Thursday, February 2, 2017

USPS Malware Emails



USPS Malware Emails

Outline:
Emails purporting to be from the United States Postal Service (USPS) claim that a parcel could not be delivered due to an address error and instruct recipients to click a link to download a shipping label.




Brief Analysis:
The emails are not from USPS. The claim that USPS failed to deliver a parcel to the recipient due to an incorrect address is untrue. Clicking on the ‘shipping label’ link in the emails will download a malicious file to the user’s computer.
Example:
Hello,Your item has arrived at Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:04:09 +0100, but our courierwas not able to deliver the parcel.You can download the shipment label attached!All the best.[Name Removed] – USPS Support Agent.
Example:
USPS Malware Email
Example:
Subject: Problem with the delivery of parcelUSPS .COMNotificationYour package has arrived on August 16th, but the messenger was
unable to deliver the package to you. For more detailed information,
please, Print and Read the Shipping Label.
USPS Malware Email
Example:
Subject: USPS delivery problem # Error ID60347Unfortunately, we failed to deliver the postal package you have sent on (date varies) in time, because the recipient’s address is erroneous.Print a Shipping LabelIf the parcel isn’t received within 30 working days our company will have the right to claim compensation from you for each day of keeping.
USPS Malware Email





Detailed Analysis:
These emails, which purport to be from the United States Postal Service (USPS), claim that a package sent by the recipient was not delivered because the postal address was incorrect. The messages instruct the recipient to click a button to print off a shipping label and then take the label to the nearest USPS office so that the error can be rectified.
However, the messages are not from USPS. The claim that a package delivery has failed is untrue. The messages are an attempt by online criminals to trick users into downloading and installing malware.
In some versions, the link in the scam email points to a compromised website that will automatically download the malicious payload to the victim’s computer.  In other cases, the malware will be contained in an attached file.
The exact nature of the malware may vary. In some recent incarnations, the payload is ransomware. Ransomware can lock up the files on your computer and then demand that you pay a fee to online criminals to receive the decryption key.
Other types of malware delivered via these fake USPS emails can steal sensitive personal information from the infected computer, make connections with remote servers operated by online criminals, and download further malware components.
To increase the illusion of legitimacy, many of the emails come complete with a USPS logo and supposed delivery bar code and shipping numbers.
The “parcel delivery” tactic has been used repeatedly by malware scammers. USPS has been targeted in very similar attacks over recent years as have UPSFedExDHL,Royal Mail and other postal and delivery organisations around the world.
Beware of any unsolicited email that claims that you must click a link or open an attachment to print a shipping label, correct a parcel addressing error, or find out more information about a supposed parcel delivery.


Last updated: February 2, 2017
First published: November 5, 2012
By Brett M. Christensen
About Hoax-Slayer

Dems in bind over Trump court pick

Dems in bind over Trump court pick

   
Briefly: Trump's SCOTUS pick
TheHill.com
Autoplay: On | Off
Senate Republicans voiced confidence Wednesday that they will have the votes to confirm President Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, as Democrats appeared divided over how to handle the pick.
Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) in a floor speech indicated that he has serious concerns about Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s pick to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia.
But Schumer stopped short of promising a filibuster against Gorsuch, saying instead that Trump’s nominee should meet a 60-vote threshold to get on the court.
“We Democrats will insist on a rigorous but fair process. There will be 60 votes for confirmation,” he said from the Senate floor. “There will be 60 votes for confirmation.”
Sen. Jeff Merkley (Ore.), who began the week promising a filibuster against any nominee from Trump, was on Wednesday the only Democratic senator explicitly voicing support for using procedural tools to stop Gorsuch, a judge on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals with a sterling academic and legal resume.
A handful of other Democrats, including Sens. Sherrod Brown (Ohio), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Ron Wyden (Ore.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), say they will oppose him. But no other Democrats have so far used Merkley’s language.
It’s possible that will change, but Democratic senators on Wednesday appeared to be in no hurry to make promises.  
Other Democrats say they are keeping an open mind on Gorsuch, even liberals such as Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.), who said he would support a hearing and vote on his nomination.
Ten Democrats representing states won by Trump last year are up for reelection in 2018 and will come under certain attack from Republicans for blocking Gorsuch on procedural grounds. Trump carried five of those states by double digits.
Sen. Joe Manchin (W.Va.), one of the red-state Democrats up for reelection, told reporters before meeting with Gorsuch that he is looking for a jurist “that follows the law,” following up on his pledge from the day before not to filibuster “for the sake of filibustering.”
Many Democrats are still sore over the way Republicans treated Merrick Garland, whom former President Obama nominated to fill Scalia’s seat in early 2016. Republicans never gave Garland a hearing or a vote.
At the same time, the party seems skeptical of pulling out every tool to block Gorsuch, despite the urging of many outside liberal groups.
Republicans across the board have praised Gorsuch’s record, and his home-state senator, Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), predicted Wednesday that the entire GOP conference would back him.
“I think he’s going to have a tremendous amount of support from Democrats as well,” he said after meeting with the nominee.
Gardner was quick to point out the political stakes for red-state Democrats.
“If your state voted for Donald Trump and you’re obstructing Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, there’s going to be a penalty to be paid,” said Gardner, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), which will be targeting vulnerable Democrats next year.
Vice President Pence accompanied Gorsuch to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) office for his first meeting of the day. Gorsuch also sat down with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley(R-Iowa) and Senate Republican Whip John Cornyn (Texas).
Grassley says he plans on holding confirmation hearings in six weeks, a timeline that Democrats are not pushing back on yet.
A senior Democratic aide said Democrats would object to Grassley’s timeline if Gorsuch were slow in turning over documentation for review, as some of Trump’s Cabinet nominees have been.
  While partisanship in the Senate has become increasingly bitter in recent years, filibusters of Supreme Court nominees are rare. 
Senate leaders have moved only four times to end filibusters of Supreme Court nominations — in 1968, 1971, 1986 and 2006, according to a Congressional Research Service report from October 2015.
There’s debate on whether those few examples qualify as judicial filibusters. Former Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-Mont.) filed a cloture motion to end dilatory debate on the nomination of William Rehnquist to serve as an associate justice on the court in 1971. Even though the motion failed, Rehnquist still won confirmation on the same day.
A decade ago, a bipartisan group of senators known as the Gang of 14 came to an agreement that judicial nominees should only be filibustered in “extraordinary circumstances,” a description that does not seem to apply to Gorsuch. 
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), who is running for reelection, blamed McConnell’s obstructionist tactics during the Obama administration for destroying the chamber’s tradition of comity.
“Things have changed around here. There was a new era of obstructionism ushered in by Mitch McConnell. He’s the one who has to account for changing the dynamics of the Senate, maybe for all time,” she said.
But vulnerable Democrats will have to walk a fine line on the nomination, knowing that if they vote to block Trump’s pick despite his impressive credentials, it will become a campaign issue next year.
“There’s a general dislike for the filibuster, and I think the president nominated someone who is easily defended,” said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who served as NRSC chairman in 2014, when Republicans captured the Senate majority. “Those two things combined make it difficult to rationalize a filibuster.”
“I would guess this becomes a significant political issue in states,” he added.
Conservative groups led by the Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) say they will spend “tens of millions” of dollars to support Gorsuch. The JCN has a $10 million budget to spend right out of the gate, and Carrie Severino, the group’s chief counsel and policy director, says it will spend more if necessary.
That’s why Democrats in pro-Trump states say they will give Gorsuch a fair review.
“I’m going to bring him in, interview him and make a decision on whether I’m going to support him or not based on what I read about him in that interview,” said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), who is up for reelection in 2018.
But Tester, along with other vulnerable Democrats such as Manchin and McCaskill, said he’s not ruling out backing a filibuster later in the spring.
Jordain Carney contributed.

Whoopi Goldberg: Defunding Planned Parenthood Makes America “Not Much Different Than the Taliban”


LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.
Top Stories• Planned Parenthood Slams Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: He’ll Overturn Roe v. Wade
• Nancy Pelosi Throws a Fit Over Neil Gorsuch: “He’s Hostile to Women” Because He Opposes Abortion
• Senate Committee Approves Pro-Life Attorney General Nominee Jeff Sessions
• Whoopi Goldberg: Defunding Planned Parenthood Makes America “Not Much Different Than the Taliban”


More Pro-Life News
• Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: “The Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”
• Senate Committee Votes to Confirm Pro-Life Rep. Tom Price as HHS Secretary Despite Democrat Boycott
• Texas Governor Greg Abbott: “The Butchering of Unborn Babies” in Abortion is “Barbaric”
• Judge Neil Gorsuch’s Touching Tribute to Justice Antonin Scalia Will Make You Like Him Even More
• Episcopalian Priest: Christians Should Promote the Planned Parenthood Abortion Business
• Woman Writes: “I Had an Abortion Last Week Just Because I Wanted To”
• Pro-Abortion Members of Congress Introduce Bill to Force Americans to Pay For Abortions
• Woman Who Killed Her Newborn Baby Girl Minutes After Birth Won’t Go to Prison
• Totally Paralyzed Patients Use a Computer to Tell Doctors Their Thoughts, They Say They’re Happy
• New Poll: 80% of Americans Wants a SCOTUS Justice Who Interprets the Constitution as Written
• Late-Term Abortionist Resumes Doing Abortions But Does Them in the Middle of the Night
• Iowa Committee Passes Legislation to Defund Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz


http://m1e.net/c?223543190-8sxlR6RnHgqow@389052154-Mwtx/zZuiMrHQ

Planned Parenthood Slams Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: He’ll Overturn Roe v. Wade
The Planned Parenthood abortion business was quick to announce its opposition to President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Click to Read at LifeNews.com.
Nancy Pelosi Throws a Fit Over Neil Gorsuch: “He’s Hostile to Women” Because He Opposes Abortion
Pro-abortion House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi threw a fit yesterday over President Donald Trump’s nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
Click to Read at LifeNews.com.
http://m1e.net/c?223543190-8XZswzfTEb1Hs@389052164-LjxoVKHyxaQQY


Senate Committee Approves Pro-Life Attorney General Nominee Jeff Sessions
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday approved the nomination of Pro-Life Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions.
Click to Read at LifeNews.com.


Whoopi Goldberg: Defunding Planned Parenthood Makes America “Not Much Different Than the Taliban”
Tuesday on the View, host Whoopi Goldberg led a segment based off of the ridiculous question, “Is America becoming like the Taliban?"
Click to Read at LifeNews.com.
http://m1e.net/c?223543190-6k901TAUQL5EE@389052185-rrSDKsqtSCxtw
Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: “The Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”
It’s what millions of Americans had been waiting for – collectively holding their breath while joyfully anticipating the outcome.
Click to Read at LifeNews.com.


Senate Committee Votes to Confirm Pro-Life Rep. Tom Price as HHS Secretary Despite Democrat Boycott
Despite a boycott by Democrats on the panel of the vote, a Senate committee voted to confirm pro-life Congressman Tom Price as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.
Cli ck to Read at LifeNews.com.
http://m1e.net/c?223543190-U/DyZiUceOuSE@389052216-bf6.ICDcn4vmY
Texas Governor Greg Abbott: “The Butchering of Unborn Babies” in Abortion is “Barbaric”
Texas is the Lone Star State for a reason. We stand apart as a model for the nation. But we must do more to establish higher standards that reflect respect for the sanctity of life.
Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Judge Neil Gorsuch’s Touching Tribute to Justice Antonin Scalia Will Make You Like Him Even More
Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch and the late pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia have much in common.
Click to Read at LifeNews.com.
http://m1e.net/c?223543190-oBEuYkEohdiF6@389052240-TD4.NFE0g3pYM
New Poll: 80% of Americans Wants a SCOTUS Justice Who Interprets the Constitution as Written

=

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *