Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Brain Cancer Patient Given 6 Months to Live Planned to Kill Himself in an Assisted Suicide. That Was 2 Years Ago

 NATIONAL   ALEX SCHADENBERG   OCT 2, 2017   |   2:53PM    WASHINGTON, DC
The Washington Post published an interesting article on September 27 about a man who was diagnosed with an aggressive brain tumor, similar to Brittany Maynard, and who planned to die by assisted suicide, but has kept on living.
Jeffrey Davitz, a scientist and silicon valley entrepreneur, was diagnosed in April 2015 a lethal and aggressive brain tumor, a brainstem glioblastoma multiforme in an advanced stage. At that time he was given, at most, six months to live with treatment.
Davitz explains that he supported assisted suicide during the California assisted suicide debate and he was planning to die by assisted suicide. He decided to accept treatment with the hope of living a little longer, while expecting that he would eventually die by assisted suicide. But then he started feeling better. Davitz states:
As I waited for the (assisted suicide) law to go into effect, I began to feel some creeping uncertainty about my decision to die. There were things I still wanted to do, like see my daughter’s high school graduation. I was ready to go, I thought, and yet I was conflicted.
Then a peculiar thing happened: I started to get better.
… I noticed that I was getting stronger: I had been almost bedridden in the early stages of my illness, too weak to walk. But my strength began to return, and as it did, I felt the dizziness that had come with the diagnosis recede. I regained my balance. Strange symptoms, such as a weird full-body buzz that had begun when I lowered my head, also faded away. Soon, I was having somewhat normal days, doing some professional things, socializing and exercising.
I was an unusual hospice member — eventually the program kicked me out, designating me a “hospice graduate,” a label that I still find funny. I celebrated my brother’s 60th birthday with him, attended my daughter’s graduation, saw my parents hit their 72nd wedding anniversary and fell into a kind of life pattern.
My MRIs reflected this. The tumor stopped its relentless advance, and there were even signs of some retreat. My most recent image, in May, surprised my doctors, who saw signs not of the expected encroachment but of a slowing and even dormant process.
I’ve now lived longer and better than anybody had projected. Suddenly, it’s hard to see self-termination in quite the same way. I could have missed all this.
One of the many flaws with legalizing assisted suicide is that it causes people who have many quality months and sometimes years to live to have their lives ended.
Davitz has not changed his mind about assisted suicide but he concludes by recognizing his internal conflict with assisted suicide. He states:
Sometimes, I wonder: Would dying have been a good choice anyway? In my case, and not speaking generally, the answer is: of course not. I had a surprising, profoundly unlikely path that has led to love and work of special kinds. I got some good luck in the midst of the bad luck, and I have had a great few years — in some peculiar way the ideal life. Not without pain and difficulties, but also with moments of transcendence.
… But I am not trying to find my way to clear, simple feelings anymore. Instead, long beyond what was expected, I am simply living.
When assisted suicide is legal the decision is influenced by the doctor who has gained the right in law to cause death.
This may have been a very different story if, from the beginning, his friends, family and medical care-givers said to him, I will not be involved with killing you, but I will ensure that you are properly cared for and that you do not suffer.
Many people fear a bad death and fear suffering, but legalizing assisted suicide is not about gaining a “right to die”, but rather it is about giving someone else the right to end my life.
LifeNews.com Note: Alex Schadenberg is the executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition and you can read his blog here.

Supreme Court Confirms Euthanasia Advocacy Group Broke the Law Helping Woman Kill Herself

 NATIONAL   DAVE ANDRUSKO   OCT 2, 2017   |   6:30PM    WASHINGTON, DC
When the U.S. Supreme Court declined today to hear an appeal by the “Final Exit Network,” it means a 2015 conviction will stand against the assisted suicide advocacy group which was found guilty of assisting in the suicide of 57-year-old Doreen Dunn, of Apple Valley, Minnesota.
“Florida-based Final Exit Network argued that Minnesota’s law making it a crime to help other people kill themselves violates the freedom of speech,” the Associated Pressreported. “But Minnesota’s appellate courts disagreed, saying the state’s assisted-suicide law is constitutional and that ‘assisting’ suicide can include speech instructing another person on methods.”
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life followed the case closely. MCCL Executive Director Scott Fischbach issued the following statement:
Today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision not to hear an appeal by Final Exit Network lets stand its conviction of violating Minnesota’s law against assisted suicide. The Court has upheld the constitutionality of our law that prohibits assisting the suicide of another person. Final Exit Network purposely came into our state in 2007, broke our law and assisted in the suicide of a vulnerable person who needed care, not suicide.
Our law protecting Minnesotans from suicide predators like Final Exit Network and other assisted suicide advocates has been in place since 1992 and has served all of us well.
Legislation recently proposed at the Minnesota Legislature would endanger us all with legalized assisted suicide. It can lead to:
  • Abuse: Abuse of people with disabilities, and elder abuse. An heir or abusive caregiver may steer someone towards assisted suicide, witness the request, pick up the lethal dose, and even give the drug.
  • Mistakes: Diagnoses of terminal illness are too often wrong, leading people to give up on treatment and lose good years of their lives.
  • Carelessness: People with a history of depression and suicide attempts have received the lethal drugs.
  • Contagion: Assisted suicide is a contagion and can increase suicide rates for all populations.
  • PTSD: Stress disorder rates increase for family and friends who participate in a suicide.
Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and the latest pro-life news.
Fischbach added,
The upheld conviction of Final Exit Network will help to protect those who could become victims of assisted suicide in Minnesota.
LifeNews.com Note: Dave Andrusko is the editor of National Right to Life News and an author and editor of several books on abortion topics. This post originally appeared in at National Right to Life News Today —- an online column on pro-life issues.

Planned Parenthood Applauds Illinois Gov. Forcing Taxpayers to Fund Abortions Throughout Pregnancy

 STATE   MICAIAH BILGER   SEP 29, 2017   |   1:21PM    SPRINGFIED, IL
Planned Parenthood praised Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner for going back on his promise this week by signing a bill to force taxpayers to fund abortions through all nine months of pregnancy.
On Thursday, the pro-abortion Republican signed a bill to keep abortion on demand up to birth legal and establish the Land of Lincoln as a “safe haven” for women seeking abortions.
Rauner previously said he would veto the radical pro-abortion bill. He said taxpayer funding for abortion is too “divisive,” a fact backed up by polling. Polls consistently show that a strong majority of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortions, including those who identify as pro-choice.
But Rauner did not stick to his promise.
On Thursday, the abortion business Planned Parenthood praised Rauner for taking “the important step of signing HB 40 and safeguarding the right of a woman to safe and legal abortion regardless of how much money she makes or where she lives,” according to the News Tribune.
Forcing taxpayers to pay for abortions has been one of the abortion chain’s top political priorities. Jennifer Welch, the president of Planned Parenthood of Illinois, lauded Rauner for helping them achieve that goal in Illinois.
“Thank you Governor Rauner for signing HB 40,” Welch said. “With access to abortion under attack at the federal level, it is essential to make sure that women will have access to safe and legal abortion in Illinois.”
A lot of people are not happy with Rauner, though, including millions of voters and female political leaders.
Illinois Lieutenant Gov. Evelyn Sanguinetti called the pro-abortion legislation a “political ploy” to divide the state. She also shared a very personal reason why she supports the right to life for unborn babies.
“As a pro-life Republican, I disagree with the Governor’s decision to sign HB 40,” Sanguinetti said. “I wouldn’t be here today if it weren’t for a 15-year-old refugee who chose to have me and keep me.”
State Sen. Sue Rezin also sharply criticized the governor for forcing taxpayers to pay for abortions when Illinois is facing a financial crisis.
“Not only can taxpayers not afford this, but polls show that the majority of people in our country don’t want their tax dollars funding abortion,” Rezin said. “As a mother of four, I am pro-life will continue to stand up for the unborn and taxpayers.”
The legislation likely will have devastating effects on unborn babies in Illinois.
Emily Troscinski, executive director of Illinois Right To Life, said the state once funded unrestricted abortions through Medicaid in the late 1970s, and taxpayers paid about $1.8 million for about 12,738 unborn babies’ abortion deaths at the time.
She predicted that state taxpayers will be forced to pay for as many as 12,000 unborn babies’ abortion deaths annually because of the legislation.
“House Bill 40 would undo a decades-old ban on taxpayer funding of abortion costing us thousands of lives a year,” Troscinski said.
According to the Pro-Life Action League, the bill also would keep abortion legal in the event that Roe v. Wade is overturned.
Furthermore, the Illinois State Assembly synopsis of the bill says the bill would remove “language [from state law and policy] … that the unborn child is a human being from the time of conception and is, therefore, a legal person for purposes of the unborn child’s right to life.”
In October 2016, a Politico/Harvard University poll found that just 36 percent of likely voters supported taxpayer funding for abortions, while 58 percent opposed it. These findings are consistent with previous polls from various groups.
Interestingly, the poll also found that voters who make more than $75,000 were more supportive of forcing taxpayers to fund abortions (45 percent in favor), while those who make $25,000 or less were strongly against it (24 percent in favor).
ACTION: Complain to Gov. Rauner. Call Rauner at 217-782-0244. Or send him an electronic message here.

Catholic Bishop: Governor Rauner Lied to Me, He Promised Not to Force Taxpayers to Fund Abortions

 STATE   MICAIAH BILGER   OCT 2, 2017   |   3:42PM    SPRINGFIED, IL
Chicago Catholic Cardinal Blase Cupich criticized the governor of Illinois for breaking his promise to millions of voters when he signed a radical pro-abortion bill last week.
On Thursday, Gov. Bruce Rauner, a pro-abortion Republican, signed a bill to keep abortion on demand up to birth legal and establish the Land of Lincoln as a “safe haven” for women seeking abortions. The new law also forces taxpayers in the already cash-strapped state to pay for abortions up to birth.
Cupich told the Chicago Tribune that Rauner called him Thursday to explain why he changed his mind.
“I reminded him of the promise and also my statement earlier thanking him for that,” Cupich told the Tribune. “He did break his word. He broke his word to the people, especially those who have continued to speak on behalf of the vulnerable child in the womb.”
Rauner made no secret of the fact that he supports abortion, but he had promised to stay away from controversial issues like abortion. The governor previously said he would veto the radical pro-abortion bill because taxpayer funding for abortion is too “divisive,” a fact backed up by polling. Polls consistently show that a strong majority of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortions, including those who identify as pro-choice.
That’s what made the governor’s decision so disappointing, Cupich said.
“It’s a disappointing day,” Cupich said Thursday evening. “It saddens me a lot. That’s the way it is, though. You just have to accept reality.”
Here’s more from the report:
The Catholic Conference of Illinois, the church’s lobbying arm in Springfield, opposed the bill not only because it provides funding, but also because it, according to Cupich, “codified in law that abortion on demand is legal, which this does in terms of the trigger.”
“That’s why we were so encouraged by his blanket statement and promise that he would veto the bill,” Cupich said. “He wasn’t going to cherry-pick this at all.
“What we’re talking about is a really divisive issue,” Cupich said. “Even though he’s pro-choice, he felt as though there were significant reason to veto this bill given what we have in this state.”
But Cupich said that on Thursday, there was little room for argument with the governor.
“He was fairly matter-of-fact in saying what decision he came to,” Cupich said. “I expressed my disappointment. I think that’s about it.”
Rauner’s decision angered a lot of people, including Illinois Lieutenant Gov. Evelyn Sanguinetti.
Late last week, Sanguinetti called the pro-abortion legislation a “political ploy” to divide the state. She also shared a very personal reason why she supports the right to life for unborn babies.
“As a pro-life Republican, I disagree with the Governor’s decision to sign HB 40,” Sanguinetti said. “I wouldn’t be here today if it weren’t for a 15-year-old refugee who chose to have me and keep me.”
The legislation likely will have devastating effects on unborn babies in Illinois.
Emily Troscinski, executive director of Illinois Right To Life, said the state once funded unrestricted abortions through Medicaid in the late 1970s, and taxpayers paid about $1.8 million for about 12,738 unborn babies’ abortion deaths at the time.
She predicted that state taxpayers will be forced to pay for as many as 12,000 unborn babies’ abortion deaths annually because of the legislation.
“House Bill 40 would undo a decades-old ban on taxpayer funding of abortion costing us thousands of lives a year,” Troscinski said.
According to the Pro-Life Action League, the bill also will keep abortion legal in the event that Roe v. Wade is overturned.
Furthermore, the Illinois State Assembly synopsis of the bill says the legislation will remove “language [from state law and policy] … that the unborn child is a human being from the time of conception and is, therefore, a legal person for purposes of the unborn child’s right to life.”
In October 2016, a Politico/Harvard University poll found that just 36 percent of likely voters supported taxpayer funding for abortions, while 58 percent opposed it. These findings are consistent with previous polls from various groups.
Interestingly, the poll also found that voters who make more than $75,000 were more supportive of forcing taxpayers to fund abortions (45 percent in favor), while those who make $25,000 or less were strongly against it (24 percent in favor).
ACTION: Complain to Gov. Rauner. Call Rauner at 217-782-0244. Or send him an electronic message here.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *