Saturday, January 1, 2022

How Justice Is Denied When Prosecutors Go Rogue...These 12 Incidents of Defensive Gun Use Prove Armed Civilians Make Situations Safer...The Awful Year We Just Lived Through

 

 
 
January 1 2022
 

Good morning from Washington. In nearby Baltimore, a prosecutor is hurting the city with her approach to crime, Armstrong Williams reveals. Can Kamala Harris change her poll numbers? Cal Thomas is skeptical. Plus: Amy Swearer on civilians using guns to defend themselves, Dennis Prager on the low points of 2021, and Helle Dale on China's atrocious treatment of reporters. Happy 2022! We wish you a happy new year, and thank you for making The Daily Signal part of your routine. 

 
 
 
COMMENTARY
How Justice Is Denied When Prosecutors Go Rogue
How Justice Is Denied When Prosecutors Go Rogue
By Armstrong Williams

Prosecutors are effectively taking the law into their own hands in certain cases, superseding the whims of the legislature that wrote the laws to protect citizens.
More
COMMENTARY
These 12 Incidents of Defensive Gun Use Prove Armed Civilians Make Situations Safer
These 12 Incidents of Defensive Gun Use Prove Armed Civilians Make Situations Safer
By Amy Swearer

In Philadelphia, an Uber driver with a concealed carry permit used his gun to fight off three armed robbers who demanded money at gunpoint.
More
COMMENTARY
US Must Prod China for More Freedom for Foreign Journalists
US Must Prod China for More Freedom for Foreign Journalists
By Helle Dale

Comparing the treatment of foreign journalists in China and in the United States not only is misleading, it is downright insulting.
More
COMMENTARY
Manchin's Opposition to Build Back Better Boondoggle Infuriates Unhinged Left
Manchin's Opposition to Build Back Better Boondoggle Infuriates Unhinged Left
By Deroy Murdock

Build Back Better would boost the national debt by $3 trillion. This is light years from President Biden’s lie that his bill “adds zero dollars to the national debt.”
More
COMMENTARY
Kamala Harris' 'Biggest Failure'? Where to Begin?
Kamala Harris' 'Biggest Failure'? Where to Begin?
By Cal Thomas

When asked her "biggest failure," Harris said it has been not getting out of Washington enough. That's easily fixed, since she has access to a government plane that can take her anywhere.
More
COMMENTARY
The Awful Year We Just Lived Through
The Awful Year We Just Lived Through
By Dennis Prager

"Safetyism," like all religions, places what it values—in this case, being safe—above other values. Safetyism explains the willingness of Americans to give up their most cherished values, including liberty.
More
 
   
 
LOGO-CHARCOAL_75percent.jpg

How are we doing?
We welcome your comments, suggestions, and story tips. Please reply to this email or send us a note at letters@dailysignal.com.

The Daily Signal
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
(800) 546-2843

 
 

 

This Was the Christmas Season that Santa Introduced Children to Witchcraft Jan 1

 

A “biological vessel” used by God? Or the Mother of God, chosen by God? By Carl E. Olson on Dec 31, 2021 10:43 pm

 

View this email in your browser

A “biological vessel” used by God? Or the Mother of God, chosen by God?

By Carl E. Olson on Dec 31, 2021 10:43 pm
Readings: Nm 6:22-27 Ps 67:2-3, 5, 6, 8 Gal 4:4-7 Lk 2:16-21 “If anyone believes that holy Mary is not the mother of God (theotokos), he has no share in the divine inheritance”, wrote the [...]
Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like A “biological vessel” used by God? Or the Mother of God, chosen by God? on Facebook

The roots of de-Christianization and the commercialization of Christmas

By Dr. Christopher Shannon on Dec 31, 2021 10:49 am
“Happy Holidays” has transformed the seasonal greeting of “Merry Christmas” into a defiant statement of Christian identity. The oft accompanying warning to “Keep Christ in Christmas!” only further chills the warmth of what should be [...]
Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like The roots of de-Christianization and the commercialization of Christmas on Facebook

Reflections on 2021

By Christopher R. Altieri on Dec 31, 2021 10:31 am
2021 has been a doozy of a year in Church news, and especially in Vatican communications. In one sense, the year that was gave us more of the same – more of what has come [...]
Read in browser »
share on Twitter Like Reflections on 2021 on Facebook


 
Donate

JANUARY 1, 2022 Viewers Demand Apology from MSNBC, Rachel Maddow By T. Roebuck In Featured, Latest News

 

JANUARY 1, 2022

Viewers Demand Apology from MSNBC, Rachel Maddow

People are demanding apologies from MSNBC and host Rachel Maddow for insisting that the COVID-19 vaccine would prevent further transmission of the virus.

A clip of Maddow’s show from March 29, 2021, was widely shared on social media, with users calling on Maddow to “retract her statement and apologize.”

“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person,” Maddow said during the broadcast.

“A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else,” she added. “It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people.”

According to Fox News: “While the COVID-19 vaccines did prove to be effective against the first strains of the coronavirus, the emergence and rapid spread of the omicron variant, even among the vaccinated, has raised cause for concern. Initial studies have shown that omicron cases feature milder symptoms than their predecessors but are more contagious.”

Given the ongoing surge in coronavirus cases in the U.S. with a 62% vaccination rate, critics laid into MSNBC.

“It’s wild how there are no consequences for all these vaccine lies,” sports journalist Clay Travis tweeted. “If you wonder why many are skeptical of the covid ‘vaccine’ it’s because they remember what they were told about how effective the vaccine was. All that Rachel Maddow says here is untrue.”

“Will she retract her statement and apologize?” Fox News host Rachel Campos-Duffy tweeted.


Do you expect members of the media to be forthcoming about journalistic errors? Please weigh in on our poll and tell us why in the comments.


Source:

Viewers demand apology from MSNBC, Rachel Maddow for previous COVID vaccine comments


Revelation 11:3-12 (3) And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth." (4) These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.

 

(3) And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth."

Having trouble reading this email? View it in your browser.

The Berean: Daily Verse and Comment
  

About The Berean | Archives | Random Berean | Subscriptions

  
  

   
Share this on FacebookPrinter versionView as PDF

  Revelation 11:3-12

(3) And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth." (4) These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth. (5) And if anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouth and devours their enemies. And if anyone wants to harm them, he must be killed in this manner. (6) These have power to shut heaven, so that no rain falls in the days of their prophecy; and they have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to strike the earth with all plagues, as often as they desire. (7) When they finish their testimony, the beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit will make war against them, overcome them, and kill them. (8) And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. (9) Then those from the peoples, tribes, tongues, and nations will see their dead bodies three-and-a-half days, and not allow their dead bodies to be put into graves. (10) And those who dwell on the earth will rejoice over them, make merry, and send gifts to one another, because these two prophets tormented those who dwell on the earth. (11) Now after the three-and-a-half days the breath of life from God entered them, and they stood on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them. (12) And they heard a loud voice from heaven saying to them, "Come up here." And they ascended to heaven in a cloud, and their enemies saw them.
New King James Version   Change your email Bible version

Notice the anthropomorphic language—all the descriptions of human traits and behaviors—of this passage. In verse 3, for instance, the Two Witnesses are clothed in sackcloth. How could this apply to two parts of a book? Most of our Bibles are "clothed," if you will, in leather bindings or cardboard and cloth covers. It takes quite a bit of mental gymnastics to see how one can fit this type of terminology into the idea of the Two Witnesses being the two books of the Old and New Testaments. A person must symbolize away nearly the entire description of them.

Also notice verse 6: "They have power . . . to strike the earth with any plague as often as they wish" (The New Testament in Modern English by J.B. Phillips). In other words, these Two Witnesses have the power of volition, or will. They can make decisions, and they can execute them within the scope of the power God has given them. The Old and New Testaments are not animate beings with minds of their own, and as such, those two collections of books cannot express volition. They cannot make decisions, nor can they execute decisions in this sense.

In verse 7, the Two Witnesses die, and they are described as having bodies that lie in the streets of Jerusalem. Admittedly, we can refer symbolically to the death of an idea. We can describe the end of an era as a kind of death and so forth. However, death in this passage does not appear to be metaphoric because God speaks of their bodies lying in the street and remaining unburied. This type of language is not amenable at all to understanding the Two Witnesses as the Old and New Testaments.

Then notice verse 11: "The breath of life from God came into them" (The New Testament by Richmond Lattimore). Are there any known instances of God breathing life into books? The idea of them being the Old and New Testament becomes even more ridiculous when we realize that the Two Witnesses then stand on their feet—this is a real resurrection—and they are translated to heaven!

In verse 10, John actually uses the word "prophets." In Greeks, it is the word prophetes (Strong's 4396), which appears about eighty times in Scripture. This word is always rendered in the King James Version as "prophet" or "prophets." For instance, Jesus uses the word in Matthew 13:57: "A prophet is not without honor except in his own country." There is not one instance where this Greek word refers to the Scriptures; it always refers to a person or to people.

A great deal of other evidence exists as well. For example, Revelation 11:3 tells us that God empowers His Two Witnesses for a limited period of time, 1,260 days. But does God ever set a time limit on the power of His Scriptures? God does not, in fact, set a time limit on the power that He gives His Word. Notice Isaiah 55:10-11:

For as the rain comes down, and the snow from heaven, and do not return there, but water the earth, and make it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower and bread to the eater, so shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth; it shall not return to Me void, but it shall accomplish what I please, and it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.

God is saying through an analogy here that, throughout the span of history—or as Solomon would say, "under the sun" (Ecclesiastes 1:3, 9, 14, etc.)—rain has always worked to produce food for mankind. In like manner throughout that same span of time, throughout all of history under the sun, God's Word has been effective to carry out His purpose. Isaiah 55 places no limitation of 1,260 days or any other. Therefore, Revelation 11:3 cannot refer to a limited period of time when God empowers the Old and New Testaments to be effective because God's Word is always effective.

Let us not belabor the point. A careful textual analysis makes it clear that the preponderance of the language of this passage points to the Two Witnesses being individuals, not collections of books.

— Charles Whitaker

To learn more, see:
Who the Two Witnesses Are Not



Related Topics:
Anthropomorphism
God's Two Witnesses
Identity of Two Witnesses
Martyrdom of the Two Witnesses
Two Witnesses




  


Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *