Friday, March 1, 2019

GOP senators fuming over Trump comments on Warmbier


Volume 90%
 
Republican senators were steaming Thursday over President Trump’s vehement defense of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s role in the death of American college student Otto Warmbier.
Trump’s statement that he believed Kim when he said he didn’t know at the time of Warmbier’s treatment left a number of GOP senators upset.
“I personally find that statement extremely hard to believe,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine). 
Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who represents Warmbier’s home state, warned the president not to be “naïve” about the “brutal nature” of the North Korean regime in a speech on the Senate floor.
“I want to make clear that we can never forget about Otto. His treatment at the hands of his captors was unforgivable and it tells us a lot about the nature of the regime,” said Portman, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee.
“We can’t be naïve about what they did to Otto, about the brutal nature of the regime that would do this to an American citizen,” he warned.
Portman later told The Hill that Kim and his lieutenants are “human rights violators across the board” and said it’s likely that Kim knew about Warmbier’s status. 
“I can’t tell you specifically who was knowledgeable of it but I would assume it goes straight to the top,” he added. 
While Republican senators expressed relief that Trump had walked away from the negotiations with Kim after he insisted that the United States drop economic sanctions in exchange for concessions on North Korea’s nuclear program, the remarks about Warmbier were what many were talking about. 
“I think it was probably smart for him to walk away when he didn’t get the concessions,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). 
“It’s high stakes, it’s high risk but it’s also high reward if you can make it happen,” she added.
Collins said she was surprised that Trump was willing to take Kim at his word on Warmbier given the North Korean regime’s long record of human rights abuses.
“I am surprised that he accepted at face value apparently what happened to the American who was held there,” she said.
Warmbier, a Cincinnati native and University of Virginia student, was arrested in January 2016 for allegedly stealing a propaganda poster while on a tour of Pyongyang. He was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor but later released to the United States in a vegetative state and died in June of 2017. 
Trump tried to assure reporters at a press conference Thursday that Kim wasn’t responsible for Warmbier’s harsh captivity, which left him with extensive brain damage. 
“He tells me he didn’t know about it, and I take him at his word,” Trump said Thursday. 
His comment defending Kim was reminiscent of remarks he made at a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin last year when Trump said he gave credence to Putin’s claim that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. 
Portman noted in his floor speech that North Korean officials failed to tell Warmbier’s family or American officials about his health status during 15 months of negotiations over the American’s release. 
“Who did the North Korean government tell about the fact that he had this brain damage? No one. Unbelievably for the next 15 months of his life they kept this a secret,” Portman said on the floor. “They denied him access to the best medical care he deserved, which of course we would have provided.”
The Trump-Kim talks broke down after Kim offered to dismantle a nuclear facility if the United States dropped all of its economic sanctions against North Korea, but refused to promise to scale down his country’s nuclear weapons program. 
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), who is emerging as a counterweight to Trump on foreign policy issues, on Thursday applauded Trump’s decision to walk away from the negotiating table. 
“In a negotiation, when you’re not making the progress you want, it’s always a wise strategy to walk away,” he said. 
Democrats criticized Trump for sitting down with Kim in this first place.
“What we saw in Hanoi was amateur hour with nuclear weapons at stake and the limits of reality-TV diplomacy,” Sen. Bob Menendez (N.J.), the senior Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said in a CNN interview Thursday.
But GOP lawmakers defended the high-stakes summit by arguing that diplomatic efforts by previous administration have failed to yield any result. 
“To Trump’s credit, he’s trying to change the dynamic,” said Portman, noting that the lack of engagement with North Korea left few channels of open communication to negotiate Warmbier’s release when he was in captivity.
--Jordain Carney contributed
   
LOAD COMMENTS (1,383
)

GOP bristles over plan to shift military funding to border wall

Volume 0%
 
GOP concerns are bubbling up over the administration's plans to divert billions in military construction money as part of President Trump's national emergency declaration.
As part of an effort to pull together roughly $8 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall, the administration will redirect $3.6 billion originally appropriated for military construction projects across the country.
Trump’s decision has sparked bipartisan backlash on Capitol Hill, where Republicans are openly concerned that the president is blurring the separation of powers and attempting to override Congress’s government funding decisions.
GOP Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) told reporters to “keep in mind the irony” of the president deciding to take money away from military construction projects that were part of his previous budget requests.
“We had military leaders come before us and make the case for each of these projects as being vital to our national security and it seems to me very shortsighted and harmful to our national security … for that money to be used for other purposes,” she said.
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), during a floor speech, also urged Trump to rethink his emergency declaration and reshuffle more money from the Pentagon’s counter-drug accounts rather than military construction.
“Using funds already approved by Congress avoids taking money from military construction projects specifically approved by Congress for such activities as military barracks and hospitals,” he said.
Senators say they are in the dark about where the administration will shuffle money from and if projects in their home states will, at least temporarily, be put on hold. The limbo status comes as the Senate is poised to vote on a resolution this month that would block Trump’s emergency declaration. 
Trump has threatened to veto the resolution, potentially setting up a conflict between the president and his party.
“I think it's clear that people want to see the final documentation and they want to know the specific statutory basis,” said Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), who is expected to back Trump. 
To pass the resolution blocking the declaration, Democrats would need to flip four Republican senators. So far three have said they will support the resolution and several from different factions of the caucus remain undecided and have voiced concerns about the administration’s actions.
Asked how they would vote on the resolution of disapproval, both Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.) demurred, noting that they hadn’t yet seen a detailed list indicating from where the White House plans to divert funds.
Republicans raised concerns about tapping military construction accounts, as well as the administration’s broader legal strategy, during a closed-door lunch with Vice President Pence and DOJ officials this week.
“That was the sentiment generally expressed. That we want to see what it's coming out of,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), asked if Republicans need to see details on the military construction funding before the Senate votes.
But the administration is trying to sooth questions from lawmakers by noting the funds could be "back filled" during the upcoming appropriations cycle, if Congress agrees.
Several Republican senators emerged from the closed-door lunch saying the administration was pledging to ask to replenish the military construction accounts as part of the fiscal year 2020 funding bills, which need to be passed by October 1.
Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) said he stood up during the lunch and told his colleagues that one of his “highest priorities” would be to replace any funding taken from military construction projects.
Robert McMahon, an assistant secretary of defense, separately told House lawmakers that no military construction projects that had been authorized would be cancelled because of the emergency declaration.
“While some may be deferred, the budget request will include a request for funds to replenish these accounts,” he said during a House Appropriations Committee meeting.
He added that to protect military readiness, the Pentagon will look to delay projects that “pose no or minimal operational readiness risks if deferred,” as well as those scheduled to be awarded in the last six months of the fiscal year, and “recapitalization projects of existing facilities that can temporarily be deferred for a period of months.”
Pentagon officials have not yet told lawmakers what projects they expect to be impacted. McMahon added that they were still waiting to hear from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on how it would spend the Defense dollars. The Defense Department is in the process of identifying what military construction funds could be moved and what projects would be delayed.
The White House announced that along with an emergency declaration, Trump would reshuffle $2.5 billion from the Pentagon’s drug-interdiction programs. But in a potential hurdle, defense officials say there is currently less than $80 million that could be used for the wall from that funding pot. 
Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) argued that the gap in funding means if the president wanted to reach the $8 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall, that could result in taking more from military construction.
“We should be prepared for a raid on other accounts or even taking even more from military construction funding. These are military construction funds that Congress already has appropriated for specific projects necessary to support the national security priorities of the United States,” he said.
Udall added that that national emergency could be put funding at risk even in red states, where senators are likely to oppose attempts to block Trump’s declaration. He noted that $210 million in military construction projects could be at risk in Florida, $520 million in Texas, $81 million in Utah “and the list goes on an on.”
To replenish the money as part of the 2020 fiscal year funding bills, the administration would need Democrats to agree to include extra money that offsets Trump’s emergency declaration.
Shelby predicted that they would ultimately go along with the plan, even if they opposed the emergency declaration.
“I hope they would be because it affects the national security,” he said. “And it might affect their districts.”
--Ellen Mitchell contributed.
   
LOAD COMMENTS (1,292)

Iranian General: “We Plan to Break U.S., Israel, Cleanse World of Their Filth”

To view this email as a web page, go here.
Dear Carl,

Below is your weekly edition of E-News recapping key developments impacting the U.S.-Israel relationship.
  
Iranian General: “We Plan to Break U.S., Israel, Cleanse World of Their Filth”
The deputy commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps says Tehran has plans “to break America, Israel, and their partners and allies” in worldwide attacks. In a speech aired February 19 on Iran’s IRINN TV, Brig. Gen. Hossein Salami said Iran was preparing to “fight them on the global level, not just in one spot.

Read more.
 
The Iranian Revolution, 40 Years On: Oppression at Home, Aggression Abroad
Forty years ago this February, the secular, modernizing, pro-Western Iranian monarchy under Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi was toppled by the radical, totalitarian, anti-Western Islamic Republic of Iran under Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

By the end of 1979, the Islamic Republic had violently suppressed internal dissent, deprived the Iranian people—particularly women—of basic human rights, taken American diplomats hostage, and laid the foundations for a regime that would further intensify internal repression and commit worldwide acts of aggression designed to destroy Israel, make Iran a regional hegemon and challenge America’s global interests.

Read more.
 
Israel Strikes Hamas Targets in Gaza After Airborne Device Explodes
The Israeli air force struck several targets in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday night after an airborne incendiary device damaged a home in the Eshkol region of southern Israel. The military said attack helicopters and fighter jets struck a military compound used by Hamas in the central Gaza Strip.

Read more.
Help work with our new Congress to ensure the U.S.-Israel relationship remains strong.

Join AIPAC Today
Israeli Director Guy Nattiv Wins Oscar for Short Film
Israeli director Guy Nattiv won an Academy Award for best live-action short for his film Skin at the Oscars on Sunday evening, February 24. “Oh my God. I moved here five years ago from Israel… Laila tov [good night] Israel, hi!” he said upon receiving the award. “My grandparents are Holocaust survivors, and, you know, the bigotry that they experienced in the Holocaust, we see that everywhere today, in America, in Europe. And this film is about education, it’s about teaching your kids a better way,” he added.

Read more.
 
.


Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *