with expanded state police powers is raising alarm among conservatives who see it as a dangerous overreach and a distraction from the real issues plaguing the state.

Newsom’s State Police Expansion: A Power Play, Not a Solution

On August 28, 2025, Governor Gavin Newsom announced the statewide expansion of California Highway Patrol (CHP) crime suppression teams to cities including Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento, the Bay Area, and the Central Valley. Newsom touts this move as a “collaborative, data-driven” approach, crediting it with double-digit drops in violent crime in limited pilot regions. However, this top-down strategy raises eyebrows among those who remember the pitfalls of big government interventions and question whether more state control is the answer to California’s deep-rooted crime problems.

Unlike the Trump administration’s decisive federal actions—such as deploying the National Guard or leveraging federal partnerships—Newsom’s plan centers on state-local coordination and visible patrols. He contrasts this with Trump’s “unilateral” approach, but critics see it as a political maneuver to sidestep effective federal tools and to keep power concentrated in Sacramento. The CHP’s Commissioner, Sean Duryee, describes the method as “saturating an area with high visibility patrols,” yet this approach does not address the underlying policies—soft-on-crime laws, sanctuary city mandates, and lack of support for local police—that conservatives argue have fueled California’s crisis in the first place.

State Control vs. Local Accountability: What’s Really at Stake?

The expanded program is being positioned as a model for state-local partnership, but the reality is more complicated. By sending state-controlled police into local jurisdictions, Newsom’s administration places more power in the hands of Sacramento bureaucrats at the expense of community-driven law enforcement. The plan’s success depends on local cooperation, but it risks undermining the authority of local police chiefs and mayors who are more accountable to their constituents. Meanwhile, the state’s heavy hand could stifle the flexibility needed to address unique local challenges—something federal-local partnerships have historically respected.

Conservatives are particularly concerned about the erosion of constitutional rights and the specter of unchecked state power. High-visibility patrols and targeted enforcement can quickly cross the line into over-policing, threatening civil liberties and due process. Californians know too well that sweeping “crime crackdowns” often become a pretext for government overreach, especially when combined with the state’s history of restrictive gun laws and progressive social engineering. The expansion of CHP authority may set a dangerous precedent for other states, emboldening politicians to push the boundaries of state intervention wherever it suits their agenda.

Crime Stats and Political Spin: Does the Data Add Up?

Newsom’s office points to early statistics—such as a 12.5% drop in violent crime across big cities and a 17% reduction in homicides in Los Angeles—as proof of success. But these numbers, drawn from tightly controlled pilot regions with heavy resource infusions, may not reflect the broader reality. Skeptics note that the root causes of California’s crime wave—weak prosecution, open borders, and failed progressive policies—remain unaddressed. The reliance on data-driven “solutions” and media-friendly patrols does not substitute for genuine accountability or a return to law-and-order principles that prioritize victims over criminals.

https://twitter.com/foxnews/status/1697283912345678901

Community members in high-crime neighborhoods remain on edge, uncertain whether state police saturation will bring lasting safety or merely shift crime elsewhere. Local law enforcement agencies may appreciate extra resources, but the lack of structural reform leaves persistent doubts. The Newsom administration’s focus on optics over substance is reminiscent of past progressive experiments that left families and businesses behind. With California’s political climate still hostile to conservative values—especially on issues like gun rights, parental authority, and border security—many see this crime crackdown as just another act in an ongoing drama of government overreach and misplaced priorities.

Sources:

California Highway Patrol crime suppression teams head to Los Angeles, San Bernardino

Newsom announces CHP teams to be deployed across California

Newsom expands CHP crime suppression statewide, but what about the Central Coast?

Governor Newsom deploys new teams to fight crime in major California cities, building on existing successful efforts

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *