Thursday, December 1, 2016

These numbers should SHUT UP liberals about the Electoral College once and for all

These numbers should SHUT UP liberals about the Electoral College once and for all

Getty Images
The keening and caterwauling we’ve been treated to by the left since Hillary Clinton’s defeat has been monumental.
Most entertaining has been the snowflake retreat to “safe spaces” with puppies and coloring books to assuage their anguish.
Less entertaining were the violent protests which were paid for erupted in cities across the nation.

Advertisement - story continues below

Putting aside Jill Stein’s quixotic effort to force a recount, the left has been loudest with its demands to dismantle the Electoral College.
After all it’s unfair: Hillary Clinton won the “popular vote” so she should win, right?
Wrong.
Our Founders in their infinite wisdom created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?
The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet and it should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.
Share this with as many whiners as you can.
There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc) don’t and shouldn’t speak for the rest of our country.
Amen.

Scarborough Laughs Uncontrollably, Calls Out Media Hypocrisy Over Clinto...

Published on Nov 28, 2016
Category
News & Politics
License
Standard YouTube License

EPA in a rush to save auto rules from Trump

EPA in a rush to save auto rules from Trump

The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday surprised business groups by rushing out a final study on fuel efficiency standards for automobiles to ensure they stay in place once President-elect Trump comes into office Jan. 20.
The Auto Alliance, the auto industry's lead trade group, said it was the wrong move by the Obama administration, calling the assessment — made before schedule in 2017 — a rush job that they plan to take up with the incoming Trump administration and Congress next year.
"This extraordinary and premature rush to judgment circumvents the serious analysis necessary to make sure the [fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas] standards appropriately balance fuel efficiency, carbon reduction, affordability and employment," the Auto Alliance said.
The EPA midterm assessment of the 2017-25 standards said they would help consumers save money while improving the environment and therefore must continue over the next eight years.
"It's clear from the extensive technical record that this program will remain affordable and effective," said EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy. "This proposed decision reconfirms our confidence in the auto industry's capacity to drive innovation and strengthen the American economy while saving drivers money at the pump and safeguarding our health, climate and environment."
The agency will take comment on the assessment until Dec. 30. After that, McCarthy will decide whether she has enough information to make a final determination on the next round of standards for model year 2022-25 cars, the EPA said.
The assessment was supposed to be made next year, with a final decision in 2018, observers point out. But McCarthy appears to want to speed up the process with a final determination before Trump takes office.
"The evidence is abundantly clear that with low gas prices, consumers are not choosing the cars necessary to comply with increasingly unrealistic standards," the alliance said. "Wishing this fact away does no one any favors, and getting this wrong has serious implications."
The EPA's technical evaluation is for the next round of car emission regulations that extend through 2025 and were already finalized in the first half of the president's term. The new round of rules are set to go into effect next year and are a key part of meeting the United States' obligations under the Paris climate change deal.
Senate Democrat says she'll work with Trump
Also from the Washington Examiner
The EPA evaluation is a midterm review that was included in the regulations. The review was meant to start in 2017 to evaluate whether the regulations are working to improve fuel efficiency and reduce carbon pollution that many scientists blame for causing global warming.
From 2017-25, the regulations are meant to improve fuel efficiency in light-duty cars and trucks from about 35 to 54 miles per gallon, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions by incentivizing the development of electric cars and other clean vehicle technologies.
The Commerce Department has shown that consumers have been buying more gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and pickups, making it harder for the auto industry to meet the standards. Those statistics, compiled at the end of last year, jibe with the Auto Alliance's reaction.
Consumer groups and proponents of the regulations told reporters on a call that the Auto Alliance's stance may not be representative of all automakers that support the regulations.
Proponents also said that a Trump administration would likely support the auto standards because they help working Americans save money at the pump and drive job creation.
Sanders: Carrier 'took Trump hostage' to win tax breaks
Also from the Washington Examiner
Neutered Dems are all bark, no bite on Trump's nominees
Top Story

Senator Lankford Releases “Federal Fumbles” Gov’t Waste Report

Senator Lankford Releases “Federal Fumbles” Gov’t Waste Report

WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford today released his second annual government waste and solutions report called, “Federal Fumbles: 100 ways the government dropped the ball.” The report represents $247 billion in wasteful and inefficient federal spending and regulations, but also includes solutions to each of the examples of government waste. CLICK HERE to access the report. 
“The American people have signaled a bold new direction for Washington with the election of President-elect Donald Trump,” said Lankford. “Although the federal debt wasn’t a major focus during the presidential campaign, it remains a serious impending crisis that must be addressed. In Fiscal Year 2016 alone, we had a $587 billion deficit and our federal debt is now an outrageous $19.5 trillion. To lower the debt, we need to grow the economy, and we must root out inefficiencies, duplication, and wasteful spending wherever they exist. This ‘Federal Fumbles’ report provides specific examples of wasteful spending and unnecessary regulations that are not in the taxpayer’s best interest.”
Lankford released the report during a press conference in Washington, DC this morning. CLICK HERE to play video.
Senator Lankford Excerpts from Press Conference:
“This is the way the federal government has dropped the ball, and what we are trying to focus in on, is not trying to pick on one particular agency or entity, but to say we have got to be able to pay attention. We are really dealing with four different main areas as we walk through this; grants that need oversight, regulations and regulators that need oversight, agency bureaucracy and inefficiency, and then a lack of coordination between agencies.
“We are not just trying to raise the problem; we are also trying to raise how you solve it. Whether it is an administration action, whether it is a piece of legislation, whether it is just coordination between the two, or some of those things that have already happened, but we haven’t engaged in it enough to provide the oversight needed to actually get the coordination. Every single one of these identify here is the problem, here is the issue, and here is how to solve it.
“This is not a comprehensive book; this is not trying to list everything in the federal government where there is an issue. We are trying to find some key areas that we can identify, and say here are some problems we have seen, and some things that we find as common ground solutions. This builds on last year’s book.
“We have got duplication issues. We have got problems that are around federal foreign aid, which has been an ongoing issue that we have made recommendations on. When we deal with foreign aid, we should simply deal with foreign aid that is to the benefit of the United States. We don’t think that is an unreasonable request. Instead, at times, we deal with foreign aid, like studying fish bones in Tanzania.”
To do his part to help reduce federal spending in Congress’ own operational budget, Lankford has operated his Senatorial office budget far below the allotted amount for each Senator. Since he was elected to the US Senate in 2014, Lankford has given back $230,000 to the Treasury each year.
Federal Debt Statistics:
  • The federal deficit for Fiscal Year 2016 was $587 billion, and overall debt is now $19.5 Trillion, according to the Treasury Department.
  • The total federal debt of $19,573,444,713,936.79 now equals about $165,575 per household in America.
  • In the eight years of Mr. Obama’s presidency, the federal debt has grown by $9 trillion, nearly matching the total amount of debt accumulated by all of his predecessors.
  • According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the projected federal deficit is expected to be $594 billion in Fiscal Year 2017.
  • Annual deficits are projected to increase above $1 trillion within this decade due to America’s aging population. Between 2010 and 2040, the number of Americans age 65 and older will double – from 41 million to 82 million people. 
Five Examples of Legislative Victories From 2015 “Federal Fumbles” Report:
  1. Subsidized Wind (page 11) – The Wind Production Tax Credit was originally created as a temporary subsidy to help get the wind energy industry off the ground. The industry is now very successful, yet it receives more than $6 billion in federal tax credits every year. Lankford helped secure a provision in the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations funding bill, which was signed into law last December, to include a three-year phasedown of the wind energy tax credit. 
  2. 25,000+ Ineligible Families In Public Housing (page 71) – Last year, more than 25,000 families in America received federally-subsidized housing from HUD, despite not being qualified for the program. More than $100 million was spent on families, like one in New York with an annual income of $497,911, who earned far more than the allowable amount for federal assistance. Lankford secured a provision in the annual Senate Appropriations bill for HUD (S. 2844) that requires implementation of an IG report’s recommendations to ensure only those who are entitled to federal housing assistance actually receive it.
  3. Disability is Only for the Disabled (page 119) – The Social Security Administration (SSA) has an enormous backlog in disability cases waiting for an Administrative Law Judge hearing. To expedite the backlog, the SSA created a new system to hear cases, but it was found to be costly and legally uncertain. Lankford confronted the SSA with the cost and risk of that scheme and after threats of a subpoena, the SSA reversed their plan and changed direction. This will save the taxpayer millions of dollars of litigation costs and will speed up the disability process.
  4. Caution: Read Before Eating (page 27) – A recent food-labeling FDA rule requires grocery stores, restaurants, and entertainment venues to add more detailed information on each food item sold. While Americans should have information on the food they eat, existing labeling requirements are already very detailed, and this regulation would burden the agriculture industry with more than $1 billion in compliance costs in the first year alone. Lankford helped secure a provision in the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations funding bill, which was signed into law last December, to pause implementation of the rule. 
  5. Taxpayers Right To Know – More than 25 pieces of legislation that address an example of waste in Lankford’s 2015 “Federal Fumbles” report have passed a Committee or one House of Congress, and could progress even further during the lame-duck session of Congress, which ends December 31, 2016. One bill is the Taxpayers Right-to-Know Act, which passed the House and has bipartisan support in the Senate. This bill will promote budget transparency, which will result in federal spending that is more accountable to the taxpayer, especially for questionable grants, which make up a significant amount of waste examples in Lankford’s 2015 report.
###

Wine Subsidy One Project Making Taxpayers Pour



Wine Subsidy One Project Making Taxpayers Pour

November 30, 2016
Who says Christmas only comes once a year? According to Senator James Lankford (R-Okla.), taxpayers have been giving all year long. And thanks to his second "Federal Fumbles" report, he's showing Americans just how generous they were forced to be. Like last year's list, this one shows how badly taxpayers are getting burned -- and not just by the $1.3 million tanning bed PSAs (p. 18). In this edition, time flies -- and so does the money studying them (p. 9). There's panda-monium over the $2 million the NSF spent to study China's lovable bears (p. 14) -- but nothing's putting people on pines and needles like the USDA's Christmas tree tax (p. 88).
If you're looking for a distraction from the government's waste, try taking in a mute Shakespeare play (p. 106). (To speak or not to speak, that is the question.) And most people assumed we already had a federal soap opera (called Congress), but NIH burned $3 million producing a real one (p. 64). There are plenty of raisins to be upset over the USDA's prune promotion (p. 21), but taxpayers won't really be wining until they see the $3.5 million in vineyard grants. In Los Angeles, the local courthouse got $1 million to buy a painting, which they later cut into six pieces (p. 35). The mural of that story is that something should be cut all right -- but it isn't that picture!
And $2 million isn't anything to sneeze at, unless you're the NIH and you want to know if kids will eat food that's been coughed on (p. 9). If it's Medieval smells you're looking for, nobody nose how to raise a stink like the NEA and NEH! For a half-million dollars, they'll look the odor way (p. 19). Meanwhile, at the Smithsonian, a controversy is already brewing over the full-time job to survey beer's impact on American history (p. 105). If this list gives you more indigestion than gas station tofu (p. 7), Senator Lankford says you can do something about it. It may feel like Congress is cutting spending slower than a gender-specific glacier (p. 47), but let your members know you have a $200,000 Tanzanian bone to pick with how they're using your money (p. 12)!
"As we enter into a new year -- with a new president and new Congress-it is past time to focus on fixing the problems facing our nation... For me, the items listed in this book are a to-do list for the next year. They are examples of violations of the public's trust that must be prevented from happening again," Senator Lankford said. You can hear more about the government's $1,179 custom Snuggies, $250,000 traveling classrooms on prison life, and other projects on yesterday's "Washington Watch." Tune in below!
Click here to listen

Tony Perkins' Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.

Also in the November 30 Washington Update:

Kellogg's Signals Bran New Day of Bias

The Best Defense (Bill) Is a Good Offense


Kellogg's Signals Bran New Day of Bias



Kellogg's Signals Bran New Day of Bias

November 30, 2016
HGTV stars Chip and Joanna Gaines were just on the cover of People magazine -- and now, they're the face of something else: a controversy over the fact that their pastor preaches the Bible. For the last few years, the Texas couple has charmed their way into people's hearts -- not just with their talent for renovation, but with their sweet and genuine relationship. Their show "Fixer Upper" has exploded in popularity, and the parents of four have never shied away from their faith -- which they've talked about at length in their books and interviews.
Today, that faith is under fire by a handful of far-Left extremists who've latched onto a sermon the Gaines' pastor, Jimmy Seibert, preached about marriage and sexuality. "If someone were to say, 'Marriage is defined in a different way,' let me just say: They are wrong," Seibert said. "God defined marriage, not you and I. God defined masculine and feminine, male and female, not you and I."
Now, I'm not sure why it's news that a Christian church believes what the Bible teaches about sexuality, but apparently, this is a shock to the liberal media establishment. When reporters contacted the church, the communications director pointed them to Antioch's webpage on "beliefs," where it says: "Marriage is the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime." That was their belief when the church was founded 17 years ago -- and it's their belief today. And, as recent polling points out, Chip and Joanna's church is hardly in the minority! Fifty-three percent of all Americans (not necessarily Christian) told Wilson Allen Perkins polling this month that despite what the Supreme Court ruled, they still define marriage as the union of a man and woman.
Obviously, the Left is trying to do to Chip and Joanna what they unsuccessfully did to the Robertsons of "Duck Dynasty:" take down a hugely successful program in a show of political force. That's unlikely to happen to a couple like the Gaines, who have no interest in renovating their views to suit a narrow ideology. Hopefully, HGTV has learned since its ousting of the Benham Brothers that religious discrimination doesn't play well with viewers.
Meanwhile, there's no sugar-coating the intolerance at Kellogg's! Like a lot of corporate bullies, the cereal company bowled over shoppers with its decision to pull ads from media heavyweight Breitbart, because the outlet is supposedly too conservative for Kellogg's taste. "We regularly work with our media-buying partners to ensure our ads do not appear on sites that are not aligned with our values as a company," said Kellogg's spokesman Kris Charles. "We recently reviewed the list of sites where our ads can be placed and decided to discontinue advertising on Breitbart.com. We are working to remove our ads from that site." The parent company of brand favorites like Eggo, Pop Tarts, Pringles, Fruit Loops, Frosted Flakes, and more is joining a few lesser known retailers in boycotting Breitbart -- a decision that's sure to rankle plenty of consumers.
"Kellogg's decision to blacklist one of the largest conservative media outlets in America is economic censorship of mainstream conservative political discourse," Breitbart fired back. "That is as un-American as it gets." If recent history is any indication, it's also as unwise as it gets. Insulting conservatives after the election hasn't exactly improved business at GrubHubPepsiTarget, and Penzey's Spices (whose CEO went so far as to call all Trump voters "racists" and asked shoppers to protest by donating to a group linked by a federal court to the first case of domestic terrorism in D.C.: Southern Poverty Law Center). But if they want to pick a public fight with Breitbart, a site with 19.2 million unique visitors a month, that's their choice. What I don't understand is why companies like Kellogg's can choose where they operate, but Christians like Barronelle Stutzman can't. I'm fine with a company declining to do business with conservatives. I'm not fine with the double standard created when Christian wedding vendors are prosecuted.

Tony Perkins' Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.

Also in the November 30 Washington Update:

Wine Subsidy One Project Making Taxpayers Pour

The Best Defense (Bill) Is a Good Offense


Big Win for Donald Trump By: Bill O'ReillyNovember 30, 2016

Big Win for Donald Trump
By: Bill O'ReillyNovember 30, 2016
As we've stated, Mr. Trump won the presidency because of his economic vision.
He promised to stop American corporations from sending blue-collar jobs overseas:
Donald Trump in Delaware, Ohio, Oct. 20:
TRUMP: “Companies like Carrier are firing their workers and moving to Mexico.  Ford is moving all of their small car production to Mexico.  When I’m president, if a company wants to fire their workers and leave for Mexico or other countries then we will charge them a 35% tax when they wanna ship their products back into the United States, and they won’t leave, believe me.”
Now the Carrier Corporation says it will stay in Indianapolis, saving a thousand jobs.
There is no question that President-elect Trump, using Vice President-elect Mike Pence, put the arm on Carrier.
A president can do a lot of damage if he or she chooses to.
Carrier wised up fast and the folks know Trump is the reason:
ROBIN MAYNARD, CARRIER EMPLOYEE: “I would like to tell him thank you for going out of your way and taking your holiday away from your family and working on the Carrier and employees deal and sticking to your word and going to bat for all of us at Carrier.”
Now if Mr. Trump continues to fulfill promises, he will gain much needed support in Congress.
Right now, no Republican would dare defy Trump after a victory like Carrier.
In the long run, there are two things that Donald Trump needs to do to achieve a successful presidency.
The first is to foster an environment where good-paying jobs are created.
The second is to stop the chaotic enforcement of immigration law.
It is quite clear to Talking Points that the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton put the needs of immigrants, some of them here illegally, above the needs of working folks.
For the past eight years, President Obama has encouraged illegal alien amnesty for certain groups, sanctuary cities and a colossal welfare state.
Meanwhile, the folks out in Indiana and other places were being laid off because corporations wanted to make a few extra bucks by moving to Mexico.
Trump said, “Enough.”  Thus, he won the election.
Summing up, Trump is off to a good start with the Carrier deal.
He might adopt a new motto with a nod to Teddy Roosevelt: Tweet softly, but carry a big stick.
And that's the memo.
Premium Member Comments

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *