Monday, January 2, 2017

Britain’s Queen Elizabeth misses church again due to heavy cold

Britain’s Queen Elizabeth misses church again due to heavy cold

FILE PHOTO: Britain's Queen Elizabeth leaves after attending the Christmas Day service at church in Sandringham, eastern England, December 25, 2015. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/File Photo
By Peter Nicholls
SANDRINGHAM, England (Reuters) – Britain’s Queen Elizabeth missed a New Year’s Day church service on Sunday due to a heavy cold, Buckingham Palace said, a week after the 90-year-old monarch missed a Christmas Day service for the first time in decades.
The world’s longest-reigning monarch, who became unwell before Christmas, stayed indoors at her Sandringham country estate in Norfolk, eastern England, while other members of the royal family attended the service.
“The Queen does not yet feel ready to attend church as she is still recuperating from a heavy cold,” Buckingham Palace said in a statement.
Elizabeth and her husband Prince Philip, 95, were both suffering from heavy colds in the week leading up to Christmas and delayed their journey from London to Sandringham by a day, traveling there by helicopter on Dec. 22.
Philip attended both the Christmas and New Year services. On Sunday he arrived by car before walking into the grey stone parish church of St. Mary Magdalene, but the queen, who is the symbolic head of the Church of England, made no public appearance.
A few dozen parishioners and a crowd of photographers had gathered outside the church on Sunday morning in cold, rainy weather as other members of the royal family arrived.
The queen’s daughter, Anne, and her third son, Edward, were among those who attended.
Elizabeth had previously attended the Christmas service at the church every year since the royal family started celebrating Christmas at Sandringham in 1988.
After more than six decades on the throne, the queen has cut back on international tours but still regularly performs official duties around Britain.
The palace announced on Dec. 20 she would step down as patron of several charities and other organizations to reduce her workload.
While Elizabeth’s father, King George VI, died at the relatively young age of 56, her mother, known as Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother, lived until 101 and was still appearing in public almost up until her death in 2002.
Elizabeth has maintained the popularity of the monarchy despite years of political, social and cultural change since she became queen on Feb. 6, 1952, aged just 25.
(Writing and additional reporting by Estelle Shirbon; Editing by Gareth Jones)

Pope tells bishops to have zero tolerance for sexual abuse

Pope tells bishops to have zero tolerance for sexual abuse

Pope Francis leads a mass on New Year's Day at Saint Peter's Basilica at the Vatican January 1, 2017. REUTERS/Remo Casilli
By Philip Pullella
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – Pope Francis has told bishops around the world they must adhere to a policy of zero tolerance for clergy who sexually abuse children and begged forgiveness for “a sin that shames us”.
In a letter sent on Dec. 28 but released by the Vatican only on Monday, Francis said: “I would like us to renew our complete commitment to ensuring that these atrocities will no longer take place in our midst.”
Since his election in 2013, Francis has taken some steps to root out sexual abuse in the Church and to put in place practices to protect children. But victims’ groups say he has not done enough, particularly to hold to account bishops who tolerated sexual abuse or covered it up.
“(The Church) recognizes the sins of some of her members: the sufferings, the experiences and the pain of minors who were abused sexually by priests. It is a sin that shames us,” Francis wrote in the letter.
“I would like us to renew our complete commitment to ensuring that these atrocities will no longer take place in our midst. Let us find the courage needed to take all necessary measures and to protect in every way the lives of our children, so that such crimes may never be repeated. In this area, let us adhere, clearly and faithfully, to ‘zero tolerance’,” he said.
The comments, included in a letter about the plight of vulnerable children in general, were some of his most comprehensive on abuse.
Francis, who has met victims of sexual abuse several times, both in the Vatican and on some of his foreign trips, said: “We join in the pain of the victims and weep for this sin – the sin of what happened, the sin of failing to help, the sin of covering up and denial, the sin of the abuse of power.”
In 2015, Francis ordered the trial and defrocking of a Polish archbishop accused of paying for sex with minors in the Dominican Republic.
The year before, he set up a Vatican commission, including some victims, to advise local Churches on how to prevent abuse.
But some members have complained about the slow pace of change in the Vatican.
Francis also approved the establishment of a Vatican tribunal to judge bishops accused of covering up sexual abuse or failing to prevent it, but the proposal has so far stalled.
Church sexual abuse broke into the open in 2002, when it was discovered that U.S. bishops moved abusers from parish to parish instead of defrocking them. Similar scandals were later discovered around the world and tens of millions of dollars have been paid in compensation.
2017-01-02T162001Z_1_LYNXMPED010H9_RTROPTP_3_NEWYEAR-POPE-MASS.JPG
(Reporting by Philip Pullella; editing by Peter Graff)

BREAKING: "Russia On Hold"

Started streaming 55 minutes ago
Pastor Paul Begley "LIVE" http://www.paulbegleyprophecy.com also Help Us Spread the Word https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
Category
News & Politics
License
Standard YouTube License

"Dont Push The Green Button" Kim Jong Un

Published on Jan 2, 2017
This man is crazy http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/01/asia/no... also http://www.paulbegleyprophecy.com
Category
People & Blogs
License
Standard YouTube License

"Good News Blessings 2017 $ 900 Tip For Waitress"

Published on Jan 2, 2017
In Phoenix, Arizona a pregnant waitress receives a 900 dollar tip http://www.paulbegleyprophecy.com Also Help Us Spread the Word
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr... also http://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/pregna... also https://crusaderjournal.com
Category
People & Blogs
License
Standard YouTube License
Created using
YouTube Capture

QUAKE WARNING/INCOMING JUMP IN SOLAR WIND SPEED.

Published on Jan 1, 2017
9 DAY CYCLE SETTING UP.
ALL LINKS http://www.BPEarthWatch.Com
Category
News & Politics
License
Standard YouTube License

Urgent: "Solar Wind Earth Facing Quake Warning Next 5 Days"

Published on Jan 2, 2017
Solar winds speeds to increase and a hole in the Sun's atmosphere are setting the stage for increase earthquakes in next 5 days http://www.paulbegleyprophecy.com also Help Us Spread the Word
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr... also https://crusaderjournal.com/2017/01/0... also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_3gg... also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_3gg...
Category
People & Blogs
License
Standard YouTube License
Created using
YouTube Capture

Prophecy Alert: "Gog And Magog Gathering Their Forces"

Published on Jan 2, 2017
Biblical Prophetic events in the Middle East leading up to the "Gog and Magog" war http://www.paulbegleyprophecy.com also Help Us Spread the Word
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr... also https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/81... also https://crusaderjournal.com/2017/01/0...
Category
People & Blogs
License
Standard YouTube License
Created using
YouTube Capture

Your Young Men will see Visions

Published on Jan 1, 2017
Two stunning stories one of a 10 year old boys near death experience reveals the third World War, and an Demonic Alein invasions turned cannibal. The Second Young man on 16 years old see in vivid detail a vision of the coming Third World War, and an Earth gone totally insane .
Links:
A Minute to Midnight You Tube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWbxh...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlSF3...
https://aminutetomidnite.com/prophecy...
http://countdowntozerotime.com/2016/1...
Category
People & Blogs
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)

Warnings: "Quake Swarms 250 Quakes Near California / Mexico Border"

Published on Jan 2, 2017
Brawley, California hit with 250 quakes making scientist very concerned http://www.paulbegleyprophecy.com also Help Us Spread the Word
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr... also http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la... also https://crusaderjournal.com/2017/01/0...
Category
People & Blogs
License
Standard YouTube License
Created using
YouTube Capture

Democrats take sides in race for DNC chair

Democrats take sides in race for DNC chair

   
Democrats take sides in race for DNC chair
© Greg Nash
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) has dominated the endorsements game in the race to become the next chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
Ellison has accumulated support from a broad swath of liberals, including key figures from the party’s progressive wing, major labor groups and scores of Capitol Hill lawmakers. 

Still, that won’t be enough to seal the deal for him.

There is little appetite among some rank-and-file Democrats to merely follow the direction of party leaders like Sens. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), both of whom are backing Ellison.  

And many of those who have endorsed Ellison are not among the 447 DNC members that will have a vote in the late-February election.
Most voting DNC members—a majority of whom are state party chairs, vice chairs, or other locally elected officials—are keeping their options open ahead of a string of candidate forums in January and February.

Many Democrats believe that despite Ellison’s early momentum, the race is destined to come to the wire between him and Labor secretary Tom Perez, whose support from the White House could set up a dynamic similar to the 2016 primary between Hillary Clinton, who Perez supported, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who was backed by Ellison.

Few DNC members have publicly made endorsements, leaving the door open for dark horse candidates like New Hampshire chairman Raymond Buckley, South Carolina chairman Jaime Harrison and Idaho executive director Sally Boynton Brown. It could even help a candidate who hasn’t even entered the race yet, like Pete Buttigieg, the South Bend, Indiana mayor who is considering a bid.

Here’s a look at who is backing who as the race for DNC chair heats up heading in the new year:

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.)

So far, Ellison has run the best organized and most aggressive campaign.

The congressman and his allies are blasting DNC members with emails, working the phones and setting up meetings in an attempt to lock down as many backers as possible.

It has paid off—Democratic sources familiar with the race believe he has close to 70 voting DNC members in his corner, putting him more than a quarter of the way to the 224 votes he’ll need to secure a majority in the 447-member DNC.

But Ellison’s real strength has been in locking down key national figures and groups that will work on his behalf to convince rank-and-file Democrats that he’s the right man for the job.

The Minnesota Democrat will rely heavily on his Capitol Hill colleagues for support.

Among leading progressives, Ellison has Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the two biggest stars from the party’s ascendant left wing. Both Reid and Schumer have also endorsed Ellison.

That’s a fearsome group of endorsers to contend with on its own, but Ellison also has six additional U.S. senators and 25 members of the House in his corner, including committee chairs like Reps. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and Maxine Waters (D-Fla.).

Only a handful of these endorsers will have votes, though. That means the state leaders backing Ellison’s bid, including Democratic party chairmen from Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nebraska, Hawaii, Montana, and Oklahoma, who will carry significant sway over their delegations, could prove even more important.

Those chairmen are some of the 100 local and state leaders—including dozens of state-level lawmakers—who have thrown their support to Ellison. They are led by the likes of Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton and New York City mayor Bill de Blasio.

Ellison has also cut into Perez’s potential base of labor leaders, landing a controversial but significant endorsement from the AFL-CIO, which gave its members the option to either support Ellison or no one.

In addition, Obama’s former Labor secretary Hilda Solis—Perez’s predecessor—is backing Ellison, as are the presidents of top labor groups representing teachers, government employees, nurses and postal and communications workers.

Progressive groups like MoveOn.org and Democracy for America – the latter of which was founded by former DNC chairman Howard Dean – are working to get Ellison elected, as are several prominent liberal luminaries, such as activist filmmaker Michael Moore.
Labor secretary Tom Perez

Perez launched his bid for DNC chair in mid-December with support from Democratic chairmen in Texas, Massachusetts and his home state of Maryland.

He got a boost last week with endorsements from four of the nation’s 18 Democratic governors—Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards, and Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo.

Democrats will be closely watching for signals from the White House, including President Obama makes an endorsement. Perez is said to have been urged to run by Obama and Vice President Biden, and met with some of the president’s top advisers before launching his bid.

About a quarter of the DNC members voting are affiliated with the labor movement, which should be Perez’s wheelhouse.

But Perez suffered a setback when AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka pushed his groups to vote before Perez got into the race. That hugely influential endorsement went to Ellison instead.

The move infuriated some unions that fall under the AFL-CIO umbrella. The International Association of Fire Fighters and the United Food and Commercial Workers Union International have since broken ranks to back Perez.

Raymond Buckley, Jaime Harrison, and Sally Boynton Brown

New Hampshire Democratic chairman Raymond Buckley is well regarded in his home state, one of the few swing states that Democrats won in 2016.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Gov. and Sen.-elect Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), and Reps. Annie Kuster (D-N.H.) and Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.) are backing Buckley, as are four DNC members with votes from New Hampshire.

South Carolina Democratic chairman Jaime Harrison has endorsements from Reps. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) and Marcia Fudge (D-S.C.), but neither has a vote in the contest. 

Sally Boynton Brown, the executive director of the Idaho Democratic Party, has the backing of Idaho’s four DNC members, including state chairman Bert Marley.

THE TRANSFERMIUM WARS

THE TRANSFERMIUM WARS

The following is an article from Uncle John’s Bathroom Reader
periodic-tableIf the Transfermium Wars raged from the late 1960s to the late 1990s, how is it that so few people have ever heard of them? Because they were fought by rival groups of scientists over who would get to name newly discovered chemical elements.
PARENT TRAP
When someone discovers a new chemical element, it’s the tradition in the scientific community that the founder gets to name it. The system works pretty well, except for when more than one scientist or group of scientists claims to be the discoverer.
Take the elements that were initially known as numbers: 104, 105, and 106. On the periodic table, elements are organized according to their atomic number—the number of protons, or positively charged subatomic particles, in the nucleus of each atom. All three of these elements were synthetic, which means they don’t exist in nature but can be produced or synthesized in laboratories. All three are radioactive, and their discoveries were the product of secret atomic research during the Cold War between the Soviet bloc countries and the United States and its allies. A group of Soviet scientists at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in the town of Dubna, near Moscow, claimed to have discovered all three in the late 1960s and early 1970s. But so did scientists at the University of California, Berkeley.
Then there’s the elements 107 and 108. The Russian scientists at Dubna claimed to have discovered those two elements as well, but so did German scientists at the Society for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, West Germany.
Because all five elements follow fermium (Fm)—which has the atomic number 100—on the periodic table, the dispute came to be known as the “Transfermium Wars.” Neither side was willing to concede victory, and the dispute over what to name the elements continued for more than 30 years.
ELEMENT 104
Who’s Your Daddy? The Russians claimed to have discovered it in 1964, but scientists at U.C. Berkeley believed they were first when they made their discovery independently in 1969. One of the problems with verifying the claims is that even the most stable form, or isotope, of element 104 has a half-life of only 1.3 hours, which means that half of the material decays in less than 80 minutes. And 1.3 hours after that, half of the remaining half will decay, and so on, until there’s not much physical evidence left to prove the claim that you’ve actually succeeded in making the stuff. The suspicion and mistrust of the Cold War era made it that much harder for one side to believe the claims the other side was making—especially when the other side claimed to be first.
The Russians named the element kurchatovium in honor of Igor Kurchatov, the father of the Soviet atomic bomb. The Berkeley scientists gave it the name rutherfordium to honor Ernest Rutherford, the New Zealand–born, Nobel Prize–winning British physicist who is considered the father of nuclear science.
ELEMENT 105
Who’s Your Daddy? If you think element 104’s half-life of 1.3 hours was a challenge, the first form of element 105 that was discovered had a half-life of just 1.6 seconds. The Soviet scientists claimed they synthesized the element as early as 1968, and the scientists at Berkeley claimed they did it in 1970. The Soviet scientists called the element nielsbohrium (Ns) in honor of Danish physicist Niels Bohr; the Berkeley scientists called it hahnium (Ha) in honor of German chemist Otto Hahn.
ELEMENT 106
Who’s Your Daddy? In this case, the claims of discovery were only a few months apart. The Soviets claimed to have synthesized element 106 in June 1974; the scientists at U.C. Berkeley said they created their first samples in September of the same year. The isotope claimed by the Soviets had a half-life of a little over half a second, and the isotope claimed by the U.C. Berkeley scientists had a half-life of 0.9 seconds.
It’s not clear that the Soviets ever picked a name for element 106, but the Berkeley scientists did: seaborgium, in honor of their colleague Glenn T. Seaborg. He and an associate named Edwin McMillan won the Nobel Prize in 1951 for discovering five different elements: plutonium (Pu), americium (Am), curium (Cm), berkelium (Bk), and californium (Cf). Seaborg also helped in the discovery of two more elements, einsteinium (Es) and mendelevium (Md).
As the co-discoverer of so many elements, Seaborg was certainly worthy of the honor, but the choice was controversial because Seaborg was still alive. Traditionally, elements are named for dead scientists. The only exceptions were einsteinium (Es) and fermium (Fm), both of which were discovered in the debris of a hydrogen bomb testing at the North Pacific atoll of Enewetak in 1952. The names for these elements were proposed while Einstein and Fermi were still alive, but the existence of the new elements, and thus their names, remained a military secret until they were declassified in June 1955. By the time the names were made public, both Einstein and Fermi were dead.
ELEMENT 107
Who’s Your Daddy? The Soviet scientists said they produced the first samples of the element in 1976, but scientists at the Society for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt made their own claim of discovery after synthesizing element 107 in 1981. In this case the Soviet claim was sketchy but the German claim was not. Scientists there were able to prove they’d created five atoms of an isotope of element 107 that had a half-life of just 84 milliseconds—less than a tenth of a second. The Russians proposed no name for the new element, but the Germans proposed naming it nielsbohrium if the Russians lost out on their bid to give that name to element 105 in honor of Niels Bohr.
ELEMENT 108
Who’s Your Daddy? Both the Soviets and the Germans claimed to have synthesized the element in 1984. It’s not known whether the Russians actually proposed a name for the element. The Germans wanted to call it hassium in honor of the German state of Hesse, where Darmstadt is located.
ONE-TWO-THREE
By the early 1990s, the names of all of these elements had yet to be sanctioned by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), a body of scientists that has the final say in picking the names that will be adopted by the scientific community worldwide. When the discoverer of an element is not in question, their role is typically to approve whatever name has been suggested by the discoverer. But when there’s no agreement on who the discoverer is, it’s hard for the IUPAC to reach consensus on which name to approve.
In the meantime, the IUPAC had a system of temporary “placeholder” names for the elements that was based on Greek and Latin words for the atomic numbers of each element in dispute. Element 104, for example, was given the placeholder name unnilquadium—“one-zero-four-ium.” This pleased nobody. In such cases, scientists in the Soviet bloc used their preferred name in scientific papers and textbooks, and the Americans used theirs. Disinterested scientists everywhere simply referred to the elements by their atomic numbers: element 104, element 105, and so on, and got on with their work.
LET’S MAKE A DEAL
In 1986, the IUPAC joined with another group called the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) to form a committee that would consider the competing claims for discovery of the elements in dispute and settle on names for the elements that all parties could agree on. It took them eleven years to hammer out a compromise, but by 1997 they finally got it done. In the end the discovery claims of the United States, Russia, and Germany were all found to have merit to one degree or another, so the sides agreed to divvy up the naming rights.
  • Element 104. This element would be named rutherfordium (Rh), as the U.C. Berkeley scientists had wished.
  • Element 105. The Russians got to name element 105 dubnium (Db) in honor of the Russian town of Dubna, which is home to the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, where the Russian scientists were based.
  • Element 106. For a time it seemed that the “dead-scientists-only” policy would prevail, but the American scientific establishment refused to accept any compromise that didn’t include naming an element after Glenn T. Seaborg, even though he was still alive. In the end they got their way and element 106 was named seaborgium (Sg). To date, Seaborg, who died in 1999, is the only scientist ever to live long enough to look himself up in the periodic table. (With the possible exception of Paul-Émile “Rooster” Lecoq de Boisbaudran.)
  • Element 107. The Germans got to name this element bohrium (Bh) in honor of Niels Bohr, a name that also pleased the Russians, who had wanted to name element 105 after him. So why was bohrium chosen instead of neilsbohrium, as had been proposed for element 105? The convention in naming elements was to use only the last name of the person being honored; had the name neilsbohrium been approved, Niels Bohr would have been the only person whose first and last names were used, but only because the name bohrium was thought to be too similar to the element boron (B). This time convention prevailed and bohrium won out over neilsbohrium.
  • Element 108. As the Germans had wished, this element was named hassium (Hs) in honor of the German state of Hesse.
This article is reprinted with permission from Uncle John’s Uncanny Bathroom Reader. This groundbreaking series has been imitated time and time again but never equaled. And Uncanny is the Bathroom Readers’ Institute at their very best. Covering a wide array of topics—incredible origins, forgotten history, weird news, amazing science, dumb crooks, and more—readers of all ages will enjoy these 512 pages of the best stuff in print.
Since 1987, the Bathroom Readers’ Institute has led the movement to stand up for those who sit down and read in the bathroom (and everywhere else for that matter). With more than 15 million books in print, the Uncle John’s Bathroom Reader series is the longest-running, most popular series of its kind in the world.
If you like Today I Found Out, I guarantee you’ll love the Bathroom Reader Institute’s books, so check them out!
 
Share the Knowledge!Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblrmail
Print Friendly
Enjoy this article? Join over 50,000 Subscribers getting our FREE Daily Knowledge and Weekly Wrap newsletters: 

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *