Saturday, December 1, 2018

Premature Baby Born at 21 Weeks is the Youngest Ever to Survive, Look at Her Now

 NATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   NOV 30, 2018   |   3:08PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Four-year-old Lyla Stensrud is a medical miracle.
The Texas preschooler is believed to be the youngest documented premature baby to ever survive, and today she is thriving at home with her family, NBC reports.
Four years ago in July 2014, doctors thought it was nearly impossible for her to survive. Lyla was born after 21 weeks and four days in the womb, weighing just 14.4 ounces, according to her mother’s blog.
Her mother, Courtney Stensrud, who recently opened up about their journey, said she hopes their story will give hope to other families with preemies.
In 2017, the journal Pediatrics highlighted the Lyla’s story but did not provide her name. The report hailed her as the youngest premature baby to survive.
Stensrud said her pregnancy with Lyla appeared normal until her 20 week ultrasound scan. She told NBC that she immediately knew something was wrong by the look on her OB-GYN’s face. Her doctor told her that her placenta was thinning and beginning to detach. She said she also developed an infection of the amniotic fluid called chorioamnionitis.
Several days later, Lyla was born.
Immediately afterward, Stensrud said she and her husband had to decide whether they wanted doctors to try to save their daughter. Some hospitals do not give families that option, but their San Antonio hospital did.
Here’s more from the report:
She had a few moments to research whether a baby born that early could live and knew it wasn’t possible.
LifeNews depends on the support of readers like you to combat the pro-abortion media. Please donate now.
“But when I was holding a live baby in my arms, I just absolutely thought she could survive. I felt it in my heart,” Stensrud said.
When [neonatologist Dr. Kaashif] Ahmad found out the pregnancy was estimated to be just 21 weeks and four days along, he quickly counselled her about the baby’s dire prospects. Infants delivered before 22 weeks’ gestation are too premature to survive, he said. Their lungs are so underdeveloped that it’s near impossible to deliver oxygen into their bodies.
Many micro-preemies also have long-term disabilities such as cerebral palsy, neurological problems and trouble with vision. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against resuscitating infants as premature as Lyla, arguing it is “not in the best interests of the child.”
But the Stensruds took a chance and prayed for a miracle.
“Although I was listening to him, I just felt something inside of me say, ‘Just have hope and have faith,’” she said. “It didn’t matter to me that she was 21 weeks and 4 days. I didn’t care. As he was talking to me, I just said, ‘Will you try?’ And he said he would, and [four] years later, we have our little miracle baby.”
Ahmad agreed to try, and Lyla responded well to the treatments.
“We put that super tiny tube down and it fit,” Ahmad told NBC. “If it had not fit, we wouldn’t have been able to resuscitate her. But she was just big enough.”
Later, they “placed her under an overhead warmer, we listened, and we heard her heart rate, which we were not necessarily expecting,” he said. “We immediately placed a breathing tube in her airway. We started giving her oxygen, and really pretty quickly, her heart rate began to rise. She very slowly changed colors from blue to pink, and she actually began to move and began to start breathing within a few minutes.”
Lyla spent four months in the hospital before she was well enough to go home. Today, despite doctors’ predictions, she does not have any medical issues. Her parents said she is a healthy, happy 4-year-old who attends preschool with other children her age.
Stensrud said she wants their story to bring hope to other parents of micro-preemies.
“The reason I’m doing these interviews — it’s not for me, it’s not for my daughter. It’s for that mother in antepartum who is frantically searching online — that she will have a little bit of hope and faith that she can have the same outcome,” she said.
She also hopes Lyla’s survival will convince other hospitals to re-think their policies about not resuscitating very premature infants. Research published in 2015 in the New England Journal of Medicine found that 23 percent of premature infants survive as early as 22 weeks of pregnancy, but some hospitals have policies against treating babies at this early age.
“Hospitals are known for having a policy in which they decide without accessing each individual situation what point resuscitation is allowed and most of those are well after 21 weeks,” Stensrud wrote on her blog. “My hope for the future and by way of this blog is to expel these policies!”

Approximately 900,000 Babies Killed in Abortions Every Year. 2,465 Babies Die Every Day

 NATIONAL   KATIE YODER   NOV 30, 2018   |   12:05PM    WASHINGTON, DC
Each year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) releases its Abortion Surveillance report during the media slump that is Thanksgiving. Regardless, the 2018 report — documenting U.S. abortion data for 2015 — garnered attention from media for a “historic low” of a “total of 638,169 abortions.” There’s just one problem: Three states declined to participate, and they potentially represent hundreds of thousands of abortions.
California, Maryland, and New Hampshire have repeatedly declined to report abortion numbers to the CDC. As Professor Michael J. New previously pointed out in National Review, “The CDC doesn’t have the authority to compel states to report abortion numbers and as a result, unsurprisingly, the data are incomplete.”
But the Guttmacher Institute, formerly associated with Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, helps fill in the gap. It lists abortion numbers for each state in 2014 — a year before the new CDC data.
For 2014, in California, “some 157,350 abortions were provided.” Maryland performed “some 28,140 abortions,” while New Hampshire had “some 2,540 abortions.” In total, those three states made up 188,030 abortions for 2014.
That number will likely shrink for 2015, if the Guttmacher Institute releases new abortion data for that year — just as the CDC’s abortion numbers declined from 2014 to 2015. From 2014 to 2015, the new CDC report recognized that the “total number of reported abortions decreased 2%,” along with the abortion rate and ratio. If the CDC’s 2% decline from 2014 to 2015 is applied to Guttmacher Institute’s 2014 abortion numbers, that means an estimated 184,269 abortions may not have been reported in 2015. That number represents nearly 29% of the nation’s abortions reported by the CDC in that year.
Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and the latest pro-life news.
But the percentage would decrease when applied to the Guttmacher Institute’s abortion data. In 2014, the Guttmacher Institute listed a total of 926,200 abortions after surveying “all U.S. facilities known or expected to have provided abortion services in 2013 or 2014,” while the CDC listed 652,639 abortions for that same year.
Again, looking at numbers from the same time period, from 2013 to 2014, the Guttmacher Institute showed a 3 percent decline in abortion when the CDC showed a 2 percent decline. If the same decline repeated for the Guttmacher Institute in 2015, as it did for the CDC, then an estimated 182,389 abortions from California, Maryland, and New Hampshire may not have been reported in 2015.
Both the CDC and the Guttmacher Institute admit data limitations and unfortunately leave Americans in the dark about the exact number of abortions per year. But even with the discrepancies — and the knowledge that one abortion is too many — the CDC’s reported 2 percent decline is still reason for hope that the country is moving in the right direction.
LifeNews Note: Katie Yoder writes for Newsbusters, where this originally appeared.

Ireland Votes to Allow Sex-Selection Abortions, Abortions on Babies With Down Syndrome

 INTERNATIONAL   MICAIAH BILGER   NOV 30, 2018   |   10:13AM    DUBLIN, IRELAND
Ireland is on its way to becoming one of the most pro-abortion countries in the world.
On Thursday, the Dáil continued to debate a bill that would legalize abortion for any reason up to 12 weeks of pregnancy and up to six months in a wide variety of circumstances. It would force taxpayers to pay for abortions and force Catholic hospitals to provide them. The bill also strictly limits conscience protections for medical professionals.
Lawmakers rejected a series of amendments this week that would have provided at least some protections for unborn babies. One amendment would have protected unborn babies from discrimination based on their sex or a disability like Down syndrome.
The Irish Times reports TDs voted 71 to 21 against the amendment after pro-abortion Health Minister Simon Harris claimed it was unnecessary.
“Terminating a pregnancy otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Bill is an offence which may be prosecuted. The legislation does not provide for termination of pregnancy to be carried out on the grounds of sex, race or disability,” Harris said.
But his bill does not prohibit the discriminatory abortions either. TD Michael Collins called out Harris’s “spin” and criticized the mainstream media for not fact-checked him on it.
Fellow TD Peadar Tóibín added, “[A] ten year old child studying a Venn diagram in school knows that if abortion is made available for every reason it is available for disability also within that Venn diagram.”
Even nearby England prohibits sex-selection abortions, but Ireland will not. Unborn baby girls particularly tend to be targets of sex-selection abortions, and some countries now are suffering from disproportionately high male populations as a result.
The Dáil also rejected another common-sense amendment that would have ensured babies who are born alive after failed abortions receive medical care, according to the report.
Here’s more:
Another amendment which sought to stipulate that a medical practitioner must take all steps to preserve the life of a foetus if it was born alive was defeated by 59 votes to 39.
Independent TD Michael Harty said the amendment was not practical because it was already the case that if a foetus was born alive, “medical ethics would kick in to give every assistance to that baby”.
But the so-called medical ethics that Harty referred to allow for the killing of babies inside the womb. With no law mandating that these babies be cared for if born alive, Ireland is opening the door for even more potential abuses. American medical workers have shared harrowing stories of babies born alive from botched abortions and left to die because there were no laws to protect them.
Meanwhile, hundreds of Irish pro-life doctorsnurses and midwives have been urging the health minister to meet with them to address a severe lack of conscience protections in the law. Without added protections, medical workers could be forced to help abort unborn babies or lose their jobs.
The bill would force Catholic hospitals and pregnancy centers to promote or provide abortions against their consciences as well. In September, Harris confirmed that Catholic hospitals will be forced to abort unborn babies, saying, “… conscientious objection is for individuals, not institutions.”
On Wednesday, Irish lawmakers also voted to force taxpayers to pay for all abortions in the country, despite strong public opposition.
An October poll by Amárach found that 60 percent of Irish residents oppose taxpayer-funded abortions. In addition, a full 80 percent say health care workers should not be forced to carry out abortions against their conscience.
Some pro-life TDs have said the legislation is much more extreme than what voters wanted when they chose to repeal the pro-life Eighth Amendment in May.
Debate on the bill and more amendments continues this week.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *