Saturday, February 28, 2015

Obama’s Back Door Gun Control Targets the AR-15: ATF Proposed Bullet Ban Has Been Fast Tracked

Obama’s Back Door Gun Control Targets the AR-15: ATF Proposed Bullet Ban Has Been Fast Tracked

Melissa Melton
The Daily Sheeple
February 26th, 2015
Reader Views: 2,178

 130  48  253





ar15
“The Obama administration was unable to ban America’s most popular sporting rifle through the legislative process, so now it’s trying to ban commonly owned and used ammunition through regulation.”
Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, has hit the nail on the head.
Following the Sandy Hook shooting, the Obama administration tried to ban several kinds of firearms, including the AR-15.
Now it seems that he may have actually found a way to do it, albeit slowly. He isn’t going to outright ban the gun itself; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) is just going to ban the most commonly sold bullets for the gun instead.
Via Washington Examiner:
At issue is so-called “armor-piercing” ammunition, an exemption for those bullets mostly used for sport by AR-15 owners, and the recent popularity of pistol-style ARs that use the ammo.
The inexpensive 5.56 M885 ammo, commonly called green tips, have been exempt for years, as have higher-caliber ammunition that also easily pierces the type of soft armor worn by police, because it’s mostly used by target shooters, not criminals. The agency proposes to reclassify it as armor-piercing and not exempt. [emphasis added]
The BATFE released a proposal this month which would ban 5.56 mm ammo period. Here’s a snippet:
Applying the sporting purposes framework set forth above, the 5.56 mm projectile that ATF exempted in 1986 does not qualify for an exemption because that projectile when loaded in to SS109 and M855 cartridges may be used in a handgun other than a single shot handgun. Specifically, 5.56 mm projectiles loaded in to the SS109 and M855 cartridges are commonly used in both “AR-type” rifles and “AR-type” handguns. The AR platform is the semi-automatic version of the M16 machine gun originally designed for and used by the military. The AR-based handguns and rifles utilize the same magazines and share identical receivers. These AR-type handguns were not commercially available when the armor piercing ammunition exemption was granted in 1986. To ensure consistency, upon final implementation of the sporting purpose framework outlined above, ATF must withdraw the exemptions for 5.56 mm “green tip” ammunition, including both the SS109 and M855 cartridges.
ATF recognizes that this ammunition is widely available to the public. Because it is legally permissible to possess armor piercing ammunition under current law, withdrawing the exemption will not place individuals in criminal possession of armor piercing ammunition. However, with few exceptions, manufacturers will be unable to produce such armor piercing ammunition, importers will be unable to import such ammunition, and manufacturers and importers will be prohibited from selling or distributing the ammunition.
So you can still legally own it if you already have it… but no one can import it, sell it, or even produce it.
Not only that, but the ban has been put on fast track.
The issue, according to BATFE, is the ability to shoot through the soft body armor worn by most police officers, but even some former officers have noted that the AR-15 isn’t the common gun of choice used by criminals to harm police.
Here’s where it gets into a semantics game, via Forbes:
Now, to be as nitpicky as the law, the M855 ball ammunition the ATF wants to ban as “armor piercing” doesn’t have a core made of the metals listed in what legally makes a bullet “armor piercing.” The M855 actually has a lead core with a steel tip. Also, the M855 is traditionally a rifle cartridge and the ban only covers handgun ammunition. The DOJ argues this doesn’t stop them because the law stipulates they can ban a bullet that “may be used in a handgun.” And, after all, any cartridge may be used in a handgun.
Still, the definition has another condition. According to law, when ammo is made for “sporting purposes” (hunting, recreation shooting and so on) it is exempt from this ban. According to the DOJ the “GCA exempts ammunition that would otherwise be considered armor piercing if the Attorney General determines that the specific ammunition at issue is ‘primarily intended to be used for sporting purposes.’” So, according to the DOJ, they simply get to decide on this condition.
The NRA has promised to fight this and has released a statement which reads in part:
As NRA has been reporting since the night the news broke, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) is moving to infringe upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners with a drastic reinterpretation of a nearly 30-year-old law regulating so-called “armor piercing” ammunition. So draconian is BATFE’s new “Framework” that it would prohibit the manufacturing, importation, and sale of M855 ball ammunition, one of the most popular cartridges for the most popular rifle in America, the AR-15. Not coincidentally, the AR-15 is among the firearms the Obama Administration has unsuccessfully sought to outlaw. If they can’t ban the pie, so the thinking apparently goes, they might at least get the apples. [emphasis added]
In an effort to thwart BATFE’s attempted action, NRA has worked with U.S. Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, to draft a letter to BATFE expressing the lawmakers’ opposition to the proposed Framework. To read a copy of the letter, please click this link.
According to the letter, “The idea that Congress intended [the ‘armor piercing’ ammunition law] to ban one of the preeminent rifle cartridges in use by Americans for legitimate purposes is preposterous.” It goes on to state that the law “should be construed in accordance with the American tradition of lawful firearms ownership, as protected by the Second Amendment.”
The proposal has already driven up the price of 5.56 mm ammo as it is. Once it’s banned from sale, that’s it… for civilians.
The government will, of course, still be able to purchase these rounds.
Gun owners can still get the more expensive .223 ammo… until, of course, they find a reason to ban that, too. If the 5.56 is dangerous for officers, won’t they come back next and say the .223 is also dangerous to officers? Under that reasoning, aren’t all bullets dangerous to officers?
See where this is headed?
Well, Eric Holder did lament that his biggest failure was the inability to pass more gun laws after Sandy Hook.

Then again, this is the same man who said we need to brainwash people against guns back in the mid-1990s.

Banning the right to keep and bear arms has been on the federal agenda for years now. It would appear that since the government knows it can’t just outright ban the Second Amendment, they’ll just inch it up incrementally and undermine it into oblivion.
The NRA has put up a webpage for contacting the BATFE, Congress, and the Obama Administration regarding the bullet ban here. Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

Contributed by Melissa Melton of The Daily Sheeple.
Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!


Please share: Spread the word to sheeple far and wide
130
 
48
 
0
 
1
Reddit
253
 
2
 

- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/obamas-back-door-gun-control-targets-the-ar-15-atf-proposed-bullet-ban-has-been-fast-tracked_022015#sthash.ESF6G6PY.dpuf

The War on Preppers: Obama Bans Ammo for the Most Popular Rifle in America




The War on Preppers: Obama Bans Ammo for the Most Popular Rifle in America

Michael Snyder
The Economic Collapse
February 27th, 2015
Reader Views: 3,254
 68  72  194
Obama
Because he can’t get Congress to approve the things that he wants to do, Barack Obama has apparently decided to rule by decree for the rest of his time in the White House.  One of Obama’s latest moves is to try to ban some of the most popular ammunition for the most popular rifle in America.  Previously, the Obama administration attempted unsuccessfully to ban the AR-15.  That didn’t work, so now Obama is going after the ammunition.  This is yet another example of the war on preppers that is going on all over the nation.  Whether you are a gun owner or not, this assault on our constitutional rights should disturb you greatly.  Barack Obama has promised to try to squeeze as much “change” as possible out of his last two years, and in the process he is “fundamentally transforming” America.  But what will our country look like when he is done?
At the top of the Drudge Report today, there was a story from the Washington Examiner detailing this ammo ban…
As promised, President Obama is using executive actions to impose gun control on the nation, targeting the top-selling rifle in the country, the AR-15 style semi-automatic, with a ban on one of the most-used AR bullets by sportsmen and target shooters.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives this month revealed that it is proposing to put the ban on 5.56mm ammo on a fast track, immediately driving up the price of the bullets and prompting retailers, including the huge outdoors company Cabela’s, to urge sportsmen to urge Congress to stop the president.
And here is more on this ammo ban from the NRA
As NRA has been reporting since the night the news broke, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) is moving to infringe upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners with a drastic reinterpretation of a nearly 30-year-old law regulating so-called “armor piercing” ammunition. So draconian is BATFE’s new “Framework” that it would prohibit the manufacturing, importation, and sale of M855 ball ammunition, one of the most popular cartridges for the most popular rifle in America, the AR-15. Not coincidentally, the AR-15 is among the firearms the Obama Administration has unsuccessfully sought to outlaw. If they can’t ban the pie, so the thinking apparently goes, they might at least get the apples.
In an effort to thwart BATFE’s attempted action, NRA has worked with U.S. Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, to draft a letter to BATFE expressing the lawmakers’ opposition to the proposed Framework. To read a copy of the letter, please click this link.
According to the letter, “The idea that Congress intended [the ‘armor piercing’ ammunition law] to ban one of the preeminent rifle cartridges in use by Americans for legitimate purposes is preposterous.” It goes on to state that the law “should be construed in accordance with the American tradition of lawful firearms ownership, as protected by the Second Amendment.” This includes due consideration of “the many legitimate uses Americans make of their firearms including target practice, hunting, organized and casual competition, training and skills development, and instructional activities.“ The letter concludes with several pointed questions for B. Todd Jones, BATFE’s director, including why the agency bypassed the Administrative Procedures Act in proposing such a radical change to its prior interpretation and enforcement of the law.
The crazy thing about all of this is the fact that this ammunition has never met the legal definition of being “armor piercing”.  So what the Obama administration is attempting to do is outside the law.
A recent Infowars article broke this down…
The ATF is trying to ban M855 AR-15 ammunition by declaring it “armor piercing,” despite the ammo containing lead which exempts it from the classification according to law.
To be considered “armor piercing” under 18 U.S.C. 921 (a)(17)(B), a bullet must have an entirely metal core or have a jacket weighting more than 25% of its weight, which wouldn’t include M855 rounds because their bullets are partly lead.
The definition in full:
(17)
(A) The term “ammunition” means ammunition or cartridge cases, primers, bullets, or propellent powder designed for use in any firearm.
(B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means- (i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium; or (ii) a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.
(C) The term “armor piercing ammunition” does not include shotgun shot required by Federal or State environmental or game regulations for hunting purposes, a frangible projectile designed for target shooting, a projectile which the Attorney General finds is primarily intended to be used for sporting purposes, or any other projectile or projectile core which the Attorney General finds is intended to be used for industrial purposes, including a charge used in an oil and gas well perforating device.
Needless to say, this ban is creating quite a bit of panic among gun owners.
Many gun owners are stocking up on this ammo while they still can
Word of ATF’s proposal sparked a run on ammo at some Springfield gun stores, and steep price spikes for steel-tipped military surplus ammo at some online ammo dealers. Rounds that sold for 25 to 30 cents apiece tripled at some some stores after BATF posted its proposal on its web site.
“We sold out of what we had in stock,” said Ryan Cook, manager of Eagle Armory in Springfield. “We didn’t have a lot in the store but I might have sold four or five cases after ATF’s statement came out. I called our suppliers but they said there was none available to order. It’s like the ammo shortage before. People are going to panic.”
Like I said earlier, even if you are not a gun owner you have got to be extremely concerned about this erosion of our constitutional rights.
We have a man occupying the White House that seems absolutely determined to stretch the limits of presidential power as far as they can possibly go.
And at this point he has become so arrogant that he doesn’t even care if Congress believes that what he is doing is legal.  Just consider what he said during one recent speech
Pres. Obama is daring Republicans to vote on whether or not his executive actions are legal.
Discussing opposition to his executive amnesty orders at an immigration town hall Wednesday, Obama said he would veto the vote because his actions are “the right thing to do”:
So in the short term, if Mr. McConnell, the leader of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, want to have a vote on whether what I’m doing is legal or not, they can have that vote. I will veto that vote, because I’m absolutely confident that what we’re doing is the right thing to do.
This is how republics die.  When one man starts grabbing more and more power and nobody stops him, eventually a dictatorship is born.
This is not what our founding fathers intended.  If they could see us today, they would be rolling over in their graves.
And a lot of Americans are getting fed up.
In fact, according to one recent survey only 47 percent of Americans still believe that Obama loves this country…
While the creepy #ILOVEOBAMA continues to trend on Twitter, fewer than half of American adults, 47 percent, say they believe that the president loves his country.
According to a survey conducted by Huffington Post/YouGov and released this week, a whopping 35 percent of Americans, more than one in three, believe that Obama doesn’t love the United States, while 17 percent said they weren’t sure.
The poll was conducted in the wake of former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani telling a gathering in Manhattan that “I do not believe, and I know this is a horrible thing to say, but I do not believe that the president loves America.”
So what do you think?
Do you believe that what Obama is trying to do is legal?
And do you believe that Obama actually loves this country and everything that it is supposed to stand for?
Please feel free to add to the discussion by posting a comment below… Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

Contributed by Michael Snyder of The Economic Collapse.
Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogs The American Dream , The Truth
- See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-war-on-preppers-obama-bans-ammo-for-the-most-popular-rifle-in-america_022015#sthash.A7f3rVhi.dpuf

You morons! You useful idiots!” :

You morons! You useful idiots!” :
 
 
 
Glenn goes off on net neutrality supporters by Wilson Thursday, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:26 PM EST Share This Tweet This googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-300x250_top-gb_101"); }); Just hours before the FCC approved net neutrality, Glenn delivered a passionate and frustrated plea for the people to wake up and recognize the dangers of growing government regulation of the internet. “Because of the way net neutrality is going to go today, I’m not sure that the strategies that we have developed here at TheBlaze or anywhere else – and I don’t mean just us, I mean, Breitbart and everybody else, – I’m not convinced that any of this is going to work,” Glenn said. Glenn fears that independent companies like TheBlaze will be left behind when the regulations are drafted. Big companies, on the other hand, will get a seat at the table. He compared it to when FDR set price controls. “What happened was, the big three automakers came in and they set the price of cars. They set the price for labor. And they were brought into the table. The little guys weren’t brought in,” Glenn said. He’s already seeing it happen. Here’s what Politico reported: FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has made some last-minute revisions to his net neutrality plan after Google and public interest groups pressed for the changes, according to sources at the commission. Google, Free Press and New America’s Open Technology Institute last week asked the commission to revise language they said could unintentionally allow Internet service providers to charge websites for sending content to consumers. Such a scenario could open the door to an avalanche of new fees for Web companies and threaten their business models. “Does that sound like net neutrality? Does that sound like these big, evil corporations don’t have anything to do with anything? I mean, it’s being written by the big evil corporations and special interest groups. Your whole point is, ‘we don’t want special interest groups and we don’t want big, evil corporations to have special access’,” Glenn said. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-300x250_mid-gb_102"); }); “They just wrote it, you nincompoop. You morons. You useful idiots. That’s all you are. You’re a useful idiot,” Glenn said of Wheeler. Your browser does not support iframes. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-620x310_gb-below-the-article_198"); }); Comments are closed.

Source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2015/02/26/you-morons-you-useful-idiots-glenn-goes-off-on-net-neutrality-supporters/?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

Vandalism in Arizona Shut Down Internet, Cellphone, Telephone Service Across State

Vandalism in Arizona Shut Down Internet, Cellphone, Telephone Service Across State


Incident raises concerns a domestic or international terrorist could tamper with U.S. infrastructure
Optical fiber and electronic component
Optical fiber and electronic component / AP
BY:

Cellphone, Internet, and telephone services across half of Arizona went dark on Wednesday after vandals sliced a sensitive fiber optic cable, according to those familiar with the situation. The incident is raising concerns about the safety of U.S. infrastructure.
The outage shut down critical services across large parts of the state, preventing individuals from using their phones, bank and ATM cards, and the Internet. Critical services, such as police and state government databases, as well as banks and hospitals, also were affected as a result of the vandalism.
The services first went dead around noon MST on Wednesday, causing complete service interruptions across half the state, from Phoenix to such northern cities as Sedona, Prescott, and Cotton Wood, according to an official from CenturyLink, the Louisiana-based communications company that owns the severed line.
“There was a vandalism that took place on a fiber optic cable that basically runs from Phoenix to Northern Arizona,” said Alex Juarez, a spokesman for CenturyLink in Arizona.
The line, which is composed of extremely thick cable, appeared to have been cut with a hacksaw, according to Juarez. Phoenix police are currently investigating the incident and say they have yet to determine a motivation for the crime.
“We’re not sure what the intent was, but they were able to cut the fiber optic cable, possibly using a hacksaw,” Juarez explained. “It looks like a pretty straight cut.”
CenturyLink personnel responded quickly to the scene to locate where the line was cut and assess the damage. They were eventually able to repair the line and get services back up and running in the early morning hours of Thursday.
“Obviously CenturyLink takes a high concern in security. Anytime there’s an outage, it impacts customers and business. In this instance, it affected everything from banks to hospitals to state agencies, you name it,” Juarez said. “So it’s a high priority to have these lines secure. These types of instances do not happen very often.”
The cable is located in a desert area north of Phoenix, meaning it is not a site routinely accessed by passersby.
“It’s a desert area, so it’s very remote, extremely remote,” Juarez said.
While CenturyLink declined to provide specific numbers of those impacted, Juarez said that it was “a large number of customers” over a large portion of the state.
Phoenix Police Department officials said that officers assessed the scene following a call about “criminal damage.”
Police say vandals must have used heavy equipment to expose the cable.
“The fiber optic cable was encased in metal piping which would have to have been accessed prior to reaching the optics,” the police said in a statement. “This indicates a power tool of type may have been used.”
Security experts familiar with these types of incidents said they highlight the vulnerability of America’s critical infrastructure. In states across the nation, vandals have gone after power transformer lines and the electric grid in acts that have been characterized by authorities as forms of sabotage.
For some, incidents of this nature have sparked concerns that a domestic or international terrorist could tamper with U.S. infrastructure, throwing state and federal governments into disarray.
“This doesn’t look like ‘vandalism’ but rather like sabotage,” said Rachel Ehrenfeld, the founder and CEO of the American Center for Democracy (ACD) and its Economic Warfare Institute (EWI). “Next time it could be both the fiber optic cables and a cell-tower or two.”
“This reinforces the need to better protect our communication channels and prepare backup systems wherever possible,” she said.
Nicholas Hanlon, an official with the Center for Security Policy (CSP), which has long warned about vulnerabilities to the U.S. electric grid and other key services, said that would-be terrorists could attack these sites with relative ease.
“The Phoenix outage tells us that terrorists and otherwise hostile groups don’t have to probe our defenses to find soft targets in our electrical infrastructure when vandals can do it for them,” Hanlon said. “NERC [The North American Electric Reliability Corporation] and the electrical industry tell us they are doing good work on their security practices one day. The next day they tell you national security is not their job.”
“Bottom line, the NERC/FERC [Federal Energy Regulatory Committee] regulatory regime is not getting the job done on the security front,” Hanlon said.


Vandalized Cable Knocks Northern Arizona Offline
People across northern Arizona couldn't use the Internet, cellphones or landlines on Wednesday after a fiber-optic line was vandalized. Service is expected to be back on Thursday. (Feb. 26)
AP

Net Neutrality to Face Lawsuits, Congressional Investigations

Net Neutrality to Face Lawsuits, Congressional Investigations


Fight over Internet regulation not over
Thomas Wheeler, the FCC's chairman / AP
Thomas Wheeler, the FCC's chairman / AP
BY:

The Federal Communications Commission voted on Thursday in favor of a proposal that will expand its influence over the Internet, but lawsuits from major Internet service providers (ISPs) as well as several congressional investigations mean the fight over Internet regulation is far from over.
In a 3-2 vote on Thursday, the FCC passed a proposal, the details of which have not been disclosed, to regulate Internet providers under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, which was developed for telephone networks during the Great Depression.
“The regulation and litigation uncertainty caused by the FCC’s action will inhibit investment in new networks but also end up harming many of the companies pushing for Title II,” said Robert McDowell senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a conservative think thank, in a phone interview on Wednesday.
“Title II is a very powerful law, and it can’t be so easily shaped and narrowed as the proponents are advertising,” said McDowell, a former FCC commissioner.
Major ISPs, such as AT&T and Verizon, are expected to sue the agency over the rules.
Francis Shammo, Verizon’s chief financial officer, told a New York audience in December 2014 that if the FCC chose to regulate broadband providers under Title II that she thought it would be a “litigious environment.”
Jim Cicconi, AT&T’s senior executive vice president for external and legislative affairs, said in November 2014 that should the FCC enact Title II, the ISP “would expect to participate in a legal challenge to such action.”
The public has to wait until the order is published in the Federal Register before it can see the rules. Publication is expected to take days or even weeks.
The FCC has promised to restrain itself from using the full authority granted to it by Congress under Title II, and supporters of the chairman’s plan, despite not having seen the rules themselves, have towed the government line.
In addition to lawsuit challenges to the FCC rules, three separate congressional investigations are also underway into attempts by the White House to influence the decision making of Thomas Wheeler, the FCC’s chairman.
“This chairman is not a lapdog for the president. He’s acting independently and he’s acting based on an evolution over a year proceeding,” said Gigi Sohn, Wheeler’s special counsel for external affairs, during a radio interview.
Sohn’s remarks came just several days before the original Feb. 20 due date Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R., Utah), the head of the House Oversight & Government Reform Committee, gave Wheeler’s office to deliver documents to his committee for one of the three investigations.
Wheeler’s office missed the both the original deadline and the extended deadline. An FCC official said on Monday that Wheeler’s office asked for more time due to the size of Chaffetz’s request.
Chaffetz’s office did not respond to a request for comment.
Republicans in the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs have also launched investigations into the agency.
Wheeler earned a rebuke Wednesday from both Chaffetz and Rep. Fred Upton (R., Mich.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, after declining a request to testify before Congress on his net neutrality proposal.
“After hearing from over four million Americans on such an important topic to our economic and cultural future, it’s striking that when Congress seeks transparency, Chairman Wheeler opts against it,” said Upton and Chaffetz.
Ajit Pai, one of the FCC’s five commissioners, said during a press conference on Feb. 10 that not only did he finish reading all 332 pages of what he characterizes as “President Obama’s Internet regulation plan,” but that it was “worse” than he imagined.
“The American people are being misled about President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet,” said Pai.
Wheeler and his office launched a public relations offensive during the first week of February to promote the benefits of his proposal, criticizing attempts to label the rules as utility-style regulations.
The chairman published an op-ed at Wired.com and a “fact sheet” on the FCC website as a rebuttal to his critics.
During a media conference call that same week, senior FCC officials unwilling to allow their names to be attributed to any statements made said that the rules would not regulate rates like a public-utility.
Commissioner Pai said that the plan does give the agency that authority, releasing his own “fact sheet” to counter Wheeler’s.
Pai said that he had no plans to leak the chairman’s order to the public out of respect for the FCC’s rules.
Advocates in favor of the new plan have defended Wheeler’s decision to withhold the document from the public. Free Press and New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute, both influential pro-net neutrality organizations, rejected Pai’s claims as “misleading.”
The Technology Policy Institute published a study on Feb. 9, which found that the FCC almost always published its orders “immediately following the vote” until the early 1970.


FCC Plans to Vote on Net Neutrality in February
The head of the Federal Communications Commission will submit a proposal for new Internet regulations in the coming weeks. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler plans to introduce proposed Net neutrality regulations in February. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler plans to introduce proposed Net neutrality regulations in February. The Federal Communications Commission said Friday, the federal regulators who intend to place restrictions on how Internet providers manage their Web traffic plan to vote on new guidelines in February. The Federal Communications Commission said Friday, the federal regulators who intend to place restrictions on how Internet providers manage their Web traffic plan to vote on new guidelines in February.
Inform

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *