Sunday, February 2, 2020

The TRUTH the Enemy DOES NOT Want You To Know!



The TRUTH the Enemy DOES NOT Want You To Know!

1,548 views
Premiered 2 hours ago
177K subscribers
SUBSCRIBED
Be the first to see it! Watch on Truth Hunters (Web Link) https://subspla.sh/8wzkffj (get the free app for any device, amazon, Roku, Apple TV! This link takes you to it on the web!
If you feel led to give to the Lyn Leahz Ministry, help support me by clicking here
https://www.paypal.me/LynLeahzMinistries or send check or money order to Lyn Leahz, P.O. Box 727, Springboro, Ohio 45066 You can write to me at LynLeahz@FreedomNationNews.Com
You can also support me via patreon
https://www.patreon.com/LynLeahz

DISCLAIMER: The news, views, and opinions shared in some of the videos created by Lyn Leahz or shared by her guests do not necessarily represent the views, opinions and beliefs of Lyn Leahz.
Visit Lyn Leahz at
http://freedomnationnews.com

California kids to be grilled on household finances, conflict

Doctors paid to question them about "adverse childhood experiences'

Print

(Pixabay)
Children in California soon will be grilled by physicians on household finances, family conflict and anything else that could be creating "toxic stress," according to a report from the Citizen's Council for Heath Freedom.
The organization focuses on issues of personal health care information and privacy.
"Starting this year, well-child visits for millions of California children could include questions about highly sensitive and delicate topics, such as divorce, family income, and unstable household environments," the organization said. "California is now paying doctors to screen their young patients for traumatic events known as 'adverse childhood experiences.'"
TRENDING: Whistleblowers now under fire, claims Pentagon inspector general
The program is intended mainly for patients covered by Medi-Cal, the state’s version of Medicaid for low-income families. But that includes some 5.3 million children.
"During clinic visits, parents or 'caregivers' will be asked to fill out a state-approved questionnaire about potentially stressful experiences in a child's life. For children under the age of 12, their caregivers will be asked to complete the questionnaire. For those between the age of 12-19, both the parents and the children will be asked to answer the questions," the organization explained.
"These surveys will cover a variety of categories of potential hardships over the course of the first 18 years of life: physical or emotional neglect, physical, emotional or sexual abuse, amount of household dysfunction, if a parent has been diagnosed with a mental illness (such as depression or anxiety), addictions, family members with criminal records, availability of housing and food, and more."
It's only a matter of time until all children are targeted, and the answers will be submitted to their electronic health records, the group said.
"What’s truly toxic about this is the government’s push to intrusively categorize, evaluate, and survey children and their families," said Twila Brase, president of CCHF. “The screenings are voluntary, but parents and children may feel coerced or pressured to fill them out.”
She said the information will be a "part of every child’s ‘cradle to grave’ electronic health record, which is evolving into a comprehensive ‘dossier’ on the child."
"What goes in these electronic health records rarely ever comes out. Therefore, as California builds complete profiles of children and their families, this could have serious implications as children age. It could stigmatize and create labels that these children will never be able to escape, even in adulthood."
She noted the federal HIPAA privacy rule allows many outside entities gain access to information about children and their families and use or share it without parental consent.
"Proponents of the program claim this information won’t be shared with outside entities or state officials, but we doubt that will be the case," Brase said. "Thanks to HIPAA, which is actually a permissive data-sharing rule, this highly sensitive and deeply personal information may be shared with over 2.2 million entities, including other providers, more than one million business associates, and other government agencies."
wnd-donation-graphic-2-2019
Submit a Correction 
Print

Persecuted Christians plead for same rights as animals!

'Look upon us as frogs, we'll accept that'

Print
Muslims are beheading Christians in the "killing field" of Nigeria, but the plights of endangered frogs in Australia, a pig forced to bungee jump in China and a gorilla at the Cincinnati zoo have drawn more attention in international media.
"The world prefers to worry about pandas rather than about us, threatened with extinction in the land where we were born," said Nicodemus Daoud Sharif, the Syrian Orthodox archbishop of Mosul.
Sharif and leaders of other churches facing persecution in Africa were given a voice by Italian journalist Giulio Meotti in a column for the Gatestone Institute.
Meotti, the cultural editor for the Italian daily Il Foglio, noted a recent wave of persecution that began with the beheading of 11 Nigerian Christians during the Christmas celebration.
TRENDING: Whistleblowers now under fire, claims Pentagon inspector general
The next day, a Catholic bride was beheaded with her bridesmaids in the Nigerian state of Borno. Then, in a raid on a village in the Nigerian state of Kaduna, terrorists shot anyone they met in the square where the evangelical community had gathered, killing two young Christian women. In addition, a Christian student was killed by Islamic jihadists who recorded his execution. Then pastor Lawan Andimi, a local leader of the Christian Association of Nigeria, was beheaded.
"Every day, our brothers and sisters are slaughtered in the streets," said Father Joseph Bature Fidelis of the Diocese of Maiduguri. " Please help us not be silent in the face of this immense extermination that is taking place in silence."
Meotti wrote that while Christians were murdered in Nigeria, the global media ran a story of a pig being tied up and shoved off a bungee tower at a new theme park in China.
"The Chinese pig got more media coverage than any of these murdered Christians in Nigeria," he wrote.
"Where has been the global outcry for the serial butchering of Christians just because they are Christians?
Sharif pointed out that a member of his Syriac church who emigrated to Australia was barred from building on land where a hole with eight frogs was discovered.
"And yet we are the last people who speak Jesus' language. We are Aramaic people and we don't have this right to have anyone protect us?" he said. "Look upon us as frogs, we'll accept that — just protect us so we can stay in our land."
Benedict Kiely, the founder of Nasarean.org, which helps the Christians of the Middle East, wrote that in "an era of round-the-clock information on our mobile phones, computers, televisions and social media, the abominations suffered by Christians have been left without images, while the brutality against the Chinese pig was streamed all over."
Nina Shea, an expert in religious freedom, said an "ongoing Islamic extremist project to exterminate Christians in sub-Saharan Africa is even more brutal and more consequential for the church than it is in the Middle East, the place where Christians suffered ISIS 'genocide,' as the U.S. government officially designated."
Meotti noted that a Nigerian Christian recently was executed by an ISIS child soldier.
"Slaughterhouse workers go on trial in France for abuses to animals," he said. "But the same France has already repatriated more than 250 ISIS fighters, the same people who turn Iraqi churches into slaughterhouses."
wnd-donation-graphic-2-2019
Submit a Correction 
Print

Pam Geller critic comes around to her way of thinking

Newspaper that attacked her ads on Islam now laments speech ban

Print
Pamela Geller
Pamela Geller, an activist, writer and speaker dedicated to revealing the intentions of Islamic supremacists, has many critics.
Among them is the "radical left-wing extremist New York Daily News," as she calls the paper.
Geller writes on her blog that the Daily News has opposed her efforts to post ads on public transportation in various cities, including New York City. The paper, she said, has called her "rhetorical bomb-thrower Pamela Geller," "Sunday Uglifier" and "Racist-Islamophobic-Anti-Muslim-Bigot," which she described as among "the many slurs and pejoratives flung at you by the storm-trooping left if you oppose jihad terror, gender apartheid, creed apartheid and genocide."
But the paper now at least agrees New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority to censor her by rejecting "any and all ads expressing opinions on contentious moral, religious or social issues."
TRENDING: Whistleblowers now under fire, claims Pentagon inspector general
The Daily News concluded in an editorial published Wednesday, "It's not OK to enforce arbitrary distinctions and chill political speech in the process."
Geller noted she warned New York City's MTA at the time of public hearings on her ads that banning certain speech on public transport would send a message to the world.
"I was right. It did just that. New York City government set the example and the rest of America's cities (run by authoritarian Democrats) followed like lemmings," she wrote.
The Daily News editorial said: "For five years now, the good men and women of the MTA have banned all political and message advertising, with the not-so-small exception of public service announcements that happen to boost incumbents like the mayor and governor. Transit system brass didn't want to let rhetorical bomb-throw Pamela Geller upset some straphangers by speaking harshly of Islam – and the only constitutional way to stop her was to say no to any and all ads expressing opinions on contentious moral, religious or social issues."
It continued: "Hard cases make bad policy. Because now, the cash-strapped subway system is leaving money on the table. Paid political speech and message advertising is being prohibited in what is the city's most vital public square, in an election year no less."
Geller responded: "What is missing from this NYDN op-ed is their mea culpa – these very same whiners supported the banning of speech until … it affected them and their hard-left causes.
"Further missing from this sophomoric (albeit correct) whine is that it's not just New York City. Every city in the United States has since imposed the Geller ban," she wrote.
See her warning about the censorship several years ago:
Geller, through the American Freedom Defense Initiative, has brought multiple court cases against transit authorities over their bans on certain speech.
wnd-donation-graphic-2-2019
Submit a Correction 
Print

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *