Saturday, September 1, 2018

A DIVERSITY OF ACID ATTACKS, WITCHCRAFT ABUSE, GENITAL MUTILATION AND TERROR

Immigrant groups mutilate, abuse and kill their own children to stop diversity. (This is Now The New Reality. Do we want this in America? If the Democrat's get into power once again, This Will Be Our Daily Reality and we all know this to be True)

 
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism
2017 was a banner year for acid attacks in Britain.
465 of them occurred in London. Most of the acid attacks are taking place in East London. The borough of Newham tops the acid attacks chart with 85 last year. What’s so special about Newham?
Nothing the media will tell you.
Newham has the second highest Muslim percentage population and the lowest native British population in London. Tower Hamlets, which has the highest Muslim population percentage, has the second highest rate of acid attacks.
None of the two dozen media explainers pretending to explain why London became the world’s acid attack capital have bothered citing that simple statistic. Instead there’s lots of mumbling about poverty, gang violence and the need for household cleaner control. To add on to the failed knife control policy.
The UK boasts the highest number of recorded acid attacks in the world. It narrowly beats out Bangladesh for the honor only because it has more transparent crime statistics and because a sizable percentage of the population of that Muslim country has relocated to the cozy boroughs of London.
Bangladeshis are one of the largest populations making up Newham and Tower Hamlets. Add on the Pakistanis, also world champions of acid hurling, and three other countries and minorities who also figure prominently in those areas, and it’s clear that immigration transplanted acid attacks to the UK.
London has an acid attack problem for the same reason that it has an Islamic terrorism problem. And it has them for the same reasons it has an honor killing problem, a sex grooming gang problem, an FGM problem and a witch problem.
Yes, witch problem.
British Department of Education statistics show that there were over 1,400 child abuse cases between 2016 and 2017 based on the belief of the parents that their children were witches or demons.
Acid attacks in London were up 500% since 2012. And witchcraft and demonic possession child abuse is up 900%since 2011. Those numbers show just how immigration and diversity are transforming the UK.
In 2012, there was already the one thing that no government could be without in a crisis: an action plan. The “National Action Plan to Tackle Child Abuse linked to Faith or Belief” debuted. It noted that, “Cases of adults inflicting physical violence or emotional harm on children they regard as witches or possessed by evil spirits are known across the world.” Except that they weren’t common in the UK in 500 years.
The action plan's example was Kristy Bamu, a teenage boy, who was tortured for days, and had his teeth smashed, before being drowned by his sister and brother-in-law for being a witch.
The Bamus were from the Congo. The murder happened in Newham which has a sizable population of Congolese immigrants.  Believing that children are witches is common enough in the Democratic Republic of Congo that there are 50,000 “child witches” living on the streets of Kinshasa.
How many child witches will there be living on the streets and dying in the flats of London in a decade?
Despite the British government’s action plan, the number of child abuse witchcraft cases just keeps rising. No amount of action plans can solve a problem whose roots are buried in faith and culture.
Trying to convince people who believe in witchcraft and demonic possessions that they shouldn’t torture children is as futile as convincing people who believe in the supremacy of Islam not to kill.
Between 2016 and 2017, not only were there over 1,400 cases of witchcraft child abuse, but there were over 5,300 recorded cases of women and girls who had undergone female genital mutilation.
33% of the cases had come through Somalia. 88% had come out of Africa.
Mutilating girls in this fashion is illegal in the UK. But the law is effectively not enforced. The few prosecutions ended in acquittals or dismissals.
Police reports of FGM cases meanwhile rose from 137 in 2014 to 647 in 2016. A 372% increase.
Newham, one of the “youngest and most diverse” boroughs, has hundreds of girls estimated to be at risk for FGM. Newham has its own Female Genital Mutilation Prevention Service and the NHS has a special clinic for FGM victims serving women from Waltham Forest, Newham, Tower Hamlets and Redbridge. Newham takes third place for FGM among London’s boroughs. Top honors went to Southwark. Only 57% of the population of Southwark was born in the United Kingdom.
But between the acid attacks, the witchcraft and the genital mutilation, Newham truly has it all.
“Honour” based violence, everything from honor killings to FGM to forced marriage, reported to the police rose from 3335 in 2014 to 5105 in 2016.  
What do a 500% rise in acid attacks, a 900% increase in witchcraft child abuse and a 372% rise in FGM police reports have in common? They’re the wages of diversity and demographic change.
Islamic terrorism is only the most obvious and explosive charge in the clash of cultures.
FGM, honor killings and witchcraft child abuse, all efforts by traditional cultures to control their children, only increased because of the transition of these immigrant groups to the UK. Like Islamic terrorism, these forms of abuse are a reaction to and rejection of a new society. The difference is that the violence of Islamic terrorism or the Muslim sex grooming gangs are external, directed at the surrounding culture, while torturing and killing your own children is violence directed internally within the community.
Both types of brutality are a clear statement that an immigrant group feels that its values are threatened by living in the UK and that it seeks to protect those values through violence.
Diversity is a mechanical talking point in the modern world. A pause inserted into every sentence. A cliché beaten to death in every pamphlet. But diversity not only brings acid attacks, witch torture, Islamic terrorism, honor killings, FGM and a thousand other horrors into the United Kingdom, those horrors are also a response to and a rejection of the same diversity that immigration advocates adore.
Parents torturing their children and terrorists blowing themselves up in London are not only clear evidence that diversity has failed, they are diverse attacks on diversity by very diverse populations.
It’s fashionable for the smart set to believe that the majority, white people, hates diversity. But it’s the bombers and stabbers, the torturers and mutilators, who truly hate diversity. And so they have doubled down on the same measures that they used to keep their children in line in their own home countries.
They don’t want their children turning British and they’re willing to mutilate their genitals, smash out their teeth, run them over, and marry them off at a young age to make certain that they don’t.
And some of those children grow up convinced that the way to redeem themselves in the eyes of their parents, to prove that, despite all evidence, they haven’t been tainted by British ways, is to run over members of the hated native population in the streets, stab them, shoot them or blow them up.
Al Qaeda and ISIS have gained so many adherents in Europe and America because diversity is hated. Immigrant populations hate diversity far more than the biggest right wing activist ever could.
Conservatives make rational arguments against the blind worship of diversity. Muslims fight and die to stop it. Immigrant groups mutilate, abuse and kill their own children out of hatred of diversity.
Maybe it’s time to listen to those rational arguments. 
Either that or watch another 900%, 500% or 300% spike in honor killings, witchcraft child abuse, acid attacks and genital mutilations. Or the latest round of Islamic terrorist attacks tearing through London.
Arguments, even the most rational ones, can be ignored. Violence can’t.
Rational arguments warn of the consequences of stupid behavior. But the consequences are an even better argument. And, unlike arguments, the more you ignore them, the worse the consequences get.


NEW YORK TIMES: IF YOU CARE ABOUT MOLLIE TIBBETS' MURDER, YOU'RE RACIST (Is this a sick joke. has the nyt just show how racist & disgusting they REALLY are. I say yes)

It was politically incorrect to care about Mollie... It was a hate crime to mourn her. It was racist to care.

 
The New York Times, a paper which hired Sarah Jeong, an actual racist, decided to accuse Americans upset over the brutal murder of a young woman of racism.
The main reason that Mollie Tibbetts’s horrible killing has received so much attention is racism. Tibbetts’s accused murderer is a Mexican immigrant, and large segments of the conservative media, including talk radio and Fox News, like to call attention to crimes committed by people with dark skin. It’s silly to pretend otherwise.
That's David Leonhardt  of the New York Times, complaining that, "The hoopla over her killing is a classic example of bigotry".
Hoopla isn't normally the word used to describe grief, shock and horror over the murder of a young woman. But the left dehumanizes people. It started dehumanizing Mollie the moment it realized that her killer wouldn't be a local pig farmer, but an illegal alien.
And once that happened, it was politically incorrect to care about Mollie. 
It was a hate crime to mourn her. It was racist to care.
This is the nightmarish thing that the left does to the human soul. It provides pretexts for dehumanizing the victims of its policies. It treats empathy as a crime. As an act of hate. As a moral flaw.

DEMS WON'T STOP WITH IMPEACHING TRUMP, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES NEXT (Are the dems asking for a civil war?) This could be the lynch pin to set it off.

 
If you're going to build a totalitarian leftist utopia, it helps to get any political opponents out of the way.
The Dems whipped up their base with Supreme Court outrage, first over Merrick Garland's "stolen seat", and now fighting to stop Kavanaugh, But what good would impeaching President Trump be without also stealing some Supreme Court seats?
A Democrat running for the U.S. House in Massachusetts has made an unusual political promise: Put me in Congress and I’ll impeach Justice Clarence Thomas for sexual harassment and perjury.
State Sen. Barbara L’Italien said the promise would be part of a broad assault on sexual abuse at the highest levels of the U.S. government that also would include congressional hearings about claims made by many women about President Trump.
And I'm sure some pretexts will be found to "investigate" other conservative justices. Since government eavesdropping of the political opposition is the new norm, how long until the FBI starts going after Justice Thomas based on "research" from Fusion GPS paid for by Planned Parenthood? 
The left is tearing down everything that keeps our elections from being a vicious zero sum struggle of naked power. 


1/3 CONSERVATIVE FACEBOOK USERS MAY  LEAVE OVER  CENSORSHIP

 
There are companies that will go over the cliff for their lefty policies. Facebook's Zuckerberg has never struck me as the type.
Facebook's censorship is largely a result of external pressure by the EU and Democrats, and internal pressure from its more 'woke' employees. And the MRC survey provides compelling evidence that censorship will be very bad for its bottom line.
Facebook is at risk of losing 32% of its conservative users due to concerns the social media giant is censoring its content, a new national omnibus survey by McLaughlin & Associates reveals.
Sponsored by the Media Research Center (MRC), the national survey of conservatives who are likely voters, conducted August 22-27, 2018, shows that 89.5% of conservatives have used Facebook at some point and that less than half (47.7%) are both using it and committed to continuing to do so:
Of conservatives who have used Facebook, 32.3% say they have either left (7.5%), or are considering leaving (24.8%), Facebook due to its censorship of conservative views.
What’s more, nearly two-thirds (66.9%) of conservative likely voters have less trust in Facebook than they did a year ago. Likewise, nearly two-thirds (66.1%) do not trust Facebook to treat all political views equally and 64.6% believe sites like Facebook are intentionally censoring conservatives and conservative ideas.
Facebook, unlike Google, has a very fragile monopoly. 
Google is fairly confident that nothing can take its place. But Facebook is very fragile. It's been buying out potential competitors. And search appears to be a force of habit, but social media habits change fairly quickly. People 'google' automatically, regardless of how bad the results are, but social is very much a matter of pack and trend. When people's friends leave, it creates a ripple effect. 
And people can and do stop using social all the time.
This survey sends a warning that Facebook can't expect to censor political dissent without paying a serious economic price.

MUSLIM TERROR GROUP CHEERS MUELLER COUP, TRUMP IMPEACHMENT (MUELLER A Man of All TREASON'S)

 
Let's have that conversation about which party is colluding with the enemy, shall we?
Muhammad Shtaya, a member of the Fatah government's Central Committee, said regional officials are counting on Democrats winning the midterms and seizing control of Congress, a scenario the Palestinians believe would work in their favor as the Trump administration pursues efforts to isolate regional governments for their support of terrorism.
Shtaya said in Arabic language comments that many are waiting with anticipation for Democrats to win the midterm elections.
November "is the midterm elections for Congress and the Senate," Shtaya said, according to an independent translation of his remarks provided to the Washington Free Beacon. "If the Democrats seize the majority in Congress and the Senate, I believe we will arrive at two results: First, the first result, a total paralysis of the Trump administration, as he will not be able to pass any bills in Congress. And second, and he spoke about this the other day, and he is the first American president to say, if I'm impeached, the world markets will collapse and everyone will pay a price for it."
The ongoing Mueller investigation also has provided a lifeline to Palestinian leaders who are hopeful it will erode Trump's presidency.
"I believe that the investigator Mueller is proceeding with a bottom-up strategy, and he's gradually tightening the noose on him."
Fatah controls the PLO. The hub of a number of Islamic terrorist groups that have killed and continue to kill Americans.
Where would Shtaya have gotten the idea that the PLO's problems will be solved by Mueller and the Democrats?
Next January, a report appeared that Kerry had met with a top negotiator for the PLO in London.
The secret back-channel negotiator, Hussein Agha, was a close confidant of terrorist dictator Mahmoud Abbas, the racist PLO boss who around this same time had delivered a speech in which he cursed President Trump, shouting, “May your house be destroyed.” Agha was a frequent collaborator with Robert Malley, who allegedly ran Soros and Obama’s back channel to Hamas. Obama fired Malley during the campaign, but once in office brought him back in a variety of roles including as a lead negotiator on the Iran Deal scam and the National Security Council’s point man for the Middle East. Malley now heads Soros’ International Crisis Group and continues undermining America and defending the Iran Deal.
Kerry urged Agha to tell the PLO boss to “be strong”, “play for time” and “not yield to President Trump’s demands.”
The former Secretary of State suggested that the PLO present its own peace plan that he would push through his contacts in the European Union and Muslim countries.
Kerry also advised the Islamic terror boss to attack Trump personally, instead of the country or administration. And Abbas appeared to have taken his advice. He also assured the Islamic terrorist leader that President Trump wouldn’t be in office a year from now. And that Kerry might run for the job.
Since there's lots of talk of collusion, let's remember the Gaza phone banks for Obama. The real collusion has always been between the left and Islamic terrorists.

"MONKEYING" AROUND AND

RETROACTIVE RACISM

 
Back in college, at a soft science class, the professor laid out a survey that was meant to test for unconscious racism. It asked if gorillas have black skin underneath their fur. 
The real thrust of this question blew past everybody answering it. It's one of those racial Rorschach tests that tell you far more about the person asking it than the one answering it.
The media outrage over Rep. DeSantis' "monkey this up" is a fairly typical case of people seeing the racism in their own heads, and also the ubiquitous retroactive racism in which something becomes racist, after being quite normal, only when it's to someone's political advantage.
As Breitbart notes, "Then-Senator Obama (D-IL) said: “I come from Chicago. It’s not as if it’s just Republicans who have monkeyed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have, too. You know, whenever people are in power, they have this tendency to try to tilt things in their direction."
Variations on monkeying, monkeyed and monkey around are routinely used in talking about elections. There are plenty of recent examples.
The working theory of the left here was that Rep. DeSantis was trying to use secret monkey code to use a racial slur. That's stupid. But the left has run this playbook before once, and it worked, against George Allen, who completely melted down. (Perversely, while Allen hadn't said anything racist, the media attacks on him quickly spilled into anti-Semitism.) DeSantis isn't melting down. And that's good.
The public reacts to signals. Confidence and strength. Offense, not defense. Always call out a lie and turn it around. Never apologize for it.
The left's retroactive racism is a nasty and hypocritical tactic that relies on wrongfooting and shame. And should always be exposed for what it is.
Monkeying around, throwing a monkey wrench in it, the 800 pound gorilla in the room, and a thousand others, are typical phrases with no racial implications. If the left believes otherwise, it's the one with the unconscious racism problem.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *