Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Can science answer "Who is a Jew?"

Can science answer "Who is a Jew?"
The woman was asked for proof of her Jewish status, but much of her family had perished in the Holocaust.
4 min read

Netanyahu extends condolences after Las Vegas tragedy
Israeli leaders expressed their deepest sympathies to the American people...
4 min read

PA government meets in Gaza for first time in three years
PA government ministers traveled to Gaza on Monday in a bid to start work...
2 min read

Brother of Toulouse Jewish school killer goes on trial
Abdelkader has been remanded in custody since the attacks that killed seven people in 2012.
3 min read

Ex-FBI agent opens new case into Anne Frank's betrayal
"There is no statute of limitation on the truth.”
3 min read

Jewish groups call for more gun control after Las Vegas
Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, said the mass shooting...
2 min read

WATCH: Tel Aviv Port hosts communal sukka
25,000 people are expected to visit the sukka during the week-long holiday...
2 min read

Mossad head: Iran is our primary objective
Yossi Cohen, the head of Israel's national intelligence agency, divulges...
2 min read

Netanyahu pledges support for Greater Jerusalem bill
It would place 19 settlements, including those of the Gush Etzion region...
4 min read

Has Israel flip-flopped on Kurdish independence?
Despite Netanyahu's apparent backtrack, Jerusalem would likely welcome...
4 min read

The news you need, delivered the way you want.
Enjoy something different.
Curated content delivered weekly. Subscribe today and stay up-to-date.

Donald’s Extreme Executive Order Has Muslim Immigrants Going Hysterical

3.3k
Shares
FacebookTwitterEmail
Shortly after being sworn into office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that called for ‘extreme vetting’ to help weed out potential terrorists that were looking to come to the United States.

That action provided us with the first clear sign that Trump would not receive anything resembling fair and balanced coverage from the mainstream media.
Trump’s common sense approach towards keeping our nation safe was met with shock and outrage from the biased press. Democratic leaders took it from there, and a number of them made complete buffoons of themselves while attempting to spin Trump’s order as discriminatory in nature.
Who can forget Sen. Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) crocodile tears while he was surrounded by cameras and microphones? How about House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) comical rendition of ‘This Land is Your Land?’
As shared by the Washington Times, we may want to keep the tissues handy and prepare for another painful sing-along.  
Homeland Security announced Monday that it will soon require more people to undergo in-person interviews before they can gain a firmer legal footing in the U.S., carrying out yet another part of President Trump’s extreme vetting executive order.
While the so-called travel ban on six Muslim-majority countries has garnered most of the attention, it was just a temporary measure designed to give the government the space to stiffen its regular checks so it could be more adept at denying potential terrorists entry.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced one of those new policies Monday, saying it wants more people to have to face in-person interviews before they’re giving permanent status in the country.
It’s an incredibly simple order that can potentially make a serious difference in the battle to keep our nation safe against potential terrorism. Who wouldn’t want that?  
“You can only vet people if you have information, and one of the best ways to get information is to talk to people and then compare that info to objective info you get from other places,” he said. “if you don’t have these interviews you’re missing a fundamental step in the vetting process.”
Mr. O’Brien said the two categories USCIS has started with for mandatory interviews both presented fraud and security risks. In the case of relatives, he said refugees will try to sneak in extended relatives or members of their clan who wouldn’t normally qualify under the letter of the law.
Interviews will add another hurdle to the process — a move that’s likely to meet resistance from activists and immigration lawyers.
If you have your sights set on a job, you don’t just waltz right in, pick out a desk, and start working.
Instead, you go through a screening process. Is that discriminatory too?
Whoops. We may have given Democratic leaders a new item to add to their nonsense platform.
Jobs for everyone! No drug screening allowed! Put an end to invasive interview questions!
As preposterous as that may sound, it’s in the same neighborhood of the thought process behind opposition to extreme vetting.  
We can’t imagine why Democrats have such a hard time selling their agenda.

Las Vegas Country Fan Defies Shooter, Flips Him the Bird

This Bud’s for you.

     
6
32
Call it calm in the midst of the storm, call it liquid courage, or perhaps call it downright stupidity, but one Las Vegas concertgoer potentially in the crosshairs of mass murderer Stephen Paddock’s crows-nested automatic rifle wasn’t letting the violent attack spoil his Sunday night buzz.
Amid long spurts of bullets raining down upon the helpless crowd, a man in sideburns and a muscle shirt stood straight up. As the sea of concertgoers huddled together for cover, the man saluted the shooter with his right arm. His left arm—bent at the razorwire tattoo—was occupied supporting his 25-ounce Bud Light Tall Boy. Seemingly devoid of fear, the man stuck out his middle digit and let that defiant statement linger for several seconds, possibly to make sure Paddock—who probably couldn’t have seen the man without a scope trained on him—got the message.
Then an explosion of several rounds of gunfire forced him to return to a lowered position. Even so, as he crouched, he seemed far from intimidated.
To the man who stood in the face of terror and gave it the finger, this Bud’s for you.
For a grimly humorous moment in the midst of the terrible grief of this attack, watch the video above. The man appears at the :57 mark.

Prager: The Greatest Libel Since the Blood Libel

It is a great lie. But it is the dominant narrative of our society.

     
2
128
The most infamous libel in history is the one known as the Blood Libel.
This was the medieval lie leveled at Jews in some European countries that accused the Jews of killing Christian children to use their blood to make Passover matzo.
As the author of a book on the history of anti-Semitism ("Why the Jews? The Reason for Antisemitism"), having taught Jewish history at the college level, and as a committed Jew who has devoted great efforts to combating anti-Semitism, I do not easily compare anything to the Blood Libel.
But perhaps the second greatest libel -- and certainly the most widespread -- is that America is a racist country that oppresses its minorities -- and women. We can call it the American Libel.
Now, I hasten to add that no one is being tortured to death as a result of this libel, as Jews were because of the Blood Libel, and, of course, no communities are being slaughtered as Jews were.
But the American Libel should be regarded as one of the great libels of history.
That America today oppresses minorities and women is as far from the truth as was Jews using Christian blood for matzo. Indeed, no country in the world is so accepting of minorities as fellow citizens as America. A third-generation German of Turkish descent is still regarded by most Germans as Turkish. But a first-generation Turkish -- or Nigerian or Chinese -- immigrant to America is regarded simply as one more American.
American Jews should be the first to denounce the American Libel. No country in history has ever been as welcoming, accepting and honoring of Jews as America. American Jews are a living refutation of the American Libel.
Did America oppress minorities? Of course, it did. But the people who engage in the American Libel claim that America oppresses minorities, and even women, today.
Take, for example, this morally odious statement issued last week by the San Francisco 49ers NFL team:
"For more than a year, members of our team have protested the oppression and social injustices still present in our society."
Or a column by a Muslim writer in the HuffPost:
"The oppression they (blacks) face is much greater than the bigotry I (a Muslim) face. It is a racism and oppression rooted in our culture."
Last year, ESPN's Paul Finebaum said on-air, "This country has issues, but this country is not oppressing black people."
After being widely denounced, two days later Finebaum felt it necessary to issue this abject apology:
"I could spend the rest of my life trying to talk my way out of it, but I can't. I blew it. I simply did not have a good grasp of the situation. I know better. I've lived in this country. I see what is going on all across the country from North to South, East to West and I have no excuse. ... All I can say is that I made a terrible mistake. In trying to express a feeling that I probably -- not probably -- I had no right to express."
The headline of a column by Washington Post columnist Courtland Milloy:
"In America, racial oppression is not ancient history."
A headline of another Washington Post column:
"How blacks, oppressed by white supremacy, can find a path to liberation."
Such examples are endless. America oppresses blacks, Latinos, women, gays and everyone else who is not a white, male, heterosexual Christian.
It is a great lie. But it is the dominant narrative of the society. And, as lies are the root of evil, this lie must lead to something awful.
It has already begun to:
First, vast numbers of nonwhites are being raised to believe that America hates them. This should be considered a form of child abuse.
Second, the charge that America is a land of oppression has utterly cheapened the word "oppression." The truly oppressed of the world will have to find a new word to express their condition. If blacks and women in America are oppressed, what word shall we use to describe the condition of Christians in Iraq or Egypt? Of gays in Iran? Of women in much of the Muslim world? Of the Untouchables in India? Kurds in Turkey?
But worse is yet to come.
The Jews survived the Blood Libel. But America may not survive the American Libel. While the first Libel led to the death of many Jews, the present Libel may lead to the death of a civilization. Indeed, the least oppressive ever created.

Glazov Gang: Ex-Muslim Issues Dire Warning to America.

Anni Cyrus shines a disturbing light on the taboo truth about Islam.

     
3
22
On this new special edition of The Glazov Gang, we are running a stirring speech that our very own Anni Cyrus recently delivered in Neosho, Missouri.
Anni issued A Dire Warning to America, shining a disturbing light on the taboo truth about Islam.
Don’t miss it!
Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.
Please donate through our Generosity Campaign or Pay Pal account to help The GlazovGang keep going. Thank you!

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *