Thursday, November 1, 2018

Hundreds of People Mourn Mom With Cancer Who Refused Abortion to Save Her Baby

 INTERNATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   OCT 31, 2018   |   9:55AM    WASHINGTON, DC
Hundreds of people, including actress Kate Winslet, gathered Tuesday to mourn for a young mother who sacrificed her life for her unborn daughter.
Gemma Nuttall, 29, of Accrington, Lancashire, England, died Oct. 14 after a five-year battle with cancer, the Daily Mail reports. When she was diagnosed in 2013, Nuttall was pregnant with her daughter, Penelope. Doctors recommended that she have an abortion and begin chemotherapy, but Nuttall refused.
“… she was offered a termination so the tumor could be removed immediately and treatment started,” her mother, Helen Sproates, said. “But Gemma decided her unborn child’s life was more important than her own so she declined and insisted on carrying on.”
Penelope, who is 4, and her mother had the opportunity to spend four special years together before Nuttall died, according to the report. The little girl’s life and the special memories they made together would not have been possible if Nuttall had chosen abortion instead.
The British mother was 16 weeks pregnant when she was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in late 2013, the report states. Nuttall refused to undergo cancer treatments until her daughter, Penelope, was born.
On March 24, 2014, Penelope arrived and Nuttall quickly was rushed into surgery to remove the cyst, her family said.
The family also began raising money for an experimental cancer treatment in Germany – something that caught Kate Winslet’s eye.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you like this pro-life article, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!
The “Titanic” actress, who attended the funeral Tuesday, said she came across Nuttall’s story while working through her own mother’s cancer diagnosis. Moved to help the young mother, Winslet set up a fundraiser and raised £300,000 for her, according to the report.
Initially, the treatment worked, and the family said Nuttall lived cancer-free for about a year. Last year, however, she discovered a lump on her head, and later learned that the cancer had returned and spread to her brain and lungs, her family said.
She died Oct. 14, a few weeks before her 30th birthday, according to her family.
On Tuesday, hundreds of people gathered to celebrate and mourn the brave young mother’s life, the Lancashire Telegraph reports.
“As a young mum Gemma’s extraordinary determination to beat her cancer for Penelope was something that deeply moved me and made me want to help,” Winslet said. “She was so clearly a fighter.
“But even though that has not been the case and even though Gemma didn’t quite make it to 30, she did make it to Penelope’s first second, third and fourth birthdays and to her first day of big school. They were also able to have some magical memories together which doctors thought would be impossible. In truth Gemma lived for at least 18 months longer than her specialists believed. She had more time with her family,” she continued.
Sproates, her mother and Penelope’s grandmother, said her granddaughter will be raised by her father now. She said her daughter’s life was short, but it was full of joy because of Penelope.
“She loved her music and movies but most of all she loved her special little Penelope and was a fantastic mummy to her. They had a very special relationship and Penelope has been her rock and her reason to keep going as long as she did,” Sproates said.
She continued: “It is heartbreaking to know Penelope is now having to grow up without her mummy’s love or influence, but we will keep Gemma’s memory alive …”

His Abortion Clinic Has Killed 500 Babies in Abortions This Year, 75% Were Late-Term Abortions

 NATIONAL   GRACE CARR   OCT 31, 2018   |   4:38PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Abortion doctor LeRoy Carhart’s clinic has seen more than 500 patients for “abortion care” since opening its doors in Maryland in October 2017, according to a spokeswoman from his practice.
Spokeswoman Chelsea Souder told HuffPost about 75 percent of abortions the clinic performs have been for patients in the second trimester or later. The clinic employs three physicians, and Carhart “still oversees every single procedure,” HuffPost reported.
Many of the women who come to the Bethesda clinic for abortions are from Mexico, Canada, Europe, South America and Central America, according to Souder. HuffPo calls Carhart “one of the country’s most public and polarizing abortion providers … offering pregnancy termination through roughly 28 weeks’ gestation and sometimes beyond.”
“We are 1 of 3 clinics in America that offer 3rd trimester abortion care. This reality makes it so that we face every barrier that all other abortion clinics face but even more and to a greater degree. Your donation will help keep this very crucial health care service available. Thank you for your support,” according to information for the Bethesda clinic on its site.
Maryland law typically draws the line for abortions at 24 weeks, but that can depend on the risk factor for the mother, according to HuffPost.
Roe v. Wade gave women the permission to abort until the point of viability, which generally refers to the point at which an unborn baby can live outside of the womb.
September 2015 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported that the survival rate in its findings for babies born at 23 weeks is 33 percent and 65 percent at 24 weeks with medical intervention.
A woman sued Carhart in September 2016 for negligence and malpractice after he allegedly botched her late-term abortion.
Carhart said he doesn’t have plans to retire.
Carhart’s clinic did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
LifeNews Note: Grace Carr writes for Daily Caller. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience.

Media Run 10 Times More Negative News Stories About Trump, Republicans Than Democrats

 NATIONAL   RICH NOYS   OCT 31, 2018   |   4:06PM    WASHINGTON, DC
With just one week to go before the 2018 midterm elections, the broadcast networks are heavily spinning their campaign coverage against the Republicans, even as President Trump’s campaign activities have received more airtime than all of the individual Senate, House, and gubernatorial contests combined.
Not only was network coverage of Republicans far more hostile (88% negative) than that meted out to Democrats (53% negative), but we found nearly ten times more negative statements about Republicans and President Trump (97) than all of the Democratic candidates combined (10).
In fact, coverage of the entire field of Democratic candidates would have been 67 percent positive if it hadn’t been for negative comments in stories about Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren’s DNA test.
For this report, MRC analysts looked at all stories that mentioned the midterm elections on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from September 1 through October 26. During those eight weeks, the networks generated 130 minutes of midterm coverage, most of which (78 minutes, or 60%) has aired in the final two weeks of our study (October 13-26).
Our analysts found a combined 132 stories that either focused on the midterms or mentioned them as part of story on another topic (such as the Kavanaugh confirmation battle). Four years ago, when Republicans were poised to take full control of Congress, those same networks aired barely one-fourth as many stories (35) during a similar time period.
LifeNews depends on the support of readers like you to combat the pro-abortion media. Please donate now.
This year, coverage has focused on President Trump and a handful of key races. Nearly half (62 minutes, or 48%) of the midterm coverage on the evening newscasts has focused on the President’s campaign activities, vs. 47 minutes (37%) for all of the individual House, Senate and gubernatorial election contests combined. (Note that this statistic only includes coverage of Trump in a campaign context, not all of the coverage he has received as President during these eight weeks.)
Also eclipsing the individual election contests: Suggestions of foreign interference in this year’s campaign, which drew nearly 15 minutes of airtime, more than any individual race in the country. Most of this coverage (84%) focused on potential shenanigans by Russia. The President’s statement at the United Nations that China was interfering in the campaign drew two minutes of airtime, while the networks spent 16 seconds acknowledging attempts by Iran to meddle as well.
Among specific races, the Texas Senate showdown drew the most coverage (13 minutes, 42 seconds), despite the fact that the polling averages calculated by RealClearPolitics shows six much closer Senate races, including four Democratic-held seats. The only other contests receiving more than three minutes of airtime this fall were the Missouri Senate race, the Georgia governor’s race, the Arizona Senate race, and the close contest in the 7th Congressional District in Texas — which was the focus of a single three and a half minute report on the October 22 CBS Evening News.
In all, the networks spent roughly 31 minutes covering ten Senate races, about eight minutes on the same number of House races, plus another eight minutes on four gubernatorial contests.
The spin of this coverage was lopsidedly anti-Republican and anti-Trump. We calculated spin by tallying all clearly positive and negative statements from non-partisan sources (in other words, reporters, anchors, voters and other unaffiliated sources). This excludes coverage that merely reflects the partisan back-and-forth of the campaign, in order to isolate the spin being imparted by the networks themselves. It also excludes “horse race assessments” about the candidate’s prospects for winning or losing.
Using this measure, we found 110 statements about Republicans: 13 positive assessments vs. 97 (88%) which were negative. More than half of these statements (63) focused on President Trump, who actually fared slightly better than his party, with 86% negative coverage (nine positive statements vs. 54 negative ones), vs. 92% negative coverage for all of the Republican candidates (just four positive statements, vs. 43 negative statements).
Examples:
■ All three networks aired nearly identical reports blaming the Republican gubernatorial candidate, Secretary of State Brian Kemp, for alleged voter suppression in Georgia. (The reports on CBS and NBC even used the same individual voter, Marsha Appling-Nunez, to criticize Kemp.)
■ ABC and NBC both aired extremely similar stories claiming Republican candidates were hypocrites for opposing ObamaCare while saying on the stump that they would protect coverage for those with pre-existing conditions.
■ And all of the networks repeatedly criticized President Trump’s rhetoric on the stump. On October 23, for instance, ABC’s Jonathan Karl flatly declared that “as he makes the final push, the President is unleashing a torrent of exaggerations and claims that just aren’t true.”
The various Democratic candidates were never burdened by such coverage. Only Elizabeth Warren, as noted above, received any significant criticism, with 86% negative coverage following her DNA test. The only other Democrat to draw more than a single evaluative comment was Texas Congressman Beto O’Rourke, who enjoyed 100% positive coverage — a massive contrast to the 86% negative spin given his opponent, Texas Senator Ted Cruz.
Campaigns ought to be a time when journalists step back, present both sides of a debate, and let voters decide. But two years ago, the networks chose to be activists, pounding then-candidate Donald Trump with coverage that was ferociously (91%) negative.
The massive tilt in this year’s coverage shows that the aggressive bias of 2016 was no one-time fluke, but just more proof that the media have utterly discarded objectivity in favor of activism.
LifeNews.com Note: Rich Noyes writes for the Media Research Center, a non profit research and education foundation dedicated to studying and analyzing the bias in the mainstream media. This column originally appeared in its Newsbusters blog.

CNN, MSNBC Blame Fox News and Conservatives for Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting

 NATIONAL   BILL D'AGOSTINO   OCT 31, 2018   |   12:27PM    WASHINGTON, DC
In the aftermath of Saturday’s synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh, liberal cable hosts hurried to place blame for the shooter’s actions at the feet of conservative media outlets, on the grounds that they had recklessly “radicalized” the American right.
CNN and MSNBC analysts, commentators, and hosts noted the shooter’s intimate familiarity with issues often raised by right-leaning news organizations — in particular, the encroaching Honduran migrant caravan, and the political activity of left-wing billionaire George Soros. Panel discussions on these networks were peppered with guilt-by-association-style insinuations that any news organization which had dared to cover these topics must be morally culpable for the October 27 tragedy.
Fox News was the most frequent target of this narrative. On Monday, afternoon MSNBC Live host Ali Velshi remarked: “This caravan that Fox News and the President keep talking about, this guy [the shooter] had memes of it…
LifeNews depends on the support of readers like you to combat the pro-abortion media. Please donate now.
On CNN the following morning, New Day co-host (and former Fox News host) Alisyn Camerota was more direct: “So is the Fox channel to blame for any of the violence and the heated rhetoric that we have seen this past week?” Camerota’s question led into a news segment narrated by Reliable Sources host Brian Stelter, who anxiously remarked that the shooting had “coincided with a rise in hateful language from the Infowars fringe to Fox’s prime time lineup.”
Others, such as CNN global affairs analyst and former Republican Max Boot, argued that guilt for the shooting spanned the entire conservative political spectrum. On Sunday night’s CNN Newsroom, Boot disingenuously claimed that those on the American right who opposed George Soros did so “basically because George Soros is a rich Jew”:
Fox News and that crowd, Breitbart, and Infowars, and the Daily Caller, and Republican Congressmen, they have been vilifying George Soros for years. And basically because George Soros is a rich Jew. And so when they talk about Soros, they’re talking about a rich Jew who’s in control of everything or when they talk about globalist, which is the term that Trump prefers.
Former McCain staffer Steve Schmidt (another former Republican) shared Boot’s big-tent view of culpability. During an October 29 guest appearance on MSNBC’s All In, Schmidt railed against all manner of right-leaning news organizations (including this one):
The propaganda industry that [Kellyanne Conway] commands, with the vile President that she serves, abetted by Mark Levine, and Rush Limbaugh, and Breitbart, and NewsBusters, and Judicial Watch, and all the rest of them, have blood on their hands for the incitements that they have made that have triggered and radicalized these crazy people. It is deliberate in intent.
Of course, this line of thinking would necessarily entail that any reservations one might have about the Honduran caravan, or about George Soros’s political activity, are rooted in dangerous and potentially violent antisemitism. Whether unwittingly or otherwise, the left-wing pundit class have crafted their own “enemy of the people” narrative — one which endeavors to hold purveyors of right-wing views responsible for the senseless slaughter of eleven civilians.
LifeNews Note: Bill D’Agostino writes for Newsbusters, where this originally appeared.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *