Obama Fumes Over Allegations — Gets Clapped-Back By Reality, Tulsi… And More

Funny how defensive he gets now that it's HIS turn in the DOJ spotlight

Wes Walker July 23, 2025
 279 4 minutes read

Anyone who was paying attention to Bongino’s updates this spring should have been expecting Tulsi’s big announcement that implicated Obama in the Get-Trump Russiagate conspiracy.

He told us about all kinds of documents that were locked away in places they shouldn’t have been, filed in ways that made them non-responsive to searches. But Bongino told us he was spending most of his time in a SCIF going though heaps of scandalous files the public had not yet seen. He couldn’t tell us what it was, other than that it was ‘big’.

Tulsi releasing files about Obama and his CIA being the driving force behind the Crossfire Hurricane hoax should not come as a surprise to anyone. But that isn’t stopping ‘no-drama’ Obama from going full drama queen in faking both surprise and outrage. Not a particularly convincing performance, either.

We have Trump calling him out, referencing the investigation:

Obama’s communications flunkie responded in the predictable way, by attacking the source rather than the merits of the allegation:

“Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,” said Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush. — DailyWire

Our readers are sophisticated to spot why that trick is dishonest as the day is long, so we’ll jump straight to Tulsi’s clap-back before adding a few observations of our own.



She tied it down to the hinge-point of the one President’s Daily Brief in December where a report discounting Russian attempts to meddle in the election were discounted by intelligence, followed by instructions from Obama to replace that with another report highlighting any evidence they might find to refute the report that agents had already prepared, and deliver it on a much shorter timeline. As a result, discredited evidence was cited with ‘high confidence’.

For those of us who followed the Crossfire Hurricane story, it is really interesting to note that this is the week whree Tulsi announces a brief visit to the UK, where she stopped by the Embassy and also met some of her counterparts in British intelligence.

That was the mechanism by which Brennan ‘laundered’ the ‘dirt’ they had on Trump to a source we could justifiably receive it from, only to have them pass it back to us as if it were their own discovery.

In another appearance, she calls out a whole host of elected Democrats, officials, and news orgs for parroting the same talking points that were crafted as part of the Russian Collusion narrative.

Here’s a little recap of the timeline for 2016.

In the latter half of December, after the change, we have Obama ‘cracking down’ on Russia for ‘election interference’. This includes kicking people out of embassies, and is part of the lead up to the hellstorm of dirty tricks they are about to unleash on an unsuspecting General Flynn.

December 9th was when stories first broke about CIA report that Russia was trying to hack the 2016 election. (Recall that legitimate CIA sources had determined the actual opposite, but Obama and a few insiders ran with the Russia collusion angle).

The November 1 – December 8th search window for ‘obama russia announcement’ pulls up a Guardian story about Russia having a problem since America is no longer the enemy… with nothing indicating conflict between Obama’s admin and Russia.

October 1 – November 1? There are a couple of references to Obama alleging Russia hacked DNC emails (remember Wikileaks?) around the 7th (called it ‘election interference’), there was an October 5 Mother Jones claim that Trump and Putin had a ‘bromance’, and Russians backing out of disarmament agreement because of sanctions.

Before that? the same paramaters going from June to October talk about Obama setting up a military partnership with Russians in Syria.

And who can forget Obama’s ‘hot mic’ moment where he says he can be ‘more flexible’ once the election is over.

Trump did raise a question about election interference. Obama rejected it loudly.

Obama called Trump’s intensifying, pre-emptive warnings about voter fraud “unprecedented” in modern politics. The rhetoric is not based on any evidence, Obama said, but is simply aimed at discrediting the election before the first votes are counted.

“You start whining before the game’s even over?” Obama said at a press conference. “Then you don’t have what it takes to be in this job.” — PBS

Obama has made a lot of public statements that haven’t aged well.  This is one is a doozy.