Bryan Cranston: I'll Leave If Trump Elected "I’d be an expatriate."

Bryan Cranston: I'll Leave If Trump Elected

"I’d be an expatriate."

10.31.2016 

 

News

 

 Paul Bois 

 

188

9935

Breaking Bad star Bryan Cranston now includes himself among the celebrities vowing to leave the United States if GOP candidate Donald Trump becomes POTUS on November 8. 

In an interview with The Bestseller Experiment podcast, the actor  said that he "absolutely" would exfiltrate himself to Canada under President Trump. 

"I would definitely move," said Cranston. "It’s not real to me that that would happen. I hope to God it won’t. It wouldn’t be a vacation. I’d be an expatriate."

The only positive to a Trump presidency, according to Cranston, would be that writers and filmmakers would have a surplus of material to create product. 

"There will be books written, movies made," he said. "I’m telling you, there will be theatrical productions about Donald Trump because of the anomaly that he presented."

When asked if he would ever consider playing Trump in a movie, Cranston said that would be considerably hard for him. 

“For me to play someone like Donald Trump, I would first need to have some time to calm down from him because I do have a judgment of him, and it’s virtually impossible to play someone that you have a judgment on, because then you’re slanted," Cranston said.

"I need to come at it from a place of neutrality so that I can build a character and justify what I say, what I do, at all times. It’s hard for me to imagine trying to justify what this man has said and done."

Cranston now joins Lena Dunham, Rosie O'Donnell, Jon Stewart, Barbara Streisand, and many more celebrities vowing to leave if Trump becomes president. 

Talk is cheap. 

Prager U: Democratic Socialism is Still Socialism Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck

Prager U: Democratic Socialism is Still Socialism

Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck

10.31.2016 

 

News

 

 Paul Bois 

 

27

6260

Leftists often try to wiggle their way out of the much maligned "socialist" label by referring to themselves as "democratic socialists" in the same way that communist countries would label themselves "people's republics."

In a new video from Prager U, the always energetic and hilarious Steven Crowder comes on hand to say that if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it's certainly not a chicken, no matter what amplifier you precede with.   

Essentially, leftists think that by somehow putting socialism up to a democratic vote, it somehow diminishes its destructiveness. As noted in the video, Venezuela's Hugo Chavez came to power via democratic vote and the country now finds itself on the brink of total collapse, with bare essential items like toilet paper now overpriced or out of stock, despite Venezuela's resource-rich nation. 

Okay, forget Venezuela. After all, leftists don't point to developing countries in South America as models for the U.S. to follow; they point to two relatively homogenous Western European countries barely one-sixtieth the size of our own: Denmark and Sweden. Here's where we get louder with Crowder:

Denmark? Ok, here’s the time where you point to an entirely homogenous population about one sixtieth the size of America’s, and you point to that as the blueprint? Ok – let’s go there. This is a place where the middle class can’t even afford a car because of the 180% new-car tax. And the Prime Minister was so fed up with Americans pointing to it as a beacon for socialist success that he felt compelled to clarify, 'I would like to make one thing clear: Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy; Denmark is a market economy.'

Sweden? I love Sweden! Ok, great bikini team, and thanks to that country my armoire now doubles as a bookcase. Speaking of which, the founder of IKEA – let’s be honest, the only real cool export from Sweden aside from a few good hockey players – left Sweden because of the stifling high tax rate. So, Sweden – good place, not bad people – but a successful model for a viable economy in today’s global market? Incorrect.

Socialism appeals to so many millennials because it appears more compassionate and altruistic than capitalism. Crowder skewers that notion by pointing out how Socialism ultimately creates more greed and selfishness through a mentality of entitlement and more violence through its enforcement by way of the gun. Every regulation and tax enacted on the populace needs enforcement, and if people don't meet the standards set by the government, then the government will eventually be showing up on people's doorsteps with a gun and handcuffs. 

That's not democratic anything. That's tyranny. 

Planned Parenthood Launches Massive 'Get-Out-the-Vote' Campaign "1,500 paid staffers and 3,500 volunteers"

Planned Parenthood Launches Massive 'Get-Out-the-Vote' Campaign

"1,500 paid staffers and 3,500 volunteers"

10.31.2016 

 

News

 

 Paul Bois 

 

33

167

Abortion conglomerate Planned Parenthood has employed 1,500 paid staffers and 3,500 volunteers for a get-out-the-vote campaign in hopes of electing pro-abortion politicians in the various battleground states.  

After pouring more than $30 million into electing pro-abortion candidates this year, Planned Parenthood's latest "Pink Out the Vote" initiative hopes to drives it home, influencing Senate races in New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Nevada. Electing Hillary Clinton on November 8th also remains a top priority. 

Planned Parenthood has much to gain by Hillary's election. Not only does she promise to continue supporting the child-killing enterprise, she also supports taxpayer dollars to going in Planned Parenthood's pocket.

"Through field testing, Planned Parenthood Votes has seen our door-to-door canvassing move undecided voters up to 12 points," says a memo obtained by CBS, which also boasts this to be Planned Parenthood's greatest get-out-the-vote campaign in their 100 year history.  

Fortunately, for every Planned Parenthood operative getting out the vote this election season, there also exists a pro-life operative getting out the vote in the opposite direction, with the Susan B. Anthony List knocking on over 1 million doors in Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, and Missouri this election season. 

"We are talking directly to pro-life voters who, without information on the pro-life positions of candidates, may not vote or vote for the pro-abortion candidates," said SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser. "Pro-life voters can provide the margin of victory for pro-life candidates."

Jewish Federations of North America Ends Ban on Visits to Judea and Samaria

"Jews have a moral and legal right to live in Judea/Samaria."

11.1.2016 

 

News

 

 Truth Revolt 

 

3

41

The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has praised the Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA), the umbrella organization which includes the Council of Jewish Federations, the United Jewish Appeal and the United Israel Appeal, for ending a 50-year old ban on permitting its representatives to conduct official visits to Jewish communities in Judea/Samaria.

Following a meeting this week, the decision was made to lift the ban, which will enable not only visits to Jewish communities in Judea/Samaria, but to Arab cities and townships as well.

ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said,

We applaud the JFNA for making this sensible and principled decision. We urge all Jewish groups like AIPAC and others to begin to visit the Jewish communities in Judea/Samaria, as well. It was an absurd anomaly that Jewish officials from across America can go to Israel but were uniquely insulated from meeting with, acquainting themselves with, getting to know the Jewish communities in Judea/Samaria. The residents of these Jewish communities, living in the historical, biblical land of Israel, are every bit Israeli citizens as their fellow citizens within the Green Line. They serve in the army; they pay their taxes; they contribute to the national economy.

Indeed, they suffer for living on Israel’s front line, enabling Israel to guard defensible frontiers, which the 1949 armistice lines never were.  Jews have a moral and legal right to live in Judea/Samaria, stemming from the 1920 San Remo settlement that earmarked this territory for Jewish settlement and which has never been superseded by an internationally-binding agreement.

We praise the JFNA for making this historic decision. We urge all Jewish groups like AIPAC and others to begin to visit the Jewish communities in Judea/Samaria, as well.  Groups that ZOA takes to this part of Israel often tell us it was the best part of their trip. They learn that Judea/Samaria contains real cities, with wonderful Jewish families raising their children.

John Podesta's BFF at DOJ Joining The FBI's Investigation Into Huma's Emails Just how incestuous can this get?

John Podesta's BFF at DOJ Joining The FBI's Investigation Into Huma's Emails

Just how incestuous can this get?

11.1.2016 

 

News

 

 Tiffany Gabbay 

 

6

45

With the help of Wikileaks, we've become acutely aware of just how incestuous the Clinton-web truly is. 

FBI agents, now working under warrant to examine 650,000 emails housed on a laptop belonging to Huma Abedin and her degenerate husband, Anthony Weinir, have their work cut out for them -- not least in part because now the Department of Justice is joining the FBI's probe in order to "help."

Representing the DOJ, assistant attorney General Peter J Kadzik wrote to Congress that his department will "continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible."

Just one snag -- Peter Kadzik is deeply entrenched in the Clinton machine and is close friends with John Podesta, who he apparently single-handedly kept "out of jail" after Podesta perjured himself during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. 

The blog ZeroHedge does a fantastic job tying the Kadzik pieces together, beginning with this dinner invitation showing how Podesta met the DOJ official for dinner just one day after Clinton's Benghazi hearing: 

ZeroHedge accurately notes that the DOJ's involvement in aiding the FBI's investigation into Huma's emails, amounts to, "the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton's Campaign char, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton."

The blog expands on the background between Podesta and Kadzik and how the latter kept the former "out of jail": 

Podesta and Kadzik met several months later for dinner at Podesta’s home, another email shows. Another email sent on May 5, 2015, Kadzik’s son asked Podesta for a job on the Clinton campaign.The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, Hillary's campaign chairman met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, who is currently a top official at the US Justice Department serving as Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs. .... 

Kadzik's role at the DOJ, where he started in 2013, is particularly notable Kadzik, as helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.

It gets better because, as we further revealed, if there is one person in the DOJ who is John Podesta's, and thus the Clinton Foundation's inside man, it is Peter Kadzik.

Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office.

All of this is corroborated, by the way, through Podesta's own emails. ZeroHedge reports "Kadzik worked on other Clinton email issues in his dealings with Congress" and that last November, it was Kadzik who "denied a request from Republican lawmakers to appoint a special counsel to lead the investigation."

ZeroHedge does a thorough job detailing Kadzik's longstanding ties to the Clintons and their surrogates and its worth reading the blog's analysis in its entirety here. 

Bad Judgement: Clinton Tweets Out Article Calling Her a Corrupt Candidate! You can't make this up.

Bad Judgement: Clinton Tweets Out Article Calling Her a Corrupt Candidate!

You can't make this up.

11.1.2016 

 

News

 

 Tiffany Gabbay 

 

16

48

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump has consistently used Bernie Sanders' and Clinton surrogates Cheryl Mills' and John Podesta's own words about Hillary Clinton to his advantage. The trio, on more than one occasion, declared that Hillary Clinton has "awful judgement."

Well, we can take the latest tweet from Hillary Clinton as proof. On Monday evening the Democratic nominee tweeted out an article titled: "Making the Choice: How should voters weigh the sins of these two uniquely corrupt candidates?"

​"For purposes of comparison, we present these complete accountings of the candidates' offenses and misdemeanors. Weigh them according to your personal moral compass, then print them out and take them to the polls to help you decide. Good luck," the Slate article reads. 

The piece, as it turns out, was a left-wing attempt at humor where the author compares hundreds of so-called Trump transgressions to just one Clinton transgression -- her email server. 

Nonetheless, we know from experience that the title of articles is what most people look at, often not reading the article itself.  

We're not sure it helps said presidential candidate when she publicly agrees that she is a "corrupt candiate."

Poor judgment, people. Poor judgment.