Friday, November 1, 2019

ISIS Spy Who Betrayed Al-Baghdadi Likely To Receive "All Or Part" Of $25 Million Bounty

The Islamic State militant who betrayed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was motivated by revenge, according to NBC News.
"I think he was under a lot of pressure from his family," Gen. Mazloum Abdi - commander of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, said in a detailed account of how he spent months handling the spy inside the inner circle of the terrorist organization's now-dead leader.
"His relatives were subjected to harsh treatment by ISIS and he no longer believed in the future of ISIS. He wanted to take revenge on ISIS and al-Baghdadi himself," added Abdi.
"He was, you could say, a security official," the general added. "A personal security official for al-Baghdadi himself, in charge of al-Baghdadi’s movements."
Part of the informant's job, Abdi said, was “securing the places” where al-Baghdadi would later hide.
This ISIS spy memorized the locations and layouts of al-Baghdadi’s safe houses and even stole samples of the world’s most wanted terrorist’s blood and clothing for DNA analysis, he said.
None of that was easy.
Al-Baghdadi took his security precautions to the highest level,” Abdi said. “He never used high-tech communications at all. Any place he was in, was in a communications blackout, with exception of those who were directly responsible for his security, and that was a small group of people.” -NBC News
"His direct family, the children, his relatives, his siblings, they are formed a tight ring around him," said Abdi, adding that the ISIS leader only allowed a small group of outsiders to meet with him - the spy being one of them.
What's more, the spy is likely to receive some or all of the $25 million bounty for al-Baghdadi's head according to the report.
"We confirmed that (al-Baghdadi) had been moved to Idlib in April of this year," said Abdi - who wouldn't reveal when or how his forces first made contact with the ISIS informant. Over the last five months, however, the relationship 'deepend and expanded dramatically' according to the report.
Idlib was an unlikely place for the ISIS leader to hide. The province is largely controlled by other Islamist groups, including one linked to al Qaeda that is often called the Al-Nusra Front. The group has, at times, fought against ISIS. Abdi said al-Baghdadi was hiding among a pocket of supporters, in what was largely unfriendly territory.
The idea that al-Baghdadi was in Idlib was completely unexpected,” Abdi said. “It was a surprise to everyone.
Idlib is a large province with a varied terrain, including hills, canyons, olive groves, and several large towns and cities. Abdi said the spy’s meetings in Idlib were frequent but inconsistent. Kurdish intelligence officials said the spy could not approach the ISIS leader at will, but had to wait to be called for meetings. The face-to-face meetings — ostensibly to talk about security, movements, transportation and setting up future safe houses — would turn out to be critical. -NBC News

In order to determine where exactly al-Baghdadi was staying in Idlib province, the spy had to rely on his senses and memory according to Abdi. Bodyguards for the ISIS leader would pick him up in a car or taxi. Because of his trusted position, he was one of the few al-Baghdadi visitors who did not have to wear a blindfold on the journey. He was simply asked not to look out the car windows.
"When they approached the area, they would ask him to lower his seat so he can't look around," said Abdi. "They asked him to lie down, to lower the seat in the taxi."
Even with the seat down, the spy was able to glean enough of the local topography to tell roughly where he was.
Once inside al-Baghdadi’s hideouts — and there were several, in close proximity to each other — the spy was able to look around freely, the general said.
He started memorizing the internal spaces and distinguishing structural features that could be seen from above, like a red water tank on a roof.
Those details, Abdi said, were fed constantly back to the Kurds and, through them, to American intelligence agencies, enabling U.S. aerial surveillance to pinpoint al-Baghdadi’s final hideout. The descriptions of the compound helped American commandos plan their assault.
He provided information about the house itself, the shape of the house and things to do with the house, the specifications of the house,” Abdi said. -NBC News
"We learned that there was a tunnel in the house," said Abdi. "We learned how many people in the house, how many guards were in the house. We learned the closest al-Nusra checkpoints near the house. We learned all the security details of the house."
US intelligence required proof, however, that the informant wasn't lying. In order to prove himself, the spy stole a pair of al-Baghdadi's underwear and, later, a blood sample to compare with known samples of the ISIS leader's DNA from when he had been in US custody in Iraq.
Abdi said the spy stole underwear roughly three months ago from a house al-Baghdadi had previously used and abandoned. He wouldn’t say how the blood was collected, only that it was taken about a month ago. Abdi said both DNA tests matched, proving the spy’s bona fides.
After that, the CIA took this more seriously,” Abdi said. “They began to work hard and serious on the highest level.”
Meanwhile, President Trump's decision to suddenly pull US troops out of northern Syria and Turkey's subsequent invasion meant that Kurdish-led forces had to shift their focus on defending themselves.
At the same time, al-Baghdadi was preparing to move locations yet again.
"Al al-Baghdadi had prepared a new house for himself in a different place located in the area of Dera al-Fraat (Jarablus area)," said Abdi. "That house was ready. I assume that within 48 hours he would have left the house to the new house, and the new house was completely different and wasn't known."
And while the spy was at the compound when US Special Forces attacked, "He was there and he returned safely with the American forces," according to Abdi.
Featured Image
shutterstock.com
Calvin FreiburgerCalvin FreiburgerFollow Calvin

NEWS

Texas school district to teach third graders about sodomy, condoms

AUSTIN, Texas, October 31, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – Despite heavy turnout from parents opposed to the plan, the Austin Independent School District voted Tuesday to approve a sex education curriculum that calls for teaching children as early as third grade how to engage in sodomy and put on condoms, that gender is “non-binary,” and more.
As detailed by Texas Values, the curriculum discourages gender-specific language like “mother” and “father” because it “can limit [children’s] understanding of gender into binaries,” encourages children to attend LGBT “pride” rallies and explore other ways to become LGBT “allies,” and proposes various role-play scenarios for children to act out in class, including lesbians deciding when to engage in oral sex and how to handle the aftermath of a drunken sexual encounter.
The material also contains detailed instructions on how to put on condoms, and even advice on “how to lower the chance of pain and make anal more enjoyable” without fear of “health issues.”
Todd Starnes and Church Militant report that more than a hundred members of the community descended on the school board meeting Monday evening to express concern.
“Who gave you the right, Austin ISD?” asked the father of a fifth-grade student. “You have overstepped.” Another parent called the curriculum an “attack on Christianity and family and on parental rights.” Concerned citizens read specific details from the curriculum, with resident Gary Moore calling the sexual role-play activities a “dream scenario for pedophiles.”
Critics were met with opposition by pro-LGBT protesters, some of whom attempted to use loudspeakers and instruments to drown them out. The school board itself largely dismissed community objections, signaling their position in advance with rainbow flags on their desks.
“If there are any kids actually watching this I want to tell them directly that they, you have heard a lot of hate tonight in this room,” Trustee Arati Singh declared at one point. The crowd reacted to the accusation by booing, which board president Geronimo Rodriguez dismissed by simply telling the audience that counselors were present for anyone who needed them.
“This vote by the Austin ISD Board sends a clear message: people of faith and traditional moral values are not welcome in Austin ISD,” Texas Values vice president David Walls said in response to the vote. “By passing this curriculum, Austin ISD has broken the sacred trust that parents put in their children’s schools. Austin ISD parents have no reason to entrust their children to a school district that weaponizes education to indoctrinate children into the LGBT political movement.”

FREE pro-life and pro-family news.

Stay up-to-date on the issues you care about the most. Sign up today!

Select Your Edition:

  

You can make a difference!

Can you donate today?


Share this article

CHINA Calls BIBLE “PORNOGRAPHY” And Then Does The Unthinkable!

Don’t Forget To Subscribe To Restricted Republic:
http://www.restrictedrepublic.com (Coupon Code “TRUTH” $7.99 monthly for 12 months)
Here’s the Video with the full story!  Don’t forget to subscribe and share!!
If you think you understand the depth and depravity of the Chinese Communist regime you are merely scratching the surface of what is one of the most demonic governments that has ever existed.  In this most recent event China has now declared the Bible “Pornography” and is taking every step possible to completely eradicate it!  The burning of Bibles, the demolition of Christian Churchs, the harvesting of organs…and yet, here in America, we have Companies, Celebrities and Athletes lauding their existence and supporting their political moves.  This is truly disgraceful not only for God but Country!
Watch the broadcast for all the information and thank you again for helping to spread the word about my Justus Knight Broadcasts!!
**Join Us At RESTRICTED REPUBLIC : SUBSCRIBE AT www.restrictedrepublic.com**
Coupon Code “TRUTH” Get’s You $7.99 monthly for 12 months!
As always, PLEASE HELP SHARE wherever you can; this broadcast truly deserves the awareness you help to assure it gets!  Your thumbs up and comments are always appreciated!!
God Speed and God Bless,
Justus
For More Information (references) See:
References Can Be Found At www.justusaknight.com (please subscribe while you’re there)
Special Call Out Links
Screen Shot 2019-10-29 at 6.21.06 PM
‘Videos Referenced:
None
Referenced Articles:



Categories: chinaNew World OrderReligion
Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

The Media Only Exists to Hate and Attack Republicans (The Democrats Only Exists to Hate & Attack God Fearing Americans Who Love and Support American Values and will not support Abortion on any Level. God Bless America Causes Democrats to Cringe in Fear.) 

 

6
The media doesn't exist as a newsgathering operation. It's a narrative engine. And the narrative is glorifying those on the Left and smearing those on the Right. The distinction between say, NBC News, and Twitter or the YouTube comments section is non-existent.
The only meaningful distinction is the amount of cash and resources the media has to push its excercises in contempt.
Take this NBC News garbage. Please. 
"Rudy Giuliani needed Apple genius help to unlock his iPhone after being named Trump cybersecurity adviser." - NBC News
This incredible expose reveals that Giuliani forgot his iPhone passcode. Incredible. Clearly he can't be a cybersecurity adviser. Because cybersecurity advisers never forget their passwords. Ever.
It's never happened.
That's actually the top cybersecurity expert qualification. Never forgetting a password.
So yes, this is a stupid, partisan cheap shot thinly disguised as a news story. It's also typical of what the media churns out these days.
It's a Twitter hot take expanded to full story size, with interviews and the other glittery tinsel of journalism thrown in, without the substance, and with no purpose except to promote a narrative of contempt toward the political opposition. And that is what the media is now for.
It's a 24 hour two minute hate.

Aaron Sorkin, Who Built His Career on Making Up Stuff About Politics, Claims Free Speech "Assaults Truth"

 

6
There's a certain kind of liberals involved in politics for whom The West Wing is the bible. It's the holy writ of how politics ought to be.
Aaron Sorkin's skill, from The West Wing to the Newsroom to the Social Network is making up stuff and making it seem like it's actually relevant to the real world. At his worst, as in The Social Network, he claims to be writing about reality when he doesn't even understand the subject. So of course he's the perfect person to be the face of the Left's insistence that Facebook censor conservatives.
Bizarrely, Sorkin begins by defending the fictional garbage that was The Social Network. "In 2010, I wrote “The Social Network” and I know you wish I hadn’t... I didn’t push back on your public accusation that the movie was a lie because I’d had my say in the theaters,"
What Zuckerberg didn't do was sue Sorkin, Sony, etc... or even ban ads for the movie from Facebook.
Rather than acknowledge that, Sorkin treats it as some form of validation and then demands that Facebook ban his political opponents.
"It was hard not to feel the irony while I was reading excerpts from your recent speech at Georgetown University, in which you defended — on free speech grounds — Facebook’s practice of posting demonstrably false ads from political candidates."
I have no idea what the 'irony' here is. Does Sorkin?
Zuckerberg called Sorkin's garbage pile of a movie a lie and let it go at that. That's free speech. That's what Sorkin is opposed to.
"I get a lot of use out of the First Amendment. Most important, it’s a bedrock of our democracy and it needs to be kept strong. But this can’t possibly be the outcome you and I want, to have crazy lies pumped into the water supply that corrupt the most important decisions we make together. Lies that have a very real and incredibly dangerous effect on our elections and our lives and our children’s lives."
If only the Framers had thought of that...
Crazy lies, whether they're Sorkin's or Warren's, are free speech. When they hurt somebody, that person may have a right to sue. But there should not be an infrastructure for censoring people because somebody, like say Sorkin or Zuckerberg, claims that they're lying.
Maybe the creator of the West Wing doesn't actually understand what the First Amendment is or why we have it?
Or what the alternative to it is.
Half of all Americans say Facebook is their main source of news. Of course the problem could be solved by those people going to a different news source, or you could decide to make Facebook a reliable source of public information.
As decided by whom?
The difference between free countries and non-free ones is that individuals decide things for themselves. That's what Aaron Sorkin is campaigning against.
And right now, on your website, is an ad claiming that Joe Biden gave the Ukrainian attorney general a billion dollars not to investigate his son. Every square inch of that is a lie and it’s under your logo. That’s not defending free speech, Mark, that’s assaulting truth.
Defending free speech means assaulting anyone's notion of an absolute truth that society must uphold through censorship.
Again, Aaron Sorkin has no idea what free speech is. His understanding of the First Amendment is that it should only apply to him and people he agrees with.
You and I want speech protections to make sure no one gets imprisoned or killed for saying or writing something unpopular, not to ensure that lies have unfettered access to the American electorate.
The former already happened. Preventing it requires allowing people to decide what they want to say and believe. 
The moment you toss that overboard, you open the door to the worst case scenarios. But you don't just defend free speech to head off the worst case scenarios. Once upon a time the ACLU knew that. Now it's become a curiously silent lefty hive group.
You prevent the worst case scenarios by fighting any incursion on freedom of speech.
You don't wait till guys like Sorkin decide that the lie emergency requires locking people up.
"I hope your C.O.O. walks into your office, leans in (as she suggested we do in her best selling book), and says, “How can we do this to tens of millions of kids? Are we really going to run an ad that claims Kamala Harris ran dog fights out of the basement of a pizza place while Elizabeth Warren destroyed evidence that climate change is a hoax and the deep state sold meth to Rashida Tlaib and Colin Kaepernick?”"
No mention of ,"Are we going to run ads claiming that President Trump is a Russian asset."
Because we all know that in Sorkintopia, some lies will be allowed and even protected.
Then, when she pushed you further, asking you if Facebook would or would not take down lies, you answered: “Congresswoman, in most cases, in a democracy, I believe people should be able to see for themselves what politicians they may or may not vote for are saying and judge their character for themselves.”
Now you tell me. If I’d known you felt that way, I’d have had the Winklevoss twins invent Facebook.
Does Sorkin really want to live in a country where he couldn't do that?
Does he really want an authority to be able to silence his lies? Or does he just want it to silence the people he hates?
 


 Share

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *