Tuesday, December 3, 2024

Students Boycott Israel at Their Own Peril by A.J. Caschetta Special to IPT News December 2, 2024

 


Steven Emerson, Executive DirectorDecember 2, 2024

Articles by IPT |  IPT in the News |  IPT Blog |  Profiles |  Multimedia |  Donate |  Contact Us

Students Boycott Israel at Their Own Peril

by A.J. Caschetta
Special to IPT News
December 2, 2024

https://www.investigativeproject.org/9380/students-boycott-israel-at-their-own-peril

 

Image Credit: GaryRobertsphotography / Alamy Stock Photo

Anti-Israel student protesters have always sought convenient, effortless ways to demonstrate their hatred for Israel. In the past, this has meant trying to remove Sabra brand hummus from campus food services. Starting at DePaul University in 2010, efforts to embargo the Israeli-made food spread quickly to other campuses (University of Ottowa in 2014, Swarthmore College in 2018, Dickinson College in 2019, and Harvard University in 2022), but after October 7, student boycott demands grew more expansive. It's no longer enough to change brands of hummus. Today's students want to ban everything from Israel.

Graduate Students at the City University of New York (CUNY), for instance, now demand not only the familiar Sabra prohibition but also a ban of "all fruits and vegetables grown in Israel." And their list doesn't end with food. They also demand that the entire CUNY system "cancel all forms of cooperation with Israeli academic institutions, including events, activities, agreements, and research collaborations."

What goes unsaid here is that not a single student will ever actually live up to these demands. The rhetorical flourishes are purely for show.

If the thousands of college students calling for a boycott of all things Israel want to live up to their sanctimonious rhetoric, they will have to give up a lot more than one brand of hummus. And they will end up sick, hungry, and underemployed.

I call on all anti-Israel, BDS, protesting students and faculty members alike to prove that they aren't the pikers, posers, and half-milers I say they are by following through on their categorical rejection of any contact with, use of, or compliance with, any and all Israeli technologies, companies, products, ideas, and universities. I dare these Pecksniffian pretenders to put their futures where their mouths are and abandon entirely anything with the taint of Israel.

It won't be easy.

Let's start with their cell phones. Israeli technology is central to the iPhone platform, so Apple phones are out. Unfortunately they can't just switch to Samsung. They'll have to give up their digital umbilical cords altogether because the cell phone was invented in 1973 by Motorola's Israeli Research and Development Department.

And it's not just cell phones they will have to shun. Israeli technology is integral to many modern conveniences that college students rely on. If they want to live up to their anti-Israel commitment, they will have to stop using USB ports (an Israeli invention), thumb drives (an Israeli invention) and firewalls (another Israeli invention). Writing term papers, theses, and dissertations without computers worked for centuries. They'll adapt.

If today's protesters ever find gainful employment outside of a few select cities, they will need a car, but they'll have to boycott all models with cameras pointing outward. An Israeli invention called the Mobileye has been warning of obstacles and keeping drivers in their lanes for years. Mirrors work too, as committed protesters will learn.

"No fruits or vegetables from Israel," say the CUNY student protesters. Will they also eschew all fruits and vegetables grown with Israeli technology? Israel invented drip irrigation, which is used in almost all modern agricultural enterprises. After researching which fruits and vegetables were not grown with drip irrigation, anti-Israel protesters might find it easier just to give up fruits and vegetables. Or maybe they'll grow their own (an unlikely scenario in New York City).

Will they boycott life-saving drugs and research developed by Israel? Multiple sclerosis is treated with a drug called Copaxone, developed at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel.

It may soon be impossible to avoid Israeli NaNose technology and the "Sniff-Phone" which smells diseases before they are manifested, allowing for preventative therapies prior to the onset of symptoms. Committed Israel boycotters will have to shun this technology in favor of the old ways of detecting diseases – often when they are too advanced to treat effectively.

Assiduously avoiding all Israeli medical technology may lead to unnecessary discomfort, or worse. For instance, the "pill cam," invented in Israel, has led to the "capsule endoscopy," in which a patient swallows a pill-sized wireless digital camera that transmits images as it travels from entrance to exit. Adhering to their anti-Israel ethos will require committed protesters to endure some far larger and more intrusive cameras should their physicians ever need a look at their entire digestive system. Perhaps this won't matter since most anti-Israel protesters are big-mouthed giant a**holes.

Many of them seem heartless too, but those who one day need heart surgery will have to forgo the flexible stent, invented at an Israeli company called Medinol. The NIR stent or EluNIR™ has become standard since its invention in 1996. Protesters who shun all things Israel might be able to find some third-world clinic willing to use the rigid stents of an earlier era. I wish them luck.

I suspect that most of the anti-Israel protests are led by faculty and students in the humanities and social sciences, where anti-Israel virtue signaling is de rigueur and comes with few repercussions. Students in other areas of specialization, however, will have to make debilitating career challenges to live up to their performative rhetoric.

Israel has the greatest number of tech companies outside of Silicon Valley, but its influence on the field extends far beyond Israel. The recent Miami Tech and Invest Conference showed the extent to which Israeli companies are "transforming Miami into a global tech hub." Any student of computer science or software engineering, as well as any budding tech entrepreneur, will suffer greatly by boycotting all things Israel.

STEM students who refuse to work with Israeli technologies, scientists, and universities will sabotage their careers. They will likely wind up at the bottom of their professions – far from important research and Nobel Prize winners. Israeli universities and research companies are responsible for many breakthroughs in detecting and treating cancer, and Israelis have dominated the Nobel Prize in chemistry for most of the 20th century.

Naturally, none of the student demands should be taken seriously. In America today, no one virtue signals like a college student. Their hunger strikes begin after breakfast and end at lunch – so too do their demands end the moment they sign a resolution or shout in front of the camera.

Of course, I would love for just one anti-Israel, BDS, boycotting/divesting protester to prove me wrong and truly refrain from using or benefitting from anything derived from Israeli ingenuity. Write me, using pen and paper of course, and tell me how it's going. Find an envelope and stamp and mail it to me at the Investigative Project on Terrorism, 5614 Connecticut Ave NW, No. 341, Washington, DC 20015.

Chief IPT Political Correspondent A.J. Caschetta is a principal lecturer at the Rochester Institute of Technology and a fellow at Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum where he is also a Milstein fellow.

Copyright © 2024. Investigative Project on Terrorism. All rights reserved.

Related Topics: A.J. CaschettaBoycottBDSHarvardDePaulCUNYSabraiPhoneUSBFirewallDrip IrrigationPill Cam

The IPT accepts no funding from outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3 organization.  


The Investigative Project on Terrorism

(202) 363-8602

 

California lawmakers to begin special session to 'Trump-proof' state laws By The Associated Press Contributors: Andrew Dyer / Military and Veteran Affairs Reporter, Carolyne Corelis / Video Journalist Published December 2, 2024 at 9:16 AM PST Updated December 2, 2024 at 5:53 PM PST

 


California lawmakers to begin special session to 'Trump-proof' state laws

California Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers returned to the state Capitol on Monday to begin a special session to protect the state's progressive policies ahead of another Trump presidency.

The Democratic governor, a fierce critic of President-elect Donald Trump, is positioning California to once again be the center of a resistance effort against the conservative agenda. He is asking his Democratic allies in the Legislature, who hold supermajorities in both chambers, to approve additional funding to the attorney general's office to prepare for a robust legal fight against anticipated federal challenges.

Democratic Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel on Monday introduced legislation to set aside $25 million for legal fees to respond to potential attacks by the Trump administration on state policies regarding civil rights, climate change, immigration and abortion access.

“While we always hope to collaborate with our federal partners, California will be ready to vigorously defend our interests and values from any unlawful action by the incoming Trump Administration,” Gabriel said in a statement.

California sued the first Trump administration more than 120 times to various levels of success.

“We’re not going to be caught flat-footed,” Newsom said at a recent news conference.

Trump often depicts California as representing all he sees wrong in America. Democrats, which hold every statewide office in California and have commanding margins in the Legislature and congressional delegation, outnumber registered Republicans by nearly 2-to-1 statewide.

Trump called the Democratic governor “Newscum” during a campaign stop in Southern California and has relentlessly lambasted the Democratic stronghold over its large number of immigrants in the U.S. illegally, homeless population and thicket of regulations.

Trump also waded into a water rights battle over the endangered delta smelt, a tiny fish that has pitted environmentalists against farmers and threatened to withhold federal aid to a state increasingly under threat from wildfires. He also vowed to follow through with his campaign promise of carrying out the mass deportation of immigrants without legal status and prosecuting his political enemies.

Before the special session began, state lawmakers swore in more than two dozen new members and elect leaders for the 2025 legislative session. Lawmakers voted to convene the special session largely along party lines.

“This special session is about sticking up for Californians and for California values,” said state Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat representing San Francisco. “It is about ensuring that the president of the United States and his administration actually follow the law.”

Hundreds of people also demonstrated around the Capitol on Monday to urge the Legislature to try to stop Trump's mass deportation plans. They carried banners that said “Not one cent for mass deportation” and “MAGA out of California.”

“With the results of the presidential election, we need our state elected officials to use every tool and every resource they have available to them to protect our immigrant Californians,” protester Deborah Lee said.

State Attorney General Rob Bonta said his office will protect the state’s immigration population, while Newsom last week unveiled a proposal to revive a rebate program for electric vehicle purchases if the incoming Trump administration eliminates a federal tax credit for people who buy electric cars. Newsom is also considering creating a backup disaster relief fund for the wildfire-prone state after Trump’s threats.

Bonta announced legislation Monday aimed at bolstering reproductive rights in the state, including by allowing the attorney general to seek monetary penalties against local governments that infringe on those rights. The proposals are part of the state's efforts to safeguard against threats to abortion access after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Republican lawmakers blasted Newsom and his Democratic allies over the special session. State Sen. Kelly Seyarto, a Republican representing Murrieta in Southern California, said the special session proposal would make California have a more adversarial relationship with the federal government.

“What we’re doing today is sending that exact message — that we are going to fight tooth and nail for everything. And you know what? That means they’re going to fight us tooth and nail for everything,” Seyarto said of the incoming Trump administration if the legislation gets approved.

Legislators also are expected to spend the year discussing ways to protect dozens of laws expected to be targeted by the Trump administration, including one that has made the state a sanctuary for people seeking abortions who live in states where such practices have been severely limited.

California, the nation’s most populous state, was the first to mandate that by 2035 all new cars, pickup trucks and SUVs sold in California be electric, hydrogen-powered or plug-in hybrids. The state also extends state-funded health care to all low-income residents regardless of their immigration status.

Newsom hasn't provided details about what actions the lawmakers will consider but said he wanted funding in place before Trump's inauguration day, Jan. 20. The state spent roughly $42 million in litigation costs during the first Trump administration, officials said.

California is projected to face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, with bigger shortfalls ahead. Gabriel, who sued the first Trump administration in 2017 when it tried to end a program to shield young immigrants from being deported, said lining up the funding now is “a wise investment."

California successfully clawed back $57 million between 2017 and 2018 after prevailing in a lawsuit to block the Trump administration from putting immigration enforcement conditions on certain federal law enforcement grants. Another legal victory over the citizenship question in the 2020 census forced the federal government to return $850,000 to the state, according to the attorney general's office.

During Trump’s first presidency, Democratic attorneys general banded together to file lawsuits over immigration, Trump’s travel ban for residents of Muslim countries, the environment, immigration and other topics. But Trump has one possible advantage this time around: He was aggressive in nominating conservative jurists to federal courts at all levels, including the Supreme Court.

___

Associated Press journalists Haven Daley and Sophie Austin contributed to this report.

Culture Shift Begins to Take Affect in Dem Stronghold BY MARK MEGAHAN DECEMBER 2, 2024

 

Culture Shift Begins to Take Affect in Dem Stronghold


California voters have finally had enough of the shoplifting, drug dealing, sideshow street takeovers, looting, carjacking and general Democrat ignored chaos. The citizens took to the polls and did a job their lawmakers should have done a long time ago. Proposition 36 is advertised as a fast way to fill up the prisons.

California fights back

Voters in California, even the progressive ones, are fed up with Democrat anarchy. Maybe full prisons aren’t as undesirable as their elected officials keep telling them. Criminals behind bars aren’t stealing the Tide from Target.

They also aren’t hijacking anyone’s Kia to drive through the doors of a convenience store, to rob it.

Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom prefers violent anarchy. He “strongly opposed the measure.” Proposition 36, he whined to the press, “takes us back to the 1980s, mass incarceration.” He says that like it’s a bad thing.

It will never work, he insists. The measure cracking down on crime, he declared, “promotes a promise that can’t be delivered.” It can be if California prosecutors will actually prosecute.

Under Democrat management, the state had virtually decriminalize crime. Shoplifting is so out of control that major retailers are leaving California in droves.

Insurance companies will no longer provide coverage to businesses in the state because retail theft laws are totally unenforced. That’s about to change. Repeat offenders can now be treated as the career criminals they are.



California citizens took to the polls to do a job their lawmakers should have done a long time ago.

New felony charges

Under California Proposition 36, simple possession of drugs including fentanyl is considered a felony. A first offender can still get a misdemeanor ticket for stealing anything up to $950 if they’re an otherwise upstanding citizen.

However, it automatically becomes a felony if “the offender has two prior drug or theft convictions.

Democrats running the deep blue state of California were shocked to see what a landslide it was. The measure was approved by a “massive” margin.

It sends a message that they want to see harsh punishment. Even for the crimes which Democrats love to turn a blind eye to.

The proposition also creates a whole new category of crime. They call it “treatment-mandated felony.” According to the bill’s summary, “defendants who plead guilty to felony drug possession and complete treatment can have charges dismissed.

Otherwise, they go into a cell for the same time they would spend in rehab and get to dry out without the methadone. When California starts getting drastic on crime, other Democrat cities will soon be following the example. Donald Trump’s anti-crime policies are one of the things which helped him clinch his latest victory.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *