Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Las Vegas Country Fan Defies Shooter, Flips Him the Bird

This Bud’s for you.

10.3.2017

Call it calm in the midst of the storm, call it liquid courage, or perhaps call it downright stupidity, but one Las Vegas concertgoer potentially in the crosshairs of mass murderer Stephen Paddock’s crows-nested automatic rifle wasn’t letting the violent attack spoil his Sunday night buzz.

Amid long spurts of bullets raining down upon the helpless crowd, a man in sideburns and a muscle shirt stood straight up. As the sea of concertgoers huddled together for cover, the man saluted the shooter with his right arm. His left arm—bent at the razorwire tattoo—was occupied supporting his 25-ounce Bud Light Tall Boy. Seemingly devoid of fear, the man stuck out his middle digit and let that defiant statement linger for several seconds, possibly to make sure Paddock—who probably couldn’t have seen the man without a scope trained on him—got the message.

Then an explosion of several rounds of gunfire forced him to return to a lowered position. Even so, as he crouched, he seemed far from intimidated.

To the man who stood in the face of terror and gave it the finger, this Bud’s for you.

For a grimly humorous moment in the midst of the terrible grief of this attack, watch the video above. The man appears at the :57 mark.

Monday, October 2, 2017

Salvation Prayer...Please Read, Please Consider And Please Print Up and Share. Simple Truth Is We Might Be Running Out Of Time...Carl

Salvation Prayer...

Year One Of The Seven has Begun..

Salvation Prayer...Please Read, Please Consider And Please Print Up and Share.
Simple Truth Is We Might Be Running Out Of Time...Carl

Can You Hear A Voice Calling Us From The Heavens.....
For We Are Being Told To Watch The Skies.

Would you like to know Jesus as your Lord and Savior? Would you like to be saved from all that is about to come? Would you like to be a part of the soon rapture of the church to live with Jesus in his awesome universe and heavenly paradise forever? It is not a mistake that you came here. In fact Jesus wants to be your Savior and He loves you so much that He died on the cross for you others who chose to come to Him. He died in your place. It doesn't matter what you had done, all are welcome to come who are ready to repent of their sins and follow Jesus, desiring for Him to be their Lord and Savior. Please say the prayer below and you too shall be saved! After this please check out the prayer link for additional information you will need to help you with your walk with Christ.

"Dear Jesus,

I know I am a sinner. I pray that you will forgive me for all of my sins, that you will come into my heart and be my Lord, the savior of my life. I confess that you died on the cross to save me from my sins and I am committed to turning away from those sins. I ask that you fill me with your Holy Spirit so that I can be born again. I ask that you give me the strength and abundant faith to overcome any and all attacks by the enemy, including my desire to sin so that I may serve you completely. I pray that you will give me discernment so that I may know all things that are truth, and the knowledge acquired from reading your Word. Use me this day as I am a willing vessel Lord, in leading others to your kingdom. Wash me as white as snow. Put a hedge of protection around me as I go forth in doing your will. Thank you Jesus for saving me, as I know that only through my faith in you that all this is possible.

Amen!"

Supreme Court set for historic new term

BY LYDIA WHEELER - 10/02/17 06:00 AM EDT 155

Autoplay: On | Off

The Supreme Court is beginning a new term on Monday with a blockbuster docket of cases touching on civil rights, free speech, presidential power, redistricting and privacy rights.

The court has agreed to hear 43 cases so far, including a challenge to mandatory union fees in the public sector. The justices are likely to take up even more cases on Monday.

But court watchers may never get to hear arguments in two of the most closely watched cases of the term.

The court canceled arguments scheduled for Oct. 10 in two cases challenging President Trump’s travel ban after the White House issued new, targeted restrictions on travelers from eight countries.

The justices have asked the parties in the travel ban case to submit additional briefs on how the new order impacts the current cases before the court. Arguments could be rescheduled, but what the court will decide to do remains unclear.

Aside from the cases, the term could be memorable for other reasons.

It will be Justice Neil Gorsuch’s first full term on the bench. He joined the court in April after a bitter, partisan battle over the vacancy left by the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

Court watchers also say this term could be Justice Anthony Kennedy’s last. Long the court’s pivotal swing voter, Kennedy was rumored to have been considering retirement last spring.

“There’s only one prediction that’s entirely safe about the upcoming term," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said recently while speaking at Georgetown Law School, "and that is it will be momentous."

Here’s a look at the top cases to watch.

Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project; Trump v. Hawaii

Some argue the Trump administration has already won the fight over its travel ban. The court in June agreed to reinstate the 90-day ban on nationals from six majority-Muslim countries that had been blocked by lower courts.

The justices, however, carved out an exemption from the ban for people who have a “bona fide” relationship with a person or entity in the U.S.

The challengers, including the state of Hawaii, are pushing the court to find the ban, which expired on Sept. 24, unconstitutional. They argue Trump used nationality as a proxy to uphold a campaign promise to ban Muslims from entering the U.S.

But the updated travel restrictions Trump issued for Chad, North Korea, Venezuela, Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen and Somalia could bolster the administration’s case that it needed the temporary ban to assess vetting procedures; it could also push the justices to rule the case is now moot.

The court’s next move will all depend on what’s argued in the briefs due Oct. 5.

Gill v. Whitford

The justices have agreed to wade into the controversial issue of partisan gerrymandering — the process of drawing voter districts to increase the political power of one party over another.

The case centers on Wisconsin’s 2011 legislative map, which was drawn by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature. A lower court struck down the map as unconstitutional last year.

A group of Democratic voters claim Republicans divided Democrats among districts so they fell short of a majority. Other Democratic voters were packed into districts their party’s candidate was already sure to win, they say.

All eyes will be on Kennedy, who signaled in a concurring judgment in 2004 that he would be open to the court resolving the issue if a “limited and precise” rationale could be found for determining whether partisan gerrymandering has occurred.

The Democrats challenging the map in this case claim to have come up with one — the "efficiency gap." That is calculated by taking one party’s total wasted votes in an election, subtracting the other party’s total wasted votes, and then dividing that by the total number of votes cast.

Wisconsin officials appealing the lower court decision argue one-third of all redistricting plans drawn in the last 45 years could be challenged under the plaintiff’s standard.

Whether the court will accept the standard is anyone’s guess. Arguments are scheduled for Oct. 3, the second day of the new term.

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

The case centers on Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple and argues he can’t be forced to do so under the state’s public accommodations law. That statute prohibits businesses from discriminating against customers based on their sexual orientation.

As a Christian, Phillips says he strives to honor his faith in all aspects of his life, including his art and his cakes. Creating a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ceremony, he argues, would violate his First Amendment rights.

The justices will decide whether Phillips’s religious objections prevail over the state law.

“The Court held that gay and lesbian persons could live out their identity by lawfully marrying someone of the same sex,” religious groups led by the Christian Legal Society wrote in a brief supporting Phillips.

“Now this Court must hold that religious dissenters from same-sex marriage have the same liberty to live consistently with their identity.”

Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation who are representing the same-sex couple in the case say a ruling in favor of Phillips would have disastrous consequences.

If religious motivation exempts businesses from anti-discrimination laws, the government could do nothing to protect Americans from the “harms of invidious discrimination,” they say.

Carpenter v U.S.

Your cellphone tracks your every move, but is that data private?

The justices are being asked to weigh whether police can obtain location data from a cellphone service provider without a warrant.

Timothy Carpenter, who was convicted of robbing Radio Shack and T-Mobile stores in Michigan and Ohio in 2010 and 2011, claims police violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure when they obtained records of his cell site locations and presented them at his trial to show his proximity to the robberies around the time they occurred.

On appeal, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Carpenter’s argument. The court said he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in cellphone location records held by his service provider.

Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31

The justices are revisiting an issue it grappled with last term, when it had only eight justices: whether public sector employees can be forced to pay union fees.

The court deadlocked 4-4 in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association in March, affirming a lower court ruling that upheld a California law requiring some public-sector workers to pay union fees.

This case before the court now centers on Mark Janus, a child support specialist for the state of Illinois who has been forced to pay money to the American Federation of State, Country and Municipal Employees Council 31. He says that union has contributed to the fiscal and economic problems of his state with its unreasonable demands.

“Our case was already in the pipeline when the court considered Freidrichs. … Now it’s in a position to take up this issue again and actually reach a decision because now there are nine members and there shouldn’t be a tie,” said Jacob Huebert, an attorney with the Liberty Justice Center.

Huebert argues that government workers at every level should be able to choose whether they give their money to a union.

The union, however, claims it has 40 years of Supreme Court precedent on its side. It argues the court has consistently affirmed its 1977 ruling in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, holding that employees may be required to pay their share of collective-bargaining activities, since all employees benefit from the outcome.

LOAD COMMENTS (155)

Can Tsunamis Hit California? Supernova Oops | S0 News Oct.2.2017

2018 Conference Page: http://www.observatoryproject.com/otf...

Conference Speakers: https://youtu.be/DtyEL2OI1Bc

Las Vegas shooting death toll rises to 58, First Victim Identified

http://marygreeley.com/?p=59174

At least 58 people were killed and 515 were injured in Las Vegas Sunday night when a gunman opened fire on a music festival crowd from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino. It was the deadliest shooting in modern U.S. history.

License

Standard YouTube License

Bone-Chilling Word From God For America's Near Future!

Man Is Given Chilling Word From God For America's Future!

If you feel led to give to the Lyn Leahz Ministry, help support me by clicking here https://www.paypal.me/LynLeahzMinistries or send check or money order to Lyn Leahz, P.O. Box 727, Springboro, Ohio 45066

DISCLAIMER: The news, views, and opinions shared in some of the videos created by Lyn Leahz do not necessarily represent the views, opinions and beliefs of Lyn Leahz. 

Visit Lyn Leahz at http://freedomnationnews.com 

Stock up on survival food today! Visit Food For Liberty at https://foodforliberty.com/leahz

Tired of feeling sick and lethargic all the time? Rid your body of toxins- https://getthetea.com Mention Lyn Leahz and get free shipping on orders of $100 or more!

Reclaim Your Blood Cells Today With This "Supernatural" Juice - 

https://www.reclaimyourcells.com

License

Standard YouTube License

SHOW LESS

Urge Congress to protect unborn babies Monday, October 2, 2017

Urge Congress to protect unborn babies

Monday, October 2, 2017

Dear Carl,
On Tuesday, October 3, Congress is scheduled to vote on a pro-life bill. This bill bans late-term abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, which is the time when an unborn baby experiences pain. Hence, the name of the bill the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

Contact and urge your representative to vote for the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

The Bible tells us that all life, both unborn and born, is sacred because humans are created in the image of God. We work toward the abolition of abortion in America, but just because we have not yet succeeded doesn't mean we shouldn't try and save all we can. Especially when we have opportunity to do so.

President Trump has promised to sign the bill if we can only get it to his desk, but to be forthright with you, this bill will face the hurdle of the Democrats' filibuster in the Senate. The Senate has a majority of 52 Republicans, but 60 votes are required to end the filibuster. Democrats will filibuster this bill to prevent it from being voted on. Many establishment Republicans will also likely refuse to "nuke" the filibuster because they want to hide behind the rule so they won't have to make the hard vote and live up to the GOP pro-life platform.

AFA has been steadfast in calling on Senate Republicans to "nuke" the filibuster (or the use of parliamentary procedures to end the 60 vote rule) just like the Senate did when confirming Judge Neil Gorsuch.

AFA is also urging all pro-life organizations to join us in calling for the Senate to nuke the filibuster and allow a vote on pro-life legislation.

Contact and urge your representative to vote for the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.
If our mission resonates with you, please consider supporting our work financially with a tax-deductible donation. The easiest way to do that is through online giving. It is easy to use, and most of all, it is secure.