Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Long Thought a Relic of the Past, Pickpocketing Returns to New York Along With Migrants Pickpocketing is ‘seen as income redistribution’ by the district attorney’s office, a former police commissioner says. ‘Police know it’s not going to be prosecuted.’

 

Long Thought a Relic of the Past, Pickpocketing Returns to New York Along With Migrants

Pickpocketing is ‘seen as income redistribution’ by the district attorney’s office, a former police commissioner says. ‘Police know it’s not going to be prosecuted.’

Getty Images
Pickpocketing is making a comeback at New York City. Getty Images

Pickpocketing is back in business in the Big Apple. It’s a crime that many New Yorkers long ago forgot about, but formal complaints are rising and migrant pickpocketing crews are making their presence known. The misdemeanor is making a comeback.

There have been 781 pickpocketing complaints this calendar year as of June 9, the New York Police Department tells the Sun. At the same time last year, that number stood at 650 complaints — and those are just the incidents that are reported to the police.

The pickpockets have “emanated from South America,” particularly from “schools in Colombia that teach this,” a former police commissioner of New York City, Raymond Kelly, tells the Sun.

“There is a core group of people that do this,” and the problem has been “augmented by migrants,” Mr. Kelly says. Even as the problem grows, it often goes unreported because people think they simply lost their wallets, he adds.

The pickpockets, though, are less skilled than those of the past, Mr. Kelly says, which makes one wonder why the crime is a growing problem. A key part of the answer, he explains, lies in the prosecutions — or lack thereof.

Raymond Kelly on May 28, 2017, at Montauk, New York.
Raymond Kelly on May 28, 2017, at Montauk, New York. Eugene Gologursky/Getty Images for DuJour
New York’s district attorney, Alvin Bragg, “has put out his manifesto on day one: ‘Decarceration is the way to go’ is his mantra,” Mr. Kelly says.

Pickpocketing is “seen as income redistribution” by the DA’s office and the city council, Mr. Kelly says. “Police know it’s not going to be prosecuted,” he says.

Prosecutors are “declining to pursue cases because they know the barrier is high and the burden is on them,” the director of policing and public safety at the Manhattan Institute, Hannah Meyers, tells the Sun. When cases are declined for prosecution, they aren’t counted in the crime data.  

Pickpockets, among other offenders, know the prosecutors have stopped going after them, thus lessening “deterrence for low-level felonies and misdemeanors,” Ms. Meyers says. 

“There are no consequences for virtually anything these days,” Mr. Kelly says. “Over 50 percent of felonies presented” to Mr. Bragg “have been downgraded to misdemeanors.”

The problem goes back to reforms to the discovery statute of the city’s criminal procedure law. The new rules, which went into effect in January 2020, “put the burden on the prosecutor” by requiring “every piece of information” before trial, Ms. Meyers says.

Police “can no longer arrest and arraign on the spot,” and instead must issue desk appearance tickets, Ms. Meyers says, creating another barrier to punishing misdemeanors. The problem is multiplied by public rhetoric that minimizes property crime, she adds. 

One potential solution is known as broken windows policing. The strategy involves punishing low-level crimes with an eye on preventing serious ones. It creates a “positive feedback deterrent effect,” Ms. Meyers says.

The concept of “broken windows” dates back to a 1982 article by George Kelling and James Wilson in which they claim that a criminal will be more likely to loot a building with a broken window than one without. Mayor Giuliani and a former police commissioner, William Bratton, put the theory into practice and popularized it by cracking down on New York City’s petty crime in the 1990s.

Broken window policing went out of style under Mayor de Blasio. The combination of discovery reform and elimination of cash bail for most misdemeanors in 2019 marked an even greater shift away from the concept.

“It’s bad for the community, families, and the victims,” Ms. Meyers says of the shift to not prosecuting minor offenses. “It breaks down the fabric of trust among citizens.”

“I don’t think it’s going to change in the short term,” Mr. Kelly says when asked if he has hope for reductions in pickpocketing. “Change can only take place if elections happen,” such as in “the anti-police city council and DA office.”

Commenting is available to paying subscribers only. Comments are reviewed and, in some cases, edited before posting. To be approved, comments must be civil, accurate, grammatically correct, and substantive or newsworthy. Personal criticisms of individuals will not be published.

Join The New York Sun

‘De Niro Principle’: Bad For Debate, Bad For Voters, Bad For America As is becoming squirmingly evident, De Niro's analytical acumen and political strategizing don't quite measure up to his silver-screen legacy. Photo of Steve Pauwels June 11, 2024

 

‘De Niro Principle’: Bad For Debate, Bad For Voters, Bad For America

As is becoming squirmingly evident, De Niro's analytical acumen and political strategizing don't quite measure up to his silver-screen legacy.

Perhaps, going forward, we should label it “The De Niro Principle”: the observation that an individual can be immensely talented in one, narrow area while proving himself ham-fisted in lots of others.

I’m speaking, of course, of film star Robert De Niro.

The attention-snagging skills the 80-year-old actor has demonstrated for over half a century in moviedom? Difficult to deny. Alas, as is becoming squirmingly evident, De Niro’s analytical acumen and political strategizing don’t quite measure up to his silver-screen legacy.

Routinely over the past several years, and with increasing frequency as Election Day 2024 looms, the Tinsel-Town tough-guy has been pugnaciously turning up in the spotlight to scathe, snarl, and spew at former President Donald Trump. Two weeks ago, for instance, he made an appearance (alongside the Biden Campaign’s Communications Director(!) Michael Tyler) mere blocks away from the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse in which Trump’s Stormy Daniels/hush-money trial was being adjudicated.

The Daily Wire‘s Tim Pearce writes:


President Joe Biden’s campaign held an event outside the courthouse … The Biden campaign invited De Niro, a vocal critic of the former president, to speak. De Niro denounced Trump and claimed the American system of government is at stake in the 2024 election.

“Under Trump, this kind of government will perish from the Earth. … If Trump returns to the White House, you can kiss these freedoms goodbye that we all take for granted,” De Niro said, “And elections? Forget about them. That’s over, that’s done. If he gets in, I can tell you right now, he will never leave. … You know that.

“That’s why I’ve joined the Biden-Harris campaign, because the only way to preserve our freedoms and hold on to our humanity is to vote for Joe Biden for president, … Really – we don’t have a choice.”

Good grief. “Perish from the earth”? “Only way to preserve our freedoms”? “He will never leave”? “Hold on to our humanity”? 

Grab the smelling salts!

What’s the movie icon’s next project? Is he auditioning for the role of hysterically overheated activist?

Not long before his courthouse foray, the Godfather 2 alum guested on mid-morning gab-fast The View where he disgorged another hyperbolic polemic: De Niro wearisomely lumped in Donald Trump with Hitler and Mussolini; elegantly accused the presumed Republican candidate’s supporters of wanting to “f*ck with the rest of the country”; and advised the Trump campaign’s slogan ought to be “F*ck America”. He predicted, “If he wins the election, it’s over.”

Recall back in 2018, in an unappetizing foretaste of things to come, De Niro launched a Tony Awards appearance before a packed house of fellow creatives by bellowing “F*ck Trump”. Twice! The second time with militantly upraised fists! (Did De Niro’s buddy Martin Scorsese direct that obscenely theatrical bit?)

Don’t miss the predictable De Niro markers in the above: the slovenly — and possibly counterproductive — descent into profanity; the disheveled reasoning and rhetoric (lazily tossing around dictator allusions: Hitler! Mussolini!); the hair-on-fire tone.

True enough, RD has made a name for himself over the decades by compellingly performing for ticket-buying audiences. Some of my fellow conservatives deride his deftness in front of the camera — and, respectfully, I believe they’re wrong. The man’s gifts as an actor are copious. Some of his detractors are allowing understandable resentments of his blared viewpoints to skew acknowledgement of his artistry.

That aside, why should the average American otherwise care a fig for the the Oscar-winner’s skewering opinions? Who says cinematic sizzle reflexively translates into political perspicacity?

Granted, De Niro has as much right to ventilate his convictions — even to spray his venom — as does the plumber next door, the financial investor, the homemaker, the — ahem – “taxi-driver”, the conservative shopkeeper or the Leftist waitress. The hard-to-miss difference is few, if any, of these “regular” folks would be afforded a platform across the street from a history-making trial; holding forth before a clutch of microphones, television cameras, and media types; the whole staging broadcast, literally, around the globe.

And yet, so much of the general populace sits spellbound before his hyperbolic sneerings … because he’s Robert De Niro, after all.

Principles of Logic warn against what is called ” The Genetic Fallacy” — which occurs when “a claim is ignored or given credibility based on its source rather than the claim itself.” I suppose “The De Niro Principle” would qualify as a tributary of the “Genetic Fallacy”: Oh, that entertaining movie chap is saying unflattering things about Trump. They must be true!

In a sense, much of celebri-philia is an offshoot of the “Genetic Fallacy”.  Whether we’re considering film or TV personae, musicians, athletes, or social media “influencers”, automatically crediting the judgments of anyone simply because he/she is a readily recognized public figure is a pulpy-headed way to approach decision-making. I see him on TV so I agree with him! She sings well — she must be wise! His website is popular — I gotta trust him!

Voilà! “The De Niro Principle” in action.

The ironic piece is, here and there, some of De Niro’s gripes may have a kernal of merit to them. Joe Biden is an unalloyed catastrophe as president; but, in my book, there’s much to knock in his 78-year-old GOP rival as well (Trump’s calls for “revenge”, childish outbursts and generally low character, backtracking on pro-life, softness for the LGBTQ lobby, etc.) Still, the Raging Bull star’s unhinged, anti-“Orange Man” mania could almost persuade a thoughtful Trump critic to reconsider his misgivings. If a frothing Hollywood-type can be so irresponsibly, off-the-rails alarmist regarding Donald Trump, while commending Joe Biden — diminished. blundering Joe Biden! — as the solution? Well, could it be all Trump’s faultfinders are similarly misguided?

Sometimes it’s enthusiasts on the political/cultural Right who unreflectively buy into every utterance of professional, publicity-hungry Trump apologists. Among their “Get-Trump-Whatever-It-Takes” opposite numbers? It’s not uncommon for every Leftist eructation to be met with undiscerning acceptance. In either case, indulgence of “The De Niro Principle” makes for an uniformed, weak-minded, undiscriminating citizenry. And it’s guaranteed to only exacerbate the kill-or-be-killed atmosphere lately transforming America into a facsimile of another De Niro production: the gruesome cornfield execution scene near the end of 1995’s mob flick Casino.

ICE Arrests 8 Alleged ISIS Terrorists That Team Biden Had Released Into Major Cities They crossed the border and were immediately released into America Wes Walker June 12, 2024

 

ICE Arrests 8 Alleged ISIS Terrorists That Team Biden Had Released Into Major Cities

They crossed the border and were immediately released into America

These terrorists were arrested in several major blue cities and one was talking about making a bomb.

If this isn’t already a BIG part of the campaign by Republican candidates in the affected cities it should be.

Anyone still doubting that Biden’s party has put their own agenda over the safety and wellbeing of ordinary Americans need look no further than this story:

Six Russian nationals suspected to have terror ties to ISIS have been arrested in a coordinated sting operation spanning Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia, The Post can exclusively reveal.
Two ICE sources confirmed to The Post they arrested the six people, who hail from Tajikistan, over the last week after the FBI contacted the agency to warn it.
Two others who were part of the same group were also arrested after being under surveillance for “several months” by a multi-agency Joint Terrorism Task Force, according to NBC.
Part of the investigation featured a wiretap which revealed one of the now-arrested individuals was talking about bombs, the sources said. — NYPost

Here is Bill Melugin talking about the arrest…



And giving some helpful historical context.

Tulsi asked the obvious question:

Remember how Chris Wray told us in a hearing that there was an elevated risk of terrorists targeting America?

With that risk on the table, what possible excuse does the White House offer for allowing thousands of unvetted people to come in every day?

The Wildman Devotional: A 50 Day Devotional for Men

Dear Warriors. The Wildman Devotional: A 50 Day Devotional for Men will fuel your inner wildman with solid meat from the scripture. In these 200+ pages, you’ll feast on the wealth, the walk, and the warfare of the Christian that’ll prepare you for maximum usefulness on this side of the grave. This book is fire! A great gift for all the men in your life. BTW, women will love this devotional as well.

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *