Friday, September 1, 2017

Teenager’s Assisted Suicide Sends Horrible Message That Being Disabled is “A Fate Worse Than Death”

Teenager’s Assisted Suicide Sends Horrible Message That Being Disabled is “A Fate Worse Than Death”

 OPINION   TAYLOR HYATT   AUG 31, 2017   |   12:13PM    LONDON, ENGLAND
Last week, the death of 19-year-old Tommy Swales made headlines in the UK. He had been diagnosed with Friedrich’s ataxia – a rare genetic disorder that causes heart disease and a gradual loss of mobility – four years ago. The teen fell easily and walked with a slouch, using a backpack to hide it. Those close to him were asked not to acknowledge his condition. The sudden change in his abilities caused him to become withdrawn, depressed, and isolated. He reportedly researched the assisted suicide organization Dignitas. While the family was out for the afternoon, he took his own life.
My first reaction to this story is grief. A young man who should be excited about everything life has to offer does not get to partake in it. His family and friends are left to mourn and wonder what could have been. Stronger than the sadness, though, is my frustration at the combination of factors that pushed him over the edge.
He told his mother, Michelle, about his greatest fear: having to use a wheelchair for the rest of his life. Before his death, he traveled to the United States, attended concerts, and cheered on his favourite soccer team – all activities he feared missing once he relied on a mobility device. After living without a disability for so long, learning to navigate the world all over again might seem overwhelming…but it is possible. Why didn’t anyone tell him that wheelchair users of all ages can still travel, work, and have active social lives? No mention was made of referrals to disability supports after his diagnosis. He also refused assistance from mental health professionals. Like many other youth with disabilities, he was isolated from a larger community that could have given him hope for the future.
The most concerning part of the story is his mother’s response. In statements given to media, Ms. Swales said, “Tommy tackled life with a quiet dignity and amazing strength and courage. We take comfort from all of this, alongside the knowledge that Tommy is where he wanted to be.” She noted that although people who have depression should reach out for support, her son was “different” and “didn’t want help” for his suffering.
I am floored that his death was accepted so casually. No one would express relief at a non-disabled person’s suicide. It seems everyone involved saw disability as a fate worse than death. Why did the family go along with this? If the average teen’s desire to die was treated the same way, outside authorities would intervene. As stories like Jerika Bolen’sdemonstrate, disability is the only “acceptable” reason for a young person to end their life. Friedrich’s ataxia was the diagnosis he received. Ultimately, it was society’s bias against disability – and the fear of having to contend with this bias – that drove him to despair. He was not the first to respond this way; nor will he be the last.
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter. 
Life with a disability is nothing to fear or be ashamed of. How many more lives will be lost before this is understood?
LifeNews Note: Taylor Hyatt is the Policy Analyst & Outreach Coordinator for Toujours Vivant-Not Dead Yet.


Court Allows Woman to Abort Her 24-Week-Old Unborn Baby Just Because He is Disabled

Court Allows Woman to Abort Her 24-Week-Old Unborn Baby Just Because He is Disabled

 INTERNATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   AUG 31, 2017   |   10:47AM    NEW DELHI, INDIA
With each passing week it seems the Supreme Court of India gives another woman permission to have her late-term unborn baby aborted.
Abortions are illegal after 20 weeks of pregnancy in India. At 20 weeks, an unborn baby is almost fully formed and close to the point of viability (about 23 weeks). Late-term abortions also are risky and can be deadly for the mother.
However, women increasingly have been petitioning the high court for permission to abort their late-term unborn babies because of fetal abnormalities or sexual assault.
On Thursday, the high court gave a 20-year-old woman from Pune, India permission to abort her unborn baby because of a fatal disability, according to the Hindustan Times.
The unborn baby is 24 weeks along, generally considered to be the point of viability. The baby recently was diagnosed with a fatal condition where his or her brain and skull did not develop, according to the report.
“We consider it appropriate and in the interest of justice to allow termination of pregnancy,” high court Justices S. A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao said in their decision.
Doctors at BJ Government Medical College said they examined the woman and her unborn baby and found that the baby had a “complete absence of brain and skull” and was not likely to survive. They also said there is no treatment for the unborn baby’s condition,NDTV reports.
Because these late-term abortion requests have become so frequent, the India Supreme Court recently asked the government to consider setting up a permanent medical board to examine late-term abortion petitions. Currently, the courts set up temporary medical boards to examine individual cases.
The government told the high court Thursday that it is acting on that request.
Here’s more from the Times:
Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the Centre, told the bench that the government had, in accordance with the apex court’s earlier direction, communicated to all states and union territories to constitute medical boards to deal with such abortion matters.
“The Union of India has communicated to all the states and union territories about having such medical boards in place,” Kumar told the court.
The high court also is considering the case of a 13-year-old rape victim from Mumbai who is 30-weeks pregnant with her unborn child, according to the BBC. The girl’s doctor recommended a late-term abortion, arguing that the girl’s pelvis is not fully developed and childbirth could cause her physical and mental trauma.
However, the doctor did not explain how the abortion will be less risky than childbirth. Late-term abortions tend not to be very different from childbirth; they typically involve inducing labor and giving birth to the dead baby’s body, rather than a live child.
Earlier this summer, the Supreme Court of India rejected another family’s request for a late-term abortion out of concern for a young girl’s health. In that case, the 10-year-old girl’s parents requested the late-term abortion without their daughter’s knowledge; the Supreme Court of India rejected their petition after medical examiners determined that the abortion could endanger the 10-year-old girl’s life.
However, in May, the high court granted permission for another 10-year-old rape victim to have an abortion when she was about 20 weeks pregnant.
In cases of fetal anomalies, the high court seems to base its decisions on whether the unborn child is likely to die anyway. The high court has granted several late-term abortion petitions to women bearing babies with fatal disabilities, but it has refused other cases where the babies had treatable conditions.
In February, for example, the high court rejected a woman’s request for a late-term abortion because her unborn baby had Down syndromeThe Free Press Journal reportsthe court said the woman’s life was not at risk and her baby should not be aborted simply because of the genetic disorder.
“It is sad that the child may suffer from physical and mental challenges and it’s unfortunate for the mother but we can’t allow an abortion…We have a life in our hands,” the court said in that case.


Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Blasted for Saying Ireland Should Make Abortion a Human Right

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Blasted for Saying Ireland Should Make Abortion a Human Right

 INTERNATIONAL   CORA SHERLOCK   AUG 30, 2017   |   10:05AM    DUBLIN, IRELAND
Pro-life campaigners in Ireland are helping to raise awareness of comments on abortion made by the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when he met with Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar last week.
The comments came about following the release of a hashtag by pro-choice campaigners in the days leading up to the meeting between the two, which was supposed to focus on trade.
#Justinformleo asked the Canadian premier to bring up the issue of abortion, which he duly did, informing Leo Varadkar that in Canada, abortion is considered a fundamental right for women. Pro-life campaigners in Ireland and abroad were disappointed to see that Mr. Varadkar chose to express his view that a referendum on Ireland’s constitutional protection for the baby in the womb would be held in 2018, instead of highlighting the fact that Ireland offers one of the best systems of care for women in pregnancy anywhere in the world.
Commenting on the meeting, Dr Ruth Cullen of the Pro Life Campaign said: “The Taoiseach has never formally met with groups at home representing women who regret their abortions or mums who say they owe the life of their child to the 8th Amendment. Yet, when he travels abroad he’s happy to converse with foreign leaders on the issue and brief them on his plans. It doesn’t make sense. In fact, it’s inexcusable.
“If Prime Minister Trudeau was so anxious to challenge Ireland’s pro-life constitution, why did the Taoiseach in turn remain silent about Canada’s ‘truly barbaric’ abortion law?
“Canada in effect provides no legal protection for unborn babies throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy. Official Canadian figures show that over a ten year period starting in 2000, 491 babies who survived botched abortions were abandoned by medical staff and left to die alone in the corners of hospitals.*
“These figures reveal the chilling and truly barbaric reality of legalised abortion. Just because this reality is rarely talked about in public doesn’t make it any less horrific. If anything, it adds to the horror.
“It’s a bit much the way Ireland’s pro-life laws are constantly attacked with little or no criticism or debate on what happens in other countries. Implied in the criticism of Ireland is that countries like Canada offer an example to the world when it comes to abortion legislation. An incredible 1 in 5 pregnancies in Canada end in abortion and there is no legal protection for unborn babies, right up to birth.
“If an issue is going to be made of Ireland’s abortion laws, then the inconvenient truth about Canada’s abortion law must also be front and centre of any discussion.”
It is very disappointing that Leo Varadkar doesn’t feel confident in Ireland’s pro-life laws.  The Eighth Amendment is a provision which stands alone in terms of human rights protection.  An independent report commissioned in 2016 found that it saved the lives of 100,000 babies in the womb.  It is something to be proud of, not reviled, and criticism from countries like Canada should not be accepted, particularly given their own shocking record in terms of protecting the baby in the womb.
In order to highlight this hypocrisy, the Pro Life Campaign issued two graphics, which were released on Facebook and widely shared.  They are both intended to convey the message that Ireland has nothing to be ashamed of when it comes to our pro-life laws.  On the contrary, it is up to other countries to look at their record before criticising Ireland, and it is up to Ireland’s politicians to defend the life-saving Eighth Amendment and provide the necessary supports which will help mothers keep their babies and enable fathers to enjoy the benefits of parenthood.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *