Saturday, February 21, 2015

DARPA Developing Squad level Robotics and sensing technology

February 20, 2015


DARPA Developing Squad level Robotics and sensing technology

DARPA’s new Squad X Core Technologies (SXCT) program aims to address the challenge and ensure that dismounted infantry squads maintain uncontested tactical superiority over potential adversaries without being overburdened by cumbersome hardware. The goal is to speed the development of new, lightweight, integrated systems that provide infantry squads unprecedented awareness, adaptability and flexibility in complex environments, and enable dismounted Soldiers and Marines to more intuitively understand and control their complex mission environments.

SXCT plans to explore four key technical areas:

1. Precision Engagement: Precisely engage threats out to 0.6 mile (1,000 meters), while maintaining compatibility with infantry weapon systems and without imposing weight or operational burdens that would negatively affect mission effectiveness

2. Non-Kinetic Engagement: Disrupt enemy command and control, communications and use of unmanned assets at a squad-relevant operational pace (walking with occasional bursts of speed)

3. Squad Sensing: Detect potential threats out to 0.6 mile (1,000 meters) at a squad-relevant operational pace

4. Squad Autonomy: Increase squad members’ real-time knowledge of their own and teammates’ locations to less than 20 feet (6 meters) in GPS-denied environments through collaboration with embedded unmanned air and ground systems

DARPA’s new Squad X Core Technologies (SXCT) program aims to help dismounted infantry squads continue to achieve and maintain overwhelming tactical superiority over potential adversaries. SXCT seeks to adapt, extend and develop capabilities that would enhance small units’ real-time situational awareness and ability to precisely verify and engage hostile targets at multiple ranges. The goal is to speed the development of new, lightweight, integrated systems that provide infantry squads unprecedented awareness, adaptability and flexibility in complex environments, and enable dismounted Soldiers and Marines to more intuitively understand and control their complex mission environments





SOURCE- DARPA
 
C

 
 


Artificial Human DNA Can Store All the Data From Google

Artificial Human DNA Can Store All the Data From Google

Susanne.Posel-Headline.News.Official- dna.data.storage_occupycorporatismSusanne Posel ,Chief Editor Occupy Corporatism | The US Independent
February 18, 2015

Researchers from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETHZ) have devised a way to use a “form of DNA” to store information with a new method that promises to address “a number of the problems associated with using DNA as data storage”.
Current technology does not preclude errors in data retrieval; as well as “gaps and false information in the encoded data result[ing] from chemical degradation and mistakes in DNA sequencing.”
The team overcame the issue of “chemical degradation of the DNA by encapsulating the genetic material in silica (glass) spheres with diameters of around 150 nanometers.”
Retrieving information encoded to DNA has produced compromised data. The researchers devised methods using the Reed-Solomon Codes in order to self-correct “to ensure accurate data recovery after long-distance data transmission.”
With current technology, DNA is assumed to be able to store up to 455 exabytes of data.
Robert Grass, lead author of the study, explained that his endeavor was purposed to “protect the information bearing DNA with a synthetic shell” that would protect the data which became the silica sphere that were no bigger than 150-nanometers wide.

Three years ago, a team of bioengineers and geneticists from Harvard University Wyss Institute (HUWI) were able to “cram” 5.5 petabytes (or 700 terabytes) of data into a single gram of DNA.
To “read” the information stored onto the DNA, researchers simply sequenced the human genome and converted “each of the TGAC bases back into binary” code.
Using human DNA for data storage has been attractive to scientists because:
• Storage capacity is dense
• Potential is volumetric instead of planar
• Amazingly stable and survive for hundreds of thousands
In 2013, the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) set out to solely use human DNA for data storage to ensure that data is not lost to time. In the recent past, magnetic tape has been used and proven to deteriorate over time.
What's Trending Online
?
X These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at info@content.ad.

Artificial Human DNA Can Store All the Data From Google
1 vote, 5.00 avg. rating (95% score)

Google Warns FBI Plans to Hack & Spy on the World

Google Warns FBI Plans to Hack & Spy on the World

Susanne.Posel-Headline.News.Official- google.fbi.digital.surviellance.doj_occupycorporatismSusanne Posel ,Chief Editor Occupy Corporatism | The US Independent
February 19, 2015

Google is in opposition to the Department of Justice (DoJ) plans to expand federal authority to search and seize digital information from corporations in order to hack “any facility” globally.
Richard Salgaldo, director of law enforcement and information security for Google, wrote to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules (ACCR) at the DoJ, explaining that his corporation is “in opposition to the proposed amendment to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41.”
Saldago continued: “The serious and complex constitutional concerns implicated by the proposed amendment are numerous and, because of the nature of Fourth Amendment case law development, are unlikely to be addressed by courts in a timely fashion.”
This rule governs the “search or seizure issuance and execution of a search warrant under special circumstances.”
The DoJ responded by accusing opponents to the rule change as “misreading the text of the proposal or misunderstanding current law”.
David Bitkower, deputy assistant attorney general, wrote in a memorandum in 2014: “The proposal would not authorize the government to undertake any search or seizure or use any remote search technique not already permitted under current law. [Investigators are] careful to avoid collateral damage when executing remote searches, just as [they are] careful to avoid injury to persons or damage to property in the far more common scenario of executing physical warrants.”
Google accuses the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) of trying to obtain new powers regarding search warrants that could create a “monumental and highly complex constitutional, legal and geopolitical concerns that should be left to Congress to decide.”
The revision to the rule would enable FBI agents to raid severs anywhere and hand over to the government “unfettered global access to vast amounts of private information”.
Google warns that government searches could happen remotely and the FBI could easily “conceal their location” through encryption services such as Tor. “This concern is not theoretical. … [T]he nature of today’s technology is such that warrants issued under the proposed amendment will in many cases end up authorizing the government to conduct searches outside the United States.”
The National Association of Assistant US Attorneys (NAAUSA) wrote to Judge Reena Raggi, chair of the ACCR, in support of the change to rule 41 with the hopes of “establishing a court-supervised framework through which law enforcement may successfully investigate and prosecute crimes involving botnets and internet anonymizing technologies.”
The NAAUSA continued: “… suspects are increasingly using sophisticated anonymizing technologies and proxy services designed to hide their true IP addresses. This creates significant difficulties for law enforcement to identify the district in which the electronic information is located.”
Christopher Soghoian, principal technologist for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) commented : ““The government is seeking a troubling expansion of its power to surreptitiously hack into computers, including using malware. Although this proposal is cloaked in the garb of a minor procedural update, in reality it would be a major and substantive change that would be better addressed by Congress.”
Arnie Stepanovich, senior policy counsel for Access told the judicial panel: “I empathize that it is very hard to get a legislative change. However, when you have us resorting to Congress to get increased privacy protections, we would also like to see the government turn to Congress to get increased surveillance authority.”
What's Trending Online
?
X These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at info@content.ad.

Big Banks Pay Senator to Make It Easier to Foreclose on Homes

Big Banks Pay Senator to Make It Easier to Foreclose on Homes

Susanne.Posel-Headline.News.Official- washington.hobbs.northwest.trustees.rco_occupycorporatismSusanne Posel ,Chief Editor Occupy Corporatism | The US Independent
February 18, 2015

Mark Wilson, mortgage lender and resident of Everett, wrote to Washington State legislator Steve Hobbs and many other senators regarding Senate Bill 5968 which would make it “easier for citizen’s homes to be taken from them without any responsibility for wrongful foreclosure.”
The bill was not voted on and the residents who came out to the Capitol expressed their grievances over the nature and implications proposed by this legislation.
Wilson wrote to Hobbs: “…your proposed bill seeks to accelerate that annihilation. It doubles down on an already suffering citizenry.”
This week Hobbs proposed legislation for consideration to the Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee (FIIC) to amend the Deeds of Trust Act to allow nearly anyone to initiate a foreclosure against the homeowner without having to possess the mortgage note at the time of filing of proceedings.
Scott Stafne, a Washington State attorney and advocate against bank foreclosures, wrote an open letter to Hobbs as commentary on the proposed legislation.
Stafne wrote: “Hobbs’ bill, SB 5968, is designed by lawyers for trustees to undo what few protections the people of Washington have against slime ball debt collectors taking Washingtonians’ homes. Why? Because the trustee makes money on every house it can take away from a Washington voter. And the trustee gives a enough of that money to someone like Hobbs, who has no interest in protecting his constituents’ rights.”
Joshua Trumbull, partner of the Stafne Trumball law firm in Arlington, wrote to Hobbs as a constituent of the senator: “I am extremely disappointed to learn that you are a sponsor of SB 5968. SB 5968 would hurt homeowners and the people of this state, while exclusively benefiting the special interests of the Financial Industry.”
Trumbull explained that the legal definition of “holder” and “owner” would be “impacted” by this bill: “The notice and proof of ownership requirements embodied in the current Deed of Trust Act are essential so homeowners can identify the owner of their loan who shares an economic interest in finding a mutually beneficial, or “win-win,” alternative to foreclosure. The proof of ownership requirement is also crucial to ensure that the party authorizing nonjudicial foreclosure is the lender/owner, or its successor in interest, that has the contractual right to foreclose under the deed of trust. SB 5968 would eliminate these valuable protections that Washington homeowners currently enjoy under the existing law.”
Residents and attorneys agree that Hobbs is motivated by special interest groups in the banking industry who would benefit from this broad redefining of “owner” and “holder” in order that more foreclosures could be initiated by banks and their representatives.
Trumbull pointed out: “It is very important for a borrower to know who owns their loan. The owner of the loan is the true stakeholder that the borrower needs to negotiate with in order to attempt to find an alternative to foreclosure. Because the loan servicer or other third party is financially incentivized to foreclose, foreclosure is what happens. If this bill passed, it would deprive homeowners of knowing the role of the entity they are communicating with, and will allow the servicers to continue to prey on borrowers and mislead them into foreclosure.”
At the heart of the foreclosure industry in Washington State and the dubious connection to Hobbs is a corporation called Northwest Trustees (NWT) and their alliance with lawyers that contributed to Hobbs senatorial campaign.
NWT has netted high profits from the more than 250,000 foreclosures administered in Washington State.
Financial contributions totaling $26,500 from NWT to Hobb’s congressional campaign for state senate was provided by:
• David and Catherine Fennell for $13,000
• Stephen and Jo Anne Routh for $10,000
• Lance and Jennifer Olsen $3,500
David Fennell is a Washington State attorney, who works with and is a shareholder principle owner of NWT, to file mortgage default notices “against delinquent homeowners” and is a senior attorney of Routh Crabtree Olsen law firm (RCOLegal).
Through the 3 partners of RCOLegal, NWT spent just under $30,000 to Hobbs who has recently introduced a bill that would directly benefit NWT in their efforts to continue to impose foreclosures on residents of Washington State.
Two years ago, Fennell was accused of “inflating the cost of foreclosure filings” 18% above average “during the [height of the] housing crisis.”
The complaint was dismissed by the Oregon State Bar for failure to prove “Fennell had direct knowledge of” the price hikes and even intimated that “some of the price increases could possibly be legitimate.”
The OSB said: “In order to hold Mr. Fennell responsible for a misrepresentation by omission, the Bar must establish that Mr. Fennell knew how FEI was describing its publication charges and that it was material to Bend area trustees or trust deed beneficiaries to know that they were being charged more than what the newspaper charged for publication. In the absence of direct evidence, the only way the Bar could establish that Mr. Fennell knew about FEI’s actions and the expectations of Bend area trustees is through inference from the evidence we do have.”
Ironically Fennell was accused of the very same price gouging in the late 1990s and again in 2004.
What's Trending Online
?
X These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at info@content.ad.

Coming Soon: The Department of the Internet

Coming Soon: The Department of the Internet

Activist Post
Activist Post
February 19th, 2015
Reader Views: 1,512

 71  18  101





net neutrality
Who opposes a free and open Internet? Answer: government. Who do activists beg to protect Internet freedom? Government.
Trusting the government to run the Internet is like trusting the NSA to never spy on Americans.
If the FCC’s plan to regulate the Internet is so wonderful, why can’t the American people read it before it goes into effect?
A new video by Project Internet Freedom highlights the absurd “solution” to a problem that doesn’t exist.

Related:
Tell Your Congressman to Stop The FCC From Taking Over The Internet
Net Neutrality: What it Really Means, and How it Could Impact You Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

Contributed by Activist Post of Activist Post.


Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
71
 
18
 
0
 
0
Reddit
101
 
0
 

- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/coming-soon-the-department-of-the-internet_022015#sthash.bEZS8Tc0.dpuf

Health Ministry: Saudi MERS Deaths Surge

Health Ministry: Saudi MERS Deaths Surge
W460
Deaths from the MERS virus have surged in Saudi Arabia, health ministry figures showed on Friday, after authorities warned of a seasonal increase in Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV).
The ministry recorded five deaths on Thursday alone, bringing to 16 the number since February 11.
That figure compares with a single death from the virus in the first 10 days of the month.
Saudi Arabia is the country which has been hardest hit by the MERS virus, which was first identified in 2012. A total of 899 people have been infected in the kingdom, of whom 382 have died.
Doctor Abdul Aziz bin Saeed, who heads the centre coordinating the ministry's response to MERS, warned earlier this month that a surge in cases typically occurs around this time of year, because of the risks posed by newborn camels.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has cited the preliminary results of studies indicating that people working with camels are at increased risk of infection from MERS-CoV, and young camels are particularly susceptible.
Saeed said "you have more infected camels right now circulating."
The ministry reported new cases from across the kingdom. Half of those who died were in their 70s or 80s.
A public awareness campaign is continuing. The WHO urged people working with camels to pay particular attention to personal hygiene.
Experts from WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization and other U.N. agencies are concluding a mission to Saudi Arabia after "a surge in cases in the past few weeks," WHO spokesman Tarik Jasarevic said.
He told reporters in Geneva that more than 40 cases have been reported in the kingdom this month, including some contracted inside health facilities.
More than 20 countries have been affected by MERS but most cases have been linked to the Middle East.

Comments 0

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *