Where are the Feminists?
While the Taliban barbarically repress women in Afghanistan, toxic feminists wage a war against American men.
65 comments
Freedom Center Shillman Fellow Bruce Bawer’s excellent Frontpage article "Where Are the Gays?" paints a chilling portrait of the imminent torture, execution and amputations that await gay men under Taliban rulership in Afghanistan. And, of course, western gays are silent. Many are too busy hooking up on multiple sex apps. Many have never been concerned with rights that extend beyond the erogenous zones of their genitalia, and several are too busy celebrating the pedophilia presented in the best-selling young adult pornographic novel, Jack of Hearts (and Other Parts), as a moral victory over heteronormative patriarchy.
The majority of sex-addicted gay men live in a curated silo where drugs, hook-ups, flaunting open relationships, and chasing youth and beauty supersede condemning the horrific agenda of the Taliban -- an agenda that will no doubt transport Afghanistan back to the Dark Ages.
A reader suggested that a better article would be named: "Where Are All The Feminists?" Given the plight of women under the Taliban when they ruled Afghanistan from 1996-2001, feminists should be concerned about the repression of the rights of individual women in that country. This concern should extend to the current resurgence of child marriage of young teenage girls to Taliban soldiers.
No, feminists in America will not be criticizing the Taliban, just as neither they nor gays in America have dared criticize the brutal treatment of women and gays under the governance of Hamas in Gaza. Feminists in this country are too consumed with another task: the destruction of the American male, who is seen as the producer of imperialism, “racist capitalism,” and systemic racial and gender oppression. This is their obsession. The destruction of the American male supersedes moral concern for the wanton annihilation of human lives in other countries. They will not speak out against the Taliban because they hate America and American men more than they care about the rights of any individual singled out as a target for discrimination based on membership in a demonized group.
As we hurtle towards a possible post-American future, this new breed of feminists, a phalanx of zealots, has forged fourth-wave feminism, and it’s far more rabidly anti-male than previous iterations of the ideological movement. You’d think because of its petty maliciousness and deranged radicalism, its appeal would be narrowly limited to the faculty lounges of liberal arts colleges. Yet since the inception of the #MeToo movement, the crazed foot soldiers of fourth-wave feminism managed not only to take their worldview mainstream, but also to put a headlock on the commanding heights of American culture. This is as impressive as it is terrifying.
These new man-haters are seething with toxic feminism, and the further spread of their noxious sentiment could likely spell the death of our country as we know it. Increasingly prevalent is their practice of exploiting female agency and identity to make blanket attacks on men, to neuter manliness, and to advocate for the end of masculinity. These goals are being achieved while simultaneously promulgating the dual concepts that men are by nature nefarious and that female advancement can only come through the wholesale annihilation of heteronormative constructs of maleness. The destructive consequences for relationships at every level of society—from the simple couple to the community to the nation—will be vast and irreparable.
The New Misandry, as I call it, arose out of the more extreme versions of second-wave feminism. Proponents of this form of feminism, such as Gloria Steinem and Kate Millett, Valerie Solanas (author of SCUM—Society for Cutting up Men) and Carol Hanisch, began the process of speaking to the irrelevance of men to women’s life and society in general. Steinem’s famous dictum, “a woman needs a man the way a fish needs a bicycle,” spoke to the changing cultural attitudes towards men that regarded them as disposable, annoying, and of having nuisance value only. Third-wave feminism, beginning in the early 1990s, saw a rise in affluent middle-class women influenced by Anita Hill who wielded their agency in strategic ways to exact a revenge against all men in the ways in which they imagined a malevolent, collectivist male psyche had inflicted irreparable damage on all women. Fourth-wave feminism, which arose in the 2010s, gained traction with the creation of the #MeToo Movement. This form of feminism is the most toxic brand we find in the history of feminism. With full malice aforethought, its adherents depict masculinity as inherently toxic, and claim that only the abolition of maleness will result in the creation of an egalitarian world for women.
The #MeToo Movement started out with noble intentions of addressing harassment claims of women that were not being adequately addressed in the legal system. It quickly morphed, however, into a male-bashing movement that sought to strip men of their agency and dignity, and engaged in a social eugenics program encroaching on all spheres of life—from abolishing the swimwear category in beauty pageants on the grounds that it was sexist, to attempting to cancel the James Bond movie franchise on the grounds that Bond represented old-fashioned sexist stereotypes of women that were degrading and eviscerative of female dignity. It quickly created a toxic culture in which an accusation of male harassment was sufficient to introduce the presumption of guilt on the part of the man. We say this in the case of Christine Blasey Ford and other women who tried to destroy the life and career of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. No compelling evidence was ever offered, just hyperbolic testimony based on hazy recollections of incidents that allegedly happened decades ago and that were never reported when they allegedly happened.
Their goal is to neuter young boys from K-12 by abolishing gender, and by queering the identity of young boys from as early as those in the 3rd grade.
Such feminists have been aided by weak and purposeless Beta-males. Governed by a “gynocentric paradigm,” they have supported the congeries of woke anti-male progressives for several reasons, ranging from political expediency to poor self-esteem.
The #MeToo Movement, the mother of fourth-wave feminism, is an insidious, Marxist-inflected, social eugenics organization bent on reshaping the sensibilities of men. Toxic femininity’s collusion with a particular kind of male gives us a look at the deeper crisis in masculinity which has created a new and rather ghastly phenomenon: the neutered Beta-male. This man has allowed himself to be eviscerated of his male pride, his manliness, his masculine virtues, and the sense of massive empowerment he ought to feel in the enjoyment of his values. He feels a deep-seated hatred for real men whom he envies largely because they have never sold out to the ways in which toxic feminists and the larger culture have attempted to re-socialize them into being feminine men. These neutered Beta-males are parasitic social ballasts who feed off toxic female power. They collude with such women to bring down real men to radically change the world. More important, their only experience of manliness comes from a weak collusion with women to destroy men who are stronger than they are. The cruel irony is that toxic feminists do not respect such men. They simply use them as pawns in politically expedient ways to serve their ends to end the patriarchy, male assertiveness, and a world in which men lead. We may describe such men as constituting a confederacy of gender-quitters—traitors against their own sex.
Now, more than ever, men—who built Western civilization and, for the most part, do the dirty work of its upkeep—are regarded as expendable, and by their very nature, an existential threat to the planet itself. Against these attacks laden with presumption of guilt, we see that civilizational longevity, economic prosperity, and human flourishing are all irrevocably tied to manliness. To be manly is not just healthy, it is moral, for it creates the ethical space out of which our sense of purpose and identity arises.
What we need to help counter this morally narcissistic form of feminism is a celebration of manliness—specifically working-class manliness—into mainstream culture. Working class men are paragons of male pride. They seek no one’s approval or permission to express their singularity, and their unabashed manliness. They aspire to glory through heroic deeds, and they often risk their lives to save and vindicate those of others. They assert their virtue over authority, and they have a strong respect for meritocracy. They may be defeated, but they are never destroyed. They are men of action who take risks as a way of life. Such men elicit admiration in a simplicity they possess. It is one forged in the crucibles of an attitude that desires to leave the world a better place than they found it through grit, resilience, honor, tenacity, and perseverance. Unlike compassion which invites us to look down on those towards whom we feel pity, admiration is a command to look up to those in control.
Toxic feminists such as Anita Hill, Gloria Steinem, Pauline Harmange, and others rely on one advantage: the Sanction of the Victims. Men who are psychologically victimized by such feminists rarely if ever speak out in radical defense of themselves, let alone their masculine natures. Their silence suggests guilt which implies wrongdoing. This in turn grants such women a coercive monopoly on the moral narratives to indict men and, further: to stamp themselves with the imprimatur of innocence. Men have too often been socialized to feel that they are somehow bad as men and exist as a problem to be solved. These toxic feminists take advantage of this moral weakness in men who are unable to inoculate themselves against the often-baseless accusations of women. Such men are presumed guilty by accusation alone. Morally neutral male behavior that is derived from masculine culture—a kind of bawdiness and raunchiness in general—is construed as damaging to the agency of women. Rather than defend their primal raunch and rambunctiousness and entreat women to be strong in their resolve, men instead resort to lame apologies, silence, moral atonement, acts of contrition and redemption.
Returning to Bruce Bawer’s initial question: the majority of sex-addicted gays and man-hating fourth-wave feminists are, in the end, irrelevant. The real question is: where are the real men—in the USA and in Afghanistan? Real men don’t surrender without a fight or, in the case of the Afghan President, Ashraf Ghani, abandon his military and his people and run in hiding at the first advance of these vicious trolls.
What we need are ways to fight the toxic feminism that aims to cripple the decisiveness of real men along with their heroic and warrior nature. This involves a comprehensive guide to taking out one of the most potent heads of the identity politics hydra. Toxic feminism is a form of identity politics that trades on a univocal victim status to inflict punishment on men in general for the sheer thrill of garnering power over them.
1) Men will first have to construct masculinity on their terms. It will be non-negotiable, and women will have to accept it as one would the invariability of the laws of nature. This is not to imply that men will not make concessions in their relationships with women for mutual advantage. It is to suggest that masculine construction, per se, is the business of men—not that of women.
2) Men must accept that human male leadership is a role that is an inherent one in nature. They must come to rid themselves of any guilt and shame they feel from exercising leadership. They must see it as their birthright and part of their natural constitution.
3) Men must learn to say No. No to toxic feminism. Silence is not an option. Mere assertion of one’s masculinity is a necessary condition for fighting toxic feminism, but it is not a sufficient one. Men must point out the emotional poison, the moral impotence, and the intention to annihilate male potency that lies behind toxic feminism.
4) Men must use their masculine agency as an ethical and constructive normative identity to enumerate an ethical masculinity. This will give countenance to constitutive features of manliness deemed offensive by toxic feminism by seeking to reclaim them as positive attributes.
To enumerate the values of ethical masculinity men will have to cultivate and manifest in their characters the values of freedom, trust, courage and glory, integrity, authenticity, responsibility, rationality, faith in God (if they are believers), moral leadership, and playfulness, joy and vitality in themselves and in others. This form of masculinity creates a space for women to be fully feminine.
Those who practice ethical masculinity are motivated to achieve, protect others, provide for others, and possess the aspirational desire to leave a legacy. They are not motivated to beat others. At its heart, toxic feminism is impotent since it seeks to destroy male agency. Generous, chivalrous and thoughtful masculine men who find that they harbor a share of the untamable, of the “bad boy” element in them and that they can exercise such traits without being duplicitous and disingenuous will discover that they will attract more women than they can handle.
Toxic feminists and their practice of toxic feminism will be defeated by the sexual, erotic and psychic gravitas these men sway over women. Toxic feminists, like the majority of sex-addicted narcissistic gay men, will be ultimately revealed for what they are: ignoble social ballasts who will elicit the scorn and contempt of real women, and the abject indifference of masculine men.
Jason D. Hill is professor of philosophy at DePaul University in Chicago specializing in ethics, social and political philosophy, American foreign policy and American politics and moral psychology. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center. Jason is the author of five books, including the forthcoming book, What Do White Americans Owe Black People: Racial Justice in the Age of Post-Oppression. Follow him on Twitter @JasonDhill6.
Posts
It's because the goal of their movement is not equality for women or even the betterment of their circumstances; their goal is communism. Anything that takes America down a notch is progress toward that goal.
American feminists - and Democrats in general - have no illusion about who their enemies are: American conservatives. That's why they keep winning. American conservatives, on the other hand, think their enemies are the Taliban, ISIS, the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, North Koreans and so on. Anybody but American feminists and other Democrats. That's why they keep losing.
Well said.....
Empowered women are a major part of the decline and fall of the West .They are a major part of the creation of the Nanny State and Australia/NZ are a fine example of the soft tyranny of the Nanny State that's obsessed with SAFETY-ISM .. the female mind is far different to the mind of men cos they are vulnerable to paranoia and hysteria , are completely risk averse and next to useless at calculating risk .. when you empower women into high political office you are far more likely to end up with that idiot, Jacinda Ardern than Margaret Thatcher
I’m less pessimistic about females than you are. Within a sane culture those women so inclined or talented could lead. A sane culture, as Professor Hill writes, would praise and admire masculinity and respect men for being men. There’s room in such a world for women to work and to lead. But that’s not our current world. Men and women are not alike ( allowing for differences in individuals in each of the two sexes). I have noted women around me to be more “ left wing” more gullible to the ubiquitous emotion based propaganda and far more needy of social affiliation than men. Which IMO is why they often vote stupidly. I’m generalizing, of course. I’m also disappointed as I never wanted to be so different and don’t care to be intellectually isolated. But here I am. The flaws you mention are real but it’s best if you leave room for variation among females and avoid disrespect and hatred. That disrespect is how this “ feminism” got started and it’s now noxious and dangerously harmful to all.
I personally don’t appreciate your comments about women. While I agree there are plenty of idiot females out there, we are not all brainless bimbo’s only concerned with our next trip to the nail salon, the mall or the gym. And we are not all prone to paranoia and hysteria either. You’re using a very broad brush to paint a lot of people who don’t deserve it.
I'm generalising ,as any adult would know .. empowering women into high political office is suicide for the west cos women are an obvious menace to national security
My 'momma' raised me with my grandma as my father wasn't around, like you I was a socialist, until I joined some socialist organisations like trade unions, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and the Green Party. Then I learned that most were well meaning but hypocrites. Other people needed to stay home, not drive or fly away to foreign holidays, the plebs couldn't do it but the elites could. Does that sound familiar?
Oh I'm sorry, I forgot to mention that in addition to cavemen real women are not interested in leftard morons.
The quotes and sayings of objectionable objectivist Marion the Librarian
you can always be counted on to add some intellectual firepower to the discussion
Yo momma had too many children.
Heil-o-anus... do you have anymore anus jokes?
The toxic feminists are one of the many fronts that the left has organized to defeat America. Since men have been the most conservative, patriotic, and difficult to sucker into leftism; and have been the majority of soldiers, inventors, engineers, builders, and sales force for our industry we have held considerable power. Some women hate that men have more power, physical or otherwise. So they band together in covens dedicated to destroying men from the time they are boys, pushing legislation that puts as many men in jail as possible, stripping men of their hard earned income with unfair child support laws, and anything else they can do to fulfill their rage over penis envy.
The leftist women of today are America's maenads and a more hostile group of people are hard to imagine. These modern day maenads are teachers, psychologists, etc. and they are tearing down the male psyche from young boys to to men to achieve their Isle of Lesbos Wakanda. The left has a custom utopia for every every deluded, deranged self-interest group alive.
The left has lost a lot of support from gays because it formed its unholy alliance with Muslims, but it still has the black front which attacks white men for every conceivable kind of racism, especially imaginary. That front appears to be losing some steam, however.
What’s ridiculous is that they pick who to “ me too” while they excuse others of far worse deeds ( see endless photos of Biden touching whoever he pleases). They never support women of different political views - attacking them perhaps most viciously- and don’t say a word about the fate of women under the most wildly oppressive masculine culture, Islam. And that’s not even addressing the death of women’s sports now weirdly taken over by men. Feminism is now all left wing bullsh*t, which is sad.
There needs to be a new word coined to define the left's hypocrisy, it is so profound.
How about “Leftism”? By its very definition it is inherently hypocritical.
It is a do as I say not as I do ideology, ie, Nazi Lugosi, governors whitless and twosome et al.
Women have destroyed ''toxic masculinity'' and have tried to reform men into a version of themselves who are pacifistic and prone to hysteria ..they will fawn and appease all our enemies and are an obvious menace to national security ..when truth be told, women were only allowed to vote in the 1920s due to idealism and PITY
The rantings of fools such as yourself do not help the situation. A real woman wants to admire a hero. Not a caveman.
Look at the trajectory of freedom and true prosperity in this nation since women got the right to vote. Look at who the left targets with its propaganda. Too many women think with their emotions, though certainly not all.
The arrogance in your assumption about heroes and cavemen is that you are singularly qualified to decide which is which. You aren't. Not even close. You're all mouth, no brain.
Out of the top 100 chess players in the world only one is a woman at 90th place ; this alone should tell you just why they shouldn't be elevated into high political office ..Thatcher was a freakish exception cos she modelled herself on her militaristic father .Orwell warned us about the dangers of Big Brother but it's Big Mother who will destroy our freedoms with their hysteria and paranoia
Nope, there's part of the female mind that can never be older than thirteen
You must be from Pluto...the dog, not the planet. How's uranus? lick it often?
Heil-o-anus made an anus joke... how funny...
Like Lenny Peikoff?
America's (and the world's) maenads, indeed. Nice mythical tie-in.
Good response. BTW How are you getting paragraphs? I'm indenting but I still am not able to separate sentences to get paragraphs. My sentences are all crammed together with no paragraphs. How are you doing it?
Press "enter" twice...
How do you find "the pursuit of happiness" in the Bible?
I never claimed "the pursuit of happiness" is Bible Prophesy... <<< Liar!
Of course you did. Why lie about it? Why isn't "the pursuit of happiness" found in the Bible? Where IS IT FOUND?
I have concluded that feminism is no more about women than BLM is about Blacks, or antifa is against fascism, or that identity politics is about any genuine oppression. It's just one more way the Left seeks to divide us all against each other pursuant to forcing Marxism upon us all.
The end game of all the mentioned, as well as many under-the-radar groups, indeed is Communism. Everything else they jabber on about is mere window dressing. The traitors want Communism on Steroids, and seem to be making good progress towards achieving that evil goal.
In the world there are several contrasting forces running things. You have the very feminized leaders of western Europe many of whom are weak, naive females, like Angela Merkel who don't understand the other strong force in the world which is composed of evil men willing to do violence and other acts of oppression to get their way. They are typified by men like Putin in Russian, Jinping in China, and the various leaders of different Islamic countries. Those men are not the least interested in human rights and have no compunctions about forcing others to do their bidding. They will not shrink from naked violence to gain their ends. The only way those violent, evil men can be countered is from strong men from the civilized countries. Asking for mercy from evil people is a fool's errand. Where are the strong male leaders in the world today? Biden certainly isn't one of them. He's as naive and weak as the European female leaders. The way things are going he will turn out to be the weakest, most feckless president in American history. Western-style feminism is destroying America and will destroy the world. The Margaret Thatchers of the world are few and far between. Maybe she was a one off. America is being destroyed because liberal American women are destroying it through radical feminism.
Feminist ideology especially DeBeavoire and Friedan had as its primary goal the destruction of the traditional family structure
The useful idiots don't realize that they are being played for fools by the Marxist ringleaders.
"Where are the Feminists?"
Stuck inside their own smarmy & tedious self-absorption and self-righteousness.
As usual.
The feminists ALWAYS disappear when there is real oppression and abuse of women. They would rather sip their Chai Lattes and whine about systemic racism other transgender rights than actually stand up for women.
Of the entire smorgasbord of leftist lamebrains, it's very possible that these fat mouths are the worst.
I asked a multi colored hair SJW "female" a few years back if she could tell me which Race and Gender made the modern World she lives in today, and while she thinks that through, can she name the Race of men that are THE most progressive in the World today. She stood up, walked away while calling me a Trump supporter... Last summer a young black American girl on Campus was screaming at the top of her lungs.."All white men should be kicked off the Internet and not allowed to use it"... I just hope one of her Far Left Professors told this silly wee lassie who it was that invented the Internet, and who it was that "allowed" her to use it. A couple of years ago, outside London England, a small group gathered carrying signs that stated, GAYS AGAINST SHARIA, and people, men and women, muslim and non muslim, starting throwing things at them, calling them racist etc... go figure.... Ya cant fix this kind of stupid.. ya really cant... An American feminist I spoke with years ago told me that women make better leaders of countries than men, so I asked to name one ,or two, she said Golda Meir and Cleopatra, wow, so I asked her if she noticed that when both these woman sent out her people to War, for whatever reasons, that the Military was ALL men... She was silent after that... Im glad to be born a Caucasian male in the UK, and I like a hard headed woman, as Cat Stevens once sang about, a woman who can help me do my best, a woman with her own opinions and the ability to voice them loud and clear. Women who hate men are usually the women that no straight guy wants to shag anyway.
Important topic.
Excellent piece.
"Where are the Feminists?"
Seems that American women--many of them, but not all of course--are just brain dead little cupcakes who only know how to play 'follow the leader.' Of course, the leader is the American Marxist movement which wants to destroy liberty for all to impose its authoritarian and totalitarian self. And seems that American women 'miss' THAT too!
Where are the Feminists?
That is a rhetorical question, right. Woke feminism in America only gets exorcised when they hear jokes about women.
Or when some actual Republican gets too many followers and the Left needs to 'invent' an "old" incident of sexual abuse. Does Anita Hill ring a bell?
They tried it with Trump several times. Didn't work either.
Never underestimate the stupidity of Useful Idiots in large groups. They are gold for enemy agents. Americans must either wake up to their actual intentions and stop trying to deal with their propaganda ploys and covert manipulation, or lose their Nation. Remember, with Communists "The issue is NEVER the issue." It is only the distraction while they achieve their goals.
I wonder if Professor Hill sees connection between the lack of response, so far, to this administration & the ‘election’ that created it and the downplaying of masculinity in American men? Because I’ve been not a little bit disappointed about that. But maybe I watch too many movies in which heroic men risk all and save the day. You know like in the American revolution?
LOL The Taliban must have been watching old John Wayne WWII movies and Schwarzenegger Terminator movies. They took control of Afghanistan in just about a week. They even posted an Iwo Jima look-a-like photo.
This is why I’m not a feminist. Never have been, never will be.
The FemiNazis are a subterfuge to undermine the influence of white males in America. They don’t care about women; they are another front of the DemoNazi war against America.
Tragically, it looks like they are winning the war as the cabal of treasonous DEMONAZI maniacs have completely destroyed our Nation. The enemy within has succeeded in undermining our constitution and way of life.
Wow! Ten cheers for Jason Hill and this incredible article! Feminism in the U.S. and the West in general was never meant to do anything but break up the family and devalue the man who is and always will be the bulwark in the struggle against communism, the disintegration of the creative and ever striving human spirit and the rejection of a toxic level of stultifying security. Life is a risk, freedom even riskier. Men, given their greater size and strength, predominance of testosterone over estrogen and masculine brain structure (yes, men's brains are different from women's) are essential to the development and evolution of human society. That is not to denigrate women. Both genders are needed, and rather than work against each other, they should complement each other -- as they do in nature.
Feminism has not made women happier. It has made them more stressed and quite frankly, miserable. it has made divorce an epidemic and single life more likely the norm. The children of divorce suffer emotionally their whole lives. This is not to say abusive marriages should be kept intact or that everyone must get married. However, overall, married couples live a happier and more fulfilling life than the divorced or the never married. No one can tell me that anger-addicted feminist leaders are actually happy and their guilt-ridden disciples are anything but stressed and miserable.
As for gays in our society, all one needs to do is look at the gay pride parades to see the effects of sexual addiction and the emotional emptiness which accompanies it. I have a feeling that many of these men were the victims of childhood sexual abuse -- often occurring because of a lack of a caring and loving father in the home to teach his son how to be a man. I used to have sympathy for gay men and lesbians who had to hide their who they were in order not to suffer persecution. Now I resent their abuse of power. I'm horrified at what happens to gay men in Iran and other such societies when they are merely trying to find love and companionship and not trying to shove their every sexual whim and fantasy in society's face. However, that is their struggle. They won't get much help from the narcissistic freak show in the West which is ever competing for the ability to shock and disgust the rest of us -- including children. Decorum is a word which needs to be stressed in gay circles. Society is benefitted by the many contributions of gay and lesbian people but there are rules concerning public behavior which everyone needs to follow.
And lastly, and this may seem petty but it is not. The huge spike in soy consumption in the American diet has had devastating effects on the body and spirit. Soy is plant estrogen. Feeding children and adults, both females and males huge quantities of this powerful hormone on a daily basis is destroying us. Take a look at the physical differences between a male who has never consumed the stuff and one who ingests it regularly. It is both shocking and sickening. Its effects on girls is also disastrous.
I love the fact that Jason Hill has listed things we need to do as a society to turn things around and reclaim our beautiful human spirit in its natural male and female form. A thousand thanks to him for what he has said.
Soylent Green ? Every single sport is segregated cos women cannot compete against men cos the female body is stunted and handicapped by size/ strength differences ; but when truth be told the female mind is stunted and limited too , both intellectually and emotionally .Consequently, women just don't have a mind for politics and barring rare exceptions become a menace to national security in a crisis ...in fact if women had been empowered into high political office in 1941 then neither America nor Britain could possibly have won WW2
Peace, prosperity and the empowerment of women has created the western Nanny State that is obsessed with SAFETY-ISM and incapable of acting like a ''Great Power'' .Our enemies hold us in complete contempt and will conspire to destroy us on the world stage ; what happened in Afghanistan is just the beginning
PS/ Women can have very nimble intelligent brains but they are unfortunately trapped in a woman's mind
the original NOW movement was begun with a small group of lesbian - Communist women in New York who hated all men and wanted to advance their agenda across the nation. with the massive help of the MSM- they have managed to infect tens of millions of women with hatred of the men in their lives- their fathers-brothers-sons-and husbands. Tens of millions of these Toxic women now find themselves cold-lonely- and afraid as they go into their golden years- they produced daughters and granddaughters who took up the cause and are now simply EVIL. take a look at the women in politics on the Democrat side of the aisle- Bullies-Lesbians-Communists-Corrupt-"women" who clawed their way to power and know how to abuse it
Real men don't eat quiche.
Real men are not from Venus.
"Where are the Feminists?" They're afraind. Afraid the moo slims will come and cut their heads off
Now is doing what they can to help. https://www.ozarksfirst.com/top-stories/womens-rights-organizations-worry-about-afghan-women-following-taliban-takeover/
Hate is the driving force behind all Democrats and that includes Democrat women and even their "pretend-women."
Democrat women will choose to kill their own babies and support the abortion for other women, based on hate and self-serving egotism.
Hate for a new-born requiring vigilant care and monitoring is a strong motivating force to just "kill it and flush it out of my body" for the fun-loving, care-free women who will not be tied down by motherhood.
The Taliban are White Male and they Beat Up women.
The picture doesn't represent the article...
The "Me Too" movement is about sex abuse, harassment and women becoming a voice against those things... <<< standing up and speaking against sex abuse...
Evidently... the "Me Too" movement isn't being clear to the world... when even writers get mixed up.
[edit] Unless the "Me Too" movement has taken up feminism? idk...
I politely asked for Scriptural Bible reference for "the pursuit of happiness" and you sent a few unrelated Scriptures on "destruction." You claim "the pursuit of happiness" is Bible Prophesy but you have yet given a verse that says anything about "the pursuit of happiness." Why is that? I have searched the entire Bible and could not find that phrase anywhere. Surely if it is Bible Prophesy, it must be in there somewhere. Give me the Scripture with the words "the pursuit of happiness" in it.
I think you have confused the Bible with The Declaration Of Independence. In the second paragraph, Jefferson comments on God's creation of our unalienable rights of Life, Liberty and THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. Maybe you have never read either the Bible nor The Declaration Of Independence. Or maybe you don't believe in either one of them.
I never claimed "the pursuit of happiness" is Bible Prophesy... <<< Liar!
Here is your quote from 2 weeks ago: "The pursuit of Happiness on earth will NEVER be obtained... <<< Biblical Prophecy is clear on that..."
Why do you continue to lie. "the pursuit of happiness" is not found in the Bible, it is found in the Declaration Of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson says that God gave man unalienable rights such as Life, Liberty and THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. Are you saying you don't agree with the Declaration Of Independence, the cornerstone our Republic was founded on? Are you calling Thomas Jefferson a Liar?
Another thing, there is a huge difference in the pursuit of happiness and being perpetually happy 24/7. Are you too ignorant to see that?