Sunday, January 3, 2021
January 3, 2021 Biden's Wet Squib By Clarice Feldman
Parler
PrintJanuary 3, 2021
Biden's Wet Squib
At midnight on New Year’s Eve Joe and Jill Biden posted a message online. The finale of the greeting was to be a pop-up confetti firecracker. It failed in its mission like a wet squib.
A perfect ending to a rotten year in which after riots and a rapidly spreading Chinese virus, we got a highly suspicious election in which the apparent winners were a crook demonstrably suffering from dementia and an unprincipled leftist with no evident qualifications for a job she may have to assume in his stead. Maybe though it’s an omen of things to come.
On January 6 a large demonstration in support of Stop the Steal is scheduled. President Trump says he will produce evidence of a stolen election. If you only get your news from the major media you might think there is no such evidence, but there is.
The President’s counsel, Rudy Giuliani (Sidney Powell who’s working on hardening election procedures, and Lin Wood who is representing himself, do not directly represent Trump) tweeted:
In a country with a free press, you would know:
1. The Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee issued a report demonstrating the vote was stolen from
2. The vote was unanimous and BIPARTISAN to audit Fulton County’s Absentee ballots.
3. And to de-certify Biden.
Scott Adams (Dilbert's creator) looked at the findings of the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee that heard the evidence Giuliani presented and agrees that Trump won Georgia and the problems demonstrated in the machine in use at the precinct where they got to examine one evince a far broader steal: “If you can find a problem in one machine you can throw out the whole election.”
Here’s the report that summarizes the testimony presented under oath in person and by affidavit.
Among the findings were these:
- Protocols to ensure the proper chain of custody of ballots “throughout the Election, after the opening of ballots prior to the elections, and during the recounts” were not followed.
- "It was possible or even likely that large numbers of fraudulent ballots were introduced into the pool of ballots that we're counted as voted.”
- There were pristine ballots in the mix “whose origin looked suspicious and which could not be verified “ and poll workers were unable to distinguish “between test ballots and absentee ballots.”
- Poll watchers observed that “ballots were not secured, that seals and security tags were not used,” both during the count and recount process.
- “There was a lack of enforcement of the law, sloppy handling of the ballots by those handling and counting, deliberate covering-up of voting numbers by poll workers, unsafe handling of military ballots and “insecure data such as on laptops and flash drives.”
- Equipment failures were frequent and some ballots would not go through the machines while others were counted more than once.
- Republican observers were deliberately blocked from observing the counting.
Even more troubling than this was the subcommittee’s findings about the Dominion voting machines:
The Subcommittee takes notice of the various publicly reported functions of the machines and heard evidence that the machines can duplicate fraudulent ballots to the point that not even trained personnel can tell the difference between a test ballot and a real ballot. Testimony also suggested that the system responds wirelessly to being reset from an unknown location as happened with the poll books. The Subcommittee also heard that Dominion machines can be programmed with algorithms that reallocate votes between candidates. In addition, the Dominion machines are programmed to count votes using percentages of whole numbers rather than actual votes, which is a feature incompatible with the actual voting process. The Subcommittee learned that the history and control of the company that owns the Dominion voting system is unclear and provides serious implications of foreign interference in the U.S. election.
The details of the testimony upon which the report is based are in the report.
A number of recommendations in the report go to future election procedures. The report also recommends prosecution of those who violate election laws by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the attorney general, “including those conspiring to place fraudulent ballots into the system and the 1,000 persons identified by the Secretary of state who voted twice in the 2020 primaries.” It recommends forensic audits of the ballots and machines by third-party auditors.
From the point of view of the present, the most significant recommendation is this:
The Legislature should carefully consider its obligations under the U.S. Constitution. If a majority of the General Assembly concurs with the findings of this report, the certification of the Election should be rescinded and the General Assembly should act to determine the proper Electors to be certified to the Electoral College in the 2020 presidential race. Since time is of the essence, the Chairman and Senators who concur with this report recommend that the leadership of the General Assembly and the Governor immediately convene to allow further consideration by the entire General Assembly.
Voters have good reason to believe that the numerous incidents of malfeasance found in Georgia were repeated elsewhere. Gateway Pundit summarizes the problems, noting three states alone that counted one million illegitimate votes for Biden: Wisconsin, Georgia, and Pennsylvania.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court held that more than 200,000 ballots cast (estimated to be heavily for Biden) in the 2020 election were illegitimate.
In Georgia 460,000 absentee ballots, most of which went to Biden, were counted with no compliance with the chain of custody requirements of Georgia law.
In Pennsylvania there still is a case pending before the Supreme Court. There the state allowed “hundreds of thousands of ballots to be counted even though they were not turned in until after 8 p.m. on election day as state law mandates.”
Regardless of the outcomes in other disputed states, decertifying and refusing to count the votes in these three states alone would hand the election to President Trump.
Those of us who believed all along that this election was stolen for Biden had good reason to think so.
There was an overwhelmingly obvious disparity in enthusiasm between the huge crowds for Trump throughout the country and the turnouts even smaller than those that greeted Hillary when Biden occasionally emerged from his basement. President Trump forcefully criticized the riots and looting in Democrat-run cities while Biden remained in a muddled “mostly peaceful” camp. The President’s stopping flights from China and his effort to quickly get a COVID vaccine created and distributed so that the country could get moving and lives saved contrasts with Basement Biden’s criticism of the flight stoppage and support for more lockdown and mask gimmickry. Finally, Biden had no coattails which in an honest election one would expect. The Democrats lost 27 out of 27 tossup elections. Looks close to a pantsing to me.
What Congress will do before January 20’s inauguration is beyond my poor powers of prognostication, but the numbers of legislators saying they’d be willing to challenge the certifications keeps growing. It has taken this long to amass the evidence supportive of our rational doubts. In large part, this is the nature of such things where the equipment used is solely in the hands of the very people who created or, at a minimum, indulged this mess and would not release them for inspection, and a court system reluctant to get involved in election disputes.
January 3, 2021 Was a COVID-19 Vaccine Developed before the First COVID-19 Case Was Discovered in America? By Robert L. Kinney, Pharm.D., M.A.
January 3, 2021
Was a COVID-19 Vaccine Developed before the First COVID-19 Case Was Discovered in America?
Regardless of one's political affiliation, it goes without saying that nobody wants to be forced or otherwise deceptively coerced into accepting a vaccine that may eventually cause cancer or some other harm — especially when many, without vaccination, do not even experience symptoms from the targeted virus. It also goes without saying that many are probably familiar with the idea that corrupt persons seek government positions or use their power and influence as a way to be paid by foreign countries or big corporations. One recent example is the Bidens' apparent collusions with China and the FBI's apparent cover-up of that information before the 2020 election.
Some commentators have made the good point that physicians do not get paid nearly as much in government or public health jobs as physicians do practicing medicine in non-government positions. This, the commentators have concluded, may leave government public health employees open to outside influences.
It is not an exaggeration to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines — which currently require two doses — could quickly become trillion-dollar products; every time a "new strain" or "new variant" of SARS-CoV-2 is claimed to be discovered, a new vaccine could (wrongly) be said to be necessary. Creating the need for such a potential trillion-dollar product could result in several persons being highly compensated. It is probably wise, then, to "follow the money" and discuss those government officials who are promoting COVID-19 vaccines. It is preferable to avoid mentioning names, but these are government public health officials who have provided the groundwork for COVID-19 vaccines, and names are required.
For example, in January 2020, one of the first to publicly create COVID-19 panic in America was Dr. Nancy Messonnier — the director of the U.S. federal government's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the CDC. She uses her position at the CDC to promote vaccines. Her bio says she is "currently leading the CDC's efforts on COVID-19 vaccine." (Some probably also know her as the sister of Rod Rosenstein, the former deputy attorney general who participated in the FBI investigation of President Trump and appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel.)
So one of the first people to create COVID-19 fear in America works for the CDC to promote vaccines. It is also worth mentioning that the CDC's apparent official stance is indeed to promote COVID-19 vaccines. Of course, COVID-19 vaccines authorized for emergency use in the U.S. are not legally approved for marketing/advertising in the U.S.; wrongly or misleadingly claiming that the unapproved COVID-19 vaccines are "safe and effective" could be illegal labeling or advertising known as "misbranding." So the CDC cunningly promotes COVID-19 vaccination without mentioning the names of the specific still unapproved vaccines.
It is relevant to mention that the CDC has falsely overstated COVID-19 death counts. Falsely over-stating COVID-19 death counts could be used as a form of deceptive coercion to scare Americans into getting vaccinated.
Then there is Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Fauci is one of the most consistent U.S. federal government officials to contribute to the COVID-19 fear.
While he was promoting the COVID-19 fear, though, there were some interesting things going on with Dr. Fauci's NIAID/NIH along with Bill Gates's "Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations" (CEPI — reportedly co-founded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017) and Moderna, a COVID-19 vaccine–maker recently given emergency use authorization by the FDA. Moderna does not have any approved products on the market (the COVID-19 vaccine is still unapproved) but set a record for the biggest biotech initial public offering in December of 2018. In a U.S. government document, Moderna wrote (emphasis added):
In collaboration with the Vaccine Research Center ("VRC") and Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases ("DMID") of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ("NIAID"), part of the National Institutes of Health ("NIH"), as well as the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations ("CEPI"), we are pursuing the rapid manufacture of a vaccine to address the current 2019-nCoV outbreak. 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] was first identified in Wuhan, China on January 7, 2020. On January 13, 2020, the NIH and our infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for the 2019-nCoV vaccine and we mobilized toward clinical manufacture. As of February 7, 2020, the first clinical batch, including fill and finishing of vials, is complete. This mRNA vaccine was designed and manufactured in 25 days and is undergoing analytical testing prior to release to the NIH for use in their planned Phase 1 clinical trial in the U.S.
Did you get that? The virus "2019-nCoV," which would soon be given the scarier (and more likely to lead to draconian lockdowns and vaccines) "SARS-CoV-2" name, was reportedly discovered on January 7, 2020. By January 13, 2020, Dr. Fauci's NIAID/NIH, Bill Gates's CEPI, and Moderna already had a COVID-19 vaccine finalized. Toward the beginning of the COVID-19 panic, some commentators were mentioning Bill Gates's odd public appearances, which were used to provoke COVID-19 fear; his co-founded entity's already having co-developed a COVID-19 vaccine by that time may have something to do with that. While two of the most influential promoters of COVID-19 fear, Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates, were attempting to scare the world, entities closely associated with them already had funded and/or finalized a potentially highly profitable vaccine.
The timeline is also worth mentioning. There were reportedly only 59 total COVID-19 cases in the world as of January 9, 2020. So there were reportedly 59 cases of COVID-19 in the whole world, none which were in America, while Moderna, Dr. Fauci's NIAID/NIH, and Bill Gates's CEPI were developing a COVID-19 vaccine. The first COVID-19 case was reportedly discovered in America on January 21, 2020 — eight days after the COVID-19 vaccine was already developed.
It also cannot be overlooked that Dr. Moncef Mohamed Slaoui, the U.S. federal government's chief adviser for "Operation Warp Speed" (the quick development of COVID-19 vaccines), had (or has) financial interests in Moderna. He joined Moderna's board of directors in 2017. And it may or may not be relevant, but Dr. Slaoui was an adviser for a company started in 2018 that creates medicines for China.
Also noteworthy is that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, led by Alex Azar, another person with ties to the pharmaceutical industry that cannot be ignored, granted "liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19." The action is dated March 10, 2020 but made the immunity effective on February 4, 2020 — prior to Moderna's, CEPI's, and the NIAID/NIH's completion of the first batch of COVID-19 vaccine.
Finally worth noting are the stock prices of both COVID-19 vaccine–makers that were given emergency use authorization by the U.S. federal government. Pfizer's stock price has remained between approximately $27 and $42 per share in 2020. The stock price of Moderna (which, again, co-developed its COVID-19 vaccine with Dr. Fauci's and the U.S. federal government's NIAID/NIH as well as Bill Gates's CEPI) began 2020 at about $19 per share and went as high as $170 per share in December 2020 — a gain of about 800%. These are two companies with similar products — but the one not developed in conjunction with the U.S. federal government and Bill Gates's CEPI did not gain even close to as much as the company that co-developed its vaccine with the U.S. federal government's NIAID/NIH and Bill Gates's CEPI.
The above may be a big deal, or it may be inconsequential or coincidence. Either way, it sure is interesting.
Image: Triggermouse via Pixabay, Pixabay License.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Subscribe To The New Under Ground Church
Posts
All Comments