Saturday, November 4, 2017

White House strikes back at Bushes over weak legacy

   
George W. Bush: ‘I’m worried that I will be the last Republican president’
TheHill.com
Autoplay: On | Off
The White House fired back at former Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush on Saturday, attacking their legacies after both Bushes expressed their displeasure with President Trump in a new book.
"The American people voted to elect an outsider who is capable of implementing real, positive, and needed change - instead of a lifelong politician beholden to special interests,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement to The Hill. “If they were interested in continuing decades of costly mistakes, another establishment politician more concerned with putting politics over people would have won.”
In another statement reported by CNN, a White House source slammed the Bush legacy.
“If one presidential candidate can disassemble a political party, it speaks volumes about how strong a legacy its past two presidents really had,” the White House said, according to CNN.
The younger Bush expressed concern in the new book, “The Last Republicans” by Mark K. Updegrove, that he would be “the last Republican president." The book, which will be released Nov. 14, was previewed by The Hill and other media outlets late Friday and Saturday. 
Both Bushes confirmed in the book they did not vote for Trump in the last election.
The elder Bush confirmed he voted for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election and called Trump a “blowhard.”
“I don’t like him,” George H.W. Bush says in the book. “I don’t know much about him, but I know he’s a blowhard. And I’m not too excited about him being a leader.”

George W. Bush offered his own critique of Trump in the book, saying Trump “doesn’t know what it means to be president."

The younger Bush also didn’t vote for Trump in the 2016 election, saying he opted for “none of the above” on his ballot.
The Bush criticism comes on the heels of former House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) implying the Republican party is dead.
"Donald Trump’s not a Republican," he told Politico.
The preview of the new book also follows a speech by George W. Bush in which he said “bigotry seems emboldened” in the United States, and warned that Americans need to reject “white supremacy.”
The younger Bush didn’t mention Trump by name during the speech, and a spokesman said Bush’s remarks were “a long-planned speech on liberty and democracy.”
But in the new book, George W. Bush said his concerns about Trump's candidacy included the country’s growing "nativism" and "isolationism."
Both Bushes offer their thoughts on the Iraq War in the book. George W. Bush says the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, “changed the equation” in Iraq and demanded a change in policy.
“I’m very comfortable that when people fully analyze my decisions in the proper context, they will understand why my foreign policy—not in the principles of U.S. leadership but in the application—was different,” George W. Bush said.
But the White House said the Bush legacy "begins with the Iraq war, one of the greatest foreign policy mistakes in American history."
George H.W. Bush said in the book that Bush’s decision on the Iraq War “will be seen as the right thing to do.”
“Saddam Hussein was a bad guy,” George H.W. Bush said. “I think history will be okay with it."
The White House told CNN that Trump remains focused on his agenda.
“President Trump remains focused on keeping his promises to the American people by bringing back jobs, promoting an America First foreign policy and standing up for the forgotten men and women of our great country,” the White House said.
— Updated 1:36 p.m.
   
LOAD COMMENTS (2,393)

Trump's Twitter lockout raises safeguard concerns

Trump's Twitter lockout raises safeguard concerns

   
Attorney to ex-Twitter employee who deactivated Trump account: 'Get a lawyer'
TheHill.com
Autoplay: On | Off
President Trump's brief Twitter lockout has underlined concerns about the safeguards on social media platforms.
The incident came just days after Facebook, Twitter and Google spent hours trying to convince lawmakers that their consumers are safe from abuse. For Republicans, it's the latest example of what they see as Silicon Valley's bias against conservatives.
Twitter initially said that the incident was the result of “human error,” before admitting that the deactivation was actually caused by a rogue customer service employee who was about to leave the company.
“Through our investigation, we have learned that this was done by a Twitter customer support employee who did this on the employee’s last day,” the company tweeted late Thursday night. “We are conducting a full internal review.”
“We have implemented safeguards to prevent this from happening again,” Twitter added on Friday. “We won’t be able to share all details about our internal investigation or updates to our security measures, but we take this seriously and our teams are on it.”
Twitter declined to answer a list of questions from The Hill about the company’s current safeguards against internal abuse or how many employees have the power to shut down users’ accounts.
While many of the president’s critics jokingly celebrated his 11-minute absence from social media, others noted with concern that the incident revealed how few checks internet platforms have on their power.
Jennifer Granick, a lawyer with the ACLU’s technology division, said that abuses of power will become unavoidable if companies continue to face pressure to moderate their content.
“It's not a surprise that Twitter employees have this capability,” Granick said. “The public and Congress have been demanding that the platform companies create the ability to ban people from the platform or delete particular messages.”
While the company would not discuss specific safeguards, an industry source speaking on the condition of anonymity said that Twitter has protections in place against employees posting from users’ accounts.
The debacle comes at an inopportune moment for Twitter, which has faced mounting questions about how it polices user accounts. And internet platforms in general are being scrutinized for their role in Russia’s alleged influence campaign during last year’s presidential race and the companies’ influence over the flow of information.
The growing list of seemingly unrelated issues has helped Silicon Valley’s critics draw attention to what they see as the industry’s unchecked influence. For conservatives, the concern centers on the perceived liberal bias in the tech sector.
"Well, I can say I feel his pain,” Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said of Trump in an interview with The Hill. “It just shows you how subjective the monitors for Twitter are and how they bring their politics into their preferences for what people are posting and tweeting."
Blackburn has been critical of Twitter since the company removed one of her campaign ads that used the phrase “baby body parts” when referencing her anti-abortion record.
Twitter later reversed its decision and allowed Blackburn’s campaign to promote the video, but the episode fueled many conservatives’ mistrust of social media’s editorial power.
“I think the question that most people have is ‘how are you making your choices?’ ” Blackburn said.
Twitter, Facebook and Google spent hours this week reassuring Congress that they are working to prevent abuse of their platforms after revelations that the internet giants had sold political ads to Russians looking to influence last year’s election.
During the three hearings this week, lawmakers repeatedly pressured the companies to police their platforms for content that may have come from Russian operatives.
Granick said the calls for internet platforms to moderate content that is unpopular are going to lead to even worse abuses from the companies.
“When we implore these private companies to have these capabilities the danger is that people will be silenced and people will not be able to hear messages and that's going to disproportionately affect the weak and vulnerable in our society and not the powerful,” she said.
   
LOAD COMMENTS (386)

Vision of Snake and Lotus Flower. Antichrist is Rising!





Published on Nov 4, 2017
SUBSCRIBED 16K
Revelation 13New American Standard Bible (NASB)

The Beast from the Sea
13 And the dragon stood on the sand of the [a]seashore.

Then I saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were blasphemous names. 2 And the beast which I saw was like a leopard, and his feet were like those of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority. 3 I saw one of his heads as if it had been [b]slain, and his fatal wound was healed. And the whole earth was amazed and followed after the beast; 4 they worshiped the dragon because he gave his authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is like the beast, and who is able to wage war with him?” 5 There was given to him a mouth speaking [c]arrogant words and blasphemies, and authority to act for forty-two months was given to him. 6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemies against God, to blaspheme His name and His tabernacle, that is, those who [d]dwell in heaven.

7 It was also given to him to make war with the [e]saints and to overcome them, and authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation was given to him. 8 All who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been [f]written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain. 9 If anyone has an ear, let him hear. 10 If anyone [g]is destined for captivity, to captivity he goes; if anyone kills with the sword, with the sword he must be killed. Here is the [h]perseverance and the faith of the [i]saints.

Salvation only through Jesus Christ

We believe that, owing to universal death through sin, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless born again; and that no degree of reformation however great, no attainments in morality, however high, no culture however attractive, no baptism or other ordinance however administered, can help the sinner to take even one step toward heaven; but a new nature imparted from above, a new life implanted by the Holy Spirit through the Word, is absolutely essential to salvation, and only those thus saved are sons of God. We believe also that our redemption has been accomplished solely by the blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, who was made to be sin and was made a curse for us, dying in our room and stead; and that no repentance, no feeling, no faith, no good resolutions, no sincere efforts, no submission to the rules and regulations of any church, nor all the churches that have existed since the days of the Apostles, can add in the very least degree to the value of the blood or to the merit of the finished work wrought for us by Him who united in His person true and proper deity with perfect and sinless humanity. (Leviticus 17:11; Isaiah 64:6; Matthew 26:28; John 3:7-18; Romans 5:6-9; 2 Corinthians 5:21; Galatians 3:13; 6:15; Ephesians 1:7; Philippians 3:4-9; Titus 3:5; James 1:18; 1 Peter 1:18-19, 23.)

We believe that the new birth of the believer comes only through faith in Christ and that repentance is a vital part of believing, and is no way in itself a separate and independent condition of salvation; nor are any other acts, such as confession, baptism, prayer, or faithful service, to be added to believing as a condition of salvation. (John 1:12; 3:16, 18, 36; 5:24; 6:29; Acts 13:39; 16:31; Romans 1:16-17; 3:22, 26; 4:5; 10:4; Galatians 3:22.)
SHOW LESS

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *