RUSSIAGATE: Kash Declassifies Evidence Of Schiff Being Shady With Classified Info
Whistleblower warned since 2017 that Adam AUTHORIZED leaking, but DOJ did nothing about it
For years, Adam Schiff has called Trump a criminal who had betrayed his country, and was eager not only to impeach Trump, but to see him destroyed and even put behind bars.
While Schiff used his gang-of-eight access to augument his efforts in leading of the charge to mainstream all of the manufactured evidence we heard from the Crossfire Hurricane smears we now know for certain were cooked up by Hillary, Obama, and key figures from the CIA and the FBI, Devon Nunes and Kash Patel were the lonely voices on the side of sanity who saw through it all and even used their security clearance to discover and expose the plot in the first place.
You may remember the duellng memos — Devon Nunes vs. Kash Patel — that we saw released in the early days of Russiagate. The Nunes Memo held up over time. The Adam Schiff rejoinder has been dropped in the dustbin of history. But Schiff has NEVER, in all that intervening time, shifted even one iota from his position in defending Russiagate as ‘valid’.
Some of our reporting on those memos:
Feb 2018: Revolting: The FBI’s Trying To Block The Nunes Memo – Here’s 10 Things You Need To Know
After the Mar-A-Lago raid, he was pimping his memoir on NPR while celebrating that the DOJ had finally taken Trump’s mishandling of classified documents seriously.
It’s about to get awkward for Schiff now that the same Kash Patel, now FBI director, has come across whistleblower claims going all the way back to 2017 claiming first-hand knowledge that Schiff authorized the leaking of classified Russiagate information with the specific intention of demonizing Trump, claiming to be shielded by speech and debate laws governing what is said in Congress. The most recent interview where he alerted DOJ to such issues was in 2023.
The DOJ at the time apparently concurred with Schiff’s Speech and Debate assertions, even though we have no precedent or official guidance claiming that even the speech and debate protection has the power to shield from the consequences of leaking classified information.
In his most recent interview with the bureau in 2023, the whistleblower, whose name is redacted, told agents from the FBI’s St. Louis office that he personally attended a meeting at which Schiff authorized leaking classified information.
“When working in this capacity, [redacted staffer’s name] was called to an all-staff meeting by SCHIFF,” the interview report said. “In this meeting, SCHIFF stated the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP. SCHIFF stated the information would be used to indict President TRUMP.”
[…] Officials also said some of the DOJ officials who declined to prosecute a rash of classified leaks during the Russiagate affair remain employed in positions of power, a matter that may be of interest to lawmakers in Congress.
“For years, certain officials used their positions to selectively leak classified information to shape political narratives,” Patel told Just the News on Monday. “It was all done with one purpose: to weaponize intelligence and law enforcement for political gain. — JustTheNews
So ethical and even-handed is Schiff, that the same guy who wanted to declassify evidence so that he could push lies connecting Trump to Putin, held the impeachment testimony in the SCIF, and kept any information that could have been applied to the defense of Trump locked securely away under ‘classified’ status. If it ever WAS declassified, it came out long after it would have been helpful for the impeachment process. Curiously, any information harmful to the President found its way to media outlets almost in real time.
That was the same impeachment process that elevated whistleblowers to ‘hero’ status, people who must be protected at all costs. Now, we have a whistleblower testifying against him. A whistleblower who happened to be a personal friend of both Nunes AND of Schiff. This whistleblower votes Democrat, and he is STILL coming forward to accuse Schiff.
Surely, Schiff would agree that no one is above the law, especially now that he is facing an investigation for mortgage fraud, and has this as one more data point connecting the players into a wider conspiracy to unseat a duly elected President.
And of all the laws that ‘nobody is above’, surely he would agree that the deliberate leaking of classified information is among the chief of those. So it’s only fair that Schiff be properly investigated for any criminal wrongdoing.
Wouldn’t it be a crying shame if the same RICO laws they tried to trap Trump with were to snap shut on the conspirators who tried to take him down?
Posts
