Sunday, February 2, 2020

Catholics making jaw-dropping claim about Protestant Trump vs. Catholic Biden (Are Democrats trying to Create a Religious War)

Print
When former Vice President Joe Biden was allegedly denied communion at a Catholic parish in South Carolina last October for his stance in favor of abortion rights, it sparked a debate over the Democratic presidential front-runner's Catholicism.
For conservative Catholics, it was a decision that the pastor in question made correctly.
Edward Peters, an expert in canon law, wrote an opinion piece for The Hill in which he said that "lest the enormity of abortion under Catholic moral analysis result in the impression that only a politician's support for abortion falls within canon law's notion of actionable 'grave sin,' note that many things can qualify as 'grave sin' and that, in Biden's case, other misdeeds could figure in a decision to withhold the sacrament.
"For example, in 2016 Biden capped many years of public support for same-sex marriage by officiating at such a ceremony between White House staffers while vice president, an act perceived as a deliberate thumb in the eye of the church for teaching that marriage can exist only between a man and a woman. Biden thus compounded his open conflicts with church teachings."
Cardinal Timothy Dolan -- inarguably America's pre-eminent Catholic -- emphasized the more liberal line.
TRENDING: 'Dog the Bounty Hunter' proposes to son's reported ex-girlfriend 7 months after wife Beth's death
While Dolan said he thought "that priest had a good point" and that Biden's stance was "publicly at odds with an issue of substance, critical substance ... about life and death in the church," he quoted the pope's stance on the matter:
“We also remember Pope Francis: ‘I personally can never judge the state of a person's soul.’ So, it’s difficult, that’s what I’m saying. I’m not there as a tribunal, as a judge in distributing Holy Communion."
All of which is to say that, within the church itself, there wasn't any debate as to whether Biden was upholding the tenets of Catholicism -- there was just a question as to whether he deserved to receive the sacrament of communion.
I would wager there were plenty of Catholics at the March for Life who would answer that question in the negative, given the fact that Fox News contributor Rachel Campos-Duffy said, when she attended the anti-abortion protest in Washington last week, she found more than a few who thought the current Protestant resident of the White House was a better Catholic than the Catholic running to replace him.
“Catholics were telling me [at the March For Life] that they thought Donald Trump was a better Catholic than Joe Biden,” Campos-Duffy told Todd Starnes on his radio show Monday.
Biden, for whatever it's worth, doesn't frequently take shelter behind the cross to duck criticism of his positions. The same can't be said for South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, another target of Campos-Duffy's ire.
It seems like no serious presidential candidate since the Rev. Pat Robertson's one-issue 1988 campaign has invoked the specter of the Almighty so often when answering weighty questions. The difference is you get the feeling Robertson actually meant it.
Buttigieg's invocation of his religious views comes across more as a challenge to his opponents to question his threadbare beliefs on policies with any kind of moral component to them. "I cannot abide by Donald Trump's take on <insert controversial policy here> because I have to answer to my Creator, sir."
Just don't ask him to answer to the deity so unequivocally when it comes to abortion.
At a town hall meeting on Sunday, Buttigieg was asked by the president of Democrats for Life (yes, Virginia, they do exist -- and, as National Review's Alexandra DeSanctis points out, they comprise roughly one-third of the party's membership) whether he would "support more-moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity, of inclusion, really does include everybody?”
The best summation of his position is this: “The best I can offer is that if we can’t agree on where to draw the line, the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line. And in my view, it’s the woman who’s faced with that decision in her own life."
Which sounds like a very roundabout way of saying, "Sorry, but inclusion isn't thatinclusive."
“As a Catholic, I know a lot of Catholics who say they’re pro-life, want to be pro-life, but continue to vote Democrat in this fantasy that somehow that tent is big enough for them,” Campos-Duffy told Starnes.
“Abortion animates the Democratic Party, and it is why Pete Buttigieg, who says he is a Christian, is willing to ignore the Scriptures that he is often quoting in order to not anger the forces of abortion within that party.”
This is why, quite frankly, a guy who hasn't even taken first Communion, much less confession, confirmation and matrimony, within the Catholic Church is potentially considered more Catholic than Joe Biden is, at least among a certain crowd.
Personal opposition to abortion is a non-negotiable litmus test for members of the Catholic faith.
It isn't that Biden thinks Roe v. Wade is the law of the land and that, while he finds it immoral, the 14th Amendment makes it clear that it's a necessary constitutional evil. People who believe that don't tweet stuff like this:
They also don't suddenly start supporting the Hyde Amendment, a piece of legislation that prohibits federal funding for abortion. Biden, under pressure from the ascendant left wing of the party, announced last July he wanted to repeal a law he'd supported throughout his political career.
“We’ve seen state after state including Georgia passing extreme laws,” Biden said, according to The Washington Post, referring to restrictions on when abortions could be performed. “It’s clear that these folks are going to stop at nothing to get rid of Roe.”
“Circumstances have changed,” he added.
How attempts to overturn Roe v. Wade necessitates taxpayer funding of abortion at the federal level escapes me, and while I don't claim to know the mind of the Almighty, I'm pretty sure it escapes His infinite wisdom, as well. It's no wonder there are plenty of Catholics willing to adopt Donald Trump as their own, at least when you consider the alternative.
I have no reason to believe that Biden and Buttigieg are lying about the fact they're men of faith out of matters of convenience. I also don't think the president is lying about it, either. At some point, all of us are going to meet the Great Scorer and our lives on earth will be judged accordingly.
I can't even begin to fathom a guess as to how it will go as a holistic matter for any of us. I'll venture a guess on two things, though.
First, when it comes to abortion, I believe the president and I will be on the right side of eternity, and Biden and Buttigieg won't be.
Second, I believe that, deep down, both Biden and Buttigieg know that, too.
If you agree with those two assumptions, I'll leave you with this closing thought:
If you're pro-life, especially if you're a Democrat, you should ask yourself why you would ever consider voting for men who would choose party and power over the unborn.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
Submit a Correction 
Print

U.S. churches divided over members packing heat

But survey finds most taking precautions in response to shootings

Print

(Image courtesy Pixabay)
Amid concern about high-profile shootings, most Protestant congregations have taken precautions to protect people who attend their services, but they are divided over members carrying weapons, according to a survey.
The survey by LifeWay Research found 80% of Protestant pastors say their church has some type of security measure in place when they gather for worship, the Baptist standard reported.
The paper noted that since 2000, 19 fatal shootings have taken place at churches. Armed attacks also have taken lives at Jewish synagogues, a Sikh temple and an Amish school.
TRENDING: 'Dog the Bounty Hunter' proposes to son's reported ex-girlfriend 7 months after wife Beth's death
"Churches are some of the most common gatherings in any community, and that makes them targets," said Scott McConnell, executive director of LifeWay Research. "Most churches understand this and have responded in some way."
While most churches have taken security precautions, there is debate over members carrying a weapon.
Nearly half of the pastors, 45%, say part of their security measures include having armed church members.
Combined with the percentages who say they have uniformed police officers or armed security personnel on site, 51% of the pastors surveyed intentionally have firearms at their worship services as part of their security measures.
The survey found 54% of evangelical pastors says they have armed church members while 34% of mainline pastors say the same. Half of pastors in the South (51 percent) and West (46 percent) has armed church members. But just 33% in the Northeast say they do.
The survey found 62% say their church has an intentional plan for an active shooter situation. The larger the church, the more likely it is to have made plans for a potential armed attacker.
And more than a quarter of churches have radio communication among security personnel.
Some churches focus on keeping all guns away from their worship services. The survey found 27% have a no-firearms policy and 3% percent have metal detectors to screen for weapons.
"While methods vary, most churches start with the resources they have to prepare for what they hope will never happen," McConnell said. "With planning, a church can be prepared without being distracted or paralyzed by the threat. Pastors are trying to balance two responsibilities — protect those on the inside, while being as welcoming as possible to those on the outside."
Researchers conducted a phone survey of 1,000 Protestant pastors from Aug. 30 to Sept. 24, 2019.
wnd-donation-graphic-2-2019
Submit a Correction 
Print

10 worst colleges for free speech, and Harvard makes list (When this used to be America)

'Our hope is that one day creating this list will be difficult'

Print
Harvard University (Pixabay)
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education's 2020 list of the 10 worst colleges for free speech includes one that fired a professor over an innocuous joke on social media and one that suspended a librarian for curating a historical display highlighting the university's own photos of its racist past.
FIRE's "worst-of-the-worst" list features both public and private colleges. The organization notes public colleges and universities are bound by the First Amendment, while private institutions are not. But they explicitly promise to respect student and faculty speech rights.
Here are the worst 10, presented in no particular order:
Babson College, Wellesley, Massachusetts
TRENDING: 'Jerry, Jerry, Jerry': Nadler steals last word from frustrated Schiff
Babson fired a professor over a private, satirical post on Facebook. Asheen Phansey was responding to President Trump's threat to bomb 52 Iranian sites, including cultural sites.
Phansey wrote: "In retaliation, Ayatollah Khomeni should tweet a list of 52 sites of beloved American cultural heritage that he would bomb. Um ... Mall of America? ... Kardashian residence?"
College administrators suspended Phansey pending an "investigation," saying the college "condemns any type of threatening words and/or actions condoning violence" and was "cooperating with local, state and federal authorities." Less than a day later, Babson concluded its "thorough investigation" and fired him.
In a letter to Babson on Jan. 9, FIRE argued Phansey’s post was clearly political hyperbole about an issue of public concern and did not constitute a "true threat” or "incitement."
Jones College, Ellisville, Mississippi:
Last spring, administrators and campus police twice stopped student Mike Brown from exercising his free speech rights when he tried to recruit fellow students for a campus chapter of the conservative group Young Americans for Liberty.
Brown was told he needed the college's explicit permission to speak on campus.
In September, FIRE helped Brown file a First Amendment lawsuit that was joined by the Justice Department arguing that Jones College's policies deny students their free speech rights. The policies require administrative approval, at least three days in advance, for any "meetings or gatherings" on campus.
A Justice Department statement said: "Such extreme preconditions to speech might not be out of place in Oceania, the fictional dystopian superstate in George Orwell's 'Nineteen Eighty-Four.' The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, however, ensures that preconditions like these have no place in the United States of America."
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts:
Harvard administrators removed a faculty dean for joining a criminal defense team, blacklisting its own students and more.
Professors Ronald Sullivan and Stephanie Robinson were removed as faculty deans of a residential house after students expressed outrage that Sullivan briefly joined Harvey Weinstein's criminal defense team, making students feel "unsafe."
The college also brought back a blacklist for students who join single-gender clubs, even off campus.
A few months ago, Harvard implemented a new speaker policy requiring that events deemed to involve "high profile, controversial speakers, or VIP guests" have a neutral moderator in place, supposedly to handle disruptions.
University of Scranton, Scranton, Pennsylvania:
Students seeking to start a registered chapter of the conservative group Turning Point USA on campus almost immediately faced obstacles.
Before the students even presented their proposal, the student government president said on social media "yikes, nope, denied" because of the group's viewpoint. The application ultimately was rejected.
The university was dismissive of FIRE's complaint to the institution's president of obvious viewpoint discrimination.
Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont:
Hours before controversial Polish scholar and politician Ryszard Legutko was set to speak on campus last April, administrators canceled the event, citing unsubstantiated "safety risks."
It wasn't the first time. In March 2017, a campus appearance by scholar Charles Murray led to violent protests, an injured professor and a canceled lecture. More recently, a student was notified he was being investigated for violating the college’s "Demonstrations and Protests Policy" and "Respectful Behavior Policy" after he engaged in heated questioning of CIA recruiters at an on-campus event. FIRE said that, to the college's credit, it quickly backed down and has since updated its demonstrations policy.
Long Island University Post, Brookville, New York:
Last spring, just three days before graduation, senior Jake Gutowitz was investigated by administrators for allegedly distributing "forbidden flyers"on campus some five months earlier.
Labeled "Common Sense" à la Thomas Paine, they contained parodies and poems criticizing LIU Post and its administrators, particularly President Kimberly Cline.
An administrator claimed an "anonymous student" reported seeing Gutowitz post the flyers on campus and reported him to campus safety officers. At an investigatory meeting, Gutowitz denied any involvement but was told he could expect a letter resolving the investigation by the end of the semester. He left the university and never received the letter, but FIRE said the probe of protected speech and failure to resolve the matter "has a lasting chilling effect on student expression."
University of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut:
Two students engaging in the common dare in which one says a taboo word and the other repeats it louder were recorded by a student. When he listened closely to the recording, he realized the students had used the word "nigger."
After the video went viral, campus police dug through surveillance video, analyzed Wi-Fi data and pulled up logs of the cards used to access campus buildings to identify the offending speakers. The two were charged with a criminal offense under a century-old statute outlawing race-based "ridicule" in commercial advertisements.
A First Amendment lawsuit brought by the students is pending.
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York:
Syracuse began the year by denying recognition to Young Americans for Freedom, finding the group's conservative ideology "inflammatory." The university demanded  that the group abolish its requirement that prospective members believe in the group's conservative values.
Syracuse closed the year by suspending all fraternity activities for the rest of the semester in response to an alleged racial incident, even though the university admitted that most, if not all, of the student groups had nothing to do with it. The allegation was the use of a racial slur by a non-fraternity member.
Last year, Syracuse suspended students of its Theta Tau engineering fraternity chapter for a private, satirical skit roasting their fellow members.
Doane University, Crete, Nebraska:
In April, the university investigated and suspended faculty librarian Melissa Gomis for curating a historical photo display called "Parties of the Past," consisting of photos selected from the university’s own archival photo collection. The display was intended to inspire discussion about the ongoing national debate surrounding offensive Halloween and party costumes, as well as a national effort to confront the history of blackface in universities' yearbooks.
After a student complained, Doane placed Gomis on leave and investigated her under a charge of "discriminatory harassment."
FIRE intervened, and Gomis has since been reinstated. But FIRE said Doane failed to meaningfully respond to the broader free-speech issues raised in the case.
Portland State University, Portland, Oregon:
After campus police canceled a socialist group’s meeting when an uninvited Patriot Prayer leader said he would show up, officers stood by while a single protester, armed with a cowbell, shut down a College Republicans meeting.
wnd-donation-graphic-2-2019
Submit a Correction 
Print

Limbaugh reveals REAL source of coronavirus and every American needs to take notice Is Rush right? ... Read more…


 
 
Web version
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. churches divided over members packing heat
 
With churches being natural targets for those on the dark side, believers are not on the same page when it comes to carrying guns to deal with shooters ... Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10 worst colleges for free speech, and Harvard makes list
 
You knew Harvard would be on this ignominious list, but what about these other nine schools that are gagging young Americans? ... Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senators charge Horowitz report 'misleading' because it conflicts with the facts
 
Lawmakers demand to see four footnotes that never have been revealed ... Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Catholics making jaw-dropping claim about Protestant Trump vs. Catholic Biden
 
Spoiler: Trump's also a better president than Biden would ever be. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Still Winning: Trump Signs Major Deal as Impeachment Drags On
 
'Everybody said this was a deal that could not be done, but we got it done,' Trump said. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rand Paul hits John Bolton with massive accusation
 
Sen. Paul was clearly furious as he leveled these charges. Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Who will we vote for in a post-Trump America?
 
In my column four weeks ago, I admonished the reader to take into account the recent deportment of liberal Democrats and the deteriorating political climate over the last 12 years... Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kobe, Mahomes and 'unwoke' blacks
 
As African Americans in the public eye have come to learn the hard way, independence of thought is neither encouraged nor welcomed by the progressive community. No two athletes of... Read more…
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conservative Great Britain: BREXIT – finally
 
This past week, the historic Brexit milestone deal was signed in London by U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson. What a Churchillian moment for the prime minister, having fought for years... Read more…
 
 
 

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *