Monday, February 1, 2021

February 1, 2021 Chicago teacher strike looms over Mayor Lightfoot’s demand for a return to classroom learning By Thomas Lifson

 

American Thinker

Chicago teacher strike looms over Mayor Lightfoot’s demand for a return to classroom learning

Chicago is at the epicenter of the nation’s struggle against teachers’ unions that are crippling a generation of children by refusing to resume classroom teaching in many Democrat-controlled cities.  Recently, Lori Lightfoot, the Democrat Mayor of Chicago, has clashed with the Chicago Teachers Union, demanding that they return to the classrooms, while the union resists and makes demands, the latest being for complete vaccination of teachers before a return to their duties.

The Chicago Sun-Times has excellent coverage of the current state of the dispute as a strike is threatened over the demand that teachers do their jobs in return for receiving their pay (as they have been since the suspension if classroom teaching).  Nader Issa and Tim Schuba write:

In a sign of the growing discord, CPS and CTU could not publicly agree why there were no negotiations Sunday. The district said its bargaining team stood ready to resume negotiations, waiting for a counterproposal from the union that never came. The union said it was told talks would continue only if “we were offering major concessions,” which it was unwilling to do.

The chaotic end to what both sides had hoped would be a successful weekend leaves thousands of families unsure of what’s next — including at the high school level. If CPS locks out elementary and middle school teachers and the union strikes, high school classes would also come to a halt, jeopardizing final exams scheduled this week. Lightfoot said she hopes “we never get to that point.”

Mayor Lightfoot is putting a happy face on what looks like a bitter dispute. Because teachers’ unions are a key constituency for Democrats, providing vast sums of money and critical manpower for get out the vote and other activities, she is really in an awkward position if she is too critical.

Despite the deadlock, the mayor said she spoke with CTU President Jesse Sharkey by phone, calling their conversation “cordial and productive.”

“We agreed at the end of the call that we would keep the lines of communication open,” Lightfoot said. “There were no insults by either side.”

Teachers are trying to place themselves in a privileged position, jumping the line ahead of groups at greater risk of Covid when it comes to their place in line for receiving Covid vaccinations.

[CTU President Jesse] Sharkey also said he understands vaccine supply is limited and teachers can’t jump in line ahead of essential workers who have been in-person the whole pandemic. But he was frustrated by what he called a lack of communication on the issue by district officials. The city is giving CPS 1,000 vaccines per week, leaving most educators searching for shots in what a union attorney described as a “bizarre ‘Hunger Games’ situation.”

The union has said its members shouldn’t be required to work in person before they’ve had a chance to be vaccinated, arguing educators should be moved to the front of the vaccine line if the city wants to reopen schools immediately.

Lightfoot and Health Commissioner Dr. Allison Arwady have been reluctant to do that, saying essential workers who have been in person all this time should be prioritized over teachers.

“The vaccine is a part of a public health toolkit in order to mitigate the spread of COVID,” Jackson said. “Rule No. 1 is that you have to disseminate those vaccines in places where we’re trying to stop the spread of COVID. Schools are not significant sources of spread. And so this is a public health solution. We have to start with that. Some of these other things are incredibly important, but some of them are political decisions.”

In my view, teachers are among the most-propagandized groups when it comes to hysteria over Covid risks. Because so many of them are true believers in the cant of the left, the rank and file may well feel seriously threatened by risks that other groups shrug off. In addition, they probably bought into the misinformation spread about hydroxychloroquine (and now, Ivermectin) being supposedly ineffective, even harmful, in the early treatment of Covid. Those early therapies could limit harm in many, many cases, if used early and in combination with other common drugs and supplements. (Of course, make any decisions abut your own health care in consultation with your physician. I do not offer any medical advice here.)

The cancellation of classroom learning over Covid fears is imposing huge costs on children, their parents and society. In the long run, the dumbing down, psychic cost, and lack of socialization of a generation of kids may turn out to be deeply destructive for American society and impair out international competitiveness.

And it is all so unnecessary. As is well established, children very rarely get Covid, and teachers are safer than many, many other categories of workers (supermarket cashiers, for one of countless examples) who have worked through the epidemic as “essential” workers. Cheryl K. Chumley of the Washington Times writes:

According to 2011-2012 data from the National Center for Education Studies, the average age of teachers in the United States was 42. Roughly 15% were younger than 30 years old; 54% fell between 30 years old and 49 years old; nearly 12% were between the ages of 50 and 54; and almost 19% were age 55 or higher.

Child Trends, meanwhile, reported that in 2017-2018, only 17% of public school teachers in America were above the age of 55 years old; 12% were between 50 and 54 years old; 57% between 30 and 49 years old; and 14% younger than 30.

In other words: They’re not exactly fitting the profile of COVID-19’s most vulnerable. And suggesting otherwise — as this headline, “Nearly one third of U.S. teachers are at higher risk of severe illness from COVID-19 due to age,” as Child Trends wrote in April of 2020 — is hyperbolic.

The only reason teachers get by with staying home from school is because their unions are using the coronavirus to financial and political advantage. The unions are driven by far-left socialists who think nothing of putting kids in harm’s way — of stymying their educational growth, of shuttering their social maturity, of yanking their athletics and stopping their after-school programs and even turning blind eyes to those who are abused, hungry and harassed — the unions think nothing of harming youth this way if it advances their demands for more pay, more money, more cushy work benefits.

The situation in Chicago is worth watching closely. Democrat leaders like Lightfoot are caught between pressures from parents and the irrational demands of their single most important interest group. If teachers continue to shrug off their duries, they should be subject to discipline, including firing, though the idea of a Demcorat taking such aciton againsts a critical interest group is fanciful.




February 1, 2021 Trump, the GOP, and the House By Bill Hansmann

 

American Thinker

Trump, the GOP, and the House

The next two years are going to be very interesting to observe with respect to the future of the Republican Party and Donald Trump's leadership role. Ten Republican members of the House of Representatives voted to impeach the president in the second sham impeachment proceeding against him, despite the fact that he was about to leave office.

Not one Republican voted for impeachment the first go-round.  This strongly suggests that the first vote was more about self-preservation than an actual endorsement of the president.  It would not bode well for a congressman to vote against the leader of his own party, a leader who seemed likely at the time to win re-election in two years and whose endorsement might prove valuable to the congressman's own re-election bid.  Any member of Congress hoping to remain in his seat would likely swallow his distaste for the president and vote not to impeach.

Granted, two of the ten were not seated members of the House at the time of the December 2019 vote; Donald Valadao of California, who originally won his seat in 2012, lost it in 2018 and then won it back this past fall, and Peter Meijer of Michigan, just elected in November of 2020, was a member of Congress for all of a week at the time of the impeachment vote.  They both voted for the president's removal from office on what was their first opportunity to do so.

Donald Trump is all about loyalty.  People might say he has not always been as loyal in return to some, but I believe that Trump sees this as "just rewards" to individuals who have failed him in some way.  A vote to impeach is certainly seen by Trump as disloyalty with a capital "D."

The obvious next step by the former president is an active role in finding and supporting primary opponents for the "disloyal ten."  Seven of the ten have already been put on notice by primary challengers, and the other three most likely won't have to wait long to see their own primary opposition form.  It's inconceivable that all ten won't be challenged.

Some of the "disloyal ten" pose more interesting situations.  A challenge to an incumbent is always difficult, often due to lack of financing for the challenger, though Trump and his supporters can certainly help overcome that monetary disadvantage.  Liz Cheney, a popular figure in Wyoming political circles owing in large part to her father, former vice president Dick Cheney, will likely be difficult to displace.  If Trump manages to help oust her, it will be a major victory for the MAGA faction of the party and a major blow to the Bush-Cheney Republican wing.

I think the case of the aforementioned David Valadao of California is also worthy of discussion.  Valadao represents a largely Hispanic district that Biden won handily.  Despite his disastrous start with the Latino vote, Trump made significant inroads with them, as well as with Blacks.  It would be interesting to see if Trump's people could find a Hispanic challenger to a congressman who is, for all intents and purposes, an independent rather than a card-carrying Republican.  Finding a MAGA true-believer Hispanic candidate to challenge Valadao would pose an interesting choice for the Hispanic voters of his district.  It would be almost a no-lose situation for Trump.  If a Trump-supported challenger won the primary but lost the general election, the Republicans won't have lost much in the House, as Valadao was no sure thing on any item on the Republican agenda.  If he won, it would be a major victory in Trump's attempt to bring minorities into the Republican fold.

If Trump and his supporters in these primary House challenges are largely unsuccessful, and if any Senate primary challenges, such as the almost certain challenge to Mitt Romney, are also unsuccessful, Trump and his followers will likely feel no loyalty to the GOP going forward.  At that point, I see Trump forming a third party.  Call it the MAGA Party, the Patriot Party, or what have you.  A third party, lacking infrastructure at most state levels, is a certain guarantee of Democratic victories, not only in 2024, but for the foreseeable future.  It would fatally damage the Republican Party.  Trump might well consider that "just rewards" in spades, but the rest of us will have to decide if we have severed our nose to spite our face.  It's going to be an interesting couple of years.

Image: Bernard DUPONT.




February 1, 2021 Researchers in Israel found something wonderful By Andrea Widburg

 

American Thinker

Researchers in Israel found something wonderful

The Bible is a dynamic book, peopled with characters who have a tremendous immediacy.  That immediacy just got a boost over the weekend when Israeli researchers announced that they'd found scraps of purple cloth dating back to the time of Kings David and Solomon.

I didn't grow up in a religious family, so I first read the Bible as a college freshman when I took a "Bible as Literature" class.  For me, it sparked a lifelong fascination with Old Testament history.  I've listed at the bottom of this post the books I've found most fascinating, as well as a video I recommend to anyone interested in the Exodus.

What's so wonderful about ancient history is that our fund of knowledge keeps growing.  The Earth is constantly moving, whether from erosion or because modern people are always digging, and this movement invariably turns up amazing treasures, things that are fascinating and, quite often, beautiful.

Most importantly, these finds offer a window into the past.  When we see a noblewoman's jewels, a warrior's sword, or a child's toys, it doesn't matter that these treasures are hundreds or thousands of years old.  They tell us that humankind is unchanged.  Sure, autres temps, autres mÅ“urs, and all that, but the core of human nature is always the same: to play as a child; fight as a man; and acquire treasures throughout life, no matter our sex, caste, or wealth.

Every day, I check LiveScience's history page to see what the earth has turned up.  In just the last few days, I've learned that a new eagle sculpture was uncovered at an Aztec temple in Mexico, a 1,500-year-old house in Turkey showed puppy paw prints6,500 medieval coins and some gold rings showed up in a Polish cornfield, an Anglo-Saxon burial site emerged in Northamptonshire, and archaeologists found evidence that conquistadors took a terrible vengeance against Acolhua people who sacrificed members of a Spanish caravan and then ate them.

But for me, the most exciting find in I don't know how long (maybe since King Richard III's skeleton was found in a parking lot) is the story that researchers found some 3,000-year-old fabric in Israel, which puts it at the time of David and Solomon:

Rare purple wool cloth scraps from the era dating back to the time of King David and King Solomon, approximately 3,000 years ago, have been discovered in Israel.

Researchers in southern Israel found the remnants of woven wool fabric that had been dyed the color of royal purple while examining textiles from the Timna valley, a copper production district of King Solomon's day. 

[snip]

In ancient times purple cloth was a luxury item, and those who wore it were associated with the nobility, priests, and royalty. The dye used to make the color was sourced from a few kinds of mollusks in the Mediterranean Sea. The dye was produced from a gland located within the body of the mollusk by way of a complex chemical process that took several days to occur. 

If you go to the linked article, you can see photographs of the exquisitely preserved wool fabric, which is a lovely, warm purplish/mauve color.

There is nothing more immediate than fabric because it is so tactile. Even when it's royal purple, it's a homey item that people wear every day.  Just as people in David's and Solomon's time did 3,000 years ago, we too wear purple woolens, although we can buy them anywhere, and, if we're not too fussy about quality and style, they're affordable, rather than being, literally, worth a king's ransom.

We live in unsettling times, and the news is often deeply depressing for those of us whose values are not aligned with the new government in Washington, D.C.  Nevertheless, stories such as this one remind us that the world is full of wonders.  We are connected by shared humanity with people who are not mythical at all but, instead, did exactly what we still do: got up in the morning, dressed for the day, and went about their business.  There's something magical about that thought.

Old Testament history books I recommend:

I also can't recommend highly enough Timothy P. Mahoney's fascinating Patterns of Evidence: The Exodus, which posits that those archaeologists and historians who deny that the Exodus really happened because, they say, there's no archaeological record have gotten the dates wrong.  If you re-date the Exodus by a few hundred years, there turns out to be a surprising amount of archaeological evidence that matches the biblical story.

Image: The anointing of Solomon by Cornelis de Vos. Kunsthistorisches Museum.  Public Domain.




February 1, 2021 Peter Barry Chowka explains the real story of Dr. Fauci By Thomas Lifson

 

American Thinker

Peter Barry Chowka explains the real story of Dr. Fauci

Peter Barry Chowka has been a writer on science and health issues for 57 years, often going far behind what the medical and scientific establishments put out for the deeper story.  In those decades, he has covered the work of Dr. Anthony Fauci, now the highest paid among the millions of federal employees.

In a must-see 20-minute interview with Jamie Glazov of The Glazov Gang, Peter explains how Fauci's handling of COVID closely parallels his work on AIDS decades ago, when he was responsible for much false information put out to spur a massive investment in fighting the disease, dwarfing what is spent on cancer on a per patient basis.  In Peter's view, the tactics used on AIDS "hit pay dirt" with COVID.

It is an eye-opening interview, and once you learn about Fauci's past, you will understand the depth of the Deep State activity and planning to exploit diseases to grab money and power.  I rarely recommend videos longer than a few minutes.  This one richly repays your investment of time.


YouTube screen grab.


Dr. Anthony Fauci is the single most responsible man for the takedown of Donald Trump over COVID, in Peter's view.

Note that Peter's five articles on Fauci's past in AT last spring earned him no fewer than four attacks by name in the pages of the Washington Post and two in the New York Times, among other MSM defenders of St. Fauci.  As the saying goes, when you're taking flak, you know you're over the target.




Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *