Thursday, July 2, 2020

Sheriff: I'll deputize gun owners if violent protests erupt

GREEN COVE SPRINGS, Fla. (AP) — A Florida sheriff says he will deputize every gun owner in his county to put down any violent protests his deputies can't handle alone.
Clay County Sheriff Darryl Daniels gave no indication in a three-minute videoreleased Wednesday that any demonstrations are planned in his suburban Jacksonville county. Daniels also said he would protect any peaceful protests, but added that if anyone starts “tearing up Clay County, that is not going to be acceptable.”
“If we can't handle you, I'll exercise the power and authority as the sheriff and I'll make special deputies of every lawful gun owner in the county and I'll deputize them to this one purpose: to stand in the gap between lawlessness and civility,” said Daniels, sporting a white cowboy hat as he stood in front of 18 deputies.
Daniels, who is African American, said in the video that his department has a “great relationship” with its residents, but “if you come to Clay County and think for one second we'll bend our backs for you, you're sadly mistaken.”
AdChoices
Slideshow preview image
 
70 PHOTOS
Anti-racism protests across the U.S.
SEE GALLERY
“The second you step out from up under the protection of the Constitution, we'll be waiting on you and give you everything you want: all the publicity, all the pain, all the glamour and glory for all that five minutes will give you."
Daniels, a Republican finishing his first term, is being challenged by six opponents in the upcoming election. He is under investigation by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement after his former employer, the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office, announced last year that he'd had an affair with a co-worker when he was running its jails. Daniels, who is married, was accused of later having the woman falsely arrested. He issued an apology, but said he wouldn't discuss specifics.

Russian referendum allows Putin to remain in power until 2036

Russian president Vladimir Putin could remain in office until 2036 after the Kremlin announced Wednesday that voters had approved changes to the Russian constitution, the Associated Press reported.
This Russian vote wasn’t quite as rigged as Putin’s 2018 reelection, but still featured its share of physical ballot box stuffing, suspect protections against voter fraud and suspiciously high turnout, according to independent observers.
Putin, 67, didn’t even need the referendum to implement the 206 constitutional changes, as Russia’s legislature approved them back in mid-March. But the horse-riding strongman wanted to show that he had the people behind him as well.
Then he had a problem: he scheduled the referendum for April 22, then botched the country’s response to the coronavirus pandemic and postponed it until July 1.
Polls were open all week to allow for staggered voting during the pandemic, the AP reported. Each day during the election, at least 1,000 new COVID-19 cases were identified in Russia.
The vote went on nonetheless, with some ballot boxes placed in car trunks, on tree stumps and in playgrounds among other less-than-secure locations, according to the AP. Putin’s popularity has declined to its lowest level in 20 years (59%) because of his bungled pandemic response, independent pollsters found, but he still cruised to victory.
Kremlin officials announced relatively early Wednesday that 73% of voters had approved the changes, CNN reported. The numbers were mostly based on Siberian results and came while polls in Moscow and St. Petersburg were still open, but the official percentage barely budged after more votes were counted.
AdChoices
Slideshow preview image
 
24 PHOTOS
Putin throws military parade
SEE GALLERY
Demonstrators, protesting Putin’s continued rule and questioning the legitimacy of the election, laid down in Moscow’s Red Square and spelled out the numbers “2036,” according to CNN. The protesters were briefly detained and not charged with crimes, according to independent Russian media.
The referendum resets Putin’s presidential term limit, allowing him to pursue reelection when his current term ends in 2024. Previously, Russian presidents were permitted to serve two six-year terms before stepping aside.
Putin already dodged this restriction once by becoming Prime Minister from 2008-2012 while his crony Dmitry Medvedev served as President. Putin has been running the country in some form since 1999.
The Kremlin did not push this message while encouraging (or forcing) people to vote, according to the AP. Instead, officials focused on popular policies like banning same-sex marriage and ignoring international law. The new term limit rules were barely mentioned.
Putin has not committed to running for president again in 2024 (or 2030). He would be 84 years old in 2036.

Court lifts ban on tell-all book by Trump's niece

NEW YORK (AP) — A New York appeals court cleared the way Wednesday for a publisher to distribute a tell-all book by President Donald Trump’s niece over the objections of the president’s brother.
The New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division said it was lifting a temporary restraint that a judge put on Simon & Schuster a day earlier that sought to block distribution of “Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man.”
Although the book was scheduled to be published on July 28, Simon & Schuster said thousands of copies of the 75,000-copy first run of the book had already been sent to bookstores and others.
The appeals ruling, written by Judge Alan D. Scheinkman, left in place restraints against Mary Trump, the book's author and the president's niece, after the president's brother, Robert Trump, said she agreed with family members not to write about their relationships without permission.
Robert Trump had sued Mary Trump to block publication of a book promoted to contain an “insider’s perspective” of “countless holiday meals,” “family interactions" and “family events.”
An email seeking comment was sent to Robert Trump's lawyer Wednesday. The appeals court noted it was ruling after hearing oral arguments from lawyers for Mary Trump and Simon & Schuster and before lawyers for Robert Trump submitted opposition papers.
Scheinkman left in place a restraint that blocked Mary Trump and any agent of hers from distributing the book, but the court made clear it was not considering the publisher to be an agent, though that issue could be decided in further proceedings at the lower court.
“The evidence submitted is insufficient for this Court to determine whether the plaintiff is likely to succeed in establishing that claim," the appeals court said in an opinion written by Judge Alan D. Scheinkman.
In court papers, the publisher said it was not aware of an agreement between Mary Trump and her relatives until she was sued.
AdChoices
In a statement, Simon and Schuster said it was gratified with the ruling, which it said would let Mary Trump tell her story. The publisher said the book was of “great interest and importance to the national discourse that fully deserves to be published for the benefit of the American public."
It added: “As all know, there are well-established precedents against prior restraint and pre-publication injunctions, and we remain confident that the preliminary injunction will be denied."
Mary Trump's lawyer, Theodore Boutrous Jr., said in a statement it was “very good news that the prior restraint against Simon & Schuster has been vacated." He added that he believed a similar finding was necessary for Mary Trump, “based on the First Amendment and basic contract law.”
In ruling, Scheinkman said people are free to negotiate away their First Amendment rights, especially if they are compensated well, which Robert Trump maintains that she was.
But he noted that “while parties are free to enter into confidentiality agreements, courts are not necessarily obligated to specifically enforce them."
The judge wrote that “whatever legitimate public interest there may have been in the family disputes of a real estate developer and his relatives may be considerably heightened by that real estate developer now being President of the United States and a current candidate for reelection."
He added: “Stated differently, the legitimate interest in preserving family secrets may be one thing for the family of a real estate developer, no matter how successful; it is another matter for the family of the President of the United States."
____
Associated Press writers Michael Balsamo in Washington and Jennifer Peltz in New York contributed to this story.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *